Equality and differences: group interaction in mixed focus groups of users and professionals discussing power

References

• Allen, J. (2011). Lost geographies of power RGS-IBG book series, Vol. 79. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update, 25(9), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Belzile, J. A., & Öberg, G. (2012). Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 459–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A., Osborn, D., Atkins, L., Michie, S., Gray, B., Stevenson, F., & Walters, K. (2015). Lowering cardiovascular disease risk for people with severe mental illnesses in primary care: A focus group study. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0136603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, K. Å., Arman, M., Davidson, L., Sundfør, B., & Karlsson, B. (2013). “We are all fellow human beings”: Mental health workers’ perspectives of being in relationships with clients in community-based mental health services. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 34(12), 883–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Femdal, I., & Knutsen, I. R. (2017). Dependence and resistance in community psychiatric health care - negotiations of user participation between staff and users. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. doi:10.1111/jpm.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2013). Group dynamics. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage learning.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 777–795. 8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., Bertani, M., & Fontana, A. (2004). “Society must be defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975-76. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grønkjær, M., Curtis, T., Crespigny, C. D., & Delmar, C. (2011). Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1), 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Halcomb, E. J., Gholizadeh, L., DiGiacomo, M., Phillips, J., & Davidson, P. M. (2007). Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(6), 1000–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. M. (1968). Group interviewing. In R. L. King (Ed.), Marketing and the new science of planning: 1968 fall conference proceedings (Vol. 28). Chigaco: American Marketing Association Conference, Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2004). The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasekara, R. S. (2012). Focus groups in nursing research: Methodological perspectives. Nursing Outlook, 60(6), 411–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Association, vol 311, pp 299–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Poland, B., & Daudelin, G. (2006). Focus group research and “the patient’s view”. Social Science & Medicine, 63(8), 2091–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorem, G. F., & Hem, M. H. (2012). Attuned understanding and psychotic suffering: A qualitative study of health‐care professionals’ experiences in communicating and interacting with patients. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(2), 114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1984). Ideology, power, and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mizil, C. D. N., Lee, L., Pang, B., & Kleinberg, J. (2012). Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, J., Antonov, K., Nilsson, J. L. G., & Ring, L. (2010). Interaction between participants in focus groups with older patients and general practitioners. Qualitative Health Research. 20 607–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2012). Focus groups and social interaction. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Papastavrou, E., & Andreou, P. (2012). Exploring sensitive nursing issues through focus group approaches. Health Science Journal, 6(2), 186–200.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., Evans, J., Laker, C., & Wykes, T. (2015). Life in acute mental health settings: Experiences and perceptions of service users and nurses. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 24(1), 90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., Sweeney, A., Leese, M., Clement, S., Jones, I. R., Burns, T., … Wykes, T. (2009). Developing a user‐generated measure of continuity of care: Brief report. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119(4), 320–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues, pp. 292–331. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding, N. J., & Phillips, T. (2007). Exploring the use of vignettes: From validity to trustworthiness. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 954–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, P. E. (1996). Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 13(3), 170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2015). Focus groups: Theory and practice (Vol. 20). Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE.
   Google Scholar