Family attitudes and gender opinions of cohabiting and married mothers in Switzerland

References

• Bozon, M. (1992). Sociologie du rituel du mariage. Population ( French Edition), 47(2), 409–433. doi:10.2307/1533916
   Google Scholar
• Bozon, M., & Héran, F. (2006). La formation du couple – Textes essentiels pour la sociologie de la famille. Paris: Grands Repères.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L. (2000). The effect of union type on psychological well-being: Depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 241–255. doi:10.2307/2676319
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 33, 1–19. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00036-X
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 913–927. doi:10.2307/352997
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
   Google Scholar
• Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74(2), 609–632. doi:10.1093/sf/74.2.609
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, M. E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436. doi:10.1177/0022022100031004001
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office. (2015). Proportion of live births outside marriage. Retrieved September 24, from http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/01/06/blank/key/02/03.html
   Google Scholar
• Gabadinho, A. (1998). L’enquête Suisse sur la famille. Berne: Office fédéral de la statistique.
   Google Scholar
• Giele, J. Z. (1998). Innovation in the typical life course. In J. Z. Giele & E. H. Glen (Eds.), Methods of life course research. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, U. (2008). L’amour c’est l’instant, le mariage c’est l’ordre. Horizon pp. 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hiekel, N., & Castro‐Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 489–505. doi:10.1111/jomf.2014.76.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A. C., & Poortman, A.-R. (2014). Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective. Demographic Research, 30(1), 1527–1560. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.55
   Google Scholar
• Jose, A., O’Leary, D. K., & Moyer, A. (2010). Does premarital cohabitation predict subsequent marital stability and marital quality? A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 105–116. doi:10.1111/jomf.2010.72.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Le Goff, J.-M., & Ryser, V.-A. (2010). Meaning of marriage for men during their transition to fatherhood: The Swiss context. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 107–125. doi:10.1080/01494921003648654
   Google Scholar
• Le Goff, J.-M., Sauvain-Dugerdil, C., Rossier, C., & Coenen-Huther, J. (2005). Maternité et parcours de vie. Berne: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14(1), 1–45. doi:10.2307/1972499
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Gauthier, J.-A., & Widmer, E. (2006). Entre contraintes institutionnelle et domestique: Les parcours de vie masculins et féminins en Suisse. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 31(4), 461–489. doi:10.2307/20058732
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, O. (2007). Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel. Methoden-Daten-Analysen, 1(1), 45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, O. (2010). Income imputation in the Swiss Household Panel 1999–2007. Working Paper Series, 1, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16(1), 53–76. doi:10.1177/019251395016001004
   Google Scholar
• Office fédéral de la justice. (2014). Entrée en vigueur de la révision du droit de l’autorité parentale. Rapport OFJ. Berne: Office fédéral de la justice.
   Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, B., & Gerber, T. P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography, 48(1), 317–342. doi:10.1007/s13524-010-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, B., & Sánchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 38(3), 435–467. doi:10.1111/padr.2012.38.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegard, T., Keizer, R., & Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 775–801. doi:10.1111/padr.2010.36.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y., Congdon, R., & Du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, I. R., & Lee, G. R. (Eds.). (1988). Family systems in America. New York, NY: College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryser, V.-A., & Le Goff, J.-M. (2011). Le mariage en Suisse: Contrainte institutionnelle ou choix de vie. In S. Gouazé, A. Salles, & C. Prat-Erkert (Eds.), Les enjeux démographiques en France et en Allemagne: Réalités et conséquences (pp. 109–123). Lille: Septentrion.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 85–138. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6
   Google Scholar
• Soons, J. P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1141–1157. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00660.x
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 254–262. doi:10.1177/0146167290162006
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Lippe, T., Voorpostel, M., & Hewitt, B. (2014). Disagreements among cohabiting and married couples in 22 European countries. Demographic Research, 31(10), 247–274. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.10
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, S. (2009). Changing patterns of nonmarital childbearing in the United States. NCHS Data Brief, no. 18, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). From marriage to informal union: Recent changes in the behaviour of French couples. Population: An English Selection, 3, 81–111.
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, E., Levy, R., Pollien, A., Hammer, R., & Gauthier, J.-A. (2003). Entre standardisation, individualisation et sexuation: Une analyse des trajectoires personnelles en Suisse. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 1(29), 35–67.
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, E., & Ritschard, G. (2009). The de-standardization of the life course: Are men and women equal? Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1–2), 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2009.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., & Noack, T. (2009). A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 465–477. doi:10.1111/jomf.2009.71.issue-3
   Google Scholar