Hydrodynamic performance of a rim-driven thruster improved with gap geometry adjustment

References

• Baltazar, J., Falcão de Campos, J. A. C., & Bosschers, J. (2012). Open-water thrust and torque predictions of a ducted propeller system with a panel method. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2012, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/474785
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Hong, F., Tang, D., Hu, F., & Lu, L. (2012). Prediction of loading distribution and hydrodynamic measurements for propeller blades in a rim driven thruster. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 24(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60218-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Wei, X., Tang, D., & Hong, F. (2014). Study of gap flow effects on performance of rim driver thrusters. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Hydrodynamics and the 26th National Symposium on Hydrodynamics, Tsingtao, China, 1197–1206.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, I. B., Ghia, U., Roache, P. J., & Freitas, C. J. (2008). Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130(7), 078001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubas, A. J., Bressloff, N. W., & Sharkh, S. M. (2015). Numerical modelling of rotor–stator interaction in rim driven thrusters. Ocean Engineering, 106, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaggero, S. (2020). Numerical design of a RIM-driven thruster using a RANS-based optimization approach. Applied Ocean Research, 94, 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grümmer, H., Harries, S., & Hochbaum, A. C. (2017, June). Simulation-driven Design of a Rim Drive for an Autonomous Vehicle. In Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Espoo, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Grűmmer, H. (2016). Design and Optimization of a Hubless rim-driven Thruster for an Autonomous Surface Vehicle using RANSE Simulation (Doctoral dissertation, MS Dissertation, Department of Dynamics of Maritime Systems, Technical University of Berlin, German).
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., Yan, Q., Ding, J., & Sun, S. (2022). Numerical study on transient four-quadrant hydrodynamic performance of cycloidal propellers. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 16(1), 1813–1832. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2022.2118171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., Ouyang, W., Sheng, C., Lan, J., & Bucknall, R. (2022). Numerical investigation on hydrodynamic performance of a novel shaftless rim-driven counter-rotating thruster considering gap fluid. Applied Ocean Research, 118, 102967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort, L. (1940). Elektrisch angertriebene schiffsschraube. German Patent, 688(114), 13.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., Thompson, D., Blarcom, B., Eaton, J., Friesch, J., & Richards, J. (2003). Scale model testing of a commercial rim-driven propulsor pod. Journal of Ship Production, 19(02), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsp.2003.19.2.121
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Guo, C., Zhao, D., Han, Y., & Su, Y. (2022a). Hydrodynamic simulation for evaluating Magnus anti-rolling devices with varying angles of attack. Ocean Engineering, 260, 111949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Han, Y., Guo, C., Su, Y., & Zhong, R. (2022b). Intelligent ship anti-rolling control system based on a deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm and the Magnus effect. Physics of Fluids, 34(5), 057102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Zhao, D., Guo, C., Zhang, Z., & Su, Y. (2020). Numerically modeling the effect of flexibility on flow around marine engineering structures: Using the shape of the Saguaro Cactus. Journal of Coastal Research, 36(3), 628–635. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-19-00115.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & Vanierschot, M. (2021). Numerical study of the hydrodynamic characteristics comparison between a ducted propeller and a rim-driven thruster. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 4919. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114919
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Vanierschot, M., & Buysschaert, F. (2022a, August). Comparison study of the k − kL − ω and γ − Reθ transition models in the open water performance prediction of a rim-driven thruster. In Conference on Modelling Fluid Flow (CMFF'22), Budapest, Hungary, 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Vanierschot, M., & Buysschaert, F. (2022b). Effects of transition turbulence modeling on the hydrodynamic performance prediction of a rim-driven thruster under different duct designs. Ocean Engineering, 256, 111142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., & Langtry, R. (2003). Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 4(1), 625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Ottersten, M., Yao, H., & Davidson, L. (2022a). Inlet gap effect on aerodynamics and tonal noise generation of a voluteless centrifugal fan. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 540(8), 117304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117304
   Google Scholar
• Ottersten, M., Yao, H., & Davidson, L. (2022b). Inlet gap influence on low-frequency flow unsteadiness in a centrifugal fan. Aerospace, 9(12), 846. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9120846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, X., Santasmasas, M. C., Xue, X., Niu, J., Davidson, L., Revell, A. J., & Yao, H. (2022). Near-wall modeling of forests for atmosphere boundary layers using lattice Boltzmann method on GPU. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 16(1), 2143–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2022.2132420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, B., Wang, Y., & Tian, W. (2015). Open water performance comparison between hub-type and hubless rim driven thrusters based on CFD method. Ocean Engineering, 103, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., Guo, C., Sun, C., Wang, C., Gong, J., Li, P., & Wang, L. (2021). Simulation strategy of the full-scale ship resistance and propulsion performance. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 15(1), 1321–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1974091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, X., Zhao, G., Yuan, L., Yang, B., Tian, G., & Ai, X. (2020). Numerical research of hydrodynamic performance impact factors of rim-driven thruster. Ship Engineering, 42(7), 67–71+163. https://doi.org/10.13788/j.cnki.cbgc.2020.07.13
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y., Lin, J., Zhao, D., Guo, C., Wang, C., & Guo, H. (2020). Real-time prediction of large-scale ship model vertical acceleration based on recurrent neural network. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(10), 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, A. Y., Sokolov, M. A., & Marinich, N. V. (2011, June). Numerical design and experimental verification of a rim-driven thruster. In Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Hamburg, Germany, 396–403.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, X., Liang, X., Ouyang, W., Liu, Z., Liu, B., & Lan, J. (2017). A review of progress and applications of ship shaft-less rim-driven thrusters. Ocean Engineering, 144, 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, H., & Davidson, L. (2019). Vibro-acoustics response of a simplified glass window excited by the turbulent wake of a quarter-spherocylinder body. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(5), 3163–3176. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5109548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, S., Jin, S. B., Chen, J. Q., Liu, Z. H., & Song, X. L. (2022). CFD-based multi-objective optimization of the duct for a rim-driven thruster. Ocean Engineering, 264, 112467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z. P., & Liu, H. L. (2022). The external characteristics and inner flow research of rim-driven thruster. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 14(2), 168781322210816. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132221081608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar