Innovate with whom? The bridging effect of organizational learning capability for knowledge-intensive SMEs

References

• Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altinay, L., Madanoglu, M., De Vita, G., Arasli, H., & Ekinci, Y. (2016). The interface between organizational learning capability, entrepreneurial orientation, and SME growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(3), 871–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E., & Williams, L. J. (1992). Assumptions about unmeasured variables with studies of reciprocal relationships: The case of employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arend, R. J. (2006). SME–supplier alliance activity in manufacturing: Contingent benefits and perceptions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Pérez, J., & Cepeda-Cardona, J. (2022). Knowledge management strategies and organizational improvisation: What changed after the emergence of technological turbulence caused by artificial intelligence? Baltic Journal of Management, 17(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2021-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima, K., Li, H., & Luca, L. M. D. (2006). The contingent value of marketing strategy innovativeness for product development performance in Chinese new technology ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherzadeh, M., Markovic, S., Cheng, J., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2019). How does outside-in open innovation influence innovation performance? Analyzing the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and innovation strategy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2889538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J., Crick, D., & Young, S. (2004). Small firm internationalization and business strategy: An exploratory study of ‘knowledge-intensive’ and ‘traditional’ manufacturing firms in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 22(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604039479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooksbank, R. (1991). Defining the small business: A new classification of company size. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 3(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629100000002
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34(12), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015). Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): external knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Hughes, M., & Yin, M. (2014). The relationship between resource acquisition methods and firm performance in Chinese new ventures: The intermediate effect of learning capability. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calantone, R. J., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. (2010). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.2002003
   Google Scholar
• Camps, J., Oltra, V., Aldás-Manzano, J., Buenaventura-Vera, G., & Torres-Carballo, F. (2016). Individual performance in turbulent environments: The role of organizational learning capability and employee flexibility. Human Resource Management, 55(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, F. (2005). A review of “knowledge work and knowledge intensive firms” by mats alvesson, Oxford university press, 2004. Journal of Management & Governance, 9(1), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-005-1568-9
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, S. L. Y., Yuen-Ping, H. O., & Shiyu, L. I. (2020). How the effect of opportunity discovery on innovation outcome differs between DIY laboratories and public research institutes: The role of industry turbulence and knowledge generation in the case of Singapore. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Du, J. (2016). The interaction between internal R & D and different types of external knowledge sourcing: An empirical study of Chinese innovative firms. R&D Management, 46(S3), 1006–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for breaking and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 169–187).
   Google Scholar
• De Marco, C. E., Martelli, I., & Di Minin, A. (2020). European SMEs’ engagement in open innovation when the important thing is to win and not just to participate, what should innovation policy do? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401
   Google Scholar
• DiBella, A. J., Nevis, E. C., & Gould, J. M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohlich, M. T. (2002). Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Hajli, N., Tajvidi, M., Gbadamosi, A., & Nadeem, W. (2020). Understanding market agility for new product success with big data analytics. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2018). Why do knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms publish their innovative ideas? Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, J., & Von Hippel, E. (2004). Welfare implications of user innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 73–87. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.425820
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Espallardo, M., Sánchez-Pérez, M., & Segovia-López, C. (2011). Exploitation-and exploration-based innovations: The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors. Technovation, 31(5–6), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Garrigos, J. A., & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation, 31(9), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2021). Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2020). SME open innovation for process development: Understanding process-dedicated external knowledge sourcing. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(2), 409–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooi, L. W. (2020). SME performance: Does organizational learning capability really matter? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(5), 1093–1116. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. H., & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Chen, J., & Liang, L. (2018). How open innovation performance responds to partner heterogeneity in China. Management Decision, 56(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literature. Organization Science, 1(2), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
   Google Scholar
• Jasimuddin, S. M., & Naqshbandi, M. M. (2019). Knowledge infrastructure capability, absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation: Evidence from SMEs in France. Production Planning & Control, 30(10–12), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1582097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerez-Gómez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, J. K., & Varkkey, B. (2018). Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: Evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2017-0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Guo, M., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Selective adoption of open innovation for new product development in high-tech SMEs in emerging economies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2948739
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software international.
   Google Scholar
• Karabag, S. F. (2019). Factors impacting firm failure and technological development: A study of three emerging-economy firms. Journal of Business Research, 98, 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., Rigtering, J. C., Hughes, M., & Hosman, V. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: A quantitative study from The Netherlands. Review of Managerial Science, 6(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-011-0062-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Wang, C. (2021). Entrepreneurial bricolage and marketing capability: Contingent roles of market turbulence and strategic flexibility. Asian Business & Management, 21(3), 458–481. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-021-00171-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maine, E. M., Shapiro, D. M., & Vining, A. R. (2010). The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9104-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangus, S. M., Jones, E., Folse, J. A. G., & Sridhar, S. (2020). The interplay between business and personal trust on relationship performance in conditions of market turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(6), 1138–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00722-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migdadi, M. M. (2019). Organizational learning capability, innovation and organizational performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2018-0246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes Silva, D. R. D., Lucas, L. O., & Vonortas, N. S. (2020). Internal barriers to innovation and university-industry cooperation among technology-based SMEs in Brazil. Industry and Innovation, 27(3), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1576507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, T., & Anokhin, S. A. (2020). The joint impact of entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation in new product development: Studying firm and environmental contingencies. Journal of Business Research, 113, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00164-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi, M. M. (2016). Managerial ties and open innovation: Examining the role of absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 54(9), 2256–2276. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi, M. M., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International Business Review, 27(3), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi, M. M., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2022). The linkage between open innovation, absorptive capacity and managerial ties: A cross-country perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi, M. M., & Kaur, S. (2014). Do managerial ties support or stifle open innovation? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(4), 652–675. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2013-0407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018). The interplay of leadership, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning culture in open innovation: Testing a moderated mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6–7), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, L., & Li, J. (2018). Joint problem solving and organizational learning capacity in new product innovation. R&D Management, 48(5), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, P. M., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Leitão, J. (2012). Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical Evidence of non-High-Tech vs. High-Tech SMEs. Research Policy, 41(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Nyamrunda, F. C., & Freeman, S. (2021). Strategic agility, dynamic relational capability and trust among SMEs in transitional economies. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 65–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orego, M., & Wainaina, L. (2019). Strategic organizational learning capability and firm performance: A case of tourism fund in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 3(8), 39–57. http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/21177
   Google Scholar
• Pateli, A., & Lioukas, S. (2019). How functional involvement affects the transformation of external knowledge into innovation outcomes. R&D Management, 49(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. L., Sengupta, S., & Krapfel, R. (2004). Effectiveness of horizontal strategic alliances in technologically uncertain environments: Are trust and commitment enough? Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 951–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00501-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov, V., Ćelić, Đ, Uzelac, Z., & Drašković, Z. (2020). Specific influence of knowledge intensive and capital intensive organizations on collaborative climate and knowledge sharing in SMEs. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 25(1), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petti, C., Rubini, L., & Podetti, S. (2017). Government support and R&D investment effectiveness in Chinese SMEs: A complex relationship. Asian Economic Papers, 16(1), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe. Research Policy, 46(7), 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. (1983). Action learning: A strategic approach for organizations facing turbulent conditions. Human Relations, 36(8), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., & Swan, J. (2003). ‘Control–what control?’ culture and ambiguity within a knowledge intensive firm. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Tekleab, A., Cheung, M., & Wu, W. P. (2022). The contingent roles of market turbulence and organizational innovativeness on the relationships among interfirm trust, formal contracts, interfirm knowledge sharing and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, (ahead-of-print).
   Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh, S. K., Nikbin, D., Alam, M. M. D., Rahman, S. A., & Nadarajah, G. (2020). Technological capabilities, open innovation and perceived operational performance in SMEs: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1486–1507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2020-0352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1992). Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2007). The sources of innovation. In Das summa summarum des management (pp. 111–120). Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. H., & Quan, X. I. (2019). The role of external technology scouting in inbound open innovation generation: Evidence from high-technology industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1558–1569. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2956069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Song, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, L. (2020). How does contract completeness affect tacit knowledge acquisition? Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Li, J. (2019). The impact of intellectual capital on SMEs’ performance in China: Empirical evidence from non-high-tech vs. High-tech SMEs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(4), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2018-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2021). Research on intellectual property management of technology innovation in Knowledge Intensive Enterprises (Doctoral dissertation, Harbin Engineering University).
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Shafi, M. (2020). How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises. Asian Business & Management, 19(5), 530–559. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00072-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Technology development strategies and policy support for the solar energy industry under technological turbulence. Energy Policy, 124, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Liu, Z., Li, J., & Zhang, G. (2020). The effects of collaboration With different partners: A contingency model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, ((6), 1546–1557. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2983067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., Liu, A., & Wang, Y. (2019). Integrating organizational learning with high-performance work system and entrepreneurial orientation: A moderated mediation framework. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-019-0057-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar