895
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

What motivates urban climate leaders? A study of urban climate governance in eight Swedish municipalities

Pages 267-281 | Received 03 May 2023, Accepted 26 Aug 2023, Published online: 06 Sep 2023

References

  • Abel D. 2021. The diffusion of climate policies among German municipalities. J Public Policy. 41(1):111–136. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X19000199.
  • Acuto M, Leffel B. 2021. Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks. Urban Stud. 58(9):1758–1774. doi: 10.1177/0042098020929261.
  • Adams W. 2015. Conducting semi-structured interviews. doi: 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.
  • Angelo H, Wachsmuth D. 2020. Why does everyone think cities can save the planet? Urban Stud. 57(11):2201–2221. doi: 10.1177/0042098020919081.
  • Araos M. 2023. Democracy underwater: Public participation, technical expertise, and climate infrastructure planning in New York city. Theor Soc. 52(1):1–34. doi: 10.1007/s11186-021-09459-9.
  • Bansard JS, Pattberg PH, Widerberg O. 2017. Cities to the Rescue? Assessing the performance of Transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. Int Environ Agreements. 17(2):229–246. doi: 10.1007/s10784-016-9318-9.
  • Boyd E, Juhola S. 2015. Adaptive climate change governance for urban resilience. Urban Stud. 52(7):1234–1264. doi: 10.1177/0042098014527483.
  • Braunschweiger D, Ingold K. 2023. What drives local climate change adaptation? A qualitative comparative analysis. Environ Science & Policy. 145(July):40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.013.
  • Brink E, Wamsler C. 2018. Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: Mapping Citizen-municipality Interactions: Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation. Env Pol Gov. 28(2):82–97. doi: 10.1002/eet.1795.
  • Bulkeley H. 2023. The condition of urban climate experimentation. Sustain Sci Pra Policy. 19(1):2188726. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2023.2188726.
  • Castán Broto V. 2017. Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World Dev. 93(May):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031.
  • Chu Z, Bian C, Yang J. 2022. How can public participation Improve environmental governance in China? A policy Simulation approach with Multi-Player Evolutionary Game. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 95:106782. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106782.
  • Dale A, Sarah B, John R, Chris S. 2018. Multilevel governance of Sustainability transitions in canada: Policy alignment, innovation, and evaluation. In: Hughes S, Chu EK Mason SG, editors. Climate change in cities: Innovations in multi-level governance. Cham: The Urban Book Series, Springer International Publishing; pp. 343–358. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65003-6_17.
  • Day JW, Hall C. 2016. America’s most sustainable cities and regions. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3243-6.
  • Evans J, Vácha T, Kok H, Watson K. 2021. How cities learn: From experimentation to transformation. Urban Plan. 6(1):171–182. doi: 10.17645/up.v6i1.3545.
  • Feiock RC, Krause RM, Hawkins CV. 2017. The impact of administrative structure on the ability of city governments to overcome functional collective action dilemmas: A climate and energy perspective. J Pub Admin Res Theory: J-PART. 27(4):615–628. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mux021.
  • Fenton P, Gustafsson S. 2017. Moving from high-level words to local action — governance for urban Sustainability in municipalities. Curr Opin Env Sust. 26–27(September):129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009.
  • Few Roger, Brown Katrina, Tompkins EL. 2007. Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the Illusion of Inclusion. Clim Policy. 7(1):46–59. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637.
  • Ford JD, King D. 2015. A Framework for Examining adaptation Readiness. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 20(4):505–526. doi: 10.1007/s11027-013-9505-8.
  • Gardner R, Elinor O, James W. 1994. Social capital and cooperation: communication, bounded rationality, and behavioral heuristics. In: Schulz U, Albers W Mueller U, editors. Social dilemmas and cooperation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; pp. 375–411. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78860-4_20.
  • Glaas E, Hjerpe M, Wihlborg E, Storbjörk S. 2022. Disentangling municipal capacities for Citizen participation in transformative climate adaptation. Env Pol Gov. 32(3):179–191. doi: 10.1002/eet.1982.
  • Glass L-M, Newig J. 2019. Governance for achieving the sustainable development goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions? Earth Sys Govern. 2(April):100031. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031.
  • Gordon DJ, Johnson CA. 2017. The orchestration of global urban climate governance: Conducting power in the post-Paris climate regime. Env Polit. 26(4):694–714. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1320829.
  • Granberg M, Elander I. 2007. Local governance and climate change: Reflections on the Swedish experience. Local Environ. 12(5):537–548. doi: 10.1080/13549830701656911.
  • Hansen KB, Agger A. 2023. Copenhagen CO2 Neutrality in 2025? A polycentric analysis of urban climate governance in Copenhagen 2006–2020. Env Pol Gov. 33(3):288–300. doi: 10.1002/eet.2030.
  • Haupt W, Eckersley P, Irmisch J, Kern K. 2022. How do local factors Shape transformation Pathways towards climate-neutral and Resilient cities? Eur Plan Stud. 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2147394.
  • Haupt W, Kern K. 2022. Explaining climate policy pathways of unlikely city pioneers: The case of the German city of Remscheid. Urban Clim. 45(September):101220. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101220.
  • Heijden van der J. 2018. City and subnational governance: High ambitions, innovative instruments and polycentric collaborations? In: Jordan A, Huitema D, van Asselt H Forster J, editors. Governing climate change: polycentricity in action? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 81–96. doi:10.1017/9781108284646.006.
  • Heikkinen M. 2022. The role of network participation in climate change mitigation: A city-level analysis. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 14(1):1–14. doi: 10.1080/19463138.2022.2036163.
  • Helsingborg. 2022. Klimat- och energiplan för Helsingborg 2018-2024. [accessed 2023 03 07]. https://helsingborg.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/kep-2018-2024.pdf.
  • Herdt T, Muñoz Sanz V. 2023. Experts as Game Changers? A Critical Discourse analysis of climate measures in the Metropolitan Region of Amsterdam. UP. 8(2):307–321. doi: 10.17645/up.v8i2.6413.
  • Hess DJ, McKane RG. 2021. Making Sustainability plans more equitable: An analysis of 50 U.S. Cities. Local Environ. 26(4):461–476. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2021.1892047.
  • Hickmann T, Stehle F. 2019. The embeddedness of urban climate politics in multilevel governance: A case study of south africa’s major cities. J Environ Develop. 28(1):54–77. doi: 10.1177/1070496518819121.
  • Hjerpe M, Glaas E, Storbjörk S. 2018. Scrutinizing virtual citizen involvement in planning: Ten applications of an online participatory tool. Polit Govern. 6(3):159. doi: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481.
  • Hjerpe M, Storbjörk S, Alberth J. 2015. ‘There is nothing political in it’: Triggers of local political leaders’ engagement in climate adaptation. Local Environ. 20(8):855–873. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2013.872092.
  • Hofstad H, Millstein M, Tønnesen A, Vedeld T, Bruun Hansen K. 2021. The role of goal-setting in urban climate governance. Earth Sys Govern. 7(March):100088. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100088.
  • Homsy GC. 2018. Unlikely pioneers: Creative climate change policymaking in Smaller U.S. Cities. J Environ Stud Sci. 8(2):121–131. doi: 10.1007/s13412-018-0483-8.
  • Homsy GC, Warner ME. 2015. Cities and Sustainability: Polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Aff Rev. 51(1):46–73. doi: 10.1177/1078087414530545.
  • Hsu A, Tan J, Yi Ming N, Toh W, Vanda R, Goyal N. 2020. Performance determinants show European cities are delivering on climate mitigation. Nat Clim Chang. 10(11):1015–1022. doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0879-9.
  • Hughes S, Miller Runfola D, Cormier B. 2018. Issue proximity and policy Response in local governments. Rev Policy Res. 35(2):192–212. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12285.
  • Johnson CA. 2018. The Power of cities in global climate politics: Saviours, supplicants or agents of change? London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-59469-3.
  • Jordan AJ, Huitema D, Hildén M, van Asselt H, Rayner TJ, Schoenefeld JJ, Tosun J, Forster J, Boasson EL. 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat Clim Chang. 5(11):977–982. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2725.
  • Juhola S, Seppälä A, Klein J. 2020. Participatory Experimentation on a climate Street. Env Pol Gov. 30(6):373–384. doi: 10.1002/eet.1900.
  • Kalafatis S, Lemos M. 2017. The emergence of climate change policy entrepreneurs in urban regions. Reg Environ Change. 17(6):1791–1799. doi: 10.1007/s10113-017-1154-0.
  • Katz B, Nowak J. 2018. The New localism: how cities can thrive in the age of populism. First ed. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Kern K. 2019. Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: Embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Env Polit. 28(1):125–145. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1521979.
  • Kern K, Eckersley P, Haupt W. 2023. Diffusion and Upscaling of municipal climate mitigation and adaptation strategies in Germany. Reg Environ Change. 23(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10113-022-02020-z.
  • Khan F, Sovacool B. 2016. Testing the efficacy of voluntary urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Clim Change. 139(2):141–154. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1793-z
  • Krause RM. 2011. Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. Cities. J Urban Aff. 33(1):45–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00510.x.
  • Lund 2022. Klimatneutrala Lund 2030: Att göra. [accessed 2023 03 07]. https://lund.se/download/18.3b02bae717dc272d0ec29319/1643274903267/Klimatneutrala%20Lund%202030.%20Att%20g%C3%B6ra.%20Version%202022-01-27.pdf.
  • McCann E. 2013. Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the Extrospective city. Urban Geogr. 34(1):5–29. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.778627.
  • OECD. 2020. Innovative Citizen participation and New democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/339306da-en.
  • Osthorst W. 2020. Tensions in urban Transitions. Conceptualizing conflicts in local climate policy Arrangements. Sustainability. 13(1):78. doi: 10.3390/su13010078.
  • Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons : The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. http://archive.org/details/governingcommons0000ostr.
  • Ostrom E. 2009. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763.
  • Otto A, Kern K, Haupt W, Eckersley P, Thieken AH. 2021. Ranking local climate policy: Assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities. Clim Change. 167(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03142-9.
  • Paterson M, Tobin P, VanDeveer SD. 2022. Climate governance antagonisms: Policy stability and repoliticization. Global Environ Polit. 22(2):1–11. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00647.
  • Papin M. 2020. Where do novelties come from? A Social network analysis of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. Earth Sys Govern. 4(June):100064. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100064.
  • Pickering J, Hickmann T, Bäckstrand K, Kalfagianni A, Bloomfield M, Mert A, Ransan-Cooper H, Lo A. 2022. Democratising Sustainability Transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic Practices in environmental governance. Earth Sys Govern. 11:100131. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.
  • Reckien D, Johannes F, Marta O, Oliver H. 2015. The influence of drivers and barriers on urban adaptation and mitigation plans—an Empirical analysis of European cities. Edited by Kristie L Ebi PLoS One. 10(8):e0135597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135597.
  • Romero-Lankao P, Bulkeley H, Pelling M, Burch S, Gordon DJ, Gupta J, Johnson C, Kurian P, Lecavalier E, Simon D, et al. 2018. Urban transformative potential in a changing climate. Nat Clim Chang. 8(9):754–756. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0.
  • Rosvall M, Gustafsson M, Åberg M. 2023. Strategic visions for local sustainability transition: Measuring maturity in Swedish municipalities. J Environ Pol Plan. June 1–15 . doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2023.2218273.
  • Saldana J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Vol. 2, Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE Publ.
  • Salvia M, Reckien D, Pietrapertosa F, Eckersley P, Spyridaki N-A, Krook-Riekkola A, Olazabal M, De Gregorio Hurtado S, Simoes SG, Geneletti D, et al. 2021. Will climate mitigation ambitions lead to carbon neutrality? An analysis of the local-level plans of 327 cities in the EU. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 135(January):110253. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110253.
  • Schoenefeld JJ, Hildén M, Schulze K, Sorvali J. 2023. What Motivates and Hinders municipal adaptation policy? Exploring vertical and horizontal diffusion in Hessen and Finland. Reg Environ Change. 23(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s10113-023-02048-9.
  • Sherman MH, Ford J. 2014. Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: An evaluation of projects in developing nations. Clim Policy. 14(3):417–441. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.859501.
  • Soni A, Jose J, Kingsley GA. 2022. When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions. Rev Policy Res. n/a (n/a) accessed 2023 July 26 doi: 10.1111/ropr.12524.
  • Steffen B, Schmidt TS, Tautorat P. 2019. Measuring whether municipal climate networks make a difference: The case of utility-scale solar pv investment in large global cities. Clim Policy. 19(7):908–922. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1599804.
  • Storbjörk S, Hjerpe M, Glaas E. 2019. ‘Take it or leave it’: From collaborative to regulative developer dialogues in six Swedish municipalities aiming to climate-proof urban planning. Sustainability. 11(23):1–16. doi: 10.3390/su11236739.
  • Susskind L, Kim A. 2022. Building local capacity to adapt to climate change. Clim Policy. 22(5):593–606. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1874860.
  • Svara JH, Watt TC, Soun Jang H. 2013. How are U.S. Cities doing Sustainability? Who is getting on the Sustainability Train, and why? Cityscape. 15(1):9–44.
  • Switzer D, Jung J. 2022. Contextual Responsiveness in U.S. Local government climate policy. Rev Policy Res. n/a (n/a) Accessed 2023 July 26 doi: 10.1111/ropr.12518.
  • Tønnesen A, Sandkjær Hanssen G, Bruun Hansen K, Valencia SC. 2022. Integrative climate leadership in multi-level policy packages for urban mobility - a study of governance systems in two Nordic Urban Regions. Transp Policy. 128(November):309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.05.007.
  • Touchant L. 2022. Municipal climate leadership in Canada: The role of leadership in the expansion of municipal climate action. IJPL. 19(2):97–115. doi: 10.1108/IJPL-08-2021-0040.
  • Uittenbroek CJ, Mees HLP, Hegger DLT, Driessen PPJ. 2022. Everybody should Contribute, but not Too much: Perceptions of local governments on Citizen Responsibilisation in climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Env Pol Gov. 32(3):192–202. doi: 10.1002/eet.1983.
  • Uittenbroek C, Mees H, Hegger D, Driessen PPJ. 2019. The design of public participation: Who participates, when and how? Insights in climate adaptation planning from the Netherlands. J Environ Plan Manag. 62(14):2529–2547. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1569503.
  • Van der Heijden J. 2019. Studying urban climate governance: Where to begin, what to look for, and how to make a meaningful contribution to scholarship and practice. Earth Sys Govern. 1(May):100005. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005.
  • Vedeld T, Hofstad H, Solli H, Sandkjær Hanssen G. 2021. Polycentric urban climate governance: Creating Synergies between Integrative and Interactive governance in Oslo. Env Pol Gov. 31(4):347–360. doi: 10.1002/eet.1935.
  • Växjö 2021. Klimatanpassningsplan för Växjö kommunkoncern. [accessed 2023 03 07]. https://www.vaxjo.se/download/18.324ca1bc1790d6528bc40889/1619774424492/Klimatanpassningsplan%20f%C3%B6r%20V%C3%A4xj%C3%B6%20kommunkoncern.pdf.
  • Wamsler C, Alkan-Olsson J, Björn H, Falck H, Hanson H, Oskarsson T, Simonsson E, Zelmerlow F. 2020. Beyond participation: When citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Clim Change. 158(2):235–254. doi: 10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9.
  • Watts M. 2017. Cities spearhead climate action. Nat Clim Chang. 7(8):537–538. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3358.
  • Wolfram M, Borgström S, Farrelly M. 2019. Urban transformative capacity: From concept to practice. Ambio. 48(5):437–448. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01169-y.
  • Wurzel RKW, Liefferink D, Torney D. 2019. Pioneers, leaders and followers in multilevel and polycentric climate governance. Env Polit. 28(1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1522033.
  • Yeganeh A, Mccoy A, Schenk T. Determinants of climate change policy adoption: A meta-analysis. Urban Clim. 2019 November. 31:100547. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100547.
  • Zeigermann U, Kammerer M, Böcher M. 2022. What Drives local communities to Engage in climate change mitigation activities? Examining the Rural–urban Divide. Rev Policy Res. n/a (n/a) Accessed 2023 July 26 doi: 10.1111/ropr.12528.
  • Ziervogel G, Cowen A, Ziniades J. 2016. Moving from adaptive to transformative capacity: Building Foundations for Inclusive, Thriving, and Regenerative urban Settlements. Sustainability. 8(9):955. doi: 10.3390/su8090955.