Exploring fuzzy AHP approaches for quality management control practices in public building construction projects

References

• Abdel-Hamid, M., & Abdelhaleem, H. M. (2019). Improving the construction industry quality using the seven basic quality control tools. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 07(06), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2019.76028
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, I., & Alinejad-Rokny, H. (2011). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for Plant species selection (case study: Reclamation plan of Sungun Copper Mine; Iran). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1104–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Alotaibi, F. M. S. (2014). Impact on quality culture of total quality management practices factors. International Journal of Business & Economic Development, 2(3), 35–48. [http://www.ijbed.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ayalew, G. G., Meharie, M. G., & Worku, B. (2022). A road maintenance management strategy evaluation and selection model by integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods: The case of Ethiopian Roads Authority. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2146628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azhar, N. A., Radzi, N. A. M., & Wan Ahmad, W. S. H. M. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making: A systematic review. (Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Electrical & Electronic Engineering), 14(8), 779–801. (https://doi.org/10.2174/2352096514666211029112443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basahel, A., & Taylan, O. (2016). Using fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS approaches for assessing safety conditions. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 6(4), 728–745. https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N4-728-745
   Google Scholar
• Berdie, A. D., & Osaci, M. (2016). A multicriteria approach in the selection of a SAP UI technology, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33941-7-62
   Google Scholar
• Elkatawneh, H. H. (2013). Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination hassan elkatawneh strategic planning: Collaboration, cooperation and coordination date. SSRN Electronic Journal, (December), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2366643
   Google Scholar
• Esmaili-Dooki, A., Bolhasani, P., & Fallah, M. (2017). An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach for ranking and selecting the chief inspectors of bank: A case study. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2017.48258
   Google Scholar
• Fathi, M. R., Zarei Matin, H., Zarchi, M. K., & Azizollahi, S. (2011). The application of fuzzy TOPSIS approach to personnel selection for Padir Company, Iran. Journal of Management Research, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v3i2.663
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, E. G., Clival, U. P., Rtery, B. A. A., Crawford, N. R., D, P. D., & Al, E. T. (2006). Comparative analysis of anterior petrosectomy. Neurosurgery, 58(February), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H., Chen, Y., & Wang, G. (2020). Using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to formulate an effectual tea assessment system. Sustainability, 12, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, G. M., & Shane, J. S. (2014). Trust in the construction industry: A literature review. (May), 2136–2145. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413517.217
   Google Scholar
• Gastelum, D. (2017). A new approach to impacting the construction industry. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 9(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37265/japiv.v9i1.33
   Google Scholar
• Harrison-Zotsi, H. A., & Dansoh, A. (2021). Quality control practices in building construction project in Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. M., Bridges, J. F. P., & IJzerman, M. J. (2014). Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: A tutorial. The Patient, 7(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0050-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ismail, A., Khan, A., & Hasnain, M. (2019). Effect of management commitment on total quality management in construction. Global Scientific Journal, 7(7), 943–951.
   Google Scholar
• Javadikasgari, H., Soltesz, E. G., & Gillinov, A. M. (2018). Surgery for atrial fibrillation. In Atlas of cardiac surgical techniques (pp. 479–488). Kolkata, West Bengal: Elsevier Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-46294-5.00028-5
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Hasin, M. A. A. (2011). Evaluation of customer oriented success factors in mobile commerce using fuzzy AHP. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n2.p361-386
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A. H., Imran, A., & Hussain, M. (2019). Evaluation of quality during construction projects: A case study of Pakistan. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 38(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.1901.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kil, S. H., Lee, D. K., Kim, J. H., Li, M. H., & Newman, G. (2016). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process to establish weighted values for evaluating the stability of slope revegetation based on hydroseeding applications in South Korea. Sustainability, 8(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., Jayaswal, P., & Kushwah, K. (2013). Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 12(2008), 600–605.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzu, Ö. H. (2020). Strategy selection in the universities via fuzzy AHP method: A case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p107
   Google Scholar
• Leader, Q. T., Policy, Q., Manual, Q., Members, Q. T., & Manual, Q. (2020). Quality teams – roles and responsibilities. (May)
   Google Scholar
• Mane, P. P., & Patil, J. R. (2017). Quality management system at construction projects. 5(April 2015), 126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Mane, P. P., & Patil, J. R. (2015 Quality management system at construction projects [Paper presentation]. Proc. Civ. Eng. PG Conf. 2015, No. October, pp. 323–327,
   Google Scholar
• Marasini, R., & Quinnell, P. (2010 Investigation of quality management practices in building construction sites in the UK [Paper presentation]. Assoc. Res. Constr. Manag. ARCOM 2010 - Proc. 26th Annu. Conf., No. September, pp. 1307–1316,
   Google Scholar
• Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M. D., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrjerdi, Y. Z. (2012). Developing fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval valued fuzzy sets. International Journal of Computer Applications, 42(14), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mumcu, A., & Gök, M. (2021). Application of fuzzy Ahp and topsis methods for manager selection. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.48145/gopsbad.906183
   Google Scholar
• Neyestani, B. (2017). Seven basic tools of quality control: the appropriate techniques for solving quality problems in the organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal, (March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2955721
   Google Scholar
• Nurul, W., Wan, H., Othman, S. A., Ramli, M., Aqilah, S., & Rashid, A. (2023). Utilizing the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to identify the best online food delivery services. Journal of Mathematics and Computing Science, 9(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland, J. (2012). Oakland on quality management. 3rd ed, 2022. British: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080479781
   Google Scholar
• Othman, I., Shafiq, N., & Nuruddin, M. F. (2018). Quality planning in construction project. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 291(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012017
   Google Scholar
• Othuman Mydin, M. A., Othman, N. A., & Sani, N. M. (2014). A prospective study on building quality: Relationship between workmanship quality and common building defects of low-cost construction projects. MATEC Web of Conferences, 17, 1001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141701001
   Google Scholar
• Oyebisi, S., Ede, A., Olutoge, F., Ngene, B., Ofuyatan, O., & Oluwafemi, J. (2019 Quality management in construction project: Empirical study of covenant university sports complex [Paper presentation]. ISEC 2019 - 10th Int. Struct. Eng. Constr. Conf., No. June, https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.res.2019.130
   Google Scholar
• Priyadharsan, M. A. K. S., & Naveen Raja, M. (2020). Impact of quality control and management in constructions. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(May), 3968–3974.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, A. A. A., Musa, S. N., Ramesh, S., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Development of a fuzzy-TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making model for material selection with the integration of safety, health and environment risk assessment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 235(7), 1532–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420721994269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramík, J. (2017). Ranking alternatives by pairwise comparisons matrix and priority vector. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64(s1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0040
   Google Scholar
• Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science. 55(Itqm), 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081
   Google Scholar
• Saghafian, S., & Hejazi, S. R. (2005 Multi-criteria group decision making using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS procedure [Paper presentation]. Proc. – Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Model. Control Autom. CIMCA 2005 Int. Conf. Intell. Agents, Web Technol. Internet, Vol. 2, pp. 215–220, https://doi.org/10.1109/cimca.2005.1631471
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., & Pitroda, J. R. (2018). A critical literature review on quality management for infrastructure projects. International Journal of Engineering Development, 14(3), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Simjanovic, D. J., Vesic, N. O., Randjelovic, B. M., & Vujadinovic, D. (2023). Cyber Security criteria: Fuzzy AHP approach. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3529(1), 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sodangi, M., Faris, M., Idrus, A., Hammad, D. B., & Ahmedumar, A. (2014). Best practice criteria for sustainable maintenance management of heritage buildings in Malaysia. Procedia Engineering. 77, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.017
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, O., Obodoh, D., & Felix, O. (2019). Quality management practices in construction; a key to successful building project delivery. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(August), 531–538.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn, H. (2012). A framework for managing quality on system development projects. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096704-2.50020-X
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, C., Metzger, S., Nehr, S., & Foken, T. (2021). Quality Assurance and Control. Springer Handbooks (pp. 47–90). Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany: Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7745–7754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H. (2020). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5, 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H. D., & Rahman, C. K. (2008 Top management commitment towards quality management in the context of Malaysian construction organisations [Paper presentation]. Int. Conf. Multi Natl. Constr. Proj., pp. 1–13,
   Google Scholar
• Tesfaye, E., Berhan, E., & Kitaw, D. (2016). A comprehensive literature review on construction project risk analysis. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management, 5(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRCM.2016100101
   Google Scholar
• Tmeemy, W., & Hassen, S. M.. (2015). The consequences of poor quality on project management success of building projects. Diyala Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8, 172–182.
   Google Scholar
• Vahidnia, M. H., Alesheikh, a., Alimohammadi, a., & Bassiri, a (2008). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B2), 593–596.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. N., Yang, C. Y., & Cheng, H. C. (2019). A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model for sustainable supplier evaluation and selection based on triple bottom line approaches in the garment industry. Processes, 7(7), 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaacob, Z. (2012). Control systems for quality management. Quality Management Practices, 10(May), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.5772/36753
   Google Scholar
• Ziegel, E. R., Swift, J. A., Ross, J. E., & Omachonu, V. K. (1999). Principles of total quality. Technometrics, 41(4), 381. https://doi.org/10.2307/1271376
   Google Scholar
• Zolkepli, M., & Aris, T. N. M. (2019). Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS in cross domain collaboration recommendation with fuzzy visualization representation. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 9(6), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmlc.2019.9.6.882
   Google Scholar