Abusive supervision in public service organisations: investigating the moderating effect of attribution styles

References

• Afshan, G., Kashif, M., Sattayawaksakul, D., Cheewaprakobkit, P., & Wijenayake, S. (2022). Abusive supervision, supervisor undermining, and turnover intentions: Mediation of quiescent silence and desire to seek revenge among Thai banking frontliners. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1479–1502. Emerald Publishing, (1)Sukkur Institute of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, J., Athar, M. R., Azam, R. I., Hamstra, M. R. W. W., & Hanif, M. (2019). A resource perspective on abusive supervision and extra-role behaviors: The role of subordinates’ psychological capital. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818767391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, I., & Begum, K. (2020). Impact of abusive supervision on intention to leave: A moderated mediation model of organizational-based self esteem and emotional exhaustion. Asian Business & Management, 22(2), 669–688. Palgrave Macmillan, Department of Business Management, Karakoram International University. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00116-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampofo, E. T., & Karatepe, O. M. (2022). The effect of abusive supervision on turnover intentions: On-the-job embeddedness versus traditional attitudinal constructs. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–18. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar, M. K. (2017), “Abusive supervision and turnover intention: Examining the mediating role of self-identity and moderating role of future work self salience ISLAMABAD ii”.
   Google Scholar
• Arif, M., Sindhu, M. I., Urooj, S. F., & Hashmi, S. H. (2017). Impact of abusive supervision on turnover intention through future work self-salience and organization-based self-esteem. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6(September), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2017.60260
   Google Scholar
• Arshadi, N., & Damiri, H. (2013). The relationship of job stress with turnover intention and job performance: Moderating role of OBSE. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 84(2003), 706–710. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.631
   Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393–411. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., Chang, C. C., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: Comparing cross-nationally the importance of fair group processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates’ responses to abusive supervision. Work & Stress, 25(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.634281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S. H. G., Lin, Z. (., Wong, I. A., Chen, Y. (., & So, A. C. Y. (2022). When employees fight back: Investigating how customer incivility and procedural injustice can impel employee retaliation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 103308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. X., & Wang, H. Y. (2017). Abusive supervision and employees’ job performance: A multiple mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(5), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.5657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daraba, D., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Faisal, M., & Wright, L. T. (2021). Working from home during the corona pandemic: Investigating the role of authentic leadership, psychological capital, and gender on employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 0–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1885573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daswati, D., Wirawan, H., Hattab, S., Salam, R., & Iskandar, A. S. (2022). The effect of psychological capital on performance through the role of career engagement: Evidence from Indonesian public organizations. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 0–19. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2012971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2022). Religiousness, collectivism, and helping behavior: The invigorating role of abusive supervision. European Review of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 100702. Elsevier Masson s.r.l., (1)Goodman School of Business, Brock University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2021.100702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, B. C. (2013). Abusive supervision and Nursing performance. Nursing Forum, 48(1), 3–16. Wiley, United States. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer, T., Tian, A. W., Lee, A., & Hughes, D. J. (2021). Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2021.101540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follmer, K. B., Neely, B. H., Jones, K. S., & Hunter, S. T. (2019). To lead is to err: The mediating role of attribution in the relationship between leader error and leader ratings. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818767392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken, E., & Plimmer, G. (2019). Mediocre and harmful public sector leadership. International Journal of Public Leadership, 15(4), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-09-2019-0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos, I., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Berger, R. (2022). Abusive supervision: A systematic Review and new research approaches. Frontiers in Communication, 6(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.640908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattab, S., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Daswati, D., & Niswaty, R. (2022). The effect of toxic leadership on turnover intention and counterproductive work behaviour in Indonesia public organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(3), 317–333. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., (1)Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tadulako. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and Conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Third., Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the Organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E., & Lilly, R. S. (1993). Resource conservation as a strategy for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 21(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(199304)21:2<128:AID-JCOP2290210206>3.0.CO;2-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures revisited. Behavior Science Research, 18(4), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939718301800403
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, H. A. (2013). Boss abuse and subordinate payback. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316636308
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. T., Liao, H. Y., & Huang, M. H. (2021). Coping with abusive supervision: The alleviating effect of self-efficacy and the perception of authenticity on the negative consequences of abusive supervision. Corporate Management Review, 41(1), 83–123. https://doi.org/10.3966/102873102021064101003
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., Bowling, N. A., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2015). Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: Evaluating validity and participant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9357-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh, E., & Lee, E. S. (2022). Can abusive supervision create positive work engagement? The interactive moderating role of positive causal attribution and workplace friendship. Management Decision, 60(3), 531–549. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., (1)KAIST College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2020-1356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, C., Wong, A., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X171037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javeed, T., & Farooqi, Y. A. (2013). Impact of Transformational leadership style on employees ’ satisfaction and well-being with working conditions as mediator. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 4(7), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, S. (2019). Determinants of employee retention: A moderated mediation model of abusive leadership and psychological empowerment. Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(7–8), 373–386. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2019-0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, A. J., & Ahmad, G. (2016). Impact of abusive supervision on job satisfaction and turnover intention: Role of power distance as a moderator. City University Research Journa, 06(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.09.041
   Google Scholar
• Khetran, S. A., Wali, S., Yar Khan, M., & Mushtaq, J. (2018). Impact of abusive supervision on employee turnover intention: The moderating effect of emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Volume-2(Issue–3), 927–935. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd11275
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. W. (2018). Moderating effects of attributional styles in the relationships between abusive supervision, employee silence and innovative behaviour. Asia Life Sciences, SUPPLEMENT(3), 1855–1863. Rushing Water Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. Y., & Shapiro, D. L. (2008). Retaliation against supervisory mistreatment: Negative emotion, group membership, and cross-cultural difference. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060810909293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Lerner, D., De Vet, H. C. W., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Individual work performance questionnaire. Work, 53(3), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152237
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Measuring Individual work performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. R., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2022). Abusive supervision and employee’s creative performance: A serial mediation model of relational conflict and employee silence. Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian, H., Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Liang, L. H., Keeping, L. M., & Morrison, R. (2014). Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Z., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R. E., Song, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020). Seeing from a short-term perspective: When and why daily abusive supervisor behavior yields functional and dysfunctional consequences. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 44(8), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000508
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W., Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2013). Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 62(2), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00520.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Borman, W. (2005). Investigating turnover intention among emergency communication specialists. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 66(11–B), 77.
   Google Scholar
• Lyu, D., Ji, L., Zheng, Q., Yu, B., & Fan, Y. (2019). Abusive supervision and turnover intention: Mediating effects of psychological empowerment of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, Chinese Nursing Association, 6(2), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical Review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940–1965. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, K. M., Ellis, A. P. J., Christian, J. S., & Porter, C. O. L. H. (2016). Examining the effects of turnover intentions on organizational citizenship behaviors and deviance behaviors: A psychological contract approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1067–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Sikora, D., & Douglas, S. C. (2011). Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., Sikora, D., & Harvey, P. (2012). The relationships between attribution styles, LMX, and perceptions of abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811435791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, C., & Babiak, P. (2016). Corporate psychopathy and abusive supervision: Their influence on employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Personality & Individual Differences, 91(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.002
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C., Mejia, O. L., & Liu, H. T. T. (2000). Cognitive appraisal theory: A psychoeducational approach for understanding connections between cognition and emotion in group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933920008411455
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., TETT, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytical findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moin, M. F., Wei, F., Khan, A. N., Ali, A., & Chang, S. C. (2022). Abusive supervision and job outcomes: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(3), 430–440. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., (1)School of Economics and Management, Tongji University. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2020-0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, J. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2013). The effects of interpersonal customer mistreatment on employee retaliation. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 6(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-07-2010-0020
   Google Scholar
• Niessen, A. S. M., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2016). Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires: Which method to use? Journal of Research in Personality, 63(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M. (2017). Collective leadership and context in public administration: Bridging public leadership research and leadership studies. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma, R., Hinna, A., & Mangia, G. (2017). Improvement of individual performance in the public sector: Public service motivation and user orientation as levers. Evidence-Based HRM, 5(3), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-07-2017-0040
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., Carter, M. Z., DeFrank, R. S., & Deng, Q. (2018). Abusive supervision, psychological distress, and silence: The effects of gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Journal of Business Ethics, Springer Netherlands, 153(3), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3384-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J., Li, M., Wang, Z., & Lin, Y. (2020). Transformational leadership and employees’ reactions to Organizational change: Evidence from a meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 00(00), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320920366
   Google Scholar
• Prakasa, Y., Raharjo, K., & Wiratama, I. D. (2020). Transformational leadership and digital maturity: The mediating role of Organizational culture. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 154(AICoBPA 2019), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201116.045
   Google Scholar
• Qin, X., Huang, M., Johnson, R. E., Hu, Q., & Ju, D. (2018). The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory Behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1951–1975. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, G. E., & Bullis, R. C. (2014). The impact of destructive leadership on senior military officers and civilian employees. Armed Forces and Society, 36(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X09334994
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. A., & Hanges, P. J. (2008), “Title of document: Development and validation of the toxic leadership scale”.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, P., Resick, C. J., & Hargis, M. B. (2011). Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision. Human Relations, 64(8), 1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711399940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., & Liu, S. (2020). Abusive supervision and employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(2), 193–207. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2019-0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syamsidah, S., Wirawan, H., & Salam, R. (2023). Does employees’ gender matter? Investigating the indirect effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity through job insecurity in Indonesia. Gender in Management: An International Journal, Emerald Publishing, (1)Department of Family Welfare Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Makassar. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2022-0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J., Phillips, J. S., & Elkins, T. J. (2000). Employee retaliation: The neglected consequence of poor leader-member exchange relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(4), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.4.457
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walter, F., Lam, C. K., Van Der Vegt, G. S., Huang, X., & Miao, Q. (2015). Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1056–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Wei, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., & Peng, Y. (2021). Abusive supervision and creativity: Investigating the moderating role of performance improvement attribution and the mediating role of psychological availability. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waruwu, H., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Nugroho, Y. A., Fikri, M. A. A., Fauji, A., & Shobihi, A. W. I., Hulu, P., Sudiyono, R. N., Agistiawati, E., & Dewi, W. R. (2020). The role of Transformational leadership, Organizational learning and structure on innovation capacity: Evidence from Indonesian private schools. EduPsycouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 378–397.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Normawati, N., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2023). Predicting turnover intention in Indonesian public organisations: Investigating the effect of citizen and workplace incivility, and job insecurity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. ahead-of-p No. ahead–of–print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0141
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. Y., & Hu, C. (2013). Abusive supervision and subordinate emotional labor: The moderating role of openness personality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, R., & Wen, Y. (2020). Employees’ turnover intention and behavioral outcomes: The role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.8609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagil, D. (2005). Employees’ attribution of abusive supervisory behaviors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Center for Advanced Studies in Management, 13(4), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb029009
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Liao, Z. (2015). Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 959–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9425-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Liu, J. (2018). Is abusive supervision an absolute devil? Literature review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9551-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L. Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic Review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474–2497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar