Sensitivity analysis of sensor placement in energy-efficient, grid-interactive ready small office buildings with dynamic shading and lighting control

References

• ASHRAE 2019. ASHRAE/IES standard 90.1-2019–energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. 2019. ASHRAE: Tullie Circle, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab, S., M. G. Kent, and M. Mayhoub. 2023. Users’ window preferences and motivations of shading control: Influence of cultural characteristics. Building and Environment 240:110455. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y. C., A. Tzempelikos, and I. Konstantzos. 2015. A systematic method for selecting roller shade properties for glare protection. Energy and Buildings 92:81–94. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caicedo, D., S. Li, and A. Pandharipande. 2017. Smart lighting control with workspace and ceiling sensors. Lighting Research & Technology 49 (4):446–60. doi:10.1177/1477153516629531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., G. Zhang, X. Xia, S. Setunge, and L. Shi. 2020. A review of internal and external influencing factors on energy efficiency design of buildings. Energy and Buildings 216:109944. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN 2021. Light and Lighting—Lighting in Work Places—Part 1: Indoor Work Places. EN Standard 12464-1; European Committee for Standardization, CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• DLC (Design Lights Consortium), and NEEA (Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance). 2020. “Energy savings from networked lighting control (NLC) systems with and without LLLC.” https://www.designlights.org/lighting-controls/reports-tools-resources/energy-savings-from-networked-lighting-controls-with-without-lllc/.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., X. Ma, S. Wei, and W. Chen. 2020. A prediction model coupling occupant lighting and shading behaviors in private offices. Energy and Buildings 216:109939. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. 2022. Grasshopper. https://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
   Google Scholar
• DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2022. Commercial Prototype Buildings Models. https://www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/prototype_models. Accessed on Dec/06/2022
   Google Scholar
• EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). 2018. 2018 Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial. Accessed on Dec/06/2022.
   Google Scholar
• EnergyPlus 2022a. Version 8.9. https://energyplus.net/.
   Google Scholar
• EnergyPlus 2022b. Weather Data. https://energyplus.net/weather/.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune Business Insights 2022. Smart Building Market Size, Share, and Industry Analysis 2023-2030. Fortune Business Insights
   Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A. D., M. R. Atif, and R. A. MacDonald. 2004. Impact of window blinds on daylight-linked dimming and automatic on/off lighting controls. Solar Energy 76 (5):523–44. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goovaerts, C., F. Descamps, and V. A. Jacobs. 2017. Shading control strategy to avoid visual discomfort by using a low-cost camera: A field study of two cases. Building and Environment 125:26–38. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heschong, L. and Heschong Mahone Group. 2011. Daylight Metrics. California Energy Commission Publication number: CEC-500-2012-053.
   Google Scholar
• IES (Illuminating Engineering Society). 2020. Recommended practice: Lighting office spaces. ANSI/IES RP-1-20. New York: Illumination Engineering Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kleindienst, S., and M. Andersen. 2009. The adaptation of daylight glare probability to dynamic metrics in a computational setting. In Proceedings of Lux Europa 2009–11th European lighting conference (No. CONF).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., I. T. Kim, A. S. Choi, and M. Sung. 2014. Evaluation of optimized PV power generation and electrical lighting energy savings from the PV blind-integrated daylight responsive dimming system using LED lighting. Solar Energy 107:746–57. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2014.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J., and C. Perry. 2017. Smart buildings: Using smart technology to save energy in existing buildings. 1–46. Washington, DC, USA: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Kunwar, N. S., K. Cetin, U. Passe, X. Zhou, and Y. Li. 2020. Energy savings and daylighting evaluation of dynamic Venetian blinds and lighting through full- scale experimental testing. Energy 197:117190. Doi: doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. G., and J. A. Jakubiec. 2022. An examination of range effects when evaluating discomfort due to glare in Singaporean buildings. Lighting Research & Technology 54 (6):514–28. doi:10.1177/14771535211047220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M., N. K. Huynh, S. Schiavon, and S. Selkowitz. 2022. Using support vector machine to detect desk illuminance sensor blockage for closed-loop daylight harvesting. Energy and Buildings 274:112443. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlefair, P., J. Ortiz, and C. D. Bhaumik. 2010. A simulation of solar shading control on UK office energy use. Building Research & Information 38 (6):638–46. doi:10.1080/09613218.2010.496556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, R., Y. Sun, M. Aburas, R. Wilson, and Y. Wu. 2018. Evaluation of the thermal and optical performance of thermochromic windows for office buildings in China. Energy and Buildings 176:216–31. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeel, R. 2022. Associates. https://www.rhino3d.com.
   Google Scholar
• Nemtzow, D. 2018. Buildings and the Grid 101: Why Does it Matter for Energy Efficiency. https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/articles/buildings-and-grid-101-why-does-it-matter-energy-efficiency. Accessed on Sep/1/2023.
   Google Scholar
• Neukomm, M., V. Nubbe, and R. Fares. 2019. Grid-interactive efficient buildings technical report series: Overview of research challenges and gaps.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, W., K. Kapsis, and A. K. Athienitis. 2013. Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: A critical review. Building and Environment 60:319–38. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård, T., R. L. Jensen, and F. S. Mikkelsen. 2020. The best way to perform building simulations? One-at-a-time optimization vs. Monte Carlo sampling. Energy and Buildings 208:109628. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B. C., A. S. Choi, J. W. Jeong, and E. S. Lee. 2011. Performance of integrated systems of automated roller shade systems and daylight responsive dimming systems. Building and Environment 46 (3):747–57. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., J. Mardaljevic, and Z. Rogers. 2006. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. LEUKOS 3 (1):7–31. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F. 2004. Lightswitch-2002: A model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy 77 (1):15–28. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudsari, M. S., M. Pak, and A. Smith. 2013. August. Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In Proceedings of the 13th international IBPSA conference, 3128–35. Lyon, France. August.
   Google Scholar
• Romm, J. J. 2014. Cool Companies: How the Best Businesses Boost Profits and Productivity by Cutting Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RADIANCE 2022. Version 5.2.2. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://www.radiance-online.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, E., and T. Hong. 2009. Simulation-based assessment of the energy savings benefits of integrated control in office buildings. Building Simulation 2 (4):239–51. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/s12273-009-9126-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H., and A. Tzempelikos. 2012. Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades. Solar Energy 86 (2):681–704. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2011.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, E., J. Hu, and M. Patel. 2014. Energy and visual comfort analysis of lighting and daylight control strategies. Building and Environment 78:155–70. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., I. J. Lazarus, and V. V. N. Kishore. 2015. Effect of internal woven roller shade and glazing on the energy and daylighting performances of an office building in the cold climate of Shillong. Applied Energy 159:317–33. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S. 2017. Daylighting simulations with radiance using matrix-based methods. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sehrawat, D., and N. S. Gill. 2019. Smart sensors: Analysis of different types of IoT sensors. In 2019 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), IEEE, 523–8. April.
   Google Scholar
• Suk, J. Y. 2019. Luminance and vertical eye illuminance thresholds for occupants’ visual comfort in daylit office environments. Building and Environment 148:107–15. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, B. 1995. Daylighting and productivity at Lockheed. Solar Today 9 (3):26–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A., and H. Shen. 2013. Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Building and Environment 67:179–92. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A., and Y. C. Chan. 2016. Estimating detailed optical properties of window shades from basic available data and modeling implications on daylighting and visual comfort. Energy and Buildings 126:396–407. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valíček, P., T. Novák, J. Vaňuš, K. Sokanský, and R. Martinek. 2016. Measurement of illuminance of interior lighting system automatically dimmed to the constant level depending on daylight. In 2016 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Florence, Italy, 1–5. doi: doi:10.1109/EEEIC.2016.7555604.
   Google Scholar
• Vanage, S., H. Dong, and K. Cetin. 2022. Energy and demand saving potential due to integrated HVAC, lighting, and shading controls in small office building. In: Construction Research Congress 2022:443–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J., and J. Christoffersen. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings 38 (7):743–57. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2007. Dynamic simulation of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis. In Building Simulation, 1197–204. Beijing, China: IBPSA. September.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. 2009. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. International Building Performance Simulation Association, 944–51. Glasgow, Scotland, July 27-30.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J., F. Frontini, S. Herkel, and S. Mende. 2011. Climate based simulation of different shading device systems for comfort and energy demand. In 12^th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. 14–6. November.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., B. Atkinson, K. Garbesi, E. Page, and F. Rubinstein. 2012. Lighting controls in commercial buildings. LEUKOS 8 (3):161–80. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2012.08.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. H., C. S. Park, and J. W. Lee. 2009. Comparative Study of Static vs. Dynamic Controls of Double-skin Systems. In Proceedings of the 11th IBPSA Conference (International Building Performance Simulation Association), July 27–30.
   Google Scholar