Blind Spots in Abortion Attitudes: Investigating the Nuance of UK Women’s Pro-Choice Perspectives

References

• Adair, L., Lozano, N. M., Ferenczi, N. (in prep). Abortion attitudes across cultures: Exploring the role of gender inequality, gender role attitudes, pronatalism, religion, and mating strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, A., Kim, C., & Dillon, L. (2020). Examining public opinion about abortion: A mixed‐methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 920–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. (2011). Violence and voice: Using a feminist constructivist grounded theory to explore women’s resistance to abuse. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110384452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2010). Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), 141. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7408141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcha, T., Semahegn, A., Tamiru, D., Yadeta, E., Abdisa, L., & Tesfaye, G. (2022). Attitudes toward safe abortion care and its associated factors among health care providers working in public health facilities in eastern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine, 10, 20503121221107792. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121221107792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berne, L. A. S. (1998). Abortion attitude scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, M. A., Brown, K., & Foster, D. G. (2020). Perceived abortion stigma and psychological well-being over five years after receiving or being denied an abortion. PloS One, 15(1), e0226417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, M., Begun, S., & McKay, K. (2018). Religiosity and personal beliefs regarding abortion: Results from a survey of social work students in the United States. Women’s Reproductive Health, 5(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2018.1463742
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology Vol. 2: Research designs (pp. 57–71). APA books.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Roccas, S. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Blind spots. Cambridge dictionary. Retrieved October 24, 2022 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/blind-spot
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chibber, K. S., Biggs, M. A., Roberts, S. C., & Foster, D. G. (2014). The role of intimate partners in women’s reasons for seeking abortion. Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 24(1), e131–e138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockrill, K., Upadhyay, U. D., Turan, J., & Greene Foster, D. (2013). The stigma of having an abortion: Development of a scale and characteristics of women experiencing abortion stigma. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1363/4507913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. S., & Joffe, C. E. (2020). Obstacle course: The everyday struggle to get an abortion in America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. L., LaRoche, K. J., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2022). Examining abortion attitudes in the context of gestational age. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). (2021, March 17). Abortion statistics for England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/abortion-statistics-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic-january-to-june-2020/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
   Google Scholar
• Donaghue, N., & Smith, N. M. (2008). Not half bad: Self and others’ judgements of body size and attractiveness across the life span. Sex Roles, 58(11–12), 875–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9408-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin, M., Beaumont, E., Martin, C. J. H., & Carson, J. (2016). A pilot study exploring the relationship between self-compassion, self-judgement, self-kindness, compassion, professional quality of life and wellbeing among UK community nurses. Nurse Education Today, 46, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eades, L. (2019). Social realities, biological realities: The 24-week foetus in contemporary English abortion activism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 74, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, A., & Atoum, A. (2002). Personality traits as self-evaluated and as judged by others. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.2.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, R., Forde, E., Bates, E., Powell, S., Eadon-Jones, E., & Draper, H. (2008). Medical students’ attitudes towards abortion: A UK study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(11), 783–787. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.023416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. The American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, N., Palileo, G., & Johnson, D. (1993). Explaining rape victim blame: A test of attribution theory. Sociological Spectrum, 13(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1993.9982040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hans, J. D., & Kimberly, C. (2014). Abortion attitudes in context: A multidimensional vignette approach. Social Science Research, 48, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanschmidt, F., Linde, K., Hilbert, A., Riedel‐Heller, S. G., & Kersting, A. (2016). Abortion stigma: a systematic review. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(4), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology 22(3), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220305
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 10(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., & Rueb, J. D. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Current Psychology, 24(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, L. (2017). Internalised abortion stigma: Young women’s strategies of resistance and rejection. Feminism & Psychology, 27(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517698997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, L. I., & Wahlberg, V. (2000). The process of decision-making on abortion: A grounded theory study of young men in Sweden. The Journal of Adolescent Health: official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 26(3), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00011-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Davies, P. G., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janes, L. M., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Jeer pressures: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2003). Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Van Der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Hardin, C. D. (2018). Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2018). Complexity in attitudes toward abortion access: Results from two studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(4), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns, J. L., Vanjani, R., Freedman, L., Meckstroth, K. R., Drey, E. A., & Steinauer, J. (2012). Women’s decision making regarding choice of second trimester termination method for pregnancy complications. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 116(3), 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopera, M., Suszek, H., Bonar, E., Myszka, M., Gmaj, B., Ilgen, M., & Wojnar, M. (2015). Evaluating explicit and implicit stigma of mental illness in mental health professionals and medical students. Community Mental Health Journal, 51(5), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9796-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: the road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203259932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Hessini, L., & Mitchell, E. M. (2009). Conceptualizing abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(6), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart, C., Lee, C. H. J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2023). The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia. International Journal of Psychology: Journal international de psychologie, 58(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, N. M., Adair, L., Baker, J., & Shrestha A. (in prep). “It makes it more real to you and more personal”: Exploring how attitudes are shaped by experience with and exposure to abortion.
   Google Scholar
• Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 137–230). Random House.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell-Henry, T., James, A., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2010). Researching with people you know: Issues in interviewing. Contemporary Nurse, 34(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2009.34.1.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikołajczak, M., & Bilewicz, M. (2015). Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltmann, F. (2013). Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43(5–6), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2014.892770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omwake, K. T. (1954). The relation between acceptance of self and acceptance of others shown by three personality inventories. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18(6), 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orihuela-Cortés, F., Álvarez del Río, A., Lagunes-Córdoba, R., & Marván, M. L. (2022). Stigma toward women who have had an induced abortion and associated variables. Women’s Reproductive Health, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2022.2094738
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E. (2009). Chapter 1: The introspection illusion (pp. 1–67). Elsevier EBooks. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00401-2
   Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Kruger, J., Savtisky, K., & Ross, L. (2001). You don’t know me, but I know you: The illusion of asymmetric insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. G., & Grimes, D. A. (2012). The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 119(2 Pt 1), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. (2018). Canada summer jobs attestation requirement seen as “unfair” by half of Canadians, “fair” by the other half. https://angusreid.org/summer-job-attestation/
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, C., Dobria, O., & Wetherell, G. (2013). The complexity and ambivalence of immigration attitudes: Ambivalent stereotypes predict conflicting attitudes toward immigration policies. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocca, C. H., Samari, G., Foster, D. G., Gould, H., & Kimport, K. (2020). Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: An examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigma. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 248, 112704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruybal, A. L., & Siegel, J. T. (2019). Attribution theory and reducing stigma toward women with postpartum depression: Examining the role of perceptions of stability. Stigma and Health, 4(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000146
   Google Scholar
• Rye, B. J., & Underhill, A. (2020). Pro-choice and pro-life are not enough: An investigation of abortion attitudes as a function of abortion prototypes. Sexuality & Culture, 24(6), 1829–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09723-7
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S., & Wellings, K. (2020). Decriminalising abortion in the UK: What would it mean? Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Flowers, P. L. M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6(4), 346–347.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W., & Son, J. (2013). General social survey 2012 final report trends in attitudes towards abortion. http://www.norc.org/pdfs/gss%20reports/trends%20in%20attitudes%20abo ut%20abortion_fnal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., & Leik, R. K. (1993). Attitudes about abortion and varying attitude structures. Social Science Research, 22(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1993.1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Unnithan, M., & Dubuc, S. (2018). Re-visioning evidence: Reflections on the recent controversy around gender selective abortion in the UK. Global Public Health, 13(6), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1346694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, E., Littman, L., Moshier, E., & Kaczorowski, J. (2013). Attitudes and knowledge about abortion and contraception among women in five countries: An internet survey using survey monkey audience. Contraception, 88(3), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, E. R., Littman, L., & Kaczorowski, J. (2015). Knowledge and attitudes about contraception and abortion in Canada, US, UK, France and Australia. Gynecology & Obstetrics, 05(09), 322. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000322
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, C., & Norrander, B. (2002). Of mood and morals: The dynamics of opinion on abortion and gay rights. In B. Norrander & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (2nd ed.). CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, C., & Riches, J. (2002). Pills in the public’s mind: RU 486 and the framing of the abortion issue. Women & Politics, 24(3), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v24n03_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. F., & Steffel, M. (2014). Double standards in the use of enhancing products by self and others. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1086/676750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2021, November 25). Abortion. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
   Google Scholar
• Zanna, M. P., & Aziza, C. (1976). On the interaction of repression-sensitization and attention in resolving cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality, 44(4), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwickert, K., & Rieger, E. (2013). Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with anorexia nervosa: an investigation of attribution theory. Journal of Eating Disorders, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-2974-1-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar