Beyond collective property: a typology of collaborative housing in Europe

References

• Baiges, C., Ferreri, M., & Vidal, L. (2020). International policies to promote cooperative housing. CIDOB.
   Google Scholar
• Bajesdorp. (n.d.). De geschiedenis van een modern stadsdorp; van gevangenis naar vrijplaats. https://bajesdorp.nl/bajesdorp/geschiedenis/
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, I., & Bernet, T. (2015). Housing as a common resource? Decommodification and self-organization in housing—Examples from Germany and Switzerland. In M. Dellenbaugh, M. Bieniok, M. Kip, & A. M. Müller (Eds.), Urban commons: Moving beyond state and market (pp. 178–195). Birkhäuser Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, I., & Gerber, J. D. (2018). Why are housing cooperatives successful? Insights from Swiss affordable housing policy. Housing Studies, 33(3), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1344958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, D. (2022). Who owns collaborative housing? A conceptual typology of property regimes. Housing, Theory and Society, 39(2), 200–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabré, E., & Andrés, A. (2018). La Borda: A case study on the implementation of cooperative housing in Catalonia. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(3), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, K. (2020). Contradictions of housing commons: between middle-class and anarchist models in Berlin. In D. Özkan, & Baykal G. Büyüksarac (Eds.), Commoning the city: Empirical perspectives on urban ecology, economics and ethics (pp. 159–176). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, C. (2018). How can squatting contribute to degrowth? In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 44–53). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, C., Martínez, M. A., & Squatting Europe Kollective. (2014). The squatters’ movement in Europe: Commons and autonomy as alternatives to capitalism. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. (2016). Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F. (2015). What is really different between cohousing and gated communities? European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2566–2581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F., & Baglione, V. (2014). Living together privately: For a cautious reading of cohousing. Urban Research & Practice, 7(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2013.827905
   Google Scholar
• Czischke, D., Carriou, C., & Lang, R. (2020). Collaborative housing in Europe: Conceptualizing the field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1703611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia sunt communia: On the commons and the transformation to postcapitalism. ZED Books.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, G. (2012). Towards dialectic utopias: Links and disjunctions between collaborative housing and squatting in the Netherlands. Built Environment, 38(3), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.38.3.430
   Google Scholar
• Droste, C. (2015). German co-housing: An opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelsman, U., Rowe, M., & Southern, A. (2018). Community Land Trusts, affordable housing and community organising in low-income neighbourhoods. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1198082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entrepatios. (n.d.). Ecología y sostenibilidad. https://www.entrepatios.org/ecologia-y-sostenibilidad/
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. (2011). Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. The Commoner. http://andandand.org/pdf/federici_feminism_politics_commons.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M., & Vidal, L. (2022). Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing commons. International Journal of Housing Policy, 22(2), 149–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frauenwohnprojekte. (n.d.). Frauengerechter wohnungsbau. https://www.frauenwohnprojekte.de/nach-typ/frauengerechter-wohnungsbau
   Google Scholar
• Grazioli, M. (2017). From citizens to citadins? Rethinking right to the city inside housing squats in Rome, Italy. Citizenship Studies, 21(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1307607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huron, A. (2018). Carving out the commons: Tenant organizing and housing cooperatives in Washington, DC. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iewan. (n.d.). Duurzaam en sociaal bouwen en wonen – het kan wél. https://www.iewan.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2019). Sharing, togetherness and intentional degrowth. Progress in Human Geography, 43(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517746519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labit, A., & Dubost, N. (2016). Housing and ageing in France and Germany: The intergenerational solution. Housing, Care and Support, 19(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-08-2016-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Stoeger, H. (2018). The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: Empirical evidence from Austria. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. G. (2020). Barcelona: Housing crisis and urban activism. In P. Hagbert, H. Gutzon, H. Thörn, & C. Wasshede (Eds.), Contemporary co-housing in Europe: Towards sustainable cities? (pp. 74–93). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, J. (2009). The transformation of social housing provision in switzerland mediated by federalism, direct democracy and the urban/rural divide. European Journal of Housing Policy, 9(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710802693599
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., & Moore, T. (2018). Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1422320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscella, V., & Palermo, P. (2014). 4StelleHotel.it [interactive documentary]. http://www.4stellehotel.it/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (2018). Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Netzwerkagentur Generationenwohnen. (n.d.). Aufgabe. https://www.netzwerk-generationen.de/aufgaben.
   Google Scholar
• Noterman, E. (2016). Beyond tragedy: Differential commoning in a manufactured housing cooperative. Antipode, 48(2), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J. (2020). Eco-communities as insurgent climate urbanism: Radical urban socio-material transformations. Urban Geography, 42(6), 738–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruijt, H. (2014). The power of the magic key. Scalability of squatting in the Netherlands and the US. In C. Cattaneo & M. A. Martínez (Eds.), The squatters’ movement in Europe. Commons and autonomy as alternatives to capitalism (pp. 110–135). Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, T., & Villa, L. (n.d.). Geschichte. https://dievilla.at/geschichte/.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. (2014). Differences between cohousing and gated communities. A literature review. Sociological Inquiry, 84(2), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2020, May 26). Making housing commons possible: inclusivity and autonomy. De Nieuwe Meent. https://nieuwemeent.nl/en/making-housing-commons-possible-inclusivity-and-autonomy/
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Bossuyt, D. (2022). Maintaining autonomy in housing commons: setting the conditions for degrowth living. In F. Savini, A. Ferreira, & K. von Schonfeld (Eds.), Post-growth planning: cities beyond the market economy. London.
   Google Scholar
• Seume14. (n.d.). Wer wir sind. https://seume14.org/
   Google Scholar
• Tsavdaroglou, C., & Kaika, M. (2022). The refugees’ right to the centre of the city: City branding versus city commoning in Athens. Urban Studies, 59(6), 1130–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021997009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: Why and how? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2016). The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2023–2040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2017). Learning from co-housing initiatives: Between passivhaus engineers and active inhabitants. Architecture and the Built Environment, 14(1), 1–282.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & MacGregor, S. (2019). Beyond wishful thinking: A FPE perspective on commoning, care, and the promise of co-housing. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Steen, B, Katzeff A, & van Hoogenhuijze, L. (Eds.) (2014). The city is ours: Squatting and Autonomous Movements in Europe from the 1970s to the Present. PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. (Ed.). (2010). Living together - cohousing ideas and realities around the world: Proceedings from the International Collaborative Housing Conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010. Division of Urban and Regional Studies. Royal Inst. of Technology. [u.a.].
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, L. (2019). Cooperative islands in capitalist waters: Limited-equity housing cooperatives, urban renewal and gentrification: Cooperative islands in capitalist waters. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar