Coaching practice as discovering performance: the wild contingencies of coaching

References

• Button, G., Lynch, M., & Sharrock, W. (2022). Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and constructive analysis: On formal structures of practical action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, E., Cushion, C. J., Harvey, S., & Partington, M. (2022). Re-visiting systematic observation: A pedagogical tool to support coach learning and development. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 962690. doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.962690
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corsby, C. L. T., & Jones, R. L. (2019). Observation, evaluation and coaching: The local orderliness of ‘seeing’ performance. Sport, Education and Society, 25(3), 348–358. doi:10.1080/13573322.2019.1587399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushion, C. J. (2007). Modelling the complexity of the coaching process. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2(4), 395–401. doi:10.1260/174795407783359650
   Google Scholar
• Ehmer, O. (2021). Synchronization in demonstrations. Multimodal practices for instructing body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 20200038. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2020-0038
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B. (2017). Sports coaching as action-in-context: Using ethnomethodological conversation analysis to understand the coaching process, Qualitative Research in Sport. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 9(1), 111–132. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2016.1246473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Reynolds, E. (2016). The organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39(4), 525–556. doi:10.1002/symb.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (ed.). (1986). Studies of work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism,Anne W. Rawls (Ed.) Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2022a). Respecifying the natural sciences as discovering sciences of practical action. In M. Lynch (Ed.), Harold Garfinkel: Studies of work in the sciences (pp. 21–52). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2022b). Seminar 1: Discovering work of the sciences (May 22, 1980). In M. Lynch (Ed.), Harold Garfinkel: Studies of work in the sciences (pp. 104–124). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2022c). Seminar 2: Discovering work of the sciences (May 27, 1980). In M. Lynch (Ed.), Harold Garfinkel: Studies of work in the sciences (pp. 125–138). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. N. (2013). Playing dangerously: An ethnomethodological view upon rock climbing. In P. Tolmie & M. Rouncefield (Eds.), Ethnomethodology at play (pp. 191–210). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. N. (2017). Rock climbers’ communicative and sensory practices: Routine inter corporeality between climbers, rock, and auxiliary technologies. In C. Meyer & U. von Wedelstaedt (Eds.), Amsterdam. Moving bodies in interaction—interacting bodies in motion: Intercorporeal and interkinesthetic enaction in sports (pp. 149–171). Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. L., & Wallace, M. (2005). Another bad day at the training ground: Coping with ambiguity in the coaching context. Sport, Education and Society, 10(1), 119–134. doi:10.1080/1357332052000308792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C. D., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). Can you see the cystic artery yet? A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O. (2014). The body in medical work and medical training: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 125–129. doi:10.1177/1461445613514671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, E. (2008). Context and detail in studies of the witnessable social order: Puzzles, maps, checkers, and geometry. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(5), 840–862. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (eds.). (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2022). Editor’s introduction. In M. Lynch (Ed.), Harold Garfinkel: Studies of work in the sciences (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. (2012). Some notes on the play of basketball in its circumstantial detail, and an introduction to their occasion. Human Studies, 35(2), 193–208. doi:10.1007/s10746-012-9235-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. (2019). Ethnomethodology's culture. Human studies, 42(2), 281–303. doi:10.1007/s10746-019-09515-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 131–161. doi:10.1177/1461445613515325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, M. (2018). Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 67–84. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, E. (2017). Description of membership and enacting membership: Seeing-a-lift, being a team. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 99–119. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, E. (2020). Respecifying dualities: The case of ‘feel enquiries’ used in sports Coaching Wiggins, Sally, Cromdal, Karin Osvaldsson Eds . Discursive psychology and embodiment: Beyond subject-object binaries (pp. 139–167). New York City: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez García, R., & Liberman, K. (2021). Turn-taking in the surfing lineup. Sociología Del Deporte, 2(1), 25–38. doi:10.46661/socioldeporte.5848
   Google Scholar
• Simone, M., & Galatolo, R. (2020). Climbing as a pair: Instructions and instructed body movement in indoor climbing with visually impaired athletes. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 286–302. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, M., & Galatolo, R. (2021). Timing and prosody of lexical repetition: How repeated instructions assist visually impaired athletes’ navigation in sport climbing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(4), 397–419. doi:10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. J. (2020). Seeing the trouble: A mountain rescue training scenario in its circumstantial and situated detail in three frames. Ethnographic Studies, 17, 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. J. (2022). Fieldwork, participation, and unique-adequacy-in-action. Qualitative Research. doi:10.1177/14687941221132955
   Google Scholar
• Sudnow, D. (1978). Ways of the hand. The organization of improvised conduct. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, S., & Haddington, P. (2019). Looking at and seeing objects: Instructed vision and collaboration in the laboratory. Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 20, 360–435.
   Google Scholar