A First Button Done Up Wrongly: Revisiting Philip H. Stoddard’s “Ottoman Special Organization”

REFERENCES

• Accounting Office of the Security General Directorate. (1913, December 24). To the Grand Vizierate. [Report]. DH.EUM.MH. (72/53). İstanbul: The Presidency of Republic of Turkey, General Directorate of State Archives (BOA).
   Google Scholar
• Akıncı, A. (2018, October). Sultan II. Abdülhamit Devrinde Hafiyelik: 1890ʹlarda Erzurum Vilayeti Örneği [Spying during the Reign of Abdulhamid II: Case of Province of Erzurum in 1890s]. Paper presented at the Vefatının 100. Yılında Sultan II. Abdülhamid ve Dönemi Uluslararası Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Aksakal, M. (2008). The Ottoman road to war in 1914: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akyürek, H. A. (2019). İstihbarat Savaşları: Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Suriye ve Lübnan’da Casusluk Faaliyetleri [Intelligence Wars: Espionage during the First World War in Syria and Lebanon]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Kronik Kitap.
   Google Scholar
• Alyot, H. (2008). Türkiye’de Zabıta: Tarihi Gelişim ve Bugünkü Durum [Police in Turkey: Historical Development and Present Situation]. Ankara, Türkiye: Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü Polis Akademisi Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Merkezi.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, C. (2009). Defend the realm – The authorized history of MI5. New York, United States of America: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• AzizBey. (1933). Suriya wa Lubnan fi’l-Harb al-‘Alamiyya: Al-Istihbarat wa’l-Jasusiyya fi’l-Dawlat al-Othmaniyya [Syria and Lebanon in the First World War: Intelligence and Espionage in the Ottoman Empire]. Beirut, Lebanon: al-Ahrar.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar, İ. (2009). Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa, MİT ve İstihbarat Örgütleri [Ottoman Special Organization, National Intelligence Organization, and Intelligence Agencies]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Kum Saati.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, I. (2012). The historiography of insurgency. In P. B. Rich & I. Duyvesteyn (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of insurgency and counterinsurgency (pp. 23–31). London and New York, United Kingdom and United States of America: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cemal Paşa. (1996). Hatırat [Memoirs]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Arma Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Çiçek, M. T. (2016). Myth of the Unionist triumvirate, the formation of the CUP factions and their impact in Syria during the Great War. In M. T. Çiçek (Ed.), Syria in World War, politics, economy, and society (pp. 9–35). New York, United States of America: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Committees sent to India and Afghanistan. (1916, January 27). [ Memorandum]. First World War collection [BDH] (F: 1831, D: 18, I: 1/26 and 1/27). Ankara, Türkiye: Archive of the Turkish General Staff Directorate of Military History and Strategic Studies [ATASE].
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, E. (2008). Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa’dan Günümüze Gizli Servisler [Secret Services from the Ottoman Special Organization to the Present]. İstanbul, Türkiye: IQ.
   Google Scholar
• Divan-ı Harb-i Örfi Muhakematı Zabıt Ceridesi, İkinci Celse [Minutes of the Court-Martial, Second Session] (1919, May 4-8). Takvim-i Vekayi, no. 3543, pp. 29–30 (Supplement).
   Google Scholar
• Dockrill, M. (1996). The Foreign Office Political Intelligence Department and Germany in 1918. In M. Dockrill & D. French (Eds.), Strategy and intelligence, British policy during the First World War (pp. 160–183). London, United Kingdom: The Hambledon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dukakinzade, F. (1927). Filistin Cebhesi [Palestinian Front]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Askeri Akademiler Kumandanlığı Matbaası.
   Google Scholar
• Ertürk, H. (Trans.) (1975). Milli Mücadele Senelerinde Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa [The Ottoman Special Organization during the War of Independence]. [Typewritten book].
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbon, C. (1978). Secret intelligence in the twentieth century. London, United Kingdom: Granada Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. (1988). The Foreign Office and political intelligence 1918-1920. Review of International Studies, 14(4), 275–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113154
   Google Scholar
• Gör, E. (2019). II. Abdülhamid Döneminde İstihbarat: Mutlakiyetten Meşrutiyete İmparatorluğun Haber Alma Faaliyetleri, 1876-1909 [Intelligence during the Reign of Abdulhamid II: Intelligence Activities of the Empire from Autocracy to Constitutional Era, 1876-1909]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Kitap Yayınevi.
   Google Scholar
• Guardianship of İstanbul. (1912, December 3). To the general headquarters, third branch. [ Memorandum]. Balkan Wars Collection (F: 197, D: 37, I: 1/14). Ankara, Türkiye: ATASE.
   Google Scholar
• Hamidli Rıza Bey. (1915, January 16). To the ministry of interior. [Petition]. BDH (F: 1828, D: 4, I: 1/69). Ankara: ATASE. http://www.cia.gov
   Google Scholar
• Karan, K. (2008). Türk İstihbarat Tarihi: Yıldız İstihbarat Teşkilatı ve Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa’dan MİT’e [Turkish Intelligence History: From Yıldız Secret Service and the Ottoman Special Organization to the National Intelligence Organization]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Truva.
   Google Scholar
• Kon, K. (2011). Almanya’nın İslam Stratejisi Mimarlarından Max von Oppenheim ve Bu Konudaki Üç Memorandumu [Max von Oppenheim, the architect of the Islamic strategy of Germany and his three related memorandums]. Tarih Dergisi, 53, 211–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kuşçubaşı, E. (1962, August 22). [Letter to Asaf Tugay]. Taha Toros Archive. İstanbul, Türkiye: Şehir University Library.
   Google Scholar
• La Gumina, S. J. (2016). The Office of Strategic Services and Italian Americans, the untold history. Massapequa Park, United States of America: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, K. L., & Lerner, B. W. (Eds.). (2004). Encyclopedia of espionage, intelligence, and security. Detroit, United States of America: Thomson/Gale.
   Google Scholar
• Liptak, E. (2009). Office of Strategic Services 1942-45, The World War II origins of the CIA. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lockman, Z. (2010). Contending visions of the Middle East, the history and politics of Orientalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud. (1908/1909). Mebusana Takdim Olunan Hafiyelerin Listesi yahut İstanbul’da Kimler Hafiyelik Etmiş [List of Spies presented to the Members of Parliament or Who Spied in İstanbul].
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. (2016). Improving intelligence studies as an academic discipline. Intelligence and National Security, 31(2), 266–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2014.952932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhar Bey. (1915, January 20). To the Ministry of Interior. [Ciphered telegram]. First World War Collection (BDH) (F: 1828, D: 4, I: 1/68). Ankara, Türkiye: ATASE.
   Google Scholar
• Mil, A., & Cemil, A. (1933/1934, April-November 2-17) Umumi Harpte Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa [The Ottoman Special Organization during the Great War]. Vakit Gazetesi.
   Google Scholar
• Names and inauguration dates of the SO directors. ( ca. 1918). [ Report]. BDH (F: 1846, D: 79, I: 13/4). Ankara, Türkiye: ATASE.
   Google Scholar
• On the foundation of the General Directorate of Security Bureau of Investigation. (1913, December 27). [Minutes]. MV (232/78). İstanbul, Türkiye: BOA.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, O., & Çetinsaya, G. ( Winter 2001/2002). Türkiye’de Osmanlı Tarihçiliğinin Son Çeyrek Yüzyılı: Bir Bilanço Denemesi [The last quarter century of the ottoman history writing in Turkey]. Toplum ve Bilim, 91, 8–38.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, T. (2003). MİT’in Gizli Tarihi [Secret History of the National Intelligence Organization]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Alfa.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, A. (2011). Türkiye’de Popüler Tarihçilik [Popular History Writing in Turkey]. Ankara, Türkiye: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, O. (2012). Arşivler Meselemiz: Siyaset Kurumunun Tarihçiyle Tehlikeli Dansı ve Meşruiyet Kaybı [Our problem of archives: Dangerous dance of politics with historian and loss of legitimacy]. Toplumsal Tarih, 217, 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pöhlmann, M. (2005). German intelligence at war, 1914-1918. Journal of Intelligence History, 5(2), 25–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16161262.2005.10555116
   Google Scholar
• Reasons of the foundation of the SO Department, lately entitled Office for Eastern Affairs (Umur-i Şarkiye Dairesi) and subsequently abolished. ( ca. 1918). [Report]. BDH (F: 1846, D: 79, I: 13-13/3). Ankara, Türkiye: ATASE.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, L. (2003). Military and civil intelligence services in Germany from World War I to the end of the Weimar Republic. In H. Bungert, J. G. Heitmann, & M. Wala (Eds.), Secret intelligence in the twentieth century (pp. 1–22). London, United Kingdom: Frans Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Safi, P. (2012a). History in the Trench: The Ottoman Special Organization – Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa Literature. Middle Eastern Studies, 48(1), 89–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2011.553898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safi, P. (2012b). The Ottoman Special Organization – Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa: An Inquiry into its Operational and Administrative Characteristics ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Safi, P. (2014). Tahir, Kurt Kanunu’nu Yazmasaydı [What if Tahir hadn’t written The Wolf’s Law]. Kılavuz, 50, 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Safi, P. (2020). Eşref: Kuşçubaşı’nın Alternatif Biyografisi [Eşref: Kuşçubaşı’s Alternative Biography]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Kronik.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, P. H. (1963). The Ottoman Government and the Arabs, 1911 to 1918: A Preliminary Study of the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Princeton University, New Jersey, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Structure of the Office for Eastern Affairs. ( ca. 1916). [Report]. BDH (F: 1870, D: 180, I: 7/1). Ankara, Türkiye: ATASE.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2002). Wanted: A definition of “Intelligence”. Studies in Intelligence, 46(3), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, A. M. (1978). The politics of propaganda: The Office of War Information 1942-1945. New Haven, United States of America: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yenen, A. (2016). The Young Turk Aftermath, Making Sense of Transnational Contentious Politics at the End of the Ottoman Empire, 1918-1922 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Basel University, Basel, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar