285
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Ontological security: a framework for the analysis of Russia’s view of the world

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Adomeit, H. (1995). Russia as a ‘great power’ in world affairs: Images and reality. International Affairs, 71(1), 35–68.
  • Akchurina, V., & Della Sala, V. (2018). Russia, Europe and the ontological security dilemma: Narrating the emerging Eurasian space. Europe-Asia Studies. https://www.academia.edu/38108477/Russia_Europe_and_the_Ontological_pdf
  • Becker, D. J. (2014). Memory and Trauma as elements of identity in foreign policy Konstantin Leontiev (cited in trenin, 2002). In E. Resende & D. Budryte (Eds.), Memory and trauma in international relations: Theories, cases and debates. London: Routledge.
  • Billington, J. H. (2004). Russia in search of itself. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
  • Boym, S. (1995). From the Russian soul to post-Communist nostalgia. Representations, 49, 133–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2928753
  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541–560.
  • Chrzanowski, B. (2021). An episode of existential uncertainty: The ontological security origins of the War in Donbas. Texas National Security Review, 4(3), 11–32. https://tnsr.org/2021/05/an-episode-of-existential-uncertainty-the-ontological-security-origins-of-the-war-in-donbas/
  • Delehanty, W. K., & Steele, B. J. (2009). Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory: Insights from feminist IR. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 523–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903104024
  • Durkheim, E. (2014). The rules of sociological method: And selected texts on sociology and its method. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Forsberg, T. (2014). Status conflicts between Russia and the West: Perceptions and emotional biases. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3), 323–331.
  • Franzosi, R. (1998). Narrative analysis—Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 517–554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.517
  • Freire, M. R. (2020). EU and Russia competing projects in the neighbourhood: An ontological security approach. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 63(1). https://www.scielo.br/j/rbpi/a/JcT5x3BTDHVHpTqKCcDnrtf/?lang=en
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2008). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Giddens, R. D. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of constructuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Giddens, R. D. (2016). Modernity and self-identity. https://revisesociology.com/2016/04/22/giddens-modernity-self-identity-summary/
  • Gorbachev, O. (2015). The Namedni project and the evolution of nostalgia in post-Soviet Russia. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 57(3-4), 180–194.
  • Graybiel, A. M. (2008). Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 359–387.
  • Grimes, W. (2018, May 17). Richard Pipes, historian of Russia and Reagan Aide, Dies at 94. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/obituaries/richard-pipes-historian-of-russia-and-reagan-aide-dies-at-94.html
  • Gustafsson, K., & Krickel-Choip, N. C. (2020). Returning to the roots of ontological security: Insights from the existentialist anxiety literature. European Journal of International Relations, 26(3), 875–895.
  • Hankiss, A. (1981). Ontologies of the self: On the mythological rearranging of one's life-history. Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences, pp. 203–209.
  • Hansen, F. S. (2010, November 18). Russia and the search for ontological security. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2010/11/18/russia-and-search-for-ontological-security-event-3127
  • Hansen, F. S. (2016). Russia’s relations with the West: Ontological security through conflict. Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 359–375.
  • Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: Identities & foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Hosking, G. (1995). The Freudian frontier. Times Literary Supplement, TLS, 4797, 27.
  • Innes, A., & Steele, B. (2013). Memory, trauma and ontological security. In D. Budryte & E. Resende (Eds.), Memory and trauma, international relations (pp. 31–45). London: Routledge Press.
  • Kanet, R. E. (2007). Russia: Re-emerging great power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kanet, R. E., & Birgerson, S. M. (1997). The domestic-foreign policy linkage in Russian politics: Nationalist influences on Russian foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 30(4), 335–344.
  • Kanet, R. E., & Moulioukova, D. (2022). A comparison of Soviet and Russian foreign policy: Ontological security and policy toward Africa. In R. E. Kanet & D. Moulioukova (Eds.), Russia and the world in the Putin era: From theory to reality in Russian global state (pp. 239–259). London: Routledge Publisher.
  • Kinnvall, C. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 25(5), 741–767. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792342
  • Kliuchevskii, V. O. (1937). Kurs russkoi istorii, 5 vols. Moscow: Gos. Sots. Ekon. Izdatel’stvo.
  • Kononenko, V. (2011). Introduction. In V. Kononenko & A. Moshes (Eds.), Russia as a network state (pp. 1–19). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Kotkin, S. (2016). Russia’s perpetual geopolitics: Putin returns to the historical pattern. Foreign Affairs, 95(2), 2–9.
  • Kozyrev, A. (1994, May/June). The lagging partnership. Foreigh Affairs.
  • Krasnodębska, M. (2021). Confrontation as ontological security: Russia’s reactions to the EU-Ukraine association agreement. In M. K. Davis Cross & I. Paweł Karolewski (Eds.), European-Russian power relations in turbulent times (pp. 135–159). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10202357.8
  • Krolikowski, A. (2008). State personhood in ontological security theories of international relations and Chinese nationalism: A sceptical view. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(1), 109–133.
  • Laing, R. D. (1969). Self and others (2nd ed.). London: Tavistock.
  • Laing, R. D. (2002). Agency and ethics: The politics of military intervention. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Laing, R. D. (2010). The divided self: An existential study in sanity and madness. London: Penguin UK.
  • Larson, D. W., & Paul, T. V. (2014). Status and world order. In T. Paul, D. W. Larson, & W. C. Wohlforth (Eds.), Status in world order (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leichtova, M. (2014). Misunderstanding Russia: Russian foreign policy and the west. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Levada Center. (2015, June 16). Russian participation in the Syrian Military conflict. http://www.levada.ru/en/2015/11/06/russian-participation-in-the-syrian-military-conflict/print/
  • Lipman, M. (2016). How Putin silences dissent: Inside the Kremlin’s crackdown. Foreign Affairs, 95(3), 38–46.
  • Mankoff, J. (2009). Russian foreign policy: The return of great power politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Mitzen, J. (2006a). Anchoring Europe's civilizing identity: Habits, capabilities and ontological security 1. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 270–285.
  • Mitzen, J. (2006b). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370.
  • Moulioukova, D., & Kanet, R. E. (2020). Assertive foreign policy despite diminished capabilities: Russian involvement in Syria. Global Affairs, 6(2), 247–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1842787
  • Moulioukova, D., & Kanet, R. E. (2022a). The battle of ontological narratives: Russia and the annexation of Crimea. In R. E. Kanet & D. Moulioukova (Eds.), Russia and the world in the Putin era: From theory to reality in Russian global state (pp. 115–139). London: Routledge Publisher.
  • Moulioukova, D., & Kanet, R. E. (2022b). Russia’s self-image as a great power. In R. E. Kanet & D. Moulioukova (Eds.), Russia and the world in the Putin era: From theory to reality in Russian global state (pp. 11–33). London: Routledge Publisher.
  • Narozhna, T. (2021). Revisiting the causes of Russian foreign policy changes: Incoherent biographical narrative, recognition and Russia's ontological security-seeking. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, XV(2), 56–81. https://www.cejiss.org/revisiting-the-causes-of-russian-foreign-policy-changes-western-recognition-and-russia-s-ontological-security-seeking
  • Neumann, I. (2008). Russia as a great power, 1815–2007. Journal of International Relations and Development, 11, 128–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.7
  • Oushakine, S. A. (2007). "We're nostalgic but we're not crazy": Retrofitting the past in Russia. Russian Review, 66(3), 451–482.
  • Patterson, M., & Monroe, K. R. (1998). Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.315
  • Pavlovsky, G. (2016, May/June). Russian politics under Putin: The system will outlast the master. Foreign Affairs.
  • Pipes, R. (1995). Russia under the old regime (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
  • Primakov, A. (1996, January 12). Primakov wants ‘Great’ Russia, but calms West. Reuters.
  • Prozorov, S. (2011). The other as past and present: Beyond the logic of ‘temporal othering’ in IR theory. Review of International Studies, 37(03), 1273–1293.
  • Putin, V. (2003, May 16). Poslanie federal’nomu sobraniu Rossiiskoi federatsii. http://pravdaoputine.ru/official-putin/putin-poslanie-federalnomu-sobraniyu-rossiyskoy-federatsii-2003-text-audio
  • Putin, V. (2005, April 25). Annual address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22931
  • Raeff, M. (1971). Patterns of Russian imperial policy toward the nationalities. In E. Allworth (Ed.), Soviet nationality problems (pp. 22–42). New York: Columbia Press.
  • Razyvayev, V. (1992). Forecast: Sticks and carrots – Controversial reflections on Russian foreign policy. Nezavisimaya Gazeta. Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, 44(10), 15.
  • Roe, P. (2000). Former Yugoslavia: the security dilemma that never was? European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 373–393.
  • Rossdale, C. (2015). Enclosing critique: The limits of ontological security. International Political Sociology, 9(4), 369–386.
  • Rumelili, B. (2015). Identity and desecuritisation: The pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(1), 52–74.
  • Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(2), 148–162.
  • Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/43649
  • Steele, B. J. (2005). Ontological security and the power of self-identity: British neutrality and the American Civil War. Review of International Studies, 31(3), 519–540.
  • Steele, B. J. (2008). Ontological security in international relations: Self-identity and the IR state. London: Routledge.
  • Subotić, J. (2016). Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(4), 610–627.
  • Subotić, J., & Steele, B. J. (2018). Moral injury in international relations. Journal of Global Security Studies, 3(4), 387–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy021
  • Sylvan, D., Graff, C., & Pugliese, E. (1998, September 16–19). Status and prestige in international relations. Presented at the Third Pan-European international relations conference, Vienna.
  • Trenin, D. (2002). The end of Eurasia: Russia on the border between geopolitics and globalization. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.
  • Trenin, D. (2006). Russia leaves the West. Foreign Affairs, 85, 87.
  • Tsygankov, A. (2012). Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tsygankov, A. (2014). The strong state in Russia: Development and crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Vernadsky, G. (1963). The Mongols and Russia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Volgy, T. J., Corbetta, R., Grant, K. A., & Baird, R. G. (Eds.). (2011). Major powers and the quest for status in international politics. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
  • Vujačić, V. (2015). Nationalism, myth, and the state in Russia and Serbia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international relations. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  • Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Somerville, NJ: Bedminster Press.
  • Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wegner, D. M., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 446–496). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Narratives as cultural tools in sociocultural analysis: Official history in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. Ethos, 28(4), 511–533.
  • Zarakol, A. (2017). States and ontological security: A historical rethinking. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(1), 48–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653158

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.