Accounting for respondent’s preference uncertainty in choice experiments

References

• Akter, S., J. Bennett, and S. Akhter. 2008. “Preference Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 67 (3): 345–351. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenio, E. 2002. “The Valuation of Environmental Externalities: A Stated Preference Case Study on Traffic Noise in Lisbon.” (PhD Thesis). Institute for Transport Studies. University of Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J. 1988. “Econometric Issues in Stated Preference Analysis.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22 (1): 59–69. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20052835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2003. “BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models”. Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference. Ascona, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2008. An Introduction to BIOGEME Version 1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2009. Estimation of Discrete Choice Models with BIOGEME 1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Boman, M. 2009. “To Pay or not to Pay for Biodiversity in Forests – What Scale Determines Response to Willingness to Pay Questions with Uncertain Response Options?” Journal of Forest Economics 15 (1-2): 79–91. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, T., and R. Brannlund. 2008. “An Alternative Interpretation of Multiple Bounded WTP Data – Certainty Dependent Payment Card Intervals.” Resource and Energy Economics 30 (4): 555–567. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. C., D. Kingsley, G. L. Peterson, N. E. Flores, A. Clarke, and A. Birjulin. 2006. “Reliability of Individual Valuations of Public and Private Goods: Choice Consistency, Response Time and Preference Refinement.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (7): 1595–1606. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caussade, S., J. D. Ortuzar, L. I. Rizzi, and D. A. Hensher. 2005. “Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiment Estimates.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39 (7): 621–640. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave, K. 2011. “Preference Elicitation and Preference Uncertainty: An Application to Noise Valuation.” (PhD Thesis). Institute for Transport Studies. University of Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dave, K., J. Toner, and H. Chen. 2018. “The Effect of Attribute Representation Methods on Noise Valuation: A Choice Experiment Study.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 62: 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, T., S. Hess, R. Brouwer, and M. Hofkes. 2016. “Decision Uncertainty in Multi-Attribute Stated Preference Studies.” Resource and Energy Economics 43: 57–73. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowkes, A., and M. Wardman. 1988. “The Design of Stated Preference Travel Choice Experiments with Particular Regard to Inter-Personal Taste Variation.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22 (1): 27–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20052833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and W. H. Greene. 2001. The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary. Working Paper. University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., K. E. Train, and J. W. Polak. 2006. “On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) Method in the Estimation of a Mixed Logit Model for Vehicle Choice.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40 (2): 147–163. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, J., M. F. Luce, and G. W. Fisher. 2004. “Consumer Preference Uncertainty: Measures of Attribute Conflict and Extremity.” Wharton-SMU Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Koppelman, F. S., and C. Bhat. 2006. A Self Instructing Course on Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models. Washington DC: US Department for Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Kosenius, A. 2009. “Causes of Response Uncertainty and its Implications for WTP Estimation in Choice Experiment”. Discussion Paper No. 29. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. Z., and L. Mattsson. 1995. “Discrete Choice Under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (2): 256–269. doi:10.1006/jeem.1995.1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. L., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundhede, T. H., S. B. Olsen, J. B. Jacobsen, and B. J. Thorsen. 2009. “Handling Respondent Uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating Recoding Approaches Against Explicit Modelling of Uncertainty.” Journal of Choice Modelling 2 (2): 118–147. doi:10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70007-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1988. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice.” In Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative and Perceptive Interactions, edited by D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. D., and E. J. Miller. 1984. Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-Oriented Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. B., T. H. Lundhede, J. B. Jacobsen, and B. J. Thorsen. 2011. “Tough and Easy Choice: Testing the Influence of Utility Difference on Stated Certainty-in-Choice in Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49: 491–510. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9443-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restle, F. 1961. Psychology of Judgment and Choice: A Theoretical Essay. New York, London: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. 2005. “A Review of Stated Choice Method”. Discussion Papers in Economics and Business. Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy. Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 2000. “The Construction of Preferences.” In Choices, Values and Frames, edited by D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, 489–502. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanez, M. F., E. Cherchi, B. G. Heydecker, and J. D. Ortuzar. 2010. “On the Treatment of Repeated Observations in Panel Data: Efficiency of Mixed Logit Parameter Estimates.” Networks and Spatial Economics 11 (3): 393–418. doi:10.1007/s11067-010-9143-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar