Adaptive reuse challenges of Jordan’s heritage buildings: a critical review

References

• Aigwi IE, Egbelakin T, Ingham J. 2018. Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres. Int J Build Pathol Adapt. 36(4):385–407. doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigwi IE, Egbelakin T, Ingham J, Phipps R, Rotimi J, Filippova O. 2019. A performance-based framework to prioritize underutilized historical buildings for adaptive reuse interventions in New Zealand. Sustain Cities Soc. 48:101547. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Nammari FM (2003). The preservation of heritage buildings in Jordan: development chances lost. 6th US/ICOMOS International Symposium: Managing conflict and conservation in historic cities: integrating conservation with tourism, development and politics. US/ICOMOS, Washington, D.C., USA, p.17.
   Google Scholar
• Alzoubi HH, Almalkawi AT. 2019. A comparative study for the traditional and modern houses in terms of thermal comfort and energy consumption in Umm Qais city, Jordan. J Ecol Eng. 20(5):14–22. doi: 10.12911/22998993/105324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington J, Unerman J. 2018. Achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals: an enabling role for accounting research. Account Audit Account J. 31(1):2–24. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton I, MacDonald A, Wright G, Hamlin I. 2019. Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: a six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process. Technol Forecast Soc. 147:72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann F, Kanie N, Kim RE. 2017. Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Curr Opin Sust. 26:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boluk KA, Cavaliere CT, Higgins-Desbiolles F. 2019. A critical framework for interrogating the United Nations sustainable development goals 2030 agenda in tourism. J Sustain Tour. 27(7):847–864. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1619748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boniotti C. 2023. The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes. J Cult Heritage Manage Sustainable Dev. 13(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothara J, Ingham J, Dizhur D. 2022. Qualifying the earthquake resilience of heritage masonry buildings along the Himalayan arc. J Build Eng. 52:104339. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce T, Zuo J, Rameezdeen R, Pullen S. 2015. Factors influencing the retrofitting of existing office buildings using Adelaide, South Australia as a case study. Struct Surv. 33(2):150–166. doi: 10.1108/SS-05-2014-0019.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen PA, Love PED. 2011. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Struct Surv. 29(5):411–421. doi: 10.1108/02630801111182439.
   Google Scholar
• Chang PL, Hsu CW, Chang PC. 2011. Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 36(21):14172–14179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CS, Chiu YH, Tsai L. 2018. Evaluating the adaptive reuse of historic buildings through multicriteria decision-making. Habitat Int. 81:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conejos S, Langston C, Chan EH, Chew MY. 2016. Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Build Res Inf. 44(5–6):507–519. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucco P, Maselli G, Nesticò A, Ribera F. 2023. An evaluation model for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage in accordance with 2030 SDGs and European quality principles. J Cult Herit. 59:202–216. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2022.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino D, Faiella D, Febbraro E, Mele E, Minichiello F, Trimarco J. 2023. Steel exoskeletons for integrated seismic/energy retrofit of existing buildings-general framework and case study. J Build Eng. 83:108413. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danacı M, Yıldırım U. 2023. Comprehensive analysis of lifeboat accidents using the fuzzy Delphi method. Ocean Eng. 278:114371. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ayala D, Wang K, Yan Y, Smith H, Massam A, Filipova V, Pereira JJ. 2020. Flood vulnerability and risk assessment of urban traditional buildings in a heritage district of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 20(8):2221–2241. doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-2221-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Medici S, De Toro P, Nocca F. 2019. Cultural heritage and sustainable development: impact assessment of two adaptive reuse projects in Siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability. 12(1):311. doi: 10.3390/su12010311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva GDR, Perera BAKS, Rodrigo MNN. 2019. Adaptive reuse of buildings: the case of Sri Lanka. J Financ Manag Prop Constr. 24(1):79–96. doi: 10.1108/JFMPC-11-2017-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre G, Sivapalan M, Rusca M, Cudennec C, Garcia M, Kreibich H, Konar M, Mondino E, Mård J, Pande S. 2019. Sociohydrology: scientific challenges in addressing the sustainable development goals. Water Resour Res. 55(8):6327–6355. doi: 10.1029/2018WR023901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, Wales PW. 2014. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 67(4):401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson K, Matthews J, Love PE. 2016. Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environ Project Asset Manage. 6(3):250–265. doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL. 2017. Adaptive reuse in the healthcare industry: repurposing abandoned buildings to serve medical missions. BMC Health Serv Res. 17(1):5–14. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2339-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esther Yakubu I, Egbelakin T, Dizhur D, Ingham J, Sungho Park K, Phipps R. 2017. Why are older inner-city buildings vacant? Implications for town centre regeneration. J Urban Regen. 11(1):44–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes A, Figueira de Sousa J, Costa JP, Neves B. 2020. Mapping stakeholder perception on the challenges of brownfield sites’ redevelopment in waterfronts: the Tagus Estuary. Eur Plan Stud. 28(12):2447–2464. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1722985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Lo Brutto M, Ventimiglia GM. 2023. A scan-to-BIM process for the monitoring and conservation of the architectural heritage: integration of thematic information in a HBIM model. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sensing Spatial Infor Sci. 48:549–556. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-549-2023.
   Google Scholar
• Fink-Hafner D, Dagen T, Doušak M, Novak M, Hafner-Fink M. 2019. Delphi method: Strengths and weaknesses. Adv Methodol Stat. 16(2):1–19. doi: 10.51936/fcfm6982.
   Google Scholar
• Foroughi M, de Andrade B, Roders AP, Wang T. 2023. Public participation and consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning: a systematic literature review. Cities. 135:104235. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster G. 2020. Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resour Conserv Recy. 152:104507. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster G, Kreinin H. 2020. A review of environmental impact indicators of cultural heritage buildings: a circular economy perspective. Environ Res Lett. 15(4):043003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab751e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunduz M, Elsherbeny HA. 2020. Operational framework for managing construction-contract administration practitioners’ perspective through modified Delphi method. J Constr Eng Manag. 146(3):04019110. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath T, Chen F, Xie J, Chen P. 2024. Heritage-led revitalisation in China: identity and modernity in Shenzhen’s urban villages. In: Roberts M, Nelson S, editors. Research handbook on urban design. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 225–247.
   Google Scholar
• Hettema J, Egberts L. 2020. Designing with maritime heritage: adaptive re-use of small-scale shipyards in northwest Europe. J Cult Heritage Manage Sustainable Dev. 10(2):130–143. doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2019-0032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo Zambrano RV, Milanes CB, Pérez Montero O, Mestanza-Ramón C, Nexar Bolivar LO, Cobeña Loor D, Cuker B, Cuker B. 2023. A sustainable proposal for a cultural heritage declaration in Ecuador: heritage housing of portoviejo. Sustainability. 15(2):1115. doi: 10.3390/su15021115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jigyasu R, Jokilehto J. 2023. From risk reduction to risk adaptation: protecting the past for the future. In: Rouhani B, Romão X, editors. Managing disaster risks to cultural heritage. London, United Kingdom: Routledge; p. 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Khammash A, Mhire H. 1986. Notes on village architecture in Jordan. Lafayette, Louisiana: University Art Museum, University of Southwestern Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Lidón de Miguel M, Vegas F, Mileto C, García-Soriano L. 2021. Return to the native earth: historical analysis of foreign influences on traditional architecture in Burkina Faso. Sustainability. 13(2):757. doi: 10.3390/su13020757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja KK, Laakso K, Palomäki J 2011. Using the Delphi method. 2011 Proceedings of PICMET’11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), Hilton Portland and Executive Tower Portland, Oregon, USA; IEEE. p 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Liu C. 2023. The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes. J Cult Heritage Manage Sustainable Dev. 13(1):1–14. doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-12-2020-0186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Azhar S, Willkens D, Li B. 2023, April. Static terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) for Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM): a systematic review. Virtual Worlds. 2(2):90–114. MDPI. doi: 10.3390/virtualworlds2020006.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe R. 2004. Lessons from climate change: a response to the commentaries. Build Res Inf. 32(1):75–78. doi: 10.1080/0961321032000153743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L. 2012. Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energ Buildings. 55:889–902. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher R, Maher M, Mann S, McAlpine CA. 2018. Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: a research through design approach. Sustainability Sci. 13(6):1565–1587. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0618-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehr SY, Skates H, Holden G. 2017. Adding more by using less: adaptive reuse of woolstores. Procedia Eng. 180:697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.229.
   Google Scholar
• Morton S, Pencheon D, Bickler G. 2019. The sustainable development goals provide an important framework for addressing dangerous climate change and achieving wider public health benefits. Public Health. 174:65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly C. 2023. The classic slum? Heritage discourses, ideologies of transition and the remaking of post-industrial Salford (1985-2021)’. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega J, Vasconcelos G, Rodrigues H, Correia M. 2018. Assessment of the efficiency of traditional earthquake resistant techniques for heritage buildings. Eng Struct. 173:1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo JMF. 2023. Challenges and Current research trends for heritage buildings in a global world: a literature review. Buildings. 13(1):162. doi: 10.3390/buildings13010162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintossi N, Ikiz Kaya D, Pereira Roders A. 2021. Assessing cultural heritage adaptive reuse practices: multi-scale challenges and solutions in Rijeka. Sustainability. 13(7):3603. doi: 10.3390/su13073603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintossi N, Kaya DI, van Wesemael P, Roders AP. 2023. Challenges of cultural heritage adaptive reuse: a stakeholders-based comparative study in three European cities. Habitat Int. 136:102807. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qtaishat Y, Emmitt S, Adeyeye K. 2020. Exploring the socio‐cultural sustainability of old and new housing: two cases from Jordan. Sustain Cities Soc. 61:102250.‏. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub SP, Martin-Rios C. 2019. “Think sustainable, act local”–a stakeholder-filter-model for translating SDGs into sustainability initiatives with local impact. Int J Contemp Hosp Manage. 31(6):2428–2447. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2018-0453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remøy H, Van der Voordt T. 2014. Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: opportunities and risks. Build Res Inf. 42(3):381–390. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.865922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rössler M. 2023. Balancing tourism and heritage conservation: a world heritage context. In: Cameron C, editors. Evolving heritage conservation practice in the 21st Century. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; p. 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Wright G. 1999. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecast. 15(4):353–375. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Wright G. 2011. The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects—Introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc. 78(9):1487–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh MAE. 2001. The decline vs the rise of architectural and urban forms in the heritage villages of southwest Saudi Arabia. Build Environ. 36(1):89–107. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00025-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ME, Ortman SG, Lobo J. 2023. Heritage sites, climate change, and urban science. Urban Clim. 47:101371. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sourani A, Sohail M. 2015. The Delphi method: review and use in construction management research. Int J Constr Educ Res. 11(1):54–76. doi: 10.1080/15578771.2014.917132.
   Google Scholar
• Strumiłło K 2020, July. Adaptive reuse of bank buildings towards promoting sustainability environment. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics; Springer, Cham. p. 10–16. 10.1007/978-3-030-51566-9_2.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaee S, Mahdiyar A, Durdyev S, Mohandes SR, Ismail S. 2019. An assessment model of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks of green roof installation: a multi criteria decision making approach. J Cleaner Prod. 238:117956. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaee S, Mohandes SR, Ahmed RR, Mahdiyar A, Arashpour M, Zayed T, Ismail S. 2022. Investigating the barriers to applying the internet-of-things-based technologies to construction site safety management. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19(2):868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Shuai C, Wang T. 2018. Critical success factors (CSFs) for the adaptive reuse of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(7):1546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrad M, Husban SM. 2021. The creation of guidelines for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings in Jordan, case study palace of the Ali Alkaid Basha (Jordan). Arch Modern Inf Technol. 3(56):64–78. doi: 10.24412/1998-4839-2021-3-64-78.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrafa Silva A, Pereira Roders A, Cunha Ferreira T, Nevzgodin I. 2023. Critical analysis of policy integration degrees between heritage conservation and spatial planning in Amsterdam and Ballarat. Land. 12(5):1040. doi: 10.3390/land12051040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevelyan EG, Robinson N. 2015. Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? Eur J Integr Med. 7(4):423–428. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsalis TA, Malamateniou KE, Koulouriotis D, Nikolaou IE. 2020. New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 27(4):1617–1629. doi: 10.1002/csr.1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng ML, Li SX, Lin CWR, Chiu AS. 2023. Validating green building social sustainability indicators in China using the fuzzy Delphi method. J Ind Prod Eng. 40(1):35–53. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2022.2070934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijesiri WMM, Devapriya KAK, Rathnasiri P, Wickremanayake Karunaratne TL. 2022. A framework to implement green adaptive reuse for existing buildings in Sri Lanka. Intell Build Int. 14(5):581–605. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2021.1906204.
   Google Scholar
• Yung EH, Chan EH. 2012. Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat Int. 36(3):352–361. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeadat ZF. 2023. Strategies toward greater youth participation in jordan’s urban policymaking. J Sustain Real Estate. 15(1):2204534. doi: 10.1080/19498276.2023.2204534.
   Google Scholar