Affiliation as Solidarity: Perspective of Vulnerable Groups

References

• Alexandrova, Anna. 2017. A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, Paul, Graham Hunter, Ian Carter, Keith Dowding, Francesco Guala, and Martin Van Hees. 2009. “The Development of Capability Indicators.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 10 (1): 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880802675366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banting, Keith, and Will Kymlicka. 2017. The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgrami, Akeel, Prabhat Patnaik, Faisal Devji, Michele Lamont, Ernesto Ottone, James Tully, Nira Wickramasinghe, and Sue Wrightand. 2018. “Belonging.” In Rethinking Society for the 21st Century: Report of the International Panel on Social Progress, Edited by International Panel on Social Progress, 779–812. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, Richard E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Data: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deneulin, S. 2008. “Beyond Individual Freedom and Agency: Structures of Living Together in the Capability Approach.” In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application, edited by F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, and S. Alkire, 105–124. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derpmann, Simon. 2009. “Solidarity and Cosmopolitanism.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragišić Labaš, Slađana. 2016. “Alcohol Use: Social Aspect, Gender Differences and Stigmatization.” Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research 52: 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, Jennifer, and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio, Joan Miró, and Stefano Ronchi. 2021. “Walking the Road Together? EU Polity Maintenance During the COVID-19 Crisis.” West European Politics 44 (5-6): 1329–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1905328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filmer, Deon. 2008. “Disability, Poverty, and Schooling in Developing Countries: Results from 14 Household Surveys.” The World Bank Economic Review 22 (1): 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhm021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Paul. 2010. Cultural Identity and Political Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, Charles. 1997. “Irreducibly social goods and the informational basis of Amartya Sen's capability approach.” Journal of Human Development 9 (2): 235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Lauren, Jacqueline Moodley, and Lisa Selipsky. 2013. “The Disability–Poverty Nexus and the Case for a Capabilities Approach: Evidence from Johannesburg, South Africa.” Disability and Society 28 (3): 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 21−48.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. “Justice and Solidarity: On the Discussion Concerning Stage 6.” Philosophical Forum 21: 32–52.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Mary. 2013. Philosophical Perspectives on Social Cohesion: New Directions for Educational Policy. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Mary. 2020. “The Other Side of Belonging.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 39 (2): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09701-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henjak, Andrija. 2017. “Loyalty, Voice or Exit: Electoral Participation and Support for New Parties in Croatia.” Annals of the Croatian Political Science Association 14: 79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Henjak, Andrija, Nenad Zakošek, and Goran Čular. 2013. “Croatia.” In Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, edited by Sten Bergund, Joakim Ekman, Kevin Deegan-Krause, and Terje Knutsen, 443–480. Chentelham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger, David. 2006. “From Identity to Solidarity.” Daedalus 135 (4): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2006.135.4.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtug, Nils. 2022. The Politics of Social Cohesion. Immigration, Community and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakelić, Slavica. 2016. Collectivistic Religions. Religion, Choice and Identity in Late Modernity. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, Helene. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy, edited by David Harper, and Andrew R. Thompson, 209–224. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapović, Mirjana. 2013. “Exiting Lepušićeva? Croatian Comparative Politics and Political Science a Quarter of a Century from the Beginning of Political Transition [in Croatian].” Anali Hrvatskog Politološkog Društva 10: 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, Monika. 2016. Vulnerable Social Groups: Before and After the Crisis. Briefing of European Parliament. Accessed July 2 2023 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/586605 /EPRS_BRI(2016)586605_EN.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Leutar, Zdravka. 2006. “Persons with Disability and Poverty [in Croatian].” Revija za Socijalnu Politiku 13 (3/4): 293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liam, Stanley. 2016. “Using Focus Groups in Political Science and International Relations.” Politics 36 (3): 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395715624120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malešević, Siniša. 2016. Identity as Ideology. Understanding Ethnicity and Nationalism. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 2017. “Solidarity and Its Sources.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, edited by Keith Banting, and Will Kymlicka, 61–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (The Seeley Lectures).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Onora. 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petek, Ana, Nikola Baketa, Anka Kekez, Marko Kovačić, Mario Munta, Krešimir Petković, Marjeta Šinko, and Borna Zgurić. 2021. “Unboxing the Vague Notion of Policy Goals: Comparison of Croatian Public Policies.” European Policy Analysis 7 (2): 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1106
   Google Scholar
• Popović, Nella, and Ana Petek. 2019. “The EU Immigration Policy: An Overview of Research Methodology [in Croatian].” Anali Hrvatskog Politološkog Društva Časopis za Politologiju 15 (1): 201–227. https://doi.org/10.20901/an.15.09
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. “The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 6 (19): 93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Room, Robin. 2005. “Stigma, Social Inequality and Alcohol and Drug Use.” Drug and Alcohol Review 24 (2): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230500102434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2015. “Solidarity as a Joint Action.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4): 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, Andrea, and Juri Viehoff. 2023. “Solidarity in Social and Political Philosophy.” In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Accessed July 2 2023 https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/solidarity/.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, Sally. 2008. Political Solidarity. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, Margret. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 2009. On Civic Friendship: Including Women in the State. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1985. Women, Technology and Sexual Divisions. New York: Trade and Development, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1999. Reason Before Identity. The Romanes Lecture for 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. 2006. Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Frances, and Severine Deneulin. 2002. “Amartya Sen's contribution to development thinking.” Studies on Comparative International Development 37: 61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, Yael. 2019. Why Nationalism? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 2010. “The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (2): 230–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009350044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschl, Miriam, and Laurent Derobert. 2008. “Does Identity Matter? On the Relevance of Identity and Interaction for Capabilities.” In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, edited by Flavio Comim, Mozaffar Qizilbash, and Sabina Alkire, 125–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winzer, Margaret, and Kas Mazurek. 2015. “Exploring the Social Milieu of Disability: Themes of Poverty, Education, and Labour Participation.” Labor et Educatio 3: 155–171.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonathan. 2020. “Social Exclusion and Capability Development.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, edited by Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti, Siddiqur Osmani, and Mozaffar Qizilbash, 562–575. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonathan, and Avner De-Shalit. 2007. Disadvantage (Oxford Political Theory). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2018. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Lin. 2018. “Measuring Well-Being: A Multidimensional Index Integrating Subjective Well-Being and Preferences.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 19 (4): 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2018.1474859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220600769331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelič, Nebojša. 2020. “Play It by Trust: Social Trust, Institutions and Leisure.” In Institutions in Action. The Nature and the Role of Institutions in the Real World, edited by Tiziana Andina, and Petar Bojanić, 51–72. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Žiljak, Tihomir, and Nikola Baketa. 2019. “Education Policy in Croatia.” In Policy-Making at the European Periphery. The Case of Croatia, edited by Zdravko Petak, and Kristijan Kotarski, 265–284. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar