110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

False information is harder to debunk after gist repetitions than verbatim repetitions

, , &
Pages 309-321 | Received 01 Sep 2023, Accepted 19 Jan 2024, Published online: 12 Feb 2024

References

  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
  • Anderson, C. A. (1982). Inoculation and counterexplanation: Debiasing techniques in the perseverance of social theories. Social Cognition, 1(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1982.1.2.126
  • Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). The perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077720
  • Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(6), 576–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90026-3
  • Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., & Boehm, L. (1989). The generality of the relation between repetition and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020203
  • Bacon, F. R. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241
  • Ball, P., & Maxmen, A. (2020). The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature, 581, 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z
  • Begg, I., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
  • Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children’s false memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71(2), 81–129. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2464
  • Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). Controlling false memories with opponent-processes: 1—Laboratory research with adults. In C. J. Brainerd, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), The science of false memory, Oxford psychology series (pp. 97–154). Oxford Academic.
  • Brown, A. S., & Nix, L. A. (1996). Turning lies into truths: Referential validation of falsehoods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1088
  • Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352251
  • Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(3), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.286
  • Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
  • Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Apai, J. (2011). Terrorists brought down the plane! — No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.497927
  • Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1
  • Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098
  • Gallucci, M. (2019). GAMLj: General analyses for linear models. [jamovi module]. https://gamlj.github.io/.
  • Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.015
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 324–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90012-X
  • Gratton, C., & Markovits, H. (2021). Reasoning strategies determine the effect of disconfirmation on belief in false claims. Memory & Cognition, 49(8), 1528–1536. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01190-1
  • Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1
  • Hawkins, A. S., Hoch, S. J., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2001). Low-involvement learning: Repetition and coherence in familiarity and belief. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1101_1
  • Jennings, D. L., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1981). Persistence of impressions of personal persuasiveness: Perseverance of erroneous self-assessments outside the debriefing paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172012
  • Johar, G. V., & Roggeveen, A. L. (2007). Changing false beliefs from repeated advertising: The role of claim-refutation alignment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70018-9
  • Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1420–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
  • Lopez, G. (2016). Pizzagate, the fake news conspiracy theory that led a gunman to DC’s Comet Ping Pong, explained. Vox. Retrieved November 8, 2022, from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/12/5/13842258/pizzagate-comet-ping-pong-fake-news.
  • Murphy, G. L., & Shapiro, A. M. (1994). Forgetting of verbatim information in discourse. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202764
  • Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386
  • Rey, B. (2014). Should you repeat your tweets? Facts and figures from 1M tweets. Wiselytics Report (October 23, 2014).
  • Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1994). The development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.2.178
  • Reyna, V. F., & Lloyd, F. (1997). Theories of false memory in children and adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(2), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(97)90002-9
  • Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880
  • Roth, Y. (21 February 2018). Automation and the use of multiple accounts. Twitter blog guidelines. https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/topics/tips/2018/automation-and-the-use-of-multiple-accounts.html.
  • Schul, Y., & Burnstein, E. (1985). When discounting fails: Conditions under which individuals use discredited information in making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.894
  • The Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org.
  • Twitter/X Copypasta and Duplicate Content Policy. (May 2023). Twitter Help Center. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/copypasta-duplicate-content#:~:text=What%20is%20considered%20a%20severe,any%20other%20Twitter%20Rules%20violations.
  • Unkelbach, C., & Rom, S. C. (2017). A referential theory of the repetition-induced truth effect. Cognition, 160, 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.016
  • Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
  • Wang, H., Zhang, J., & Johnson, T. R. (1999). Order effects in human belief revision. In Martin Hahn & Scott C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. First published 1999. eBook Published 22 December 2020: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603494
  • Wang, W. C., Brashier, N. M., Wing, E. A., Marsh, E. J., & Cabeza, R. (2016). On known unknowns: Fluency and the neural mechanisms of illusory truth. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(5), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00923
  • Wilkes, A. L., & Leatherbarrow, M. (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40(2), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000168

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.