Stomatal shape described by a superellipse in four Magnoliaceae species

References

• Biggins JD, Thompson JE, Birkhead TR. 2018. Accurately quantifying the shape of birds’ eggs. Ecol Evol. 8(19):9728–9738. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonan GB. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 320(5882):1444–1449. doi: 10.1126/science.1155121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschmann H, Borchers A. 2020. Handedness in plant cell expansion: a mutant perspective on helical growth. New Phytol. 225(1):53–69. doi: 10.1111/nph.16034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornbusch T, Watt J, Baccar R, Fournier C, Andrieu B. 2011. A comparative analysis of leaf shape of wheat, barley and maize using an empirical shape model. Ann Bot. 107(5):865–873. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esau K. 1967. Plant anatomy. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(25):10343–10347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904209106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielis J. 2003. A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. Am J Bot. 90(3):333–338. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.3.333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielis J. 2017. The geometrical beauty of plants. Paris, France: Atlantis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature. 424(6951):901–908. doi: 10.1038/nature01843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu P. 1996. Multiple comparisons: theory and methods. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1201/b15074.
   Google Scholar
• Huang W, Li Y, Niklas KJ, Gielis J, Ding Y, Cao L, Shi P. 2020. A superellipse with deformation and its application in describing the cross-sectional shapes of a square bamboo. Symmetry. 12(12):2073. doi: 10.3390/sym12122073.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Gao Z, Wang R. 2021. Application of segregation process in observing the leaf stomatal structure of Michelia plants. Anhui For Sci Technol. 47(1):26–29. doi: 10.3969/j.2095-0152.2021.01.009.
   Google Scholar
• Lamé G. 1818. Examen des Différentes Méthodes Employées Pour Résoudre les Problèmes de Géométrie. Paris, France: V. Courcier.
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, Hou J, He N, Xu L, Zhang Z. 2021. Changes in leaf stomatal traits of different aged temperate forest stands. J For Res. 32(3):927–936. doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01135-5.
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, Niklas KJ, Ü N, Zhang L, Yu K, Gielis J, Gao J, Shi P. 2023. The data of 960 stomata from four Magnoliaceae species, Dryad. Dataset. doi: 10.5061/dryad.c866t1gc2.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Niklas KJ, Gielis J, Ü N, Schrader J, Wang R, Shi P. 2022. An elliptical blade is not a true ellipse, but a superellipse–evidence from two Michelia species. J For Res. 33(4):1341–1348. doi: 10.1007/s11676-021-01385-x.
   Google Scholar
• Narushin VG, Romanov MN, Griffin DK. 2021. Egg and math: introducing a universal formula for egg shape. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1505(1):169–177. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Mead R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Comp J. 7(4):308–313. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes TDG, Zhang D, Raissig MT. 2020. Form, development and function of grass stomata. Plant J. 101(4):780–799. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang W, Struik PC, Yin X, Yang J. 2017. Stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and transpiration efficiency in relation to leaf anatomy in rice and wheat genotypes under drought. J Exp Bot. 68(18):5191–5205. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston FW. 1953. The shapes of birds’ eggs. The Auk. 70(2):160–182. doi: 10.2307/4081145.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Australia): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; [accessed 2022 June 1]. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Shi P, Gielis J, Quinn BK, Niklas KJ, Ratkowsky DA, Schrader J, Ruan H, Wang L, Ü N. 2022. ‘Biogeom’: An R package for simulating and fitting natural shapes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1516(1):123–134. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi P, Huang J, Hui C, Grissino-Mayer HD, Tardif JC, Zhai L, Wang F, Li B. 2015. Capturing spiral radial growth of conifers using the superellipse to model tree-ring geometric shape. Front Plant Sci. 6:856. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi P, Ratkowsky DA, Gielis J. 2020. The generalized Gielis geometric equation and its application. Symmetry. 12(4):645. doi: 10.3390/sym12040645.
   Google Scholar
• Shi P, Ratkowsky DA, Li Y, Zhang L, Lin S, Gielis J. 2018. A general leaf area geometric formula exists for plants—evidence from the simplified gielis equation. Forests. 9(11):714. doi: 10.3390/f9110714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su J, Niklas KJ, Huang W, Yu X, Yang Y, Shi P. 2019. Lamina shape does not correlate with lamina surface area: an analysis based on the simplified Gielis equation. Glob Ecol Conserv. 19:e00666. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian F, Wang Y, Sandhu HS, Gielis J, Shi P. 2018. Comparison of seed morphology of two ginkgo cultivars. J For Res. 31(3):751–758. doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0770-y.
   Google Scholar
• Tian M, Yu G, He N, Hou J. 2016. Leaf morphological and anatomical traits from tropical to temperate coniferous forests: mechanisms and influencing factors. Sci Rep. 6(1):19703. doi: 10.1038/srep19703.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toscano S, Ferrante A, Tribulato A, Romano D. 2018. Leaf physiological and anatomical responses of lantana and ligustrum species under different water availability. Plant Physiol Biochem. 127:380–392. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong D, Flexas J. 2020. From one side to two sides: the effects of stomatal distribution on photosynthesis. New Phytol. 228(6):1754–1766. doi: 10.1111/nph.16801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Z, Dun Z, Wang Y, Yang D, Xiong D, Cui K, Peng S, Huang J. 2022. Effect of stomatal morphology on leaf photosynthetic induction under fluctuating light in rice. Front Plant Sci. 12:754790. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.754790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Shi P, Schrader J, Niklas KJ. 2020. Nondestructive estimation of leaf area for 15 species of vines with different leaf shapes. Am J Bot. 107(11):1481–1490. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Yang Y, Peng S, Li Y. 2021. Nighttime transpirational cooling enabled by circadian regulation of stomatal conductance is related to stomatal anatomy and leaf morphology in rice. Planta. 254(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03661-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar