Amartya Sen, Karl Polanyi, and Universal Basic Income

References

• Anderson, E. 2000. “Optional Freedoms: A Response to A Basic Income for All by Philippe Van Parijs.” Boston Review. https://www.bostonreview.net/forum_response/elizabeth-anderson-optional-freedoms/.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 2013. “Optional Freedoms.” In Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research, edited by K. Widerquist, J. A. Noguera, Y. Vanderborght, and J. de Wispelaere, 23–25. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2009. “The Great Transformation of Embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/1.
   Google Scholar
• Bidadanure, J. U. 2019. “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 481–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, F., and M. R. Somers. 2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi’s Critique. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay. 2016. Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, R. K. 2008. “Standing Polanyi on His Head: The Basic Income Guarantee as a Response to the Commodification of Labor.” Race, Gender & Class 15 (3/4): 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Casassas, D. 2008. “Basic Income and the Republican Ideal: Rethinking Material Independence in Contemporary Societies.” Basic Income Studies 2: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R. 2015. “The Capability to Hold Property.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16 (2): 220–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. 2016. Political Economy: A Comparative Approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1995. “Critical Political Economy.” In International Political Economy: Understanding Global Disorder, edited by B. Hettne, 31–45. Halifax: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G. 2012. “Double Movements and Pendular Forces: Polanyian Perspectives on the Neoliberal Age.” Current Sociology 60 (1): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davala, S. 2019. “Pilots, Evidence and Politics: The Basic Income Debate in India.” In The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income, edited by M. Torry, 373–388. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davala, S., R. Jhabvala, S. K. Mehta, and G. Standing. 2015. Basic Income: A Transformative Policy for India. New Delhi: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Domènech, A., and D. Raventós. 2008. “Property and Republican Freedom: An Institutional Approach to Basic Income.” Basic Income Studies 2: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Drèze, J., and A. Sen. 2002. India: Development and Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1981. “What is Equality? Part II: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4): 283–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depolitization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 2015. Give a Man a Fish: Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fouksman, E., and E. Klein. 2019. “Radical Transformation or Technological Intervention? Two Paths for Universal Basic Income.” World Development 122: 492–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemici, K. 2008. “Karl Polanyi and the Antinomies of Embeddedness.” Socio-Economic Review 6: 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gemici, K. 2023. “The Place of the Market in Society.” Politics & Society, doi:10.1177/00323292221139028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilini, U., M. Grosh, J. Rigolini, and R. Yemtsov, eds. 2020. Exploring Universal Basic Income: A Guide to Navigating Concepts, Evidence, and Practices. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. 2022. “Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook.” Development and Change 53 (3): 676–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvie, T. 2013. “Thomas Aquinas, Amartya Sen, and a Critical Economic Discourse.” Philosophy, Culture, and Traditions 9: 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. 2006. The Ethics of Care. Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, T. 2017. “Real Freedom for All Revisited – Normative Justifications of Basic Income.” Basic Income Studies 12 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. 2018. Polanyi in Times of Populism: Vision and Contradiction in the History of Economic Ideas. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kimhur, B. 2020. “How to Apply the Capability Approach to Housing Policy? Concepts, Theories and Challenges.” Housing, Theory and Society 37 (3): 257–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, P. 2021. Karl Polanyi and the Contemporary Political Crisis: Transforming Market Society in the Era of Climate Change. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lacher, H. 2019. “Karl Polanyi, the “Always-Embedded Market Economy,” and the Re-Writing of the Great Transformation.” Theory and Society 48: 671–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lain, B. 2018. “Polanyi’s Economic Embeddedness, Countermovement, and Republican Political Economy.” Ethics, Politics & Society 1: 34–34.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, M. 2005. “The United Nations Concept of Water as a Human Right: A New Paradigm for Old Problems?” International Journal of Water Resources Development 21 (2): 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli, L. 2017. IPR Policy Brief: Assessing the Case for a Universal Basic Income in the UK. IPR Policy Brief, Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, https://www.bath.ac.uk/publications/assessing-the-case-for-a-universal-basic-income-in-the-uk/attachments/ipr-assessing-the-case-for-a-universal-basic-income-in-the-uk.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2007. “Ethics, Ontology and Capabilities.” Review of Political Economy 19 (1): 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, R., C. Neves, and B. Laín. 2022. Basic Income Experiments. A Critical Examination of Their Goals, Contexts, and Methods. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. 1994. Contemporary Cultural Theory. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., and A. Sen. 2009. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 2004. “Democratizing Citizenship: Some Advantages of a Basic Income.” Politics & Society 32 (1): 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1947. “Our Obsolete Market Mentality.” Commentary 3: 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1992. “The Economy as Instituted Process.” In The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by M. Granovetter, and R. Swedberg, 29–52. New York: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. [1944] 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2000. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.” Nepantla Views from the South 1 (3): 533–580.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2003. “Is Nancy Fraser’s Critique of Theories of Distributive Justice Justified?” Constellations 10 (4): 538–553.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, J. 2004. “Endogenous Preferences and Embeddedness: A Reappraisal of Karl Polanyi.” Journal of Economic Issues 38 (1): 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan, T. 2017. The Moral Economists: RH Tawney, Karl Polanyi, EP Thompson, and the Critique of Capitalism. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M. J., P. Dey, and S. Teasdale. 2021. “Re-Embedding Embeddedness: What is the Role of Social Enterprise in Promoting Democracy and Protecting Social Rights?” Social Enterprise Journal 17 (3): 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1982. Equality of What? Choice, Welfare and Measurement, 353–370. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1991. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., and C. Seward. 2009. “The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 10 (2): 213–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, M., and F. Block. 2021. “Against Polanyian Orthodoxy: A Reply to Hannes Lacher.” Theory and Society 50: 417–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: The Dangerous New Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2015. “Why Basic Income’s Emancipatory Value Exceeds Its Monetary Value.” Basic Income Studies 10 (2): 193–223.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2019. “Basic Income as Common Dividends: Piloting a Transformative Policy Guy Standing. A Report for the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer.” Progressive Economy Forum, https://www.progressiveeconomyforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/PEF_Piloting_Basic_Income_Guy_Standing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., and E. Hartman. 2012. “Competing Ontologies: A Primer for Public Administration [with Commentary].” Public Administration Review 72 (3): 388–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. 2010. “What is Epistemological Violence in the Empirical Social Sciences?” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (5): 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1994. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uhde, Z. 2018. “Caring Revolutionary Transformation: Combined Effects of a Universal Basic Income and a Public Model of Care.” Basic Income Studies 13 (2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P. 1995. Real Freedom for All. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P., and Y. Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, K. 2011. The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widerquist, K. 2013. Independence, Propertylessness, and Basic Income: A Theory of Freedom as the Power to Say No. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Widerquist, K., J. A. Noguera, Y. Vanderborght, and J. De Wispelaere, eds. 2013. Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2005. “Basic Income as a Socialist Project.” Rutgers Journal of Law & Urban Policy 2 (1): 196–203.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamori, T. 2018. “The Concept of Need in Amartya Sen: Commentary to the Expanded Edition of Collective Choice and Social Welfare.” Ethics and Social Welfare 12 (4): 387–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar