Brazil and China going global: emerging issues and questions to explore knowledge and policy transfers

References

• Abdenur, A. E. 2014. “Emerging Powers as Normative Agents: Brazil and China Within the UN Development System.” Third World Quarterly 35 (10): 1876–1893. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.971605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, A. C. 2012. “Chinese Economic and Trade Co-Operation Zones in Africa: Facing the Challenges.” SAIIA Policy Briefing 51: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, A. C., and C. Lee. 2022. “Knowledge Transfer in the Global South: Reusing or Creating Knowledge in China’s Special Economic Zones in Ethiopia and Cambodia?” Global Policy 13 (Suppl. 1): 45–57. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13060.
   Google Scholar
• Amanor, K. S., and S. Chichava. 2016. “South–South Cooperation, Agribusiness, and African Agricultural Development: Brazil and China in Ghana and Mozambique.” World Development 81: 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardila, D. S. 2020. “Global Policies for Moving Cities: The Role of Think Tanks in the Proliferation of Bus Rapid Transit Systems in Latin America and Worldwide.” Policy and Society 39 (1): 70–90. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1699636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Author a, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Author a, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Author a and Author b, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Badie, B. 2000. The Imported State: The Westernization of the Political Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C. 2013. “Brazil’s Liberal Neo-Developmentalism: New Paradigm or Edited Orthodoxy?” Review of International Political Economy 20 (2): 298–331. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D. 1993. “South-South Technology Transfer: The Case of China’s Kpatawee Rice Project in Liberia.” World Development 21 (12): 1989–2001. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(93)90071-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D., and X. Tang. 2014. ““Going Global in Groups”: Structural Transformation and China’s Special Economic Zones Overseas.” World Development 63: 78–91. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. 2011. “The ‘China model’ and the Global Crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese Mode of Governance?” International Affairs 87 (6): 1323–1343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. M. 2004. ‘International Financial Institutions and the Diffusion of Foreign Models for Social Security Reform in Latin America’. K. Em Weyland. “International Financial Institutions and the Diffusion of Foreign Models for Social Security Reform in Latin America.” In Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform, 53–80. Washington D.C: Woodrow Wilson Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., D. Bainton, N. Lendvai, and P. Stubbs. 2015. Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Sá e Silva, M. . 2017. Poverty Reduction, Education, and the Global Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfers. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L., M. F. Plattner, and C. Walker. 2016. Authoritarianism Goes Global: The Challenge to Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-making.” Governance 13 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., R. Plugaru, and S. Saurugger. 2020. “The Process of Transfer: The Micro-Influences of Power, Time and Learning.” Public Policy and Administration 35 (4): 445–464. doi:10.1177/0952076718822714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoulin, D. 2021. “Collaborative Event Ethnography as a Strategy for Analyzing Policy Transfers and Global Summits.” In Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation, edited by O. P. De Oliveira, 80–99. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. 2012. “The Neglected Dimension: Bringing Time Back into Cross-National Policy Transfer Studies.” Policy Studies 33 (6): 567–585. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.728900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferchen, M. 2013. “Whose China Model is It Anyway? The Contentious Search for Consensus.” Review of International Political Economy 20 (2): 390–420. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filho, M. L., E. Sabourin, and D. Sayago. 2018. A cooperação do Brasil na América Latina e no Caribe, edited by Em:C. Grisa and E. Sabourin., 34–53. Porto Alegre: Escritos.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. . 1999. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53 (4): 699–732. doi:10.1162/002081899551048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourie, E. 2015. “China’s Example for Meles’ Ethiopia: When Development ‘Models’ Land.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 53 (3): 289–316. doi:10.1017/S0022278X15000397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. 1978. “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics.” International Organization 32 (4): 881–912. doi:10.1017/S002081830003201X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., and B. Gills. 2016. “South–South Cooperation and the Rise of the Global South.” Third World Quarterly 37 (4): 557–574. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1128817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoberg, G. 1991. “Sleeping with an Elephant: The American Influence on Canadian Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 107–131. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00004955.
   Google Scholar
• Hodzi, O., and J. H. S. Åberg. 2020. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Strategic Deployment of the China Model in Africa.” Politics and Policy 48 (5): 804–814. doi:10.1111/polp.12378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, I. 2004. “‘After Cancún: G21, WTO, and Multilateralism.” Journal of International and Area Studies 11 (2): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. 2000. Imitation and Politics: Redesigning Modern Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. 2010. “The Myth of the Beijing Consensus.” Journal of Contemporary China 19 (65): 461–477. doi:10.1080/10670561003666087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lampton, D., S. Ho, and C. Kuik. 2020. Rivers of Iron Railroads and Chinese Power in Southeast Asia. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawther, I. 2017. “Why African Countries are Interested in Building Agricultural Partnerships with China: Lessons from Rwanda and Uganda.” Third World Quarterly 38 (10): 2312–2329. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1333889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lendvai, N., and P. Stubbs. 2009. “Assemblages, Translation and Intermediaries in South East Europe.” European Societies 11 (5): 673–695. doi:10.1080/14616690802475504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Lee C and Alden C. (2022). The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South. Global Policy, 13(S1), 5–10. 10.1111/1758-5899.13075
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and J. C. Sharman. 2009. “Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer.” Policy Studies 30 (3): 269–288. doi:10.1080/01442870902863851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawsdley, E. 2008. “Fu Manchu versus Dr Livingstone in the Dark Continent? Representing China, Africa and the West in British Broadsheet Newspapers.” Political Geography 27 (5): 509–529. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawsdley, E. 2017. “The ‘Southernisation’ of Development?” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 59 (2): 173–185. doi:10.1111/apv.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2010. “Relationality/Territoriality: Toward a Conceptualization of Cities in the World.” Geoforum 41 (2): 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2013. “A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Policy Transfer Research: Geographies, Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations.” Policy Studies 34 (1): 2–18. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.748563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milhorance, C. 2018. New Geographies of Global Policy-Making: South–South Networks and Rural Development Strategies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio Gonnet, C. 2018. ¿Aprendiendo o emulando? Cómo se difunden las políticas sociales en América Latina. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2010. “Mobilizing Policy: Models, Methods, and Mutations.” Geoforum 41 (2): 169–174. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimenta de Faria, C. . 2022. “Foreign Policy and Policy Diffusion in Lula da Silva’s Brazil.” Contexto internacional 44 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1590/s0102-8529.20224401e20200091.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, M., B. Suyama, and L. T. Waisbich. 2019. “The Diffusion of Social Protection and Food Security Policies: Emerging Issues in Brazilian South-South Cooperation for Development.” In Latin America and Policy Diffusion from Import and Export, edited by O. Porto de Oliveira , C. Osorio Gonnet, S. Montero, and C. Kerches da Silva Leite, 93–114. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O., and C. R. S. Milani. 2022. “Brazilian Perspectives on Policy Transfer and South-South Cooperation.” Contexto internacional 44 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1590/s0102-8529.20224401e20210059.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O., C. Osorio Gonnet, S. Montero, and C. Kerches Da Silva Leite, edited by. 2019. Latin America and Policy Diffusion: From Import to Export. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O., and L. A. Pal. 2018. “‘New Frontiers and Directions in Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation Research: Agents, Spaces, Resistance, and Translations.” Brazilian Journal of Public Administration 52 (2): 199–220. doi:10.1590/0034-761220180078.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O. International Policy Diffusion and Participatory Budgeting: Ambassadors of Participation, International Organizations and Transnational Networks. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O. Policy ambassadors: human agency in the transnationalization of Brazilian social policies. Policy and Society, v. 39, n. 1, p. 53–69, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O. Brazil Exporting Social Policies: From Local Innovation to a Global Model. Journal of Politics in Latin America, p. 1–23, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O.; Romano, G. C. (EDS.). Brazil and China in Knowledge and Policy Transfer: Agents, Objects, Time, Structures and Power. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pu, X. 2012. “Socialisation as a Two-Way Process: Emerging Powers and the Diffusion of International Norms.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (4): 341–367. doi:10.1093/cjip/pos017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaoson, J., and R. M. M. Edimo, edited by. 2022. New Nationalisms and China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Exploring the Transnational Public Domain. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramo, J. C. 2004. The Beijing Consensus. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Richer, P. 1971. La Chine et le tiers monde. Paris: Payot.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2016. “Thinking Cities Through Elsewhere: Comparative Tactics for a More Global Urban Studies.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (1): 3–29. doi:10.1177/0309132515598025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, G.C. , 2020 Changing Urban Renewal Policies in China: Policy Transfer and Policy Learning under Multiple Hierarchies (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan) .
   Google Scholar
• Romano, G.C. , 2021 Understanding the role of culture in policy transfers. In Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation (pp. 258-277). (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing) .
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, E., and C. Grisa, edited by. 2018. A difusão de políticas brasileiras para a agricultura familiar na América Latina e Caribe. Porto Alegre: Escritos.
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, E., and C. Milhorance. 2021. “Policy transfer research in the rural sector.” In Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation, edited by O. PORTO DE OLIVEIRA, 406–424. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2004. “Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the ‘Transnationalization’ of Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (3): 545–566. doi:10.1080/13501760410001694291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., O. Porto de Oliveira, and L. A. Pal. 2020. “Transnational Policy Transfer: The Circulation of Ideas, Power and Development Models.” Policy and Society 39 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1619325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, P. 2005. “Stretching Concepts Too Far? Multi-Level Governance, Policy Transfer and the Politics of Scale in South East Europe.” Southeast European Politics VI (2): 66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Tugendhat, H., and D. Alemu. 2016. “Chinese Agricultural Training Courses for African Officials: Between Power and Partnerships.” World Development 81 (May): 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.022.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2018. “China-IMF Collaboration: Toward the Leadership in Global Monetary Governance.” Chinese Political Science Review 3 (1): 62–80. doi:10.1007/s41111-017-0085-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 2004. “Neoliberalism and Democracy in Latin America: A Mixed Record.” Latin American Politics and Society 46 (1): 135–157. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2004.tb00268.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. 2015. “Multiple Temporalities of Policy Circulation: Gradual, Repetitive and Delayed Processes of BRT Adoption in South African Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (3): 568–580. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and D. Marsh. 2016. “Learning by Doing: The Case of Administrative Policy Transfer in China.” Policy Studies 37 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1080/01442872.2015.1107959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar