Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Optimize Transcatheter Heart Valve Sizing and Positioning in Bicuspid Aortic Valve

References

• Dowling C, Kondapally Seshasai SR, Firoozi S, Brecker SJ. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgery for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(1):158–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2005;111(7):920–925. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000155623.48408.C5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz C, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, et al. Patient-specific image-based computer simulation for the prediction of valve morphology and calcium displacement after TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN valve. EuroIntervention. 2016;11(9):1044–1052. doi:https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV11I9A212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, et al. Patient-specific computer modeling to predict aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:508–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocatello G, El Faquir N, De Santis G, et al. Patient-specific computer simulation to elucidate the role of contact pressure in the development of new conduction abnormalities after catheter-based implantation of a self-expanding aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(2):e005344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling C, Bavo AM, El Faquir N, et al. Patient-specific computer simulation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve morphology. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:e009178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer J, Gheorghe L, Nijenhuis VJ, et al. Insight on patient specific computer modeling of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(6):1097–1105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Faquir N, De Backer O, Bosmans J, et al. Patient-specific computer simulation in TAVR with the self-expanding Evolut R valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(15):1803–1812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling C, Firoozi S, Brecker SJ. First-in-human experience with patient-specific computer simulation of TAVR in bicuspid aortic valve morphology. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(2):184–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(5):1226–1233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilaihawi H, Chen M, Webb J, et al. A bicuspid aortic valve imaging classification for the TAVR era. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(10):1145–1158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buellesfeld L, Stortecky S, Kalesan B, et al. Aortic root dimensions among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(1):72–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchetche D, de Biase C, van Gils L, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve anatomy and relationship with devices: the BAVARD multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(1):e007107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilaihawi H, Makkar RR, Kashif M, et al. A revised methodology for aortic-valvar complex calcium quantification for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(12):1324–1332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger N, Khalique OK, Krepp JM, et al. Practical determination of aortic valve calcium volume score on contrast-enhanced computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement and impact on paravalvular regurgitation: elucidating optimal threshold cutoffs. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(4):302–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling C, Gooley R, McCormick L, Firoozi S, Brecker SJ. Patient-specific computer simulation: an emerging technology for guiding the transcatheter treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Interv Cardiol. 2021;16:e26. doi:https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.09.
   Google Scholar
• Jilaihawi H, Zhao Z, Du R, et al. Minimizing permanent pacemaker following repositionable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(18):1796–1807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, Monaghan MJ. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(3):340–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman D, Gabbieri D, Del Blanco BG, et al. Expert consensus on sizing and positioning of SAPIEN 3/ultra in bicuspid aortic valves. Cardiol Ther. 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00223-9.
   Google Scholar
• De Biase C, Agudze E, Siddiqui S, et al. Supra-annular sizing for prediction of THV expansion in bicuspid aortic valves: a MSCT study. Struct Heart. 2021;5(4):382–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24748706.2021.1915515.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio AS, Angelillis M, De Backer O, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: development and validation of an algorithm based on multi-slice computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(5):452–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannopollo G, Romano V, Buzzatti N, et al. A novel supra-annular plane to predict TAVI prosthesis anchoring in raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve disease: the LIRA plane. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(3):259–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannopollo G, Romano V, Buzzatti N, et al. Supra-annular sizing of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses in raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve disease: the LIRA method. Int J Cardiol. 2020;317:144–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WK, Renker M, Rolf A, et al. Annular versus supra-annular sizing for TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(3):e231–e238. doi:https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir-McCall JR, Attinger-Toller A, Blanke P, et al. Annular versus supra-annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(5):407–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchetche D. Transcatheter treatment of bicuspid aortic valves with the Evolut platform: the BIVOLUT-X registry. Presented on: June 27, 2020. PCR e-Course; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mangieri A, Tchetchè D, Kim WK, et al. Balloon versus self-expandable valve for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: insights from the BEAT international collaborative registrys. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(7):e008714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WK, Schäfer U, Tchetche D, et al. Incidence and outcome of peri-procedural transcatheter heart valve embolization and migration: the TRAVEL registry (TranscatheteR HeArt Valve EmboLization and Migration). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(38):3156–3165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellhammer K, Piayda K, Afzal S, et al. Micro-dislodgement during transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a contemporary self-expandable prosthesis. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran S, Ganesapandi R, Sivaprakasam MC. Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve with extreme horizontal aorta to left ventricle angulation challenges. IHJ Cardiovascular Case Rep. (CVCR). 2018;2:S54–S56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihjccr.2018.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon SH, Kim WK, Dhoble A, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(9):1018–1030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar RR, Yoon SH, Leon MB, et al. Association between transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid vs tricuspid aortic stenosis and mortality or stroke. Jama. 2019;321(22):2193–2202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.7108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shoshan J, Alosaimi H, Lauzier PT, et al. Double S-curve versus cusp-overlap technique: defining the optimal fluoroscopic projection for TAVR with a self-expanding device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(2):185–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Ramlawi B, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves from the STS/ACC TVT registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(15):1749–1759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Simpson TF, Akhavein R, et al. Hemodynamic and conduction system outcomes in Sievers Type 0 and Sievers Type 1 bicuspid aortic valves post transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Struct Heart. 2021;5(3):287–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24748706.2021.1883782.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest JK, Ramlawi B, Deeb GM, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thériault-Lauzier P, Andalib A, Martucci G, et al. Fluoroscopic anatomy of left-sided heart structures for transcatheter interventions: insight from multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:947–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar