Towards climate action and UN sustainable development goals in BRICS economies: do export diversification, fiscal decentralisation and environmental innovation matter?

References

• Abid A, Mehmood U, Tariq S, Haq ZU. 2022. The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(8):11654–11662. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D. 2021. Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools. Environ Dev Sustain. 23(11):16057–16082. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Zheng J. 2021. Do innovation in environmental-related technologies cyclically and asymmetrically affect environmental sustainability in BRICS nations? Technol Soc. 67:101746. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Le HP. 2021. Linking information communication technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(7):8770–8781. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11205-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K. 2020. Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy. 67:101677. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Cary M, Le HP. 2021. Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: an aggregated and disaggregated investigation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 86:106511. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S. 2020. Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc. 55:102064. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Ul Haq Z, Khan Z, Khattak SI, Ur Rahman Z, Khan S 2019. Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from China. Econ Res-Ekon Istraz. 32(1):2099–2121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anser MK, Alharthi M, Aziz B, Wasim S. 2020. Impact of urbanization, economic growth, and population size on residential carbon emissions in the SAARC countries. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 22(4):923–936. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01833-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anser MK, Usman M, Godil DI, Shabbir MS, Sharif A, Tabash MI, Lopez LB. 2021. Does globalization affect the green economy and environment? The relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(37):51105–51118. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14243-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apergis N, Jebli MB, Youssef SB. 2018. Does renewable energy consumption and health expenditures decrease carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Renew Energ. 127:1011–1016. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows G, Ollivier H. 2021. Foreign demand, developing country exports, and CO2 emissions: firm-level evidence from India. J Dev Econ. 149:102587. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterbury SP, Fernando JL. 2006. Rescaling governance and the impacts of political and environmental decentralization: an introduction. World Dev. 34(11):1851–1863. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baye RS, Olper A, Ahenkan A, Musah-Surugu IJ, Anuga SW, Darkwah S. 2021. Renewable energy consumption in Africa: evidence from a bias corrected dynamic panel. Sci Total Environ. 766:142583. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölük G, Mert M. 2014. Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy. 74:439–446. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can M, Ahmad M, Khan Z. 2021. The impact of export composition on environment and energy demand: evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(25):33599–33612. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13084-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can M, Dogan B, Saboori B. 2020. Does trade matter for environmental degradation in developing countries? New evidence in the context of export product diversification. Environ Sci Pollut R. 27(13):14702–14710. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08000-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Zhao T, Liao Z. 2020. The impact of technology-environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in China’s transportation sector. Environ Sci Pollut R. 27(23):29485–29501. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08983-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Awan U, Ahmad S, Tan Z. 2021. How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technol Forecast Soc. 162:120398. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M. 2019. The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut R. 26(15):15028–15038. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04891-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M, Boamah KB, Ampon-Wireko S, Dogbe CSK. 2021. Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. J Clean Prod. 281:125143. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis A, Shepherd B. 2011. Trade facilitation and export diversification. The World Eco. 34(1):101–122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01303.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Sun Y. 2021. The nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: from the perspective of biased technological progress. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(23):29890–29899. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12833-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C. 2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model. 29(4):1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan S. 2021. Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and building sector carbon emissions in the BRICS countries. J Environ Manage. 293:112780. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Export Import Bank of India (2014) Research & development in BRICS: an insight. Occasional Paper No. 168https://www.bricsibcm.org/images/publications/ResearchandDevelopmentinBRICSAn_Insight.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fell H, Kaffine DT. 2014. Can decentralized planning really achieve first-best in the presence of environmental spillovers? J Environ Econ Manag. 68(1):46–53. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gozgor G, Can M. 2016. Export product diversification and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut R. 23(21):21594–21603. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7403-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Zhou Y, Ali S, Shahzad U, Cui L. 2021. Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: an empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. J Environ Manage. 292:112779. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Chen YF, Liao H, Wei YM. 2020. China’s fiscal decentralization and environmental quality: theory and an empirical study. Envir & Dev Eco. 25(2):159–181. doi:10.1017/S1355770X19000263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu G, Can M, Paramati SR, Doğan B, Fang J. 2020. The effect of import product diversification on carbon emissions: new evidence for sustainable economic policies. Econ Anal Policy. 65:198–210. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal N, Abbasi KR, Shinwari R, Guangcai W, Ahmad M, Tang K. 2021. Does exports diversification and environmental innovation achieve carbon neutrality target of OECD economies? J Environ Manage. 291:112648. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain V, Purnomo EP, Islam M, Mughal N, Guerrero JWG, Ullah S, Ullah S. 2021. Controlling environmental pollution: dynamic role of fiscal decentralization in CO2 emission in Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(46):65150–65159. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15256-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C, Chiang M, Chen B 1999. International R&D spillovers: an applicationof estimation and inference in panel cointegration.Oxford. Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 61(Special Issue):691–709.
   Google Scholar
• Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, Kui Z. 2021. Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renew Energ. 171:479–491. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MK, Khan MI, Rehan M. 2020. The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan. Financ Innov. 6(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s40854-019-0162-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan Z, Ali S, Umar M, Kirikkaleli D, Jiao Z. 2020. Consumption-based carbon emissions and international trade in G7 countries: the role of environmental innovation and renewable energy. Sci Total Environ. 730:138945. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Ahmad M. 2022a. The cyclical impact of innovation in green and sustainable technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in OECD economies. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(22):33809–33825. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18577-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Ahmad M. 2022b. The cyclical impact of green and sustainable technology research on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(15):22687–22707. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17368-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Ul Haq Z, Shaofu G, Hang J. 2022. On the goals of sustainable production and the conditions of environmental sustainability: does cyclical innovation in green and sustainable technologies determine carbon dioxide emissions in G-7 economies. Sustainable Production And Consumption. 29:406–420. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Ul Haq Z, Shaofu G, Hang J 2022. On the goals of sustainable production and the conditions of environmental sustainability: Does cyclical innovation in green and sustainable technologies determine carbon dioxide emissions in G-7 economies. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 29:406–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konisky DM. 2007. Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: is there a race to the bottom? Am J Pol Sci. 51(4):853–872. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00285.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laeven L, Valencia F 2020. Systemic banking crises database II. IMF Econ Rev. 68:307–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson A. 2003. Environmental regulatory competition: a status report and some new evidence. Natl Tax J. 56(1):91–106. doi:10.17310/ntj.2003.1.06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom. 108(1):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Ahmad M, Fareed Z, Hassan T, Kirikkaleli D. 2021. Role of trade openness, export diversification, and renewable electricity output in realizing carbon neutrality dream of China. J Environ Manage. 297:113419. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin B, Ma R. 2022. Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technol Forecast Soc. 176:121434. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin B, Zhou Y. 2021. Does fiscal decentralization improve energy and environmental performance? New perspective on vertical fiscal imbalance. Appl Energ. 302:117495. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Kim H, Liang S, Kwon OS. 2018. Export diversification and ecological footprint: a comparative study on EKC theory among Korea, Japan, and China. Sustainability. 10(10):3657. doi:10.3390/su10103657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Ding D, He J. 2019. Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and haze pollution decoupling effects: a simple model and evidence from China. Comput Econ. 54(4):1423–1441. doi:10.1007/s10614-017-9700-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Ren X, Cheng C, Wang Z. 2020. The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Sci Total Environ. 718:137379. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Feng J, Zhai G, Razzaq A 2022. Influence of fiscal decentralization and renewable energy investment on ecological sustainability in EU: What is the moderating role of institutional governance?. Renew Energ. 200:1265–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mania E, Rieber A. 2019. Product export diversification and sustainable economic growth in developing countries. Structural Change And Economic Dynamics. 51:138–151. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mania E. 2020. Export diversification and CO2 emissions: an augmented environmental Kuznets curve. J Int Dev. 32(2):168–185. doi:10.1002/jid.3441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millimet DL. 2003. Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism. J Reg Sci. 43(4):711–733. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4146.2003.00317.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathaniel S, Anyanwu O, Shah M. 2020. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environ Sci Pollut R. 27(13):14601–14613. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Development Bank, (2017). Developing solutions for a sustainable future annual report. https://www.ndb.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/NDB_AR2017. pdf [Accessed, 05.11.2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ngepah N, Udeagha MC. 2018. African regional trade agreements and intra-African trade. J Eco Inte. 33(1):1176–1199. doi:10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngepah N, Udeagha MC. 2019. Supplementary trade benefits of multi-memberships in African regional trade agreements. J African Busi. 20(4):505–524. doi:10.1080/15228916.2019.1584719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata UK. 2018. Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod. 187:770–779. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni P. 2015. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. MIT Press. 83(4):727–731. doi:10.1162/003465301753237803.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH, Yamagata T. 2008. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom. 142(1):50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH. 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. SSRN Electron J. doi:10.2139/ssrn.572504.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH. 2006. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica. 74(4):967–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. J Appl Econ. 22(2):265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani T (2021). Does fiscal decentralization and green innovation mitigate the environmental pollution with the help of Institutional governance? Evidence from Asian countries using novel (MMQR). Research Square 10.21203/rs.3.rs-291426/v1,
   Google Scholar
• Requate T, Unold W. 2003. Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology: will the true ranking please stand up? Eur Econ Rev. 47(1):125–146. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboori B, Zaibet L, Boughanmi H. 2022. Export diversification, energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation: evidence from Oman. Int J Ambient Ener. 43(1):8486–8504. (just-accepted). doi:10.1080/01430750.2022.2091026.
   Google Scholar
• Santra S. 2017. The effect of technological innovation on production-based energy and CO2 emission productivity: evidence from BRICS countries. African J Sci, Tech, Inn & Dev. 9(5):503–512. doi:10.1080/20421338.2017.1308069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad U, Doğan B, Sinha A, Fareed Z. 2021. Does Export product diversification help to reduce energy demand: exploring the contextual evidences from the newly industrialized countries. Energy. 214:118881. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kautish P. 2019. Dynamism between selected macroeconomic determinants and electricity consumption in India: an NARDL approach. Int J Soc Econ. 46(6):805–821. doi:10.1108/IJSE-11-2018-0586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kautish P. 2020a. Linkages between financial development and economic growth in the middle-income countries of South Asia: a panel data investigation. Vision. 24(2):140–150. doi:10.1177/0972262920923908.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kautish P. 2021. Aid-growth association and role of economic policies: new evidence from South and Southeast Asian Countries. Global Business Review. 22(3):735–752. doi:10.1177/0972150918822059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kautish P, Kumar DS. 2018. Impact of selected macroeconomic determinants on economic growth in India: an empirical study. Vision. 22(4):405–415. doi:10.1177/0972262918803173.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kautish P, Kumar DS. 2021. Assessing dynamism of crude oil demand in middle-income countries of South Asia: a panel data investigation. Global Business Review. 22(1):169–183. doi:10.1177/0972150918795367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh A, Hassan OI. 2021. Investigating the relationship between export diversification and river water pollution: a time series analysis of the Indian experience. Arthaniti: J Eco Theory And Prac. 09767479211040135. doi:10.1177/09767479211040135.
   Google Scholar
• Sigman H. 2014. Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution levels and variation. Land Econ. 90(1):114–130. doi:10.3368/le.90.1.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song M, Du J, Tan KH. 2018. Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity. Int J Prod Econ. 205:359–367. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su CW, Umar M, Khan Z. 2021. Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote renewable energy consumption? Analyzing the role of political risk. Sci Total Environ. 751:142220. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Du J, Wang S. 2020. Environmental regulations, enterprise productivity, and green technological progress: large-scale data analysis in China. Ann Oper Res. 290(1):369–384. doi:10.1007/s10479-019-03249-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufail M, Song L, Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D, Khan S. 2021. Do fiscal decentralization and natural resources rent curb carbon emissions? Evidence from developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(35):49179–49190. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13865-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Breitenbach MC. 2021. Estimating the trade-environmental quality relationship in SADC with a dynamic heterogeneous panel model. African Review Of Economics And Finance. 13(1):113–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Breitenbach MC. 2023a. Exploring the moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Financ Innov. 9(1):5. doi:10.1186/s40854-022-00396-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Breitenbach MC. 2023b. On the asymmetric effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions in SADC with a nonlinear ARDL approach. Discov Sustain. 4(1):2. doi:10.1007/s43621-022-00117-3.
   Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Breitenbach MC. 2023c. Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and CO2 emissions in South Africa: fresh policy insights. Financ Innov. 9(1):50. doi:10.1186/s40854-023-00453-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Breitenbach MC. 2023d. Can fiscal decentralization be the route to the race to zero emissions in South Africa? Fresh policy insights from novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lag simulations approach. Environ Sci Pollut R. 30(16):46446–46474. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-25306-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Breitenbach MC. 2023e. The role of financial development in climate change mitigation: fresh policy insights from South Africa. Biophys Econ Sust. 8(1):1. doi:10.1007/s41247-023-00110-y.
   Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Muchapondwa E. 2022a. Investigating the moderating role of economic policy uncertainty in environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(51):77199–77237. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21107-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Muchapondwa E. 2022b. Environmental sustainability in South Africa: understanding the criticality of economic policy uncertainty, fiscal decentralization, and green innovation. Sustain Dev. 1–14. doi:10.1002/sd.2473.
   Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Muchapondwa E. 2023a. Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: fresh policy insights from the BRICS nations. Int J Sust Dev World. 1–17. doi:10.1080/13504509.2023.2183526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Muchapondwa E. 2023b. Achieving regional sustainability and carbon neutrality target in BRICS economies: understanding the importance of fiscal decentralization, export diversification and environmental innovation. Sustain Dev. 1–15. doi:10.1002/sd.2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2019. Revisiting trade and environment nexus in South Africa: fresh evidence from new measure. Environ Sci Pollut R. 26(28):29283–29306. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05944-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2020. Trade liberalization and the geography of industries in South Africa: fresh evidence from a new measure. International Journal Of Urban Sciences. 24(3):354–396. doi:10.1080/12265934.2019.1695652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2021. The asymmetric effect of trade openness on economic growth in South Africa: a nonlinear ARDL approach. Economic Change And Restructuring. 54(2):491–540. doi:10.1007/s10644-020-09285-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2022a. Striving towards environmental sustainability in the BRICS economies: the combined influence of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation. International Journal Of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 30(2):111–125. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2123411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2022b. Does trade openness mitigate the environmental degradation in South Africa? Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(13):19352–19377. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2022c. Dynamic ARDL Simulations Effects of Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, and Institutional Quality on Environmental Sustainability: evidence from South Africa. Sustainability. 14(16):10268. doi:10.3390/su141610268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2022d. Disaggregating the environmental effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in South Africa: fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Econ Change Restruct. 55(3):1767–1814. doi:10.1007/s10644-021-09368-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2022e. The asymmetric effect of technological innovation on CO2 emissions in South Africa: new evidence from the QARDL approach. Frontiers In Envir Sci. 10:985719. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.985719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah N. 2023. Can public–private partnership investment in energy (PPPI) mitigate CO2 emissions in South Africa? Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Front Environ Sci. 10:1044605. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1044605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeagha MC, Ngepah NN. 2021. A step Towards Environmental Mitigation in South Africa: does Trade Liberalisation Really Matter? Fresh Evidence from a Novel Dynamic ARDL Simulations Approach. Research Square. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-419113/v1
   Google Scholar
• Ulucak D, Ulucak R. 2020. How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ. 712:136504. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNIDO (2019) Industrial development report 2020- industrializing in the digital age. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-11/UNIDO_IDR2020-MainReport_overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Usman M, Hammar N. 2021. Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environ Sci Pollut R. 28(12):15519–15536. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Chang HL, Rizvi SKA, Sari A. 2020. Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries? J Environ Manage. 270:110829. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QS, Su CW, Hua YF, Umar M 2021. Can fiscal decentralisation regulate the impact of industrial structure on energy efficiency?. Econ Res-Ekon Istraz. 34(1):1727–1751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimin Z, Chishti MZ, Rehman A, Ahmad M. 2022. A pathway toward future sustainability: assessing the influence of innovation shocks on CO2 emissions in developing economies. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(4):4786–4809. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01634-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund J. 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 69(6):709–748. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2021) World development indicators. http://www.worldbank.org. Accessed 9 Apr 2021
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2019) World development indicators. http://www.worldbank.org. Accessed 9 Apr 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Xia S, You D, Tang Z, Yang B. 2021. Analysis of the spatial effect of fiscal decentralization and environmental decentralization on carbon emissions under the pressure of officials’ promotion. Energies. 14(7):1878. doi:10.3390/en14071878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao-Sheng L, Yu-Ling L, Rafique MZ, Asl MG. 2022. The effect of fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and economic development on haze pollution: empirical evidence for 270 Chinese cities during 2007–2016. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(14):20318–20332. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17175-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao-Sheng L, Yu-Ling L, Rafique MZ, Asl MG 2022. The effect of fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and economic development on haze pollution: empirical evidence for 270 Chinese cities during 2007–2016. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(14):20318–20332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin D, Ahmad M, Lei H, Khattak SI. 2021. Do innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States? Technol Soc. 67:101761. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M. 2022. Research on the relationship between fiscal decentralization and environmental management efficiency under competitive pressure: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(16):23392–23406. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17426-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You C, Khattak SI, Ahmad M. 2022. Do international collaborations in environmental-related technology development in the US pay off in combating carbon dioxide emissions? Role of domestic environmental innovation, renewable energy consumption, and trade openness. Environ Sci Pollut R. 29(13):19693–19713. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17146-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar MW, Saleem MM, Destek MA, Caglar AE. 2022. The dynamic linkage between remittances, export diversification, education, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in top remittance‐receiving countries. Sustain Dev. 30(1):165–175. doi:10.1002/sd.2236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Zhang ZY, Liang QM. 2017. An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energ Policy. 103:203–211. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner A 1962. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc. 57(298):348–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar