A systematic review of CDIO knowledge library publications (2010 – 2020): An Overview of trends and recommendations for future research

References

• Agouridas, V., and P. Race. 2007. “Enhancing Knowledge Management in Design Education Through Systematic Reflection Practice.” Concurrent Engineering 15 (1): 63–76. doi:10.1177/1063293X07076267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, G. C., S. Kepes, and K. P. Banks. 2012. “Publication Bias: The Antagonist of Meta-Analytic Reviews and Effective Policymaking.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (3): 259–277. doi:10.3102/0162373712446144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, J., and M. Prenzel. 2012. “European Teacher Training Reforms.” Science 336 (6089): 1642–1643. doi:10.1126/science.1218387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, L., and M. Borrego. 2015. “The Role of Replication in Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 104 (4): 388–392. doi:10.1002/jee.20082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhadani, K., C. Stöhr, E. Hulthén, J. Quist, M. Bengtsson, M. Evertsson, and J. Malmqvist 2017. Students Perspectives on Video-Based Learning in CDIO-Based Project Courses. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, 690–705. http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/students-perspectives-video-based-learning-cdio-based-project-courses
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M. 2007. “Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods.” Journal of Engineering Education 96 (2): 91–102. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall. 2010. “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (3): 185–207. doi:10.1002/J.2168-9830.2010.TB01056.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, R., R. Hugo, K. Johnston, N. Nelson, R. Paul, and M. Sullivan 2018. A Systematic Review of Canadian Engineering Education Research 2004-2017. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 1–5. 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.13079
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, D. R. 2012a. The Ethics of Globalization. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, 1–17. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/ethics-globalization
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, D. R. 2012b. Mentoring Young Adults in the Development of Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, 1–19. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/mentoring-young-adults-development-social-responsibility
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, J., T. Hyland, and N. Seery. 2021. “Coronaslöjd.” Techne Serien - Forskning i Slöjdpedagogik Och Slöjdvetenskap 28 (4): 1–20. doi:10.7577/TechneA.4722.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, J. R., R. Vasconcelos, A. B. Bernardo, and L. S. Almeida. 2021. “University Dropout in Engineering: Motives and Student Trajectories.” Psicothema 33 (4): 595–601. doi:10.7334/psicothema2020.363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, J. M. 2017. “The Historical Evolution of Engineering Degrees: Competing Stakeholders, Contestation Over Ideas, and Coherence Across National Borders.” European Journal of Engineering Education 42 (6): 974–986. doi:10.1080/03043797.2016.1238446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDIO Initiative. (2022). http://www.cdio.org/
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, E. F., J. Malmqvist, W. A. Lucas, and D. R. Brodeur 2011. The CDIO Syllabus V2. 0. An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/local_143186.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crüwell, S., J. van Doorn, A. Etz, M. C. Makel, H. Moshontz, J. C. Niebaum, A. Orben, S. Parsons, and M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck. 2019. “Seven Easy Steps to Open Science.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie 227 (4): 237–248. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickersin, K. 2006. “Publication Bias: Recognizing the Problem, Understanding Its Origins and Scope, and Preventing Harm.” In Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis, 9–33. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch2.
   Google Scholar
• Dykman, C., and C. K. Davis. 2008. “Part One – the Shift Toward Online Education.” Journal of Information Systems 19 (1): 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edström, K. 2017. “The Role of CDIO in Engineering Education Research: Combining Usefulness and Scholarliness.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (1): 113–127. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1401596.
   Google Scholar
• Edström, K., and A. Kolmos. 2014. “PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (5): 539–555. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703.
   Google Scholar
• Edström, K., J. Malmqvist, and J. Roslöf. 2020. “Scholarly Development of Engineering Education – the CDIO Approach.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1080/03043797.2020.1704361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouw, N. D., R. Klaassen, and Y. V. D. Tang 2020. Prerequisites for Interdisciplinary Learning: Organisation and Staff. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, 307–317. http://cdio.org/content/prerequisites-interdisciplinary-learning-organisation-and-staff
   Google Scholar
• Francis, R., and S. J. Shannon. 2013. “Engaging with Blended Learning to Improve students’ Learning Outcomes.” European Journal of Engineering Education 38 (4): 359–369. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.766679.
   Google Scholar
• Frieler, K., D. Müllensiefen, T. Fischinger, K. Schlemmer, K. Jakubowski, and K. Lothwesen. 2013. “Replication in Music Psychology.” Musicae Scientiae 17 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1177/1029864913495404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J., D. Izzo, K. Odato, and L. Wang 2006. Evidence-Based Medicine Subject Guide: EBM Pyramid. In Trustees of Dartmouth College and Yale University. https://guides.lib.uci.edu/ebm/pyramid
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. 2018. The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. In Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). https://jwel.mit.edu/assets/document/global-state-art-engineering-education.
   Google Scholar
• Jesiek, B., M. Borrego, and K. Beddoes 2008. Expanding Global Engineering Education Research Collaboration. Proceedings of 36th European Society for Engineering Education, SEFI Conference on Quality Assessment, Aalborg, Denmark. Employability and Innovation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228852481
   Google Scholar
• Josefsson, T. 2010. Intercultural Competence in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, 1–11. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/intercultural-competence-engineering-education
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, A. 2021. Cdio. Can We Continue the Way We Are? The 17th International CDIO Conference, 26–43. http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/74493
   Google Scholar
• Kans, M., and Å. Gustafsson 2016. Analyzing the Meaning of Interdisciplinary in the CDIO Context. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, 962–973. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/analyzing-meaning-interdisciplinary-cdio-context
   Google Scholar
• Klaassen, R., B. D. Bruin, N. D. Fouw, A. Kamp, and H. Hellendoorn 2020. Cognitive, Social and Emotional Aspects of Interdisciplinary Learning. Proceedings of the 16thInternational CDIO Conference, 343–355. https://chalmersuniversity.app.box.com/s/a74pfd3c5c5tqywn7k34gedm561zpfe5
   Google Scholar
• Lefoe, G., and W. Meyers 2006. Modelling Blended Learning Environments: Designing an Academic Development Blog. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Ascilite Conference: Who’s Learning? Whose Technology?, 1, 451–454. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=asdpapers
   Google Scholar
• Le, B. N., and M. D. Le 2014. Effectiveness of Cultural Appreciation via Online Learning. Proceedings of the 10th Annual International CDIO Conference. http://cdio.org/node/6133
   Google Scholar
• le Roux, K., D. L. Taylor, B. Kloot, and S. Allie. 2021. “Research on Higher Education: A Perspective on the Relations Between Higher Education Studies and Discipline-Based Education Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 26 (1): 50–64. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1634538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., and J. Bennedsen 2014. Methodological Analysis of CDIO Papers. The 10th International CDIO Conference, 1–11. http://www.cdio.org/node/6217
   Google Scholar
• López-Pérez, M. V., M. C. Pérez-López, and L. Rodríguez-Ariza. 2011. “Blended Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions and Their Relation to Outcomes.” Computers & Education 56 (3): 818–826. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., and J. A. Plucker. 2014. “Facts are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences.” Educational Researcher 43 (6): 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189X14545513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., K. Edström, and A. Rosen 2020. CDIO Standards 3.0–Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, 60–76. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1469617
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., K. Edström, and A. Rosén 2020. CDIO Standards 3.0 - Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 60–76. https://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/cdio-standards-30-%E2%80%93-updates-core-cdio-standards
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., U. Lundqvist, A. Rosén, K. Edström, R. Gupta, H. Leong, S. M. Cheah, et al. 2022. The CDIO Syllabus 3.0 - an Updated Statement of Goals. 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 18–36. http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/cdio-syllabus-30-updated-statement-goals
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., T. Machado, A. Meikleham, and R. Hugo 2019. Bibliographic Data Analysis of CDIO Conference Papers from 2005-2018. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, 816–832. https://www.google.com/search?q=Bibliographic+Data+Analysis+of+CDIO+Conference+Papers+from+2005-2018
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., K. K. Rådberg, and U. Lundqvist 2015. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of CHALLENGE-BASED LEARNING EXPERIENCES. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, 1–13. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/problem-based-challenge-based-learning-%E2%80%93-motives-examples-outcomes-and
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., M. K. Wedel, U. Lundqvist, K. Edström, A. Rosén, T. F. Astrup, M. Vigild, et al. 2019. Towards CDIO Standards 3.0. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, 23–42. http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/towards-cdio-standards-30
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., H. R. Rothstein, and D. L. Whetzel. 2006. “Publication Bias: A Case Study of Four Test Vendors.” Personnel Psychology 59 (4): 927–953. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00059.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLure, F. I., K. S. Tang, and P. J. Williams. 2022. “What Do Integrated STEM Projects Look Like in Middle School and High School Classrooms? A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Studies of iSTEM Projects.” International Journal of STEM Education 9 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00390-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, and M. Baki. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Teachers College Record 115 (3): 1–47. doi:10.1177/016146811311500307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones. 2009. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Meikleham, A., R. Hugo, A. Kamp, and J. Malmqvist 2018. Visualizing 17 Years of Cdio Influence via Bibliometric Data Analysis. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, 53–72. http://www.cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/visualizing-17-years-cdio-influence-bibliometric-data-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Mielikäinen, M. 2021. “Towards Blended Learning: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on a Project-Based Integrated Curriculum in ICT Engineering Education.” Industry and Higher Education 36 (1): 74–85. doi:10.1177/0950422221994471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millson, M. R., and D. Wilemon. 2008. “Educational Quality Correlates of Online Graduate Management Education.” Journal of Distance Education 22 (3): 1–18. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=35638872&site=eds-live.
   Google Scholar
• Min, Y., G. Zhang, R. A. Long, T. J. Anderson, and M. W. Ohland. 2011. “Nonparametric Survival Analysis of the Loss Rate of Undergraduate Engineering Students.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (2): 349–373. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00017.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca, J. B., D. R. Ball, J. S. Buzza, and D. P. Paul III. 2010. “A Comprehensive Student-Based Analysis of Hybrid Courses: Student Preferences and Design Criteria for Success.” Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 8 (5): 7–22. doi:10.19030/jber.v8i5.715.
   Google Scholar
• Okaz, A. A. 2015. “Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences 186: 600–603. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086.
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 1–9. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.
   Google Scholar
• Paura, L., and I. Arhipova. 2014. “Cause Analysis of Students’ Dropout Rate in Higher Education Study Program.” Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences 109: 1282–1286. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.625.
   Google Scholar
• Power, J. R. 2021a. “Enhancing Engineering Education Through the Integration of Open Science Principles: A Strategic Approach to Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Engineering Education 110 (3): 509–514. doi:10.1002/jee.20413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, J. R. 2021b. “Systematic Reviews in Engineering Education: A Catalyst for Change.” European Journal of Engineering Education 1–12. doi:10.1080/03043797.2021.1980770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., H. Bartholomew, V. Hames, A. Hind, J. Leach, R. Millar, and J. Osborne. 2005. “Evidence‐Based Practice in Science Education: The Researcher–User Interface.” Research Papers in Education 20 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1080/02671520500078036.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, A., A.-K. Högfeldt, A. Lantz, L. Gumaelius, R. Wyss, M. N. Bergendahl, J. Vasell, and S. K. Lujara 2018. Connecting North and South Through Challengedriven Education. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, 967–983. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/connecting-north-and-south-through-challengedriven-education
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R., A. J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein. 2005. “Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis.” In Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, edited by, H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, and M. Borenstein. Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470870168.
   Google Scholar
• Roza, A. D. 2010. Industry Linkages at Nanyang Polytechnic Singapore: Translating Innovative Approaches into Action. Proceedings of the 6th CDIO Conference, 1–13. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/industry-linkages-nanyang-polytechnic-singapore-translating-innovative-a
   Google Scholar
• Saboowala, R., and M. P. Mishra. 2021. “Readiness of In-Service Teachers Toward a Blended Learning Approach as a Learning Pedagogy in the Post-COVID-19 Era.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 50 (1): 9–23. doi:10.1177/00472395211015232.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., W. M. C. Rosenberg, J. A. M. Gray, R. B. Haynes, and W. S. Richardson. 1996. “Evidence Based Medicine: What It is and What It Isn’t.” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 312 (7023): 71–72. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. 2009. “Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences.”Methodological Issues and Strategies in Clinical Research, 4th. ed, Vol. 13. Issue 2 581–596. American Psychological Association. 10.1037/14805-036.
   Google Scholar
• Serdar, C. C., M. Cihan, D. Yücel, and M. A. Serdar. 2021. “Sample Size, Power and Effect Size Revisited: Simplified and Practical Approaches in Pre-Clinical, Clinical and Laboratory Studies.” Biochemia Medica 31 (1): 27–53. doi:10.11613/BM.2021.010502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 2002. “Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research.” Educational Researcher 31 (7): 15–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007015.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, D., J. Raynauld, and P. Lalande 2011. Proposed Framework for Transdisciplinary Product and Process Design Education. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, 1–8. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/proposed-framework-transdisciplinary-product-and-process-design-educatio
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and R. Pring. 2004. Evidence-Based Practice in Education. UK: In Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, H. M., C. Zhu, and N. A. Diep. 2017. “The Effect of Blended Learning on Student Performance at Course-Level in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 53: 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xian, H., and K. Madhavan. 2014. “Anatomy of Scholarly Collaboration in Engineering Education: A Big-Data Bibliometric Analysis.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (3): 486–514. doi:10.1002/JEE.20052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, M., P. J. Williams, J. Gu, and H. Zhang. 2020. “Hotspots and trends of technology education in the International Journal of Technology and Design Education: 2000–2018.“ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 30 (2): 207–224. doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09508-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigit, T., A. Koyun, A. S. Yuksel, and I. A. Cankaya. 2014. “Evaluation of Blended Learning Approach in Computer Engineering Education.” Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences 141: 807–812. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.140.
   Google Scholar
• Yström, A., L. Peterson, B. V. Sydow, and J. Malmqvist 2010. Using Personas to Guide Education Needs Analysis and Program Design. Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, 1–13. http://cdio.org/knowledge-library/documents/using-personas-guide-education-needs-analysis-and-program-design
   Google Scholar