The influence of audience on the topics discussed by King Abdullah II of Jordan: a corpus-assisted discourse study

References

• Abdallah, S. (2002). Jordan’s King launches identity campaign. UPI. Available from http://www.upi.com/Jordans-king-launches-identity-campaign/32771036095066/
   Google Scholar
• AbuAlhuda, A. S., & Alshboul, S. (2022). Persuasive strategies in two speeches of King Abdullah II about the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Theory and practice in language studies, 12(12), 2658–2668.
   Google Scholar
• Abu Rumman, R., & Haider, A. (2023). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of Jordan’s 2011 protest movement in Jordanian newspapers. Online journal of communication and media technologies, 13(1), e202306. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12856 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Rumman, R., & Hamdan, J. (2022). Conceptual metaphors in political discourse: evidence from the speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan. Dirasat: human and social sciences social sciences, 49(5), 189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Abbas, L.S., and Haider, A.S., 2020. The representation of homosexuals in Arabic-language news outlets. Equality, diversity and inclusion: An international journal, 40(3), 309–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2020-0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abed Al-Haq, F., & Al-Sleibi, N. M. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of three speeches of King Abdullah II. US-China foreign language, 13(5), 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khalafat, L., & Haider, A. S. (2022). A corpus-assisted translation study of strategies used in rendering culture-bound expressions in the speeches of King Abdullah II. Theory and practice in language studies, 12(1), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.16.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Salman, S., & Haider, A. S. (2021). The representation of COVID-19 and China in reuters’ and xinhua’s headlines. Search (Malaysia), 13(1), 93-110.
   Google Scholar
• Al Helih, M. M., & Nasereddin, Y. A. (2019). A roadmap for improving e-learning in jordan and ensuring the quality of its outputs. International journal of management, 10(3), 1078-1086.
   Google Scholar
• Almahasees, Z., & Mahmoud, S. (2022). Persuasive strategies utilized in the political speeches of king abdullah II: a critical discourse analysis. Cogent arts & humanities, 9(1), 2082016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlOudat, M. A., & Alshboul, A. (2010). “Jordan first”: tribalism, nationalism and legitimacy of power in Jordan. Intellectual discourse, 18(1), 65.
   Google Scholar
• Althedie, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1991). Media worlds in the postjoumalism era. New York: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P., 2006. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P., 2014. Using corpora to analyze gender. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, B. R. (2004). Audiences, metaphors, and the Persian Gulf war. Communication studies, 55(3), 447-463. doi:10.1080/10510970409388631
   Google Scholar
• Bercovitch, J., & Fretter, J. (2007). Studying international mediation: developing data sets on mediation, looking for patterns, and searching for answers. International negotiation, 12(2), 145-173. doi:10.1163/138234007X223267
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., and Bloor, T., 2007. The practice of critical discourse analysis: an introduction. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, R. (2022). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics. quarterly publication of the international pragmatics association (IPrA), 21(4), 493-525. doi:10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre
   Google Scholar
• Brulé, D. (2006). Congressional opposition, the economy, and U.S. dispute initiation, 1946-2000. Journal of conflict resolution, 50(4), 463-483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamie, J. (2015). Desperate Migration in the Middle East. Retrieved from UNHCR.
   Google Scholar
• Dibas, S., Rabab’ah, G., & Haider, A. S. (2022). Ideological dichotomy in the Arab newspapers coverage: the case of the 2017 Riyadh summit. International journal for the semiotics of law-revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 36(3), 1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09914-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2010). The politics of presidential speeches. Congress & the presidency, 37(1), 1. doi:10.1080/07343460903390679
   Google Scholar
• Farghal, M., & Kalakh, B. (2019). Engagement in translation: interactional metadiscourse markers in American presidential debates. Jordan journal of modern languages and literatures, 12(1), 103-122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleisher, R., and Bond, J.R., 2000. Partisanship and the president’s quest for votes on the floor of congress. In: J. R. Bond, and R. Fleisher, eds. Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 154–185.
   Google Scholar
• Forest, R. W. (2007). “Tell us what you really think”: collocation and discourse in an intertextual corpus. Thesis (PhD), City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, E., & Kampf, Z. (2014). Politically speaking at home and abroad: A typology of message gap strategies. Discourse & Society, 25(6), 706-724. doi:10.1177/0957926514536836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, A. S. (2016a). Conflicts as causes to change news foci: Frequency analysis for Asharq Al-Awsat and Al-Khaleej newspapers before and after the Arab Spring. International journal of English language and linguistics research, 4(7), 18-45.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, A. S. (2016b). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the Arab uprisings: evidence from the Libyan case. Dissertation (PhD), University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, A. S. (2017). Frequency analysis as a way of uncovering news foci: evidence from the Guardian and the New York Times. International journal of English linguistics, 7(2), 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, A. S. (2018). Using corpus linguistic techniques in (critical) discourse studies reduces but does not remove bias: Evidence from an Arabic corpus about refugees. Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics, 55(1), 89-133. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2019-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, R. F., Haider, A. S., & Al-Sayyed, S. (2021). A corpus-driven study of terms used to refer to articles and methods in research abstracts in the fields of economics, education, English literature, nursing, and political science, Journal of educational and social research, 11(3), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0056
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. T. (2015). Teaching audience analysis with presidential “victory” speeches. Communication teacher, 29(3), 146-150. doi:10.1080/17404622.2015.1028559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koller, V., & Mautner, G. (2004). Computer applications in critical discourse analysis. In Hewings, A., Coffin, C. and O’Halloran, K. (Ed.), Applying English grammar: corpus and functional approaches (pp. pp. 216–228). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, L. L. (1994). Home and homeland: the dialogics of tribal and national identities in Jordan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. (1998). The art of public speaking. Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., and Wilson, A., 2001. Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, S., Osborn, M., & Osborn, R. (2008). Public speaking guidebook. United Kingdom: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A. 2006. Metaphors, motifs and similes across discourse types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at work. In: Walter Bisang, et al, ed. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 267–304.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, M. (2016). Youth movement takes on Brotherhood and taboos in Jordan vote. Middle East Eye. Available from: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/jordan-parliamentary-elections-1478441765
   Google Scholar
• Quint, S. (2014). Kerry shuffles to Jordan hoping to keep the peace process alive. Foreign policy. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2014/03/27/kerry-shuffles-to-jordan-hoping-to-keep-the-peace-process-alive/
   Google Scholar
• Rabab’ah, G., & Abu Rumman, R. (2015). Hedging in political discourse: Evidence from the speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan. Prague journal of English studies, 4(1), 157-185.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1988). The postmodern president: the White House meets the world. Chatham, N.J: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Saed, H. A., Hussein, R. F., Haider, A. S., Al-Salman, S., & Odeh, I. M. (2022). Establishing a COVID-19 lemmatized word list for journalists and ESP learners. Indonesian journal of applied linguistics, 11(3), 577–588. doi:10.17509/ijal.v11i3.37103
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., 2016. Wordsmith tools version 7. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In Ryan, A. & Wray, A. (Ed.), Evolving models of language: British studies in applied linguistics (Vol. 12, pp. 100-116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: corpus studies of lexical semantics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Todhunter, J. P. (2013). The domestic fruits of diplomacy: mediation and presidential approval. International negotiation, 18(2), 195-217. doi:10.1163/15718069-12341253
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T.A., 2001. Critical discourse analysis. In: D. Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 352–371.
   Google Scholar
• Wareing, S. n. (2004). What is language and what does it do. In L. Thomas (Ed.), Language, society, and power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London; Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar