Engaging the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 in strategic governance of “Europe’s most sustainable city”

References

• Antikainen R, Lähtinen K, Leppänen M, Furman E. 2013. Vihreä talous suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa (Green economy in a Finnish society). Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha E, Caprioli C, Cotella G. 2022. Unpacking SDG target 11.A: what is it about and how to measure its progress? City And Environ Interactions. 14(2022 Apr):100080. doi: 10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100080.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann F, Hickmann T, Sénit CA, Beisheim M, Bernstein S, Chasek P, Grob L, Kim RE, Kotze LJ, Nilsson M, et al. 2022. Scientific evidence on the political impact of the sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain. 5(2022):795–800. doi: 10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5.
   Google Scholar
• Bilsky E, Moreno AC, Fernández Tortosa A. 2021. Local governments and SDG localisation: reshaping multilevel governance from the bottom up. J Of Human Dev And Capa. 22(4):713–724. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2021.1986690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter N. 2013. Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. Environ Politics. 22(1):73–94. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff P. 1996. Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities. Environ Politics. 5(3):476–500. doi: 10.1080/09644019608414283.
   Google Scholar
• Ciambra A, Siragusa A, Proietti P, Stamos I. 2023. Monitoring SDG localisation: an evidence-based approach to standardised monitoring frameworks. J Of Urb Ecology. 9(1):juad013. doi: 10.1093/jue/juad013.
   Google Scholar
• Ciambra A, Stamos I, Siragusa A. 2023. Localizing and monitoring climate neutrality through the sustainable development goals (SDGs) framework: the case of Madrid. Sust. 15(6):4819. doi: 10.3390/su15064819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianchi J. 2015. Radical environmentalism: nature, identity and more-than-human agency. London: Springer; p. 191.
   Google Scholar
• The City of Espoo. 2020. Voluntary local review: implementation of the United Nations’ sustainable development goals 2030 in the city on Espoo. https://www.local2030.org/pdf/vlr/EspooVLR2020Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Croese S, Oloko M, Simon D, Valencia SC. 2021. Bringing the global to the local: the challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 13(3):435–447. doi: 10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly HE. 1977. Steady-state economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duman O, Mäntysalo R, Granqvist K, Johnson E, Ronikonmäki NM. 2022. Challenges in Land Use and Transport Planning Integration in Helsinki Metropolitan Region—A Historical-Institutional Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland). 14(1):146. doi: 10.3390/su14010146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins P. 1993. ‘Limits to growth’ and ‘sustainable development’: grappling with ecological realities. Ecol Econ. 8(3):269–288. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(93)90062-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortum. Espoo district heating transformation 2014-2029: Espoo clean heat. [accessed 2023 Oct 25] https://www.fortum.com/products-and-services/heating-cooling/espoo-clean-heat
   Google Scholar
• Global Taskforce of local and regional governments. 2016. Roadmap for localizing the SDGs: implementation and monitoring at subnational level. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/commitments/818_11195_commitment_ROADMAPLOCALIZINGSDGS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist K, Sarjamo S, Mäntysalo R. 2019. Polycentricity as spatial imaginary: the case of Helsinki city plan. Eur Plan Stud. 27(4):739–758. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1569596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertell S 2018. Poikkihallinnollinen päätöksenteko strategisen ohjauksen keinona kestävän kehityksen tavoitteiden toimeenpanossa. [Cross-administrative decision-making as a means of strategic guidance in the implementation of sustainable development goals.] [ master’s thesis]. Espoo: Aalto University School of Engineering. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch F. 1976. Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen S, Hult A. 2021. Spatial myopia: sustainability, urban politics and Malmö city. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 13(2):159–173. doi: 10.1080/19463138.2020.1855432.
   Google Scholar
• Howes M, McKenzie M, Gleeson B, Gray R, Byrne J, Daniels P. 2010. Adapting ecological modernisation to the Australian context. J Integr Environ Sci. 7(1):5–21. doi: 10.1080/19438150903478597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber J. 2000. Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. J Environ Policy And Plan. 2(4):269–285. doi: 10.1080/714038561.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher K. 2019. Transforming urban climate governance: capacities for transformative climate governance. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CA. 2018. The power of cities in global climate politics. Cities and the global politics of the environment. London: Palgrave Macmillan; pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen P. 2000. Europeanisation and Ecological Modernisation: Agri-Environmental Policy and Practice in Finland. Environ Politics. 9(1):138–167. doi: 10.1080/09644010008414515.
   Google Scholar
• Jones P, Comfort D. 2020. A commentary on the localisation of the sustainable development goals. J Pub Affairs. 20(1):e1943. doi: 10.1002/pa.1943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgenson AK, Clark B. 2012. Are the economy and environment decoupling? A comparative international study, 1960-2005. AJS. 118(1):1–44. doi: 10.1086/665990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke M 2000. Ecological modernization. Innovation and diffusion of policy and technology. FFU Report 8. Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik. FU Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke M. 2008. Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. J Cleaner Production. 16(5):557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika M. 2017. ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’: the new urban Agenda as immunology … or … what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with ‘smart cities’ and indicators. Environ And Urbanization. 29(1):89–102. doi: 10.1177/0956247816684763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanuri C, Revi A, Espey J, Kuhle H. 2016. Getting started with the SDGs in cities. A guide for stakeholders. Sustainable Development Solutions Network: Cities SDG Guide_vms_edits.docx (multiscreensite.com).
   Google Scholar
• Koivistoinen R. 2016. Lisää ruutia maapolitiikkaan. [More gunpowder to land policy] Maankäyttö. 2016(1):24–25. Finnish
   Google Scholar
• Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW 1972. The limits to growth: a report to the club of Rome.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of the Environment. 2022. A better environment for future generations. Ministry of the environment’s strategy 2035. [ accessed 2023 Feb 16] YM-strategia-2035-2909-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mol A, Sonnenfeld D. 2000. Ecological modernisation around the world: an introduction. Environ Politics. 9(1):1–14. doi: 10.1080/09644010008414510.
   Google Scholar
• Mol A, Spaargaren G. 2000. Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review. Environ Politics. 9(1):17–49. doi: 10.1080/09644010008414511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo R, Tuppurainen S, Wallin S. 2016. Keilaniemi, Espoo. A large scale solution seeking a problem, and facing dilemmas. In: Savini F Salet W, editors Planning projects in transition. Interventions, regulations and investments. Berlin: Jovis; pp. 156–173.
   Google Scholar
• Næss P, Moberg KR. 2021. Change processes and driving forces behind urban spatial development in four Norwegian municipalities. Nordic J Urban Stud. 1(2):148–175. doi: 10.18261/issn.2703-8866-2021-02-04.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow DN, Schnaiberg A, Weinberg AS. 2000. Putting the ecological modernisation thesis to the test: the promises and performances of urban recycling. Environ Politics. 9(1):109–137. doi: 10.1080/09644010008414514.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer E, Halko A, Mäntysalo R. 2024. Turning global sustainability goals into local actions: the role of the Agenda 2030 and the SDGs in fostering integrative public leadership in Espoo, Finland. In: C O, and Brinkmann R, editors. The palgrave handbook on practical sustainability. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs JD, Schmidt-Traub G, Mazzucato M, Messner D, Nakicenovic N, Rockström J. 2019. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain. 2(2019):805–814. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor B. 2008. The Tributaries of Radical Environmentalism. J Study of Radicalism. 2(1):21–61.
   Google Scholar
• The Prime Minister’s office. What is sustainable development? [accessed 2023 Mar 15] Sustainable Development and Agenda2030 - (kestavakehitys.fi)
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen J, Hueting R 1991. GNP and market prices: wrong signals for sustainable economic success that mask environmental destruction. Environmentally sustainable economic development: building on Brundtland. Environment Working Paper No. 46, World Bank, Washington, DC. 36–42
   Google Scholar
• Tirkkonen J 2000. Ilmastopolitiikka ja ekologinen modernisaatio. Diskursiivinen tarkastelu suomalaisesta ilmastopolitiikasta ja sen yhteydestä metsäsektorin muutokseen. [Climate policy and ecological modernization. A discursive examination of Finnish climate policy and its connection to changes in the forest sector.] [ dissertation]. Tampere: University of Tampere. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• United Cities and Local Governments. 2021. Towards the localization of the SDGs. Sustainable and resilient recovery driven by cities and territories. Local and regional governments report to the 2019 HLPF: 5th report. Barcelona. https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/towards_the_localization_of_the_sdgs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nations. 2021. Agenda 2030. [accessed 2022 Dec 27] https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
   Google Scholar
• Valencia SC, Simon D, Croese S, Nordqvist J, Oloko M, Sharma T, Buck NT, Versace I. 2019. Adapting the sustainable development goals and the new urban Agenda to the city level: initial reflections from a comparative research project. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 11(1):4–23. doi: 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The YLE News. 2018 Jun 9. Espoo named “most intelligent community in the world”. [accessed 2022 Dec 28] https://yle.fi/a/3-10243536 Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Zoeteman B, Mulder R, Smeets R, Wentink C. 2016. Towards sustainable EU cities: a quantitative benchmark study of 114 European and 31 Dutch cities. Telos. 16(142):115.
   Google Scholar