Ethical consumption in three stages: a focus on sufficiency and care

References

• Ackermann, K., and B. Gundelach. 2020. “Psychological Roots of Political Consumerism: Personality Traits and Participation in Boycott and Buycott.” International Political Science Review 43 (1): 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120959683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akenji, L., M. Bengtsson, V. Toivio, M. Lettenmeier, T. Fawcett, T. Parag, Y. Saheb, et al. 2021. 1.5-Degree Lifestyles: Towards a Fair Consumption Space for All. Berlin: Hot or Cool Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Alfredsson, E., M. Bengtsson, H. S. Brown, C. Isenhour, S. Lorek, D. Stevis, and P. Vergragt. 2018. “Why Achieving the Paris Agreement Requires Reduced Overall Consumption and Production.” Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy 14 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2018.1458815.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., N. Clarke, P. Cloke, and A. Malpass 2005. The Political Ethics of Consumerism Faith-Based Organisations and Exclusion in European Cities View Project Geographies of Postsecularity View Project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42792807.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2007. Consuming Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. 1983. “Worldly Possessions: Issues and Criticisms.” In Advances in Consumer Research, edited by Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout, 514–519. Vol. 10. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., G. Ger, and S. Askegaard. 2003. “The Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (3): 326–351. https://doi.org/10.1086/378613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berki-Kiss, D., and K. Menrad. 2022. “Ethical Consumption: Influencing Factors of Consumer´s Intention to Purchase Fairtrade Roses.” Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy 2:100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2022.100008.
   Google Scholar
• Beyeler, L., and M. Jaeger-Erben. 2022. “How to Make More of Less: Characteristics of Sufficiency in Business Practices.” Frontiers in Sustainability 3:949710. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.949710.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M. 2023. The Social Life of Unsustainable Mass Consumption. Lanham: Lexington books.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M., M. Micheletti, and P. Oosterveer. 2019. “Studying Political Consumerism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Consumerism, pp. xvi–24. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190629038.013.44.
   Google Scholar
• Callmer, Å. 2019. “Making sense of sufficiency: Entries, practices and politics.” Doctoral thesis in planning and decision analysis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Carfagna, L. B., E. A. Dubois, C. Fitzmaurice, M. Y. Ouimette, J. B. Schor, M. Willis, and T. Laidley. 2014. “An Emerging Eco-Habitus: The Reconfiguration of High Cultural Capital Practices Among Ethical Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (2): 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514526227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, M., A. Chatzidakis, H. Goworek, and D. Shaw. 2021. “Consumption Ethics: A Review and Analysis of Future Directions for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2): 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04425-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, M., and A. Chatzidaksi. 2018. Critical Perspective on Ethical Consumption Form: The Routledge Companion to Critical Marketing Routledge. Edited by Tadajewski, M., Higgins, J., and Varman, R, 1st ed. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630526.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, M. J., B. A. Neville, and G. J. Whitwell. 2010. “Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers.” Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1): 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, M. J., D. Zwick, and B. Neville. 2016. “The Ideology of the Ethical Consumption Gap.” Marketing Theory 16 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115595674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casais, B., and J. Faria. 2022. “The Intention-Behavior Gap in Ethical Consumption: Mediators, Moderators and Consumer Profiles Based on Ethical Priorities.” Journal of Macromarketing 42 (1): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467211054836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzidakis, A., D. Shaw, and M. Allen. 2021. “A Psycho-Social Approach to Consumer Ethics.” Journal of Consumer Culture 21 (2): 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518773815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. 2005. “Slower Consumption: Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 (1–2): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Pinto, D., A. Borges, M. Maurer Herter, and M. Boto Ferreira. 2020. “Reducing Ingroup Bias in Ethical Consumption: The Role of Construal Levels and Social Goodwill.” Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (1): 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin, C. 2012. “The Social Logic of Late Capitalism: Guilt Fetishism and the Culture of Crisis Industry.” Cultural Sociology 6 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975511427650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker, P., L. Driesen, and G. Rayp. 2005. “Do Consumers Care About Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 39 (2): 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker, P., W. Janssens, and C. Mielants. 2005. “CONSUMER VALUES and FAIR-TRADE BELIEFS, ATTITUDES and BUYING BEHAVIOUR.” © International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing 2 (2): 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893257.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022. Green Deal: New Proposals to Make Sustainable Products the Norm and Boost Europe’s Resource Independence. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_2013.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. M. 2019. “What is Consumption, Where Has It Been Going, and Does It Still Matter?” The Sociological Review 67 (3): 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118764028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenreich, B., and S. Schaltegger. 2020. “Developing Sufficiency-Oriented Offerings for Clothing Users: Business Approaches to Support Consumption Reduction.” Journal of Cleaner Production 247:119589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., M. Sahakian, T. Gumbert, A. Di Giulio, M. Maniates, S. Lorek, and A. Graf. 2021. “Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life within Sustainable Limits.” In Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life within Sustainable Limits. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367748746.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., and G. Rodeschini 2016. “Caring as a Collective Knowledgable Doing: About Concern and Being Concerned.” Management Learning 47 (3): 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615610030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., and G. Rodeschini. 2016. “Caring as a Collective Knowledgeable Doing: About Concern and Being Concerned.” Management Learning 47 (3): 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615610030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler, M., and E. Veresiu. 2014. “Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity.” Journal of Consumer Research 41 (3): 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1086/677842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, L. 2022. “Care and Consumption.” Consumption and Society 1 (2): 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1332/iuyx1774.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, L., and J. Langlois. 2021. “Care, Gender, and Change in the Study of Sustainable Consumption: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Frontiers in Sustainability 2:2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.725753.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A., D. N. Pellow, and A. Schnaiberg. 2004. “Interrogating the Treadmill of Production: Everything You Wanted to Know About the Treadmill but Were Afraid to Ask.” Organization & Environment 17 (3): 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604268747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K. 2021. “Conceptualizing Ethical Consumption within Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 21 (3): 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211013956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory-Smith, D., A. Smith, and H. Winklhofer. 2013. “Emotions and Dissonance in “Ethical” Consumption Choices.” Journal of Marketing Management 29 (11–12): 1201–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.796320.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R. 2022. “Powerless, Stupefied and Repressed Actors Cannot Challenge Climate Change.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., T. Newholm, and D. Shaw. 2005. The Ethical Consumer. Thou-sand Oaks, PA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2017. Prosperity without Growth. Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, E., and A. Dulrud. 2007. “Will Consumers Save the World? The Framing of Political Consumerism.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5): 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9043-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungell-Michelsson, J., and P. Heikkurinen. 2022. “Sufficiency: A Systematic Literature Review.” Ecological Economics 195:107380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimzadeh, S., and M. Boström. 2022. “Ethical Consumption: Why Should We Understand It as a Social Practice within a Multilevel Framework?” version 2; peer review: 2 approved] Open Research Europe 2022, 2:109. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15069.2
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., and J. M. Handelman. 2004. “Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology.” Journal of Consumer Research, Inc 31 (3): 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1086/425104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, J. 2022. “Sufficiency and Transformation–A Semi-Systematic Literature Review of Notions of Social Change in Different Concepts of Sufficiency.” Frontiers in Sustainability 3:954660. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.954660.
   Google Scholar
• Lastovicka, J. L., L. A. Bettencourt, R. S. Hughner, and R. J. Kuntze. 1999. “Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement.” Journal of Consumer Research 26 (1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/209552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Y. Jin, and H. Shin. 2018. “Cosmopolitanism and Ethical Consumption: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour and Modelling for Fair Trade Coffee Consumers in South Korea.” Sustainable Development 26 (6): 822–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, T., and P. Heikkurinen. 2022. “Sufficiency and Sustainability: Conceptual Analysis and Ethical Considerations for Sustainable Organisation.” Environmental Values 31 (5): 599–618. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16328186623878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., L. Wei, X. Zeng, and J. Zhu. 2020. “Mindfulness in Ethical Consumption: The Mediating Roles of Connectedness to Nature and Self-Control.” International Marketing Review 38 (4): 756–779. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2019-0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorek, S., and D. Fuchs. 2013. “Strong Sustainable Consumption Governance – Precondition for a Degrowth Path?” Journal of Cleaner Production 38:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniates, M. 2001. “Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?” Global Environmental Politics 1 (3): 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001316881395.
   Google Scholar
• Micheletti, M. 2003. Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam International. 2020. “Confronting Carbon Inequality.” Oxfam media briefing. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/confronting-carbon-inequality.
   Google Scholar
• Pellandini-Simányi, L. 2014. “Ethical Consumerism and Everyday Ethics.” In Consumption Norms and Everyday Ethics, pp. 140–165. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137022509_6.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, O. 2022. “Scaling sufficiency: Towards less material consumption.” Doctoral thesis in planning and decision analysis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, O., and M. Klintman. 2021. “Framing Sufficiency: Strategies of Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations Towards Reduced Material Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Culture 22 (2): 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521990857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, M. 2021. “Sufficiency Transitions: A Review of Consumption Changes for Environmental Sustainability.” Journal of Cleaner Production 293:126097. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126097.
   Google Scholar
• Sassatelli, R. 2007. Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, H., J. Krieger, and A. Bayraktar. 2011. “The Impact of Intrinsic Religiosity on Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs: Does It Depend on the Type of Religion? A Comparison of Christian and Moslem Consumers in Germany and Turkey.” Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2): 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0816-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J., and C. Thompson, edited by. 2014. Sustainable Lifestyles and the Quest for Plenitude. Case Studies of the New Economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K. A., and S. T. Weaver. 2018. “The Intersection of Sustainable Consumption and Anticonsumption: Repurposing to Extend Product Life Spans.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 074867661881185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748676618811851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., R. McMaster, C. Longo, and N. Özçaglar-Toulouse. 2017. “Ethical Qualities in Consumption: Towards a Theory of Care.” Marketing Theory 17 (4): 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117699662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., R. McMaster, and T. Newholm. 2016. “Care and Commitment in Ethical Consumption: An Exploration of the ‘Attitude–Behaviour Gap.” Journal of Business Ethics 136 (2): 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2442-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper, K. 2008. “Alternative Hedonism, Cultural Theory and the Role of Aesthetic Revisioning.” Cultural Studies 22 (5): 567–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerton, D. 2013. “Habits, Routines and Temporalities of Consumption: From Individual Behaviours to the Reproduction of Everyday Practices.” Time & Society 22 (3): 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X12464228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, J. H., and S. Lorek. 2019. “Sufficiency and Consumer Behaviour: From Theory to Policy.” Energy Policy 129:1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhaut, S., and P. van Kenhove. 2006. “The Mediating Role of Anticipated Guilt in consumers’ Ethical Decision-Making.” Journal of Business Ethics 69 (3): 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9090-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, A. M. 2021. “Things are Getting Worse on Our Way to Catastrophe: Neoliberal Environmentalism, Repressive Desublimation, and the Autonomous Ecoconsumer.” Critical Sociology 47 (3): 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520958099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., R. Gunderson, and B. Petersen. 2020. “Overconsumption as Ideology: Implications for Addressing Global Climate Change.” Nature and Culture 15 (2): 199–223. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2020.150205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 2013. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York, NY: NYU.
   Google Scholar
• Uggla, Y. 2019. “Taking Back Control: Minimalism as a Reaction to High Speed and Overload in Contemporary Society.” Sociologisk Forskning 56 (3–4): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.56.18811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitell, S. J. 2015. “A Case for Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSr): Including a Selected Review of Consumer Ethics/Social Responsibility Research.” Source: Journal of Business Ethics 130 (4): 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlen, S., and A. Stroude. 2023. “Sustainable Consumption, Resonance, and Care.” Frontiers in Sustainability 4: 1013810. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1013810.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2010. Consumption. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 2014. “After Taste: Culture, Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (3): 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514547828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D., M. Sahakian, and S. Wahlen. 2022. “Consumption and Society in the 21st Century.” Consumption and Society 1 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1332/YRTA1119.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, D., and D. Southerton. 2019. “After Paris: Transitions for Sustainable Consumption.” Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy 15 (1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2018.1560861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold, M., and L. F. Martinez. 2018. “Ethical Consumer Behaviour in Germany: The Attitude-Behaviour Gap in the Green Apparel Industry.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 42 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaikauskaitė, L., G. Butler, N. F. S. Helmi, C. L. Robinson, L. Treglown, D. Tsivrikos, and J. T. Devlin. 2022. “Hunt–Vitell’s General Theory of Marketing Ethics Predicts “Attitude-Behaviour” Gap in Pro-Environmental Domain.” Frontiers in Psychology 13:13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.732661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar