Place (un)making through soft urban densification: exploring local experiences of density and place attachment in Tehran

References

• Aalbers MB. 2020. Financial geography III: the financialization of the city. Prog Hum Geogr. 44(3):595–607. doi:10.1177/0309132519853922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawadi K, Benkraouda O. 2019. The debate over neighborhood density in Dubai: between theory and practicality. J Plan Educ Res. 39(1):18–34. doi:10.1177/0739456X17720490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson W, Kanaroglou P, Miller E. 1996. Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Studies [Preprint]. [accessed 2017 Feb 17]. http://usj.sagepub.com/content/33/1/7.short.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel R, Ronald R. 2017. The role of urban form in sustainability of community: the case of Amsterdam. Environ Plan B: Urban Anal City Sci. 44(1):33–53. doi:10.1177/0265813515608640.
   Google Scholar
• Atash F. 2007. The deterioration of urban environments in developing countries: mitigating the air pollution crisis in Tehran, Iran. Cities. 24(6):399–409. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi MM, Moeini M. 2011. An analysis of relationship between environmental quality and construction density, Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi. Wegweiser. [accessed 2017 Aug 22] https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_24680_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, King R. 2018. Social sustainability, climate resilience and community-based urban development, social sustainability, climate resilience and community-based urban development. doi:10.4324/9781351103329.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby P, Henneberry J, Halleux J-M. 2020. Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: the case of England between 2001 and 2011. Urban Stud. 58(10):0042098020936967. doi:10.1177/0042098020936967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch EL, Keating AM. 2011. An assessment of how cities create and transfer knowledge: a landscape study. Philadelphia: Penn Inst Urban Res [Preprint].
   Google Scholar
• Blanc F, White T. 2020. Life in London’s changing densities. Urban Geogr. 41:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokaie M, Zarkesh MK, Arasteh PD, Hosseini A. 2016. Assessment of Urban Heat Island based on the relationship between land surface temperature and Land Use/Land Cover in Tehran. Sustainable Cities Soc. 23:94–104. doi:10.1016/J.SCS.2016.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley G, Power SS. 2009. Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 36(1):30–48. doi:10.1068/b33129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown B, Perkins D. 1992. Disruptions in place attachment. Place Attachment. 279–304. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_13.
   Google Scholar
• Brown D. 2014. Challenging the conceptual boundaries of the dominant EuroAmerican compact city paradigm. Sub-Saharan Africa: the need for Southern alternatives to compact urban form and high density. Development Planning Unit Working Paper Series, University College London [Preprint].
   Google Scholar
• Burton E. 2001 Apr. The compact city and social justice. Hous Environ Sustainability. 18–19:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Casey ES. 2001. Between geography and philosophy: what does it mean to be in the place-world? Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 91(4):683–693. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavicchia R, Cucca R. 2020. Densification and school segregation: the case of Oslo. Urban Plann. 5(3):217–229. doi:10.17645/up.v5i3.3215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau M. 1988. The practice of everyday life. Rendall S, translator. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero R. 2002. Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 7(4):265–284. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccone A. 2002. Agglomeration effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev. 46(2):213–227. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00099-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cittati V-M, Balest J, Exner D. 2022. What is the relationship between collective memory and the commoning process in historical building renovation projects? The case of the Mas di Sabe, Northern Italy. Sustainability. 14(19):11870. doi:10.3390/su141911870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane M, Lloyd S, Haines A, Ding D, Hutchinson E, Belesova K, Davies M, Osrin D, Zimmermann N, Capon A, et al. 2021. Transforming cities for sustainability: a health perspective. Environ Int. 147:106366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell T. 2014. Place: an introduction. doi:10.1139/h2012-055.
   Google Scholar
• Crinson M. 2005. Urban memory: history and amnesia in the Modern City. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dave S. 2010. High urban densities in developing countries: a sustainable solution? on JSTOR. Built Environ. 36(1):9–27. doi:10.2148/benv.36.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Dave S. 2011. Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustainable Dev. 19(3):189–205. doi:10.1002/sd.433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey N. 2006. The influence of the quality of the built environment on social cohesion in English neighbourhoods.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S, Brown C. 2011. The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Dev. 19(5):289–300. doi:10.1002/sd.417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey N, Brown C, Bramley G. 2012. The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Prog Plann. 77(3):89–141. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright P. 2009. Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 19(6):426–441. doi:10.1002/casp.1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianati V. 2021. The interplay between urban densification and place change in Tehran; implications for place-based social sustainability. Sustainability. 13(17):9636. doi:10.3390/su13179636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning R, Hickman H, While A. 2020. Planning control and the politics of soft densification. Town Plan Rev. 91(3):305–324. doi:10.3828/tpr.2020.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning R, Hickman H, While A. 2020. Planning control and the politics of soft densification. Town Plan Rev. 91(3):305–324. doi:10.3828/tpr.2020.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton G, Puga D. 2020. The economics of urban density. Journal Econ Perspect. 34(3):3–26. doi:10.1257/jep.34.3.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eizenberg E, Jabareen Y. 2017. Social sustainability: a new conceptual framework. Sustainability. 9(1):68. doi:10.3390/su9010068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emo B, Treyer L, Schmitt G, Hoelscher C, 2017, January. Towards defining perceived urban density. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe: ShoCK. p. 637–646.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing R, Hajrasouliha A, Neckerman KM, Purciel-Hill M, Greene W. 2016. Streetscape features related to pedestrian activity. J Plan Educ Res. 36(1):5–15. doi:10.1177/0739456X15591585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah BN, Partridge MD, Olfert MR. 2011. Urban sprawl and productivity: evidence from US metropolitan areas. Pap Reg Sci. 90(3):451–472. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00330.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferm J, Clifford B, Canelas P, Livingstone N. 2021. Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: the case of permitted development in England. Urban Stud. 58(10):2040–2058. doi:10.1177/0042098020936966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadami M, Dittmann A, Safarrad T. 2020. Lack of spatial approach in urban density policies: the case of the master plan of Tehran. Sustainability. 12(18):7285. doi:10.3390/su12187285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadami M, Newman P. 2019. Spatial consequences of urban densification policy: floor-to-area ratio policy in Tehran, Iran. Environ Plan B: Urban Anal City Sci. 46(4):626–647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317722168.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings B, Rogerson R. 2021. Compacting the city centre: densification in two Newcastles. Build Cities. 2(1):185–202. doi:10.5334/bc.74.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani MV. 2003. Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment. In: Bonnes M, Lee T, Bonaiuto M, editors. Psychological theories for environmental issues. London: Routledge; p. 137–170.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Gottlieb JD. 2009. The wealth of cities: agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. J Econ Lit. 47(4):983–1028. doi:10.1257/jel.47.4.983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbwachs M. 1992. On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamiduddin I, Adelfio M. 2019. Social sustainability and new neighbourhoods: case studies from Spain and Germany. Urban Social Sustainability: Theory, Policy Practicepolicy. doi:10.4324/9781315115740.
   Google Scholar
• Handy S. 1996. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 1(2):151–165. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00010-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper C. 2019. Density: objective measure or critical tool of the neoliberal agenda? Footprint: Delft Univ Archit Theory J. 13(1):31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hemani S, Das AK, Chowdhury A. 2017. Influence of urban forms on social sustainability: a case of Guwahati, Assam. Urban Des Int. 22(2):168–194. doi:10.1057/s41289-016-0012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez B, Hidalgo MC, Ruiz C. 2013. Theoretical and methodological aspects of research on place attachment.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo M, Hernandez B. 2001. Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. J Environ Psychol [Preprint]. [accessed 2017 May 3]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027249440190221X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstad H. 2012. Compact city development: high ideals and emerging practices. European J Spatial Dev. 1(1):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hummon DM. 1992. Community attachment. In: Irwin, Altman, Setha, M. Low, Editors. Place attachment. Boston, MA: Springer US; p. 253–278.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop B. 2002. Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: a state–theoretical perspective. Antipode. 34(3):452–472. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones P, Evans J. 2012. Rescue geography: place making, affect and regeneration. Urban Stud. 49(11):2315–2330. doi:10.1177/0042098011428177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karampour K. 2018. Municipal funding mechanism and development process: a case study of Tehran.
   Google Scholar
• Karampour K. 2021. Implications of density bonus tool for urban planning: relaxing floor area ratio (FAR) regulations in Tehran. Int Plann Stud. 26(3):219–235. doi:10.1080/13563475.2020.1802235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil R. 2020. The density dilemma: there is always too much and too little of it. Urban Geogr. 41(10):1284–1293. doi:10.1080/02723638.2020.1850025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatam A, Keshavarzian A. 2016. Decentralization and ambiguities of local politics in Tehran. Middle East Institute, Governing Megacities in MENA and Asia [Preprint]. http://www.mei.edu/content/map/governing-megacities-mena-and-asia.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshnoodmotlagh S, Daneshi A, Gharari S, Verrelst J, Mirzaei M, Omrani H. 2021. Urban morphology detection and it’s linking with land surface temperature: a case study for Tehran Metropolis, Iran. Sustainable Cities Soc. 74:103228. doi:10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjærås K. 2020. Towards a relational conception of the compact city. Urban Stud. 58(6):004209802090728. doi:10.1177/0042098020907281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä M, Broberg A, Haybatollahi M, Schmidt-Thomé K. 2016. Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 43(1):34–57. doi:10.1177/0265813515600121.
   Google Scholar
• Lak A, Hakimian P. 2019. Collective memory and urban regeneration in urban spaces: reproducing memories in Baharestan Square, city of Tehran, Iran. City, Cult Soc. 18:100290. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100290.
   Google Scholar
• Lara-Hernandez JA, Melis A. 2018. Understanding the temporary appropriation in relationship to social sustainability. Sustainable Cities Soc. 39:366–374. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawhon M, Truelove Y. 2020. Disambiguating the southern urban critique: propositions, pathways and possibilities for a more global urban studies. Urban Stud. 57(1):3–20. doi:10.1177/0042098019829412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1991. Critique of everyday life: foundations for a sociology of the everyday. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicka M. 2008. Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: restoring the forgotten city past. J Environ Psychol. 28(3):209–231. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka M. 2011. Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? J Environ Psychol. 31(3):207–230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka M. 2013a. In search of roots. Memory as enabler of place attachment. In: L M., and Devine-Wright P., editors. Place attachment. Advances in theory, methods and applications. p. 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicka M. 2013b. Place attachment, place attachment: advances in theory, methods and applications. doi:10.4324/9780203757765.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone N, Fiorentino S, Short M. 2021. Planning for residential “value”? London’s densification policies and impacts. Build Cities. 2(1):203–219. doi:10.5334/bc.88.
   Google Scholar
• Low S, Altman I. 1992. Place attachment. Place Attachment [Preprint]. [accessed 2017 May 3]. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• Macarthur D. 2001. Place and experience: a philosophical topography. Philos Rev. 110(4):632–634. doi:10.1215/00318108-110-4-632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour A. 1998. Tehran: the making of a metropolis. Chichester: Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour A. 2006. Urban planning and development in Tehran. Cities. 23(6):433–438. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour A. 2011. Sustainable development, urban form, and megacity governance and planning in Tehran. 67–91. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-99267-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Malpas J. 1999. Place and experience. A Philosophical Topography [Preprint].
   Google Scholar
• Manzo L, Devine-Wright P. 2013. Place attachment: advances in theory, methods and applications.
   Google Scholar
• Massey D. 2013. Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane C. 2016. The geographies of urban density. Prog Hum Geogr. 40(5):629–648. doi:10.1177/0309132515608694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane C. 2020. De/re-densification: a relational geography of urban density. City. 24(1–2):314–324. doi:10.1080/13604813.2020.1739911.
   Google Scholar
• Mindali O, Raveh A, Salomon I. 2004. Urban density and energy consumption: a new look at old statistics. Transp Res Part A: Policy Practi. 38(2):143–162. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2003.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modarres A. 2013. Commuting and energy consumption: toward an equitable transportation policy. J Transport Geogr. 33:240–249. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan P. 2010. Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. J Environ Psychol. 30(1):11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouratidis K. 2018. Built environment and social well-being: how does urban form affect social life and personal relationships? Cities. 74:7–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss P, Saglie IL, Richardson T. 2020. Urban sustainability: is densification sufficient? European Plann Stud. 28(1):146–165. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1604633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanzer B. 2004. Measuring sense of place: a scale for Michigan. Admin Theory Prax. 26(3):362–382. doi:10.1080/10841806.2004.11029457.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrete‐hernandez P, Toro F. 2019. Urban systems of accumulation: half a century of chilean neoliberal urban policies. Antipode. 51(3):899–926. doi:10.1111/anti.12504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nematollahi S. 2013. An investigation into selling surplus density. فصلنامه علمی - پژوهشیپژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری. 7(24):23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman M. 2005. The compact city fallacy. J Plan Educ Res. 25(1):11–26. doi:10.1177/0739456X04270466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman PG, Kenworthy JR. 1989. Cities and automobile dependence: an international sourcebook.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson P. 2017. Are valuations of place-based amenities driven by scale? Hous Stud. 32(4):449–469. doi:10.1080/02673037.2016.1219330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Collins KMT. 2007. The qualitative report a typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qual Rep. 12(2):281–316. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell S, Robinson J. 2012. Re)theorizing cities from the global south: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geogr. 33(4):593–617. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S. 2014. Is there a ‘south’perspective to urban studies?. In: Susan, Parnell, Sophie, Oldfield, Editors. The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. London: Routledge; p. 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall R, Carruthers JI. 2003. Does density exacerbate income segregation? Evidence from U.S. Metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000. Hous Policy Debate. 14(4):541–589. doi:10.1080/10511482.2003.9521487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez F. 2020. ‘The miracle of density’: the socio‐material epistemics of urban densification. Int J Urban Reg Res. 44(4):617–635. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pont MB, Haupt P, Berg P, Alstäde V, Heyman A. 2021. Systematic review and comparison of densification effects and planning motivations. Build Cities. 2(1):378. doi:10.5334/bc.125.
   Google Scholar
• Quastel N, Moos M, Lynch N. 2012. Sustainability-as-density and the return of the social: the case of Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Geogr. 33(7):1055–1084. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.33.7.1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley JM. 1998. Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal Econ Perspect. 12(2):127–138. doi:10.1257/jep.12.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao V. 2007. Proximate distances: the phenomenology of density in Mumbai. Built Environ. 33(2):227–248. doi:10.2148/benv.33.2.227.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport A. 1975. Toward a redefinition of density. Environ Behav. 7(2):133–158. doi:10.1177/001391657500700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport A. 1982. Urban design and human systems: on ways of relating buildings to urban fabric. Hum Energy Factors Urban Plann: A Syst Approach. 161–184. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7651-1.
   Google Scholar
• Relph E. 1976. Place and placelessness. [accessed 2017 May 2]. http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/clc/116180.
   Google Scholar
• Roshan G, Sarli R, Grab SW. 2021. The case of Tehran’s urban heat island, Iran: impacts of urban “lockdown” associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities Soc. 75:103263. doi:10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A. 2005. Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. J Am Plann Assoc. 71(2):147–158. doi:10.1080/01944360508976689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A. 2014. Worlding the South: Toward a post-colonial urban theory. In: Susan, Parnell, Sophie, Oldfield, Editors. The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South. London: Routledge; p. 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell L, Gifford R. 2010. Defining place attachment: a tripartite organizing framework. J Environ Psychol. 30(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Thomé K, Haybatollahi M, Kyttä M, Korpi J. 2013. The prospects for urban densification: a place-based study. Environ Res Lett. 8(2):025020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon D. 2000 April. A way of seeing people and place: phenomenology in environment-behavior research. Theor Perspect Environ -Behav Res. 157–178. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4701-3
   Google Scholar
• Seamon D. 2014. Place attachment and phenomenology: the synergystic dynamism of place. Place Attachment: Adv Theory Methods Appl. 11–22. doi:10.4324/9780203757765.
   Google Scholar
• Sedaghat A, Sharif M. 2022. Mitigation of the impacts of heat islands on energy consumption in buildings: a case study of the city of Tehran, Iran. Sustainable Cities Soc. 76:103435. doi:10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seghezzo L. 2009. The five dimensions of sustainability. Env Polit. 18(4):539–556. doi:10.1080/09644010903063669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamai SS. 1991. Sense of place: an empirical measuremen. Geoforum. 22(3):347–358. doi:10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh E, Shojaei R. 2008. The impacts of increasing urban density on neighbourhood’s social qualities (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi MR. 2020. Compact urban form: neighbouring and social activity. Sustainability. 12(5):1987. doi:10.3390/su12051987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi MR, Keivani R. 2019. Social sustainability discourse: a critical revisit. Urban Social Sustainability: Theory, Policy Practicepolicy. doi:10.4324/9781315115740.
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi MR, Keivani R. 2021. Social sustainability of compact neighbourhoods evidence from London and berlin. Sustainability (Switzerland). 13(4):2340. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoorcheh M, Varesi H, Mohammadi J, Litman T. 2016. Urban growth structure and travel behavior in Tehran City. Mod Appl Sci. 10(8):32. doi:10.5539/mas.v10n8p32.
   Google Scholar
• Sivam A, Karuppannan S, Davis MC. 2012. Stakeholders’ perception of residential density: a case study of Adelaide, Australia. J Hous Built Environ. 27(4):473–494. doi:10.1007/s10901-011-9265-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja EW. 1980. The socio-spatial dialectic. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 70(2):207–225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman RC. 1999. Sense of place as an indicator of community sustainability. For Chron. 75(5):765–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc75765-5.
   Google Scholar
• Talen E. 1999. Sense of community and neighbourhood form: an assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Stud. 36(8):1361–1379. doi:10.1080/0042098993033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touati-Morel A. 2015. Hard and soft densification policies in the Paris city-region. Int J Urban Reg Res. 39(3):603–612. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trentelman CK. 2009. Place attachment and community attachment: a primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Soc Nat Resour. 22(908553686):191–210. doi:10.1080/08941920802191712.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan YY. 1979. Space and place: humanistic perspective. Philos Geogr. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5.
   Google Scholar
• Turcu C. 2012. Local experiences of urban sustainability: researching housing market renewal interventions in three English neighbourhoods. Prog Plann. 78(3):101–150. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcu C. 2013. Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. J Environ Plann Manage. 56(5):695–719. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.698984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üçoğlu M, Güney KM, Keil R. 2020. Form, function, density: understanding the legacies of a century of modernist planning and urbanisation in Istanbul. In: Margot, Rubin, Alison, Todes, Philip, Harrison, Alexandra, Appelbaum, Editors. Densifying the city?. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ujang N, Kozlowski M, Maulan S. 2018. Linking place attachment and social interaction: towards meaningful public places. J Place Manage Dev. 11(1):115–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-01-2017-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shaw D. 2018. The complexity of high-density neighbourhood development in China: intensification, deregulation and social sustainability challenges. Sustainable Cities Soc. 43:578–586. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S. 2020. A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst People. 16(1):304–325. doi:10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J. 2013. The devastating conquest of the lived by the conceived. Space Cult. 16(3):364–380. doi:10.1177/1206331213487064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wirth T, Grêt-Regamey A, Moser C, Stauffacher M. 2016. Exploring the influence of perceived urban change on residents’ place attachment. J Environ Psychol. 46:67–82. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers CWJ. 2009. Place and the“spatial turn” in geography and in history. J Hist Ideas. 70(4):637–658. doi:10.1353/jhi.0.0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcraft S. 2015. Understanding and measuring social sustainability. J Urban Regener Renewal. 2:133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Yunda JG, Sletto B. 2020. Densification, private sector-led development, and social polarization in the global south: lessons from a century of zoning in Bogotá. Cities. 97:102550. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareyian M. 2015. The social impacts of increasing urban density in Tehran (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Zube EH, Friedman S, Simcox DE. 1989. Landscape change: perceptions and physical measures. Environ Manage. 13(5):639–644. doi:10.1007/BF01874970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar