When did the austerity era of European crisis management end? On the failure of National competitiveness boards

References

• afep. 2015. La gouvernance économique en Europe. Paris: Flash ECO.
   Google Scholar
• Bekker, S. 2018. “Flexicurity in the European Semester: Still a Relevant Policy Concept?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (2): 175–192. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1363272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieling, H.J. 2015. “Uneven Development and ‚european Crisis constitutionalism‘, or the Reasons for and Conditions of a ‚passive Revolution in trouble‘.” In Asymmetric Crisis in Europe and Possible Futures, edited by J. Jäger and E. Springler, 98–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bieling, H.J., and U. Brand. 2015. “Competitiveness or Emancipation?” In The Future of Capitalism After the Financial Crisis: The Varieties of Capitalism Debate in the Age of Austerity, edited by R. Westra, D. Badeen, and R. Albritton, 184–204. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bieling, H.J., and J. Steinhilber. 2000. “Hegemonic Projects in the Process of European Integration.” In Dimensions of a Critical Theory of European Integration, edited by H.-J. Bieling and J. Steinhilber, 33–58. Marburg: FEG.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., C. Görg, and M. Wissen. 2011. “Second-Order Condensations of Societal Power Relations: Environmental Politics and the Internationalization of the State from a Neo-Poulantzian Perspective.” Antipode 43 (1): 149–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00815.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U., M. Krams, V. Lenikus, and E. Schneider. 2022. “Contours of Historical-Materialist Policy Analysis.” Critical Policy Studies 16 (3): 1–18. doi:10.1080/19460171.2021.1947864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRUEGEL. 2022. “Members.” Accessed March 30, 2022. https://bit.ly/34iAwWN.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie, [BDI]. 2015. “Die Vollendung der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion: Reformoptionen in der Diskussion.” Berlin: BDI.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie [BDI], Mouvement des entreprise de France [MEDEF], . 2014. Strengthening Competitiveness and Creating more Jobs in Europe. Berlin, Paris
   Google Scholar
• Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie [BDI], Bundesvereinigung der deutscher Arbeitgeberverbände [BDA]. 2015. ”BDI/BDA Brüssel Aktuell 07/2015.“ Brussels: BDI/BDA.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesvereinigung der deutscher Arbeitgeberverbände, [BDA]. 2016. “Arbeitgeber aktuell 01/2016.“ Brussels: BDA.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesvereinigung der deutscher Arbeitgeberverbände [BDA], Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund [DGB]. 2015. “Letter to Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker .“
   Google Scholar
• BusinessEurope, [BE]. 2015a. Business Views on the Future of Europe‘s Economic and Monetary Union. Brussels: BE.
   Google Scholar
• BusinessEurope, [BE]. 2015b. Strengthening Competitiveness in All EU Policies. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil National de Productivité France [FCNP]. 2019. “Productivity and Competitiveness: Where Does France Stand in the Euro Zone? NPB First Report.”.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., and M. Daly. 2018. “The European Semester and EU Social Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (5): 1001–1018. doi:10.1111/jcms.12703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, [Council]. 2015a. “Outcome of the Council Meeting Competitiveness: 3431st Council Meeting.“ 14783/15.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, [Council] . 2015b. “Preparation of the Competitiveness Council of 30 November and 1 December 2015” 14025/15. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Darvas, Z., and Á. Leandro. 2015. “The Limitations of Policy Coordination in the Euro Area Under the European Semester. Bruegel Policy Contribution 19.“ 2015/19. Brussels: BRUEGEL.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. 2018. “New Governance and the Displacement of Social Europe: The Case of the European Semester.” European Constitutional Law Review 14 (1): 191–209. doi:10.1017/S1574019618000081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’erman, V. J., D. F. Schulz, A. Verdun, and D. Zagermann. 2022. “The European Semester in the North and in the South: Domestic Politics and the Salience of Eu‐induced Wage Reform in Different Growth Models.” Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1111/jcms.13274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’erman, V., and A. Verdun. 2022. “An Introduction: “Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and Domestic Politics: Policy Coordination in the EU from the European Semester to the Covid‐19 Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (1): 3–20. doi:10.1111/jcms.13276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bundesregierung [DBR]. 2016. Wettbewerbsausschüsse in den Euroländern. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, [DGB] 2015b. “Körzell: EU-Kommission bereitet Angriff auf Tarifautonomie vor: Wettbewerbsräte sollen Lohnentwicklung mitbestimmen.” https://tinyurl.com/2p853cdb
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, [DGB]. 2015a. “Stellungnahme zum Bericht „Die Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion Europas vollenden“(Bericht der fünf Präsidenten) und zur Fortentwicklung der wirtschaftspolitischen Steuerung in EU und Eurozone.” Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, [DGB]. 2015c. “Brief an Bundeswirtschaftsminister Sigmar Gabriel .”
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Competition [DG COMP], and BRUEGEL. 2015. “Taking Competitiveness Seriously?” Accessed July 9, 2020. https://bit.ly/3arTgGS.
   Google Scholar
• EP Group Socialists and Democrats [S&D]. 2015. “Completing and Rebalancing the EMU Will Take More Than What the Five presidents‘ Report proposes“. News release. June 22. Accessed March 12, 2021. https://bit.ly/37u7uW9.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, [COM]. 2015a. Better Economic Governance Report - Discussion by Sherpas: Next Steps on Better Economic Governance in the Euro Area Draft Outline. Brussels: European Commission.”.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, [COM]. 2020a. “List of Meetings.“ Transparency Register 1771817758–48.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, [COM]. 2020b. “List of Meetings.“ Transparency Register 95393329-85.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, [COM]. (2020c). “List of Meetings.“ Transparency Register 43763731235–75.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, [COM] . 2020d. “List of Meetings.” Transparency Register 7749519702–29.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, [COM]. 2020e. “List of Meetings.” Transparency Register 25487567824–45.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Labour Market Developments in Europe. Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission [COM]. 2015b. “On the Establishment of National Competitiveness Boards Within the Euro Area.” COM (2015) 601 Final.
   Google Scholar
• European Round Table of Industrialists, [ERT]. 2010. “Launch of Ert’s Vision for a Competitive Europe in 2025” Brussels: ERT.
   Google Scholar
• European Round Table of Industrialists, [ERT]. 2013. “Restoring Europe‘s Competitiveness, Growth and Employment.” Brussels: ERT.
   Google Scholar
• European Round Table of Industrialists, [ERT]. 2014. “EU Industrial Renaissance: ERT Agenda for Action 2014-2019.” Brussels: ERT.
   Google Scholar
• European Round Table of Industrialists, ERT, and Snabe, J. 2013. “Creating Flexible Labour Markets and Responsive Education Systems.” Brussels: ERT.
   Google Scholar
• European Trade Union Confederation, [ETUC]. 2015a. “ETUC Position on National Competitiveness Boards.” Brussels: ETUC.
   Google Scholar
• European Trade Union Confederation [ETUC]. 2015b. “Competitiveness Boards or Wage Boards?” News release. October 21.
   Google Scholar
• European Trade Union Confederation [ETUC]. 2015c. “ETUC Meets Juncker and Tusk Ahead of EU Summit.” News Release October 15.
   Google Scholar
• European Trade Union Confederation [ETUC]. 2015d. “Trade Unions & Employers Should Set Wages: Not 5 President‘s ‚competitiveness authorities‘.” News release. June 22.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2010. “Triangulation in Qualitative Research.” In A Companion to Qualitative Research, edited by F. Uwe, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke, 178–183. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, S. 2015. “Nationale Ausschüsse für Wettbewerbsfähigkeit.“ Letter to DGB President Reiner Hoffmann.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 2012. Gefängnishefte. Hamburg: Argument.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, J. S., J. D. Valerie, F. S. Daniel, and A. Verdun. 2020. “Economic and Fiscal Policy Coordination After the Crisis: Is the European Semester Promoting More or Less State Intervention?” Journal of European Integration 42 (3): 327–344. doi:10.1080/07036337.2020.1730356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1997. “Die Zukunft des Nationalstaates.” In Erosion oder Reorganisation?“In Jenseits der Nationalökonomie?, edited by S. Becker, T. Sablowski, and W. Schumm, 50–96. Hamburg: Argument.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J., V. Maccarrone, and R. Erne. 2021. “Towards a Socialization of the Eu‘s New Economic Governance Regime? EU Labour Policy Interventions in Germany, Ireland, Italy and Romania (2009–2019).” British Journal of Industrial Relations 59 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1111/bjir.12522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.C., D. Tusk, J. Dijsselbloem, M. Draghi, and M. Schulz. 2015. Completing Europe‘s Economic and Monetary Union. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Koll, W. 2016. “Zur Vertiefung der wirtschaftlichen Konvergenz in der Eurozone.” Wirtschaftsdienst 96 (6): 405–412. doi:10.1007/s10273-016-1990-4.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, C.M. 2022. “The COVID-19 Crisis: The EU Recovery Fund and Its Implications for European Integration – a Paradigm Shift.” European Review 30 (3): 374–392. doi:10.1017/S106279872100003X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miró, J. 2021. “Austerity’s Failures and Policy Learning: Mapping European Commission officials’ Beliefs on Fiscal Governance in the Post-Crisis EU.” Review of International Political Economy 28 (5): 1224–1248. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1749868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouvement des entreprises de France [ MEDEF]. 2019. “Commentaires au rapport du Conseil national de la productivité.”.
   Google Scholar
• O’dwyer, M. 2022. “Gender and Crises in European Economic Governance: Is This Time Different?” Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (1): 152–169. doi:10.1111/jcms.13273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund [ÖGB]. 2015. “Kurzinfo: Vertiefung der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion.”.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, J. 2015. Rebalancing the Governance of the Euro Area. Document de travail de France Stratégie 02/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Republica Italiana [RI]. 2015. “Italian Paper on Five presidents’ Report – Creation of Competitiveness Authorities.”.
   Google Scholar
• Republique Française, R. F. 2015. “Contributions from the Sherpas of the Member States to the Five Presidents‘ Report: France.”.
   Google Scholar
• Sachverständigenrat. 2019. “Produktivität. Wachstumsbedingungen verbessern: Nationaler Produktivitätsbericht 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, A., and G. B. Wolff. 2015a. ”Euro-Area Governance: What to Reform and How to Do It.“ Bruegel Policy Brief 2015/01. Brussels: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, A., and G. B. Wolff. 2015b. “Pour une politique budgétaire et salariale européenne.“ Le Monde. 71 (04.06.15): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1998. “Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare States.” In The Future of European Welfare: A New Social Contract?, edited by M. Rhodes and Y. Mény, 157–177. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 2021. “Forced Structural Convergence in the Eurozone.” In Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies, edited by S. Avlijaš, A. Hassel, and B. Palier, 161–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. 2022. “Germany’s Industrial Strategy 2030, EU Competition Policy and the Crisis of New Constitutionalism. (Geo-)Political Economy of a Contested Paradigm Shift.” New Political Economy 28 (2): 1–18. doi:10.1080/13563467.2022.2091535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, E., and S. Sandbeck. 2019. “Monetary Integration in the Eurozone and the Rise of Transnational Authoritarian Statism.” Competition & Change 23 (2): 102452941880001. doi:10.1177/1024529418800013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulten, T. 2019. “German Collective Bargaining – from Erosion to Revitalisation?” In Industrial Relations in Germany: Dynamics and Perspectives, edited by M. Behrens and H. Dribbusch, 11–30. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schulten, T., and T. Müller. 2021. “A Paradigm Shift Towards Social Europe? The Proposed Directive on Adequate Minimum Wages in the European Union.” Italian Labour Law E-Journal 14 (1): 1–19. doi:10.6092/ISSN.1561-8048/13368.
   Google Scholar
• Schwieter, C., and A. Schout. 2018. “National Fiscal Councils, the European Fiscal Board and National Productivity Boards: New EMU Independent Bodies Without Much Prospect.” In Clingendael State of the Union 2018: Towards Better European Integration, edited by M. Drent, M. Holderied, A. Schout, H. Kassim, R. Korteweg, Y. van Loon, and M. Luining, et al., 32–39. The Hague: Clingendael Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Syrovatka, F. 2016. Die Reformpolitik Frankreichs in der Krise: Arbeitsmarkt- und Rentenpolitik vor dem Hintergrund europäischer Krisenbearbeitung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Syrovatka, F. 2021. “Labour Market Policy Under the New European Economic Governance: France in the Focus of the New European Labour Market Policy.” Capital & Class 45 (2): 283–309. doi:10.1177/0309816820943177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrovatka, F. 2022a. Neue Europäische Arbeitspolitik: Umkämpfte Integration in der Eurokrise. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Syrovatka, F. 2022b. “The Emergence of a New European Labour Policy Regime: Continuity and Change Since the Euro Crisis.” Competition & Change 26 (5): 575–602. doi:10.1177/10245294211031051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrovatka, F. 2022c. “Stabilisierung statt Paradigmenwechsel.” PROKLA 52 (206): 119–140. doi:10.32387/prokla.v52i206.1962.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2000. “Why German Employers Cannot Bring Themselves to Dismantle the German Model.” In Unions, Employers, and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies, edited by T. Iversen, 138–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valkama, S. A., and A. Zoppè. 2018. The National Productivity Boards: Briefing. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• van Apeldoorn, B. 2002. Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle Over European Integration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhercke, B., and A. Verdun. 2022. “The European Semester as Goldilocks: Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and the Recovery and Resilience Facility.” Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (1): 204–223. doi:10.1111/jcms.13267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger, A. 2019. “The New EU Industrial Policy: Authoritarian Neoliberal Structural Adjustment and the Case for Alternatives.” Globalizations 16 (3): 353–369. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1502496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissel, J. 2015. Staatsprojekt EUropa: Grundzüge einer materialistischen Theorie der Europäischen Union. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Zeilinger, B. 2021. “The European Commission as a Policy Entrepreneur Under the European Semester.” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 63–73. doi:10.17645/pag.v9i3.4102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J., and B. Vanhercke. 2018. “Socializing the European Semester: EU Social and Economic Policy Co-Ordination in Crisis and Beyond.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (2): 149–174. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1363269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziltener, P. 1999. Strukturwandel der europäischen Integration: Die Europäische Union und die Veränderung von Staatlichkeit. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar