Nomination Committees and National Sport Organizations: Designing the Way to Democracy?

References

• Allern, E. H., & Pedersen, K. (2007). The impact of party organisational changes on democracy. West European Politics, 30(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aperte, L. A. (2016). The impact of shareholder involvement in the nomination process on board diversity. Nordic Journal of Business, 6(1), 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Appiah, K. O., & Chizema, A. (2016). The impact of board quality and nomination committee on corporate bankruptcy. Advances in Accounting, 35, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. D. (2011). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. SAGE. (Original work published 1994). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986397
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T. (2005). Political selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, T., & O’Boyle, I. (2015). Batting above average: Governance at New Zealand Cricket. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(4), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c3p3
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. A. (2002). Racial diversity and performance of nonprofit boards of directors. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. A. (2007). Board development practices and competent board members: Implications for performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.151
   Google Scholar
• Bruneel, J., Clarysse, B., Staessens, M., & Weemaes, S. (2020). Breaking with the past: The need for innovation in the governance of nonprofit social enterprises. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunzell, T., & Söderman, S. (2012). Board evaluation in the top Nordic football clubs. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 2(3), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426781211261520
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, K. (2007). Elements of effective governance: Measurement, accountability and participation. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capling, A., & Marjoribanks, T. (2004). Connecting commerce and culture in third sector organisations: The case of Australian football league clubs. Third Sector Review, 10, 1, 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E. (2002). Factors associated with the development of board sub-committees. Corporate Governance, 10(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.-L., & Mrkonjic, M. (2013). Existing governance principles in sport: A review of published literature. In J. Alm (Ed.), Action for good governance in international sports organisations: Final report (pp. 222–240). Danish Institute for Sports Studies. https://www.playthegame.org/fileadmin/documents/Good_governance_reports/AGGIS-report_-_18Existing_governance_principles_in_sport__p_222-240_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chelladurai, P. (2013). A personal journey in theorizing in sport management. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clune, R., Hermanson, D., Tompkins, J., & Ye, Z. (2014). The nominating committee process: A qualitative examination of board independence and formalization. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 748–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courant, D. (2019). Sortition and democratic principles: A comparative analysis. In J. Gastil & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Legislature by lot: Transformative designs for deliberative governance (pp. 229–247). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cuomo, M. M., & Holzer, H. (Eds.). (2004). Lincoln on democracy. https://www.jstor.org/
   Google Scholar
• Dean, R., Gagnon, J.-P., & Asenbaum, H. (2019). What is democratic theory? Democratic Theory, 6(2), v–xx. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060201
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eminet, A., & Guedri, Z. (2010). The role of nominating committees and director reputation in shaping the labor market for directors: An empirical assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(6), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00814.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B., & Waldahl, R. H. (2010). Democratic governance and oligarchy in voluntary sport organizations: The case of the Norwegian Olympic Committee and Confederation of Sports. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740903559909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar, J. D. (2012). Case study research for business. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ferkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2010). Developing board strategic capability in sport organisations: The national-regional governing relationship. Sport Management Review, 13(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2010.01.009
   Google Scholar
• Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & O’Boyle, I. (2018). Leadership in governance: Exploring collective board leadership in sport governance systems. Sport Management Review, 21(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I., & Lee, P. C. (2004). Governance and ethics in sport. In J. Beech & S. Chadwick (Eds.), The business of sport management (pp. 25–41). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., Renz, D. O., & Heimovics, R. D. (1996). Board practices and board effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130070404
   Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2004). Board member selection, orientation and evaluation: Implications for board performance in member-benefit voluntary sport organisations. Third Sector Review, 10, 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., & Doherty, A. (2011). Nonprofit sport board performance: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Sport Management, 25(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.25.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, M., Mack, J., & Plastow, K. (2015). Who selects the ‘right’ directors? An examination of the association between board selection, gender diversity and outcomes. Accounting & Finance, 55(4), 1071–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvenmark, J., & Einarsson, T. (2021). Democratic governance in member-based organizations. In G. Donnelly-Cox, M. Meyer & F. Wijkström (Eds.), Research handbook on nonprofit governance (pp. 258–278). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788114912
   Google Scholar
• Incorporated Societies Act. (1908). Incorporated Societies Act 1908. New Zealand Legislation. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1908/0212/latest/DLM175775.html?src=qs
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, K., & O’Boyle, I. (2018). Sport governance in Australia: Questions of board structure and performance. World Leisure Journal, 60(2), 156–172. ¬https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2017.1340332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Olympic Committee. (2011). Basic universal principles of good governance of the Olympic and sports movement. https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/IOC/Who-We-Are/Commissions/Ethics/Good-Governance/EN-Basic-Universal-Principles-of-Good-Governance-2011.pdf#_ga=2.45127524.1751994187.1591600219-501850424.1591600219
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2012). Antecedents of board composition: The role of nomination committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, S., & Nyuur, R. (2016). Review of the literature on board committees: Taking stock and looking ahead. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 11(2), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2016.078200
   Google Scholar
• Kallamu, B. S. (2016). Nomination committee attributes and firm performance: Evidence from finance companies in Malaysia. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 3, 150–165. http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JEST/
   Google Scholar
• Kihl, L. A., & Schull, V. (2020). Understanding the meaning of representation in a deliberative democratic governance system. Journal of Sport Management, 34(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Minikin, B. (2015). Legitimacy and democracy: Implications for governance in sport. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 5(5), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-03-2015-0010
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, T., Dickson, G., & Ferkins, L. (2020). Director selection, development and evaluation. In D. Shilbury & L. Ferkins (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport governance (pp. 333–350). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, T., Ferkins, L., & Dickson, G. (2020). Sport board performance: A contribution to the integrated board performance model. In D. Shilbury & L. Ferkins (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport governance (pp. 318–332). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nachemson-Ekwall, S., & Mayer, C. (2018). Nomination committees and corporate governance: Lessons from Sweden and the UK. Saïd Business School WP 2018-12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3170397
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Law Commission. (2013). A new Act for incorporated societies. https://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC%20R129.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, I., & Shilbury, D. (2016). Comparing federal and unitary models of sport governance: A case study investigation. Managing Sport and Leisure, 21(6), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2017.1289339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, M. M. (2016). Stakeholder perceptions on the democratic governance of major sports events. Sport Management Review, 19(4), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, M. (2019). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Democratic theory through an agonistic lens. Democratic Theory, 6(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060208
   Google Scholar
• Pirzada, K., Mustapha, M. Z., & Alfan, E. B. (2017). Antecedents of ethnic diversity: The role of nomination committees. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2976235
   Google Scholar
• Renz, D. O. (2004). An overview of nonprofit governance. Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership at UMKC. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from http://energycollection.us/Board-Of-Directors/Governance/Overview-Nonprofit-governance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M.-J. (2008). Building board expertise through key supporting processes. Measuring Business Excellence, 12(4), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040810919953
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., Tacheva, S., Greve, P., & Hu, Y. (2006). The determinants and effects of board nomination committees. Journal of Management & Governance, 10(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-006-0001-3
   Google Scholar
• Seaworth, A. D. (2016). Limited Leadership: An examination of Houston nonprofit board diversity and whether selection processes and executive director perceptions of governance models affect composition [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations.
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D. (1993). Determining the problem of order in the Australian football league. Journal of Sport Management, 7(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.7.2.122
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2020). Overview of sport governance scholarship. In D. Shilbury & L. Ferkins (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sport governance (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., O’Boyle, I., & Ferkins, L. (2016). Towards a research agenda in collaborative sport governance. Sport Management Review, 19(5), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., O’Boyle, I., & Ferkins, L. (2020). Examining collective board leadership and collaborative sport governance. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(4), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1713198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, L. (2012). Discerning which qualitative approach fits best. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 46, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sport New Zealand (Sport NZ). (n.d.). Nine steps to effective governance: Building high performance organisations (3rd ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration & Governance, 4(2), 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C., Fahlén, J., Strittmatter, A.-M., & Skille, E. (2020). Hierarchies of criteria in NSO board-nomination processes: Insights from nomination committees’ work. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(5), 636–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1672204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenling, C., Fahlén, J., Strittmatter, A.-M., & Skille, E. (2021a). Gate-keeping nonprofit governance: Evaluative criteria and their rankings in nomination committee selection processes. In G. Donnelly-Cox, M. Meyer & F. Wijkström (Eds.), Research handbook on nonprofit governance (pp. 279–293). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788114912
   Google Scholar
• Stenling, C., Fahlén, J., Strittmatter, A.-M., & Skille, E. (2021b). The gatekeepers of sport governance – Nomination committees’ shaping potential in national sport organizations’ board composition processes. European Sport Management Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1897640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swimming New Zealand. (2012). Swimming in New Zealand: Growing a cornerstone sport. https://www.swimming.org.nz/visageimages/Legal%20&%20Governance/SNZ%20Review/SNZReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Union of European Football Associations. (2016). UEFA HatTrick IV regulations edition 2016. https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefaorg/HatTrick/02/34/63/05/2346305_DOWNLOAD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. (1999). The nature of board nominating committees and their role in corporate governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(1–2), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00253
   Google Scholar
• Walther, A., & Morner, M. (2014). Opening the black box of nomination committees: A case study of non-executive director selections in German supervisory boards. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 9(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2014.063275
   Google Scholar
• Walther, A., Morner, M., & Calabrò, A. (2017). The role of behaviorally integrated nominating committees in non-executive director selection processes. European Management Journal, 35(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2017). A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers, M., Hillman, A., & Cannella, A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar