Automating versus augmenting intelligence

References

• Accenture. (2017). Artificial intelligence: Healthcare's New Nervous System. New York: Accenture Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2017). Where is technology taking the economy? McKinsey Quarterly, Fall, 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Aubrey, S. B. (2010). The profitable hobby farm: How to build a sustainable local foods business. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, P. E. (2017). The code economy: A forty-thousand-year history. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S., & Lizza, C. S. (1991). Pilot's Associate: A cooperative, knowledge-based system application. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 6(3), 18–29. doi:10.1109/64.87681.
   Google Scholar
• Basole, R. C., Seuss, C. D., & Rouse, W. B. (2012). IT innovation adoption by enterprises: Knowledge discovery through text analytics. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1044–1054. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.029.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., & Kroll, A. (2009). Automated life underwriting: A survey of life insurance utilization of automated underwriting systems. New York: Deloitte.
   Google Scholar
• Bershidsky, L. (2015). Self-driving cars can't handle moral choices. Bloomberg View, May 10.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, D. (Ed.) (2016). The future of machine intelligence: Perspectives from leading practitioners. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2017). Artificial intelligence comes of age: The promise and challenge of integrating AI into cars, healthcare, and journalism. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Boodman, S. G. (2017). A dog bite sent him to the ER: A cascade of missteps nearly killed him. The Washington Post, June 16.
   Google Scholar
• Booker, C. (2016). Dutch police use eagles to hunt illegal drones. PBS NewsHour, September 16.
   Google Scholar
• Boudette, N. E. (2016). Five things that give self-driving cars headaches. New York Times, June 4.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, D. (2017). The coming age of robo-everything. In Marketplace. Washington, DC: National Public Radio, April 3.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The Business of Artificial Intelligence. The Big Idea. Harvard Business Review. Online. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/cover-story/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial-intelligence
   Google Scholar
• Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2016). Where machines could replace humans – and where they can't (yet). McKinsey Quarterly, July.
   Google Scholar
• Coldewey, D. (2017). Laying a trap for self-driving cars. TechCrunch, March 17.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, S. E., & Walker, E. (1994). DART: Applying knowledge-based planning and scheduling to crisis action planning. In M. Zweben & M. S. Fox (Eds.), Intelligent scheduling (pp. 711–729). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. (2017). Human obsolescence: How quickly will machines sweep man aside? The Economist, November 21.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. (2016). Automation and anxiety: Will smarter machines cause mass unemployment? The Economist, June 25.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. (2017). Why AI researchers like video games. The Economist, May 13.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbert, C., & Hagel, J. (2017). Fulfilling the promise of AI means rethinking the nature of work itself. Harvard Business Review, December 18.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. C. et al. (2017). Clinical decision support to efficiently identify patients eligible for advanced heart failure therapies. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 23(10), 719–726. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.08.449.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, E. A. (1980). Expert systems: Looking back and looking ahead. In R. Wilhelm Ed., Jahrestagung. Informatik-fachberichte (Vol. 33), Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrucci, D., Levas, A., Bagchi, S., Gondek, D., & Mueller, E. T. (2013). Watson: Beyond Jeopardy! Artificial Intelligence, 199, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Galeon, D., & Hauser, K. (2016). IBM's Watson AI recommends same treatment as doctors in 99% of cancer cases. Futurism, October 26.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmueller, A. (2017). How precision oncology will use data to advance cancer treatment. Health Data Management, December 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hof, R. D. (2013). Deep learning: With massive amounts of computational power, machines can now recognize objects and translate speech in real time. Artificial intelligence is finally getting smart. Technology Review, April.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, F. (2002). Behind Deep Blue: Building the computer that defeated the world chess champion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators: How a group of hackers, geniuses, and geeks created the digital revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. (2015). Is it possible to create an ethical robot? Wall Street Journal, July 25.
   Google Scholar
• Lenartowicz, M. (2015). Mere impediments? A second thought on the role of social boundaries in self-organization of the global collective intelligence on Earth. Proceedings of the International Society for Information Studies Summit, Vienna, June 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Kraus, G. (2016). The great AI awakening. New York Times Magazine, December 14.
   Google Scholar
• Lighthill, J. (1973). Artificial Intelligence: A general survey. In Symposium on Artificial Intelligence. UK: Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. (2017). Enterprise Transformation in the Automobile Ecosystem: How Brands and Technologies Interact with Market and Environment (PhD Dissertation). School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd's. (2016). Foresight review of robotics and autonomous systems. London: Lloyd's.
   Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. (2016). Machines of loving grace: The quest for common ground between humans and robots. New York: Ecco/Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. L. (1954). Theory of Neural-Analog Reinforcement Systems and Its Application to the Brain Model Problem (PhD Dissertation). Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, N., Lowes, P., Ronanki, R., Wen, J., & Sharma, S. (2017). Machine intelligence: Technology mimics human cognition to create value. New York: Deloitte University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1959). Report on a general problem-solving program. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing, UNESCO, Paris. 256–264.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A. (2016). What artificial intelligence can and can't do right now. Harvard Business Review, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., Yosinski, J., & Clune, J. (2015). Deep neural networks are easily fooled: High confidence predictions for unrecognizable images. Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, June 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2014). The human side of automation. Proceedings of the Automated Vehicles Symposium, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Paquette, D. (2017). Robots could replace nearly a third of the US workforce by 2030. The Washington Post, November 30.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership. (2017). Partnership on AI strengthens its network of partners and announces first initiatives. Retrieved from https://www.partnershiponai.org.
   Google Scholar
• Plungis, J. (2017). Self-driving cars: Driving into the future. Consumer Reports, February 28.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, F. (1957). The perceptron: A perceiving and recognizing automaton. Buffalo, NY: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, S. H., & Rouse, W. B. (1980). Computer-based manuals for procedural information. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-10(8), 506–510.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, S. H., Rouse, W. B., & Hammer, J. M. (1982). Design and evaluation of an onboard computer-based information system for aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC–12(4), 451–463. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308849.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B. (1988). Adaptive aiding for human/computer control. Human Factors, 30(4), 431–443. doi:10.1177/001872088803000405.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B. (2007). People and organizations: Explorations of human-centered design. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B., Geddes, N. D., & Curry, R. E. (1988). An architecture for intelligent interfaces: Outline of an approach to supporting operators of complex systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 3(2), 87–122. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0302_1.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B., Geddes, N. D., & Hammer, J. M. (1990). Computer-aided fighter pilots. IEEE Spectrum, 27(3), 38–41. doi:10.1109/6.48849.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1987). Conceptual design of a human error tolerant interface for complex engineering systems. Automatica, 23(2), 231–235. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(87)90097-5.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. (1969). A conceptual dependency parser for natural language. Proceedings of the 1969 Conference on Computational linguistics, Sång-Säby, Sweden, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756.
   Google Scholar
• Seuss, C. D. (2011). In-depth understanding: Teaching search engines to interpret meaning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(4), 531–535. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011.2105531.
   Google Scholar
• Shortliffe, E. H., & Buchanan, B. G. (1975). A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Mathematical Biosciences, 23(3–4), 351–379. doi:10.1016/0025-5564(75)90047-4.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J. (2016). Innovation for jobs with cognitive assistants: A service science perspective. In D. Nordfors & M. Senges (Eds.), Disrupting unemployment (pp. 157–174). St. Louis, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., & Banavar, G. (2015). Cognition as a service: An industry perspective. AI Magazine, 36(4),71–86. doi:10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2618.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., Giuiusa, A., Demirkan, H., & Ing, D. (2013). Service science: Reframing progress with universities. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 561–569. doi:10.1002/sres.2213.
   Google Scholar
• Spohrer, J., Siddike, M. A., & Kohda, Y. (2017). Rebuilding evolution: A service science perspective. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan 4.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford. (2016). One hundred year study on artificial intelligence. Palo Alto:, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. (2015). It's impossible to find out if self-driving cars are safe: Report. Fortune, April 12
   Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–460. doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.
   Google Scholar
• Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9, 36–45. doi:10.1145/365153.365168.
   Google Scholar
• Widerquist, K., & Lewis, M. A. (2005). The ethics and economics of the basic income guarantee. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., Serban, N., & Rouse, W. B. (2013). The demographics of change: Enterprise characteristics and behaviors that influence transformation. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 3(4), 285–306. doi:10.1080/19488289.2013.860346.
   Google Scholar