Facility dogs in UK courtrooms: Public perspective

References

• Ahern, E., Kowalski, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2018). A case study perspective: The experiences of young persons testifying to child sexual exploitation in British criminal court. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2017.1393479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, S. V. (2013). The use of therapy dogs in Indiana courtrooms: Why a dog might not be defendant’s best friend. Indiana Law Review, 46(4), 1289–1316.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burd, K. (2013). The effects of facility animals in the courtroom on juror decision-making [Master’s thesis, Arizona State University]. ASU Repository. https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/110576/content/Burd_asu_0010N_12989.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burd, K. A., & McQuiston, D. (2019). Facility dogs in the courtroom: Comfort without prejudice. Criminal Justice Review, 44(4), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016819844298
   Google Scholar
• Caprioli, S., & Crenshaw, D. A. (2017). The culture of silencing child victims of sexual abuse: Implications for child witnesses in court. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 57(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815604442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, K., & Connolly, D. A. (2015). Testifying through the ages: An examination of current psychological issues on the use of testimonial supports by child, adolescent, and adult witnesses in Canada. Canadian Psychology, 56(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courthouse Dogs Foundation. (2015). Courthouse dogs at children’s advocacy centers and in legal proceedings: Best practices. Courthouse Dogs Foundation. https://courthousedogs.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Facility-Dogs-at-CACs-Best-Practices-Final-2-18-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Courthouse Dogs Foundation. (2022). Where dogs are working. https://www.courthousedogs.org/dogs/where
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, D. A., Stella, L., O’Neill-Stephens, E., & Walsen, C. (2019). Developmentally and trauma-sensitive courtrooms. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 59(6), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167816641854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service. (2020). Special measures. CPS. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/special-measures
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, M. (2009). Using dogs for emotional support of testifying victims of crime. Animal Law, 15(2), 171–192.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, J., & Zendle, J. (2019). Victim experience project. Report into victim experiences in the magistrates’ court. Magistrates Association. https://www.magistrates-association.org.uk/Portals/0/47%20Victim%20experience%20project_MA%20report_August%202019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, A. M., Glenn, M. K., Meade, J., & Wirth, O. (2017). Dogs in the workplace: A review of the benefits and potential challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklyn, R. (2012). Satisfaction and willingness to engage with the criminal justice system. Findings from the witness and victim experience survey, 2009-2010. Ministry of Justice. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/197099/satisfaction-willingness-to-engage-with-cjs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gerkey, L. (2016). Legal beagles, a silent minority: Therapeutic effects of facility dogs in the courtroom. International Journal of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, 1, 405–430.
   Google Scholar
• Glaberson, W. (2011, August 8). By helping a girl testify at a rape trial, a dog ignites a legal debate. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, M. (2018). Assessing the perceptions of the use of a courthouse facility dog program with child and youth witnesses [Master’s dissertation, University of Western Ontario]. University of Western Ontario Repository. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5265
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, A. L. (2013). An examination of why permitting therapy dogs to assist child-victims when testifying during criminal trials should not be permitted. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 16(1), 263–292.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2018). Victims strategy. HM Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/746930/victim-strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holder, C. (2013). All dogs go to court: The impact of court facility dogs as comfort for child witnesses on a defendant’s right to fair trial. Houston Law Review, 50(4), 1155–1188.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, T. J., Hodgkin, S., Modderman, C., & Bennett, P. C. (2021). Integrating facility dogs into legal contexts for survivors of sexual and family violence: Opportunities and challenges. Anthrozoös, 34(6), 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1938406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. G., & Chizkov, R. R. (2014). Are therapy dogs like Xanax? Does animal-assisted therapy impact processes relevant to cognitive behavioural psychotherapy? Anthrozoös, 27(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303714X14023922797959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, G., Jacobson, J., & Kirby, A. (2013). Out of the shadows: Victims’ and witnesses’ experiences of attending crown court. Project report. Victim Support https://www.victimsupport.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/documents/files/Out%20of%20the%20shadows%20report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Justice, R. M. (2007). Pets in the courtroom: The new “comfort” item. American Prosecutors Research Institute’s National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse, 20, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. M. (2020). Courthouse facility dogs: An intervention for survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2020.1828214
   Google Scholar
• Krause-Parello, C. A., Thames, M., Ray, C. M., & Kolassa, J. (2018). Examining the effects of a service-trained facility dog on stress in children undergoing forensic interview for allegations of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1443303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D., Neyroud, P., & Starmer, K. (2015). Recommendations on a Victims’ Law. Report for the labour party by the victims’ taskforce. Victims’ Taskforce. https://www.yourbritain.org.uk/uploads/editor/files/Victims_Taskforce_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lobe, B. (2008). Integration of online research methods. In Information technology/social informatics collection. University of Lbjubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacNamara, M. (2013). Needs assessment for animal-assisted interventions: Factors influencing implantation of dogs as judiciary aids in criminal justice processes in CPS cases [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Denver. University of Denver Repository. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1389&context=etd
   Google Scholar
• Mariani, J. (2020). Courthouse facility dogs: A witness’s best friend. Criminal Justice, 35(2), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2013). The witness charter: Standards of care for witnesses in the criminal justice system. Ministry of Justice. https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/victims_witnesses/witness_charter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2014). Report on review of ways to reduce distress of victims in trials of sexual violence. Ministry of Justice. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/299341/report-on-review-of-ways-to-reduce-distress-of-victims-in-trials-of-sexual-violence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Molina, J., & Poppleton, S. (2020). Rape survivors and the criminal justice system: October 2020. Victims Commissioner. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/jotwpublic-prod-storage-1cxo1dnrmkg14/uploads/sites/6/2021/12/Rape-Survivors-and-the-CJS_FINAL-v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2021). Population estimates. Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roby, E. (2015). Friend indeed: Adult witnesses and facility dogs in the courtroom. Mid-Atlantic Journal on Law and Public Policy, 3(1), 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, G. N. (2010). Court facility dogs – Easing the apprehensive witness. The Colorado Lawyer, 39(4), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Spruin, E., Mozova, K., Dempster, T., & Freeman, R. (2020). The use of facility dogs to bridge the justice gap for survivors of sexual offending. Social Sciences, 9(6), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9060096
   Google Scholar
• Spruin, E., Mozova, K., Dempster, T., & Mitchell, S. (2019a). Exploring the impact of specially trained dogs on the court experiences of sexual offence survivors in England and Wales: An exploratory case study. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09419-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruin, E., Mozova, K., Franz, A., Mitchell, S., Fernandez, A., Dempster, T., & Holt, N. (2019b). The use of therapy dogs to support court users in the waiting room. International Criminal Justice Review, 29(3), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567719827063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruin, E., Mozova, K., & Mozova, K. (2018). Dogs in the criminal justice system: Consideration of facility and therapy dogs. Pet Behaviour Science, 5(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21071/pbs.v0i5.10084
   Google Scholar
• Sturge, G. (2021). Court statistics for England and Wales. House of Commons Library. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8372/CBP-8372.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, K., Parker, I., & Bunt, L. (2015). Responsive Justice. How citizens experience the justice system. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/Global/CitizensAdvice/Crime%20and%20Justice%20Publications/Responsivejustice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Victims’ Commissioner. (2021). Next steps for special measures. A review of the provision of special measures to vulnerable and intimidated witnesses. Victims’ Commissioner. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/jotwpublic-prod-storage-1cxo1dnrmkg14/uploads/sites/6/2021/12/2021-05-18_Special-measures_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wedlock, E., & Tapley, J. (2016). What works in supporting victims of crime: A rapid evidence assessment. Victims’ Commissioner. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/jotwpublic-prod-storage-1cxo1dnrmkg14/uploads/sites/6/2021/12/VC-What-works-in-supporting-victims-of-crime-Review-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wemmers, J. (2013). Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013492755
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Harpur, P., & Pachana, N. (2018). Teaching an old dog new tricks: Using courthouse facility dogs in Australia. Alternative Law Journal, 43(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X18767694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Lepanjuuri, K., Paskell, C., Thompson, J., Adams, L., & Coburn, S. (2015). Victim and witness satisfaction survey. Crown Prosecution Service. https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/victims_witnesses/cps_victim_and_witness_survey_sept_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar