Guidance for data-center CFD (RP-1675)

References

• Abdelmaksoud, W. A., H. E. Khalifa, T. Q. Dang, B. Elhadidi, R. R. Schmidt, and M. Iyengar. 2010a. Experimental and computational study of perforated floor tile in data centers. In 2010 12th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITherm 2010. 1–10. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2010.5501413.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelmaksoud, W. A., H. E. Khalifa, T. Q. Dang, R. R. Schmidt, and M. Iyengar. 2010b. Improved CFD modeling of a small data center test cell. In 2010 12th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITherm 2010, 1–9. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2010.5501425.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelmaksoud, W. A., T. Q. Dang, H. E. Khalifa, R. R. Schmidt, and M. Iyengar. 2012. Perforated tile models for improving data center CFD simulation. In InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITHERM, 60–67. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2012.6231414.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelmaksoud, W. A., T. Q. Dang, H. Ezzat Khalifa, and R. R. Schmidt. 2013. Improved computational fluid dynamics model for open-aisle air-cooled data center simulations. Journal of Electronic Packaging 135 (3):1–13. DOI: 10.1115/1.4024766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alissa, H. A., K. Nemati, B. Sammakia, K. Ghose, M. Seymour, and R. Schmidt. 2015. Innovative approaches of experimentally guided CFD modeling for data centers. In Annual IEEE Semiconductor. Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium. 2015-April, 176–184. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/SEMI-THERM.2015.7100157.
   Google Scholar
• Arghode, V. K., and Y. Joshi. 2014. Rapid modeling of air flow through perforated tiles in a raised floor data center. In Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems -Proceedings of the Intersociety Conference, 1354–1365. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2014.6892437.
   Google Scholar
• Arghode, V. K., P. Kumar, Y. Joshi, T. Weiss, and G. Meyer. 2013. Rack level modeling of air flow through perforated tile in a data center. Journal of Electronic Packaging 135 (3):1–7. DOI: 10.1115/1.4024994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athavale, J. D., Y. Joshi, and M. Yoda. 2018. Experimentally validated computational fluid dynamics model for data center with active tiles. Journal of Electronic Packaging 140 (1). DOI: 10.1115/1.4039025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS Fluent R1. 2020. Software by ANSYS, Inc. Canonsburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, B., C. X. Lin, D. Patel, Y. Joshi, J. VanGilder, and M. Seymour. 2021. A new tile model for air flow distribution in a full-featured data center with raised floor plenum. InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITHERM 2021-June, 510–7. Atlanta, Georgia. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM51669.2021.9503275.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, B., D. Patel, and L. Phan. 2022. Guidance for CFD modeling of Data Centers ASHRAE RP-1675. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, New York City, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, M., H. Hamann, R. R. Schmidt, and J. VanGilder. 2007. Comparison between numerical and experimental temperature distributions in a small data center test cell. In 2007 Proceedings of the ASME InterPack Conference, IPACK 2007. Vol. 1, 819–826. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1115/IPACK2007-33508.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., R. R. Schmidt, K. M. Kelkar, A. Radmehr, and S. V. Patankar. 2001. A methodology for the design of perforated tiles in raised floor data centers using computational flow analysis. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies 24 (2):177–83. DOI: 10.1109/6144.926380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karki, K. C., and S. V. Patankar. 2006. Airflow distribution through perforated tiles in raised-floor data centers. Building and Environment 41 (6):734–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karki, K. C., A. Radmehr, and S. V. Patankar. 2003. Use of computational fluid dynamics for calculating flow rates through perforated tiles in raised-floor data centers. HVAC&R Research 9 (2):153–66. DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2003.10391062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder, B. E., and B. I. Sharma. 1974. Application of the energy-dissipation model of flow near a spinning disc. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer 1 (2):131–7. 10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7
   Google Scholar
• Pardey, Z. M., D. W. Demetriou, H. S. Erden, J. W. VanGilder, H. E. Khalifa, and R. R. Schmidt. 2015. Proposal for standard compact server model for transient data center simulations. ASHRAE Transactions 121:413–21.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, C. D., C. E. Bash, C. Belady, L. Stahl, and D. Sullivan. 2001. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of high compute density data centers to assure system inlet air specifications. Advances in Electronic Packaging 2:821–9.
   Google Scholar
• Radmehr, A., K. C. Karki, and S. V. Patankar. 2007. Analysis of airflow distribution across a front-to-rear server RACK. In 2007 Proceedings of the ASME InterPack Conference, IPACK 2007, Vol. 1(September), 837–843. Washington, DC. DOI: 10.1115/IPACK2007-33574.
   Google Scholar
• Shehabi, A., S. Smith, D. Sartor, R. Brown, M. Herrlin, J. Koomey, E. R. Masanet, N. Horner, I. Azevedo, and W. Lintner. 2016. United states data center energy usage report. U.S. Department of Energy Washington, New York City, New York.
   Google Scholar
• VanGilder, J. W., and R. R. Schmidt. 2005. Airflow uniformity through perforated tiles in a raised-floor data center. In Proceedings of the ASME/Pacific Rim Technical Conference and Exhibition on Integration and Packaging of MEMS, NEMS, and Electronic Systems: Advances in Electronic Packaging 2005. PART A, 493–502. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1115/ipack2005-73375.
   Google Scholar
• VanGilder, J. W., and X. Zhang. 2014. Cooling performance of ceiling-plenum-ducted containment systems in data centers. In Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems -Proceedings of the Intersociety Conference, 786–792. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2014.6892361.
   Google Scholar
• VanGilder, J. W., Z. M. Pardey, P. Bemis, and D. W. Plamondon. 2016. Compact modeling of data center raised-floor-plenum stanchions: Pressure drop through sparse tube bundles. In Proceedings of the 15th InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITherm 2016, 1148–1155. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2016.7517678.
   Google Scholar
• VanGilder, J., Y. Vaishnani, W. Tian, and M. Condor. 2020. A compact rack model for data center CFD modeling. In InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITHERM, 2020-July, 350–356. Atlanta, Georgia. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM45881.2020.9190187.
   Google Scholar
• VanGilder, J. W., M. Seymour, B. Hu, W. Tian, M. Pang, and C.-X. Lin. 2022. Flow resistance characteristics for data center CFD. ASHRAE Transactions 2022 128 (Part 2). Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, J. Z., K. A. Hermansen, and S. Al-Saadi. 2012. The development of Simplified Rack Boundary Conditions for Numerical Data Center Models. ASHRAE Transactions 118 (PART 2):436–47.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., M. Iyengar, J. W. VanGilder, and R. R. Schmidt. 2008. Effect of rack modeling detail on the numerical results of a data center test cell. In 2008 11th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, I-THERM, 1183–1190. New York City, New York. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2008.4544395.
   Google Scholar