106
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Examining Ignition-Interlock Post-Arrest Treatments

&
Pages 172-200 | Received 12 Jul 2022, Accepted 09 Nov 2022, Published online: 01 Dec 2022

References

  • Beck, K. H., Rauch, W. J., Baker, E. A., & Williams, A. F. (1999). Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: A randomized trial in Maryland. American Journal of Public Health, 89(11), 1696–1700. doi:10.2105/ajph.89.11.1696
  • Becker, S. O., & Caliendo, M. (2007). Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 7(1), 71–83. doi:10.1177/1536867X0700700104
  • Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
  • Caulkins, J. P., & DuPont, R. L. (2010). Is 24/7 sobriety a good goal for repeat driving under the influence (DUI) offenders? Addiction (Abingdon, England), 105(4), 575–577. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02844.x
  • Coben, J. H., & Larkin, G. L. (1999). Effectiveness of ignition interlock devices in reducing drunk driving recidivism. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(1 Suppl), 81–87.
  • Cochran, J. C., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of correctional sanctions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(2), 317–347. doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9205-2
  • DeMichele, M., Payne, B., & Lowe, N. (2016). Identifying the characteristics of chronic drunk drivers using a criminological lens. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1570–1596. doi:10.1177/0011128713510079
  • DuPont, R. L., Shea, C. L., Talpins, S. K., & Voas, R. B. (2010). Leveraging the criminal justice system to reduce alcohol-and drug-related crime: A review of three promising, and innovative model programs. Prosecutor, Journal of the National District Attorneys Association, 44(1), 38–43.
  • DeYoung, D. J., Tashima, H. N., & Masten, S. V. (2005). An evaluation of effectiveness of ignition interlock in California: Technical report (No. CAL-DMV-RSS-05-217). Sacramento, CA: California Depart of Motor Vehicles.
  • Elder, R. W., Voas, R. B., Beirness, D., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L., & Compton, R., Task Force on Community Prevention Services. (2011). Effectiveness of ignition interlock for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 40(3), 362–376. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.012
  • EMT Group. (1990). Evaluation of the California ignition interlock pilot program for DUI offenders (Farr-Davis Driver Safety Act of 1986). Sacramento, CA: California Office of Traffic Safety.
  • Fulkerson, J. A. (2003). Blow and go: The breath-analyzed ignition interlock device as a technological response to DWI. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29(1), 219–235.
  • Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–492.
  • Marques, P. R., Tippetts, S., & Voas, R. B. (2003). Comparative and joint prediction of DUI recidivism from alcohol ignition interlock and driver records. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(1), 83–92.
  • McCartt, A. T., Leaf, W. A., Farmer, C. M., & Eichelberger, A. H. (2013). Washington state’s alcohol ignition interlock law: Effects on recidivism among first-time DUI offenders. Traffic Injury Prevention, 14(3), 215–229. doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.708885
  • Mears, D. P. (2010). American criminal justice policy: An evaluation approach to increasing accountability and effectiveness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., & Bales, W. D. (2012). Gender differences in the effects of prison on recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(5), 370–378. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.009
  • Miller, P. G., Curtis, A., Sonderlund, A., Day, A., & Droste, N. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 41(1), 16–29.
  • Morse, B. J., & Elliott, D. S. (1992). Effects of ignition interlock devices on DUI recidivism: Findings from a longitudinal study in Hamilton Count, Ohio. Crime & Delinquency, 38(2), 131–157. doi:10.1177/0011128792038002001
  • National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2022, April). Alcohol-impaired Driving: 2020 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 813 0294). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  • Raub, R. A., Lucke, R. E., & Wark, R. I. (2003). Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: Controlling the recidivist. Traffic Injury Prevention, 4(3), 199–205. doi:10.1080/15389580309873
  • Rauch, W. J., Zador, P. L., Ahlin, E. M., Howard, J. M., Frissell, K. C., & Duncan, G. D. (2010). Risk of alcohol-impaired driving recidivism among first offenders and multiple offenders. American Journal of Public Health, 100(5), 919–924.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  • Roth, R., Voas, R. B., & Marques, P. (2007). Interlocks for first offenders: Effective? Traffic Injury Prevention, 8(4), 346–352.
  • Roth, R., Voas, R., & Marques, P. (2007). Mandating interlocks for fully revoked offenders: The New Mexico experience. Traffic Injury Prevention, 8(1), 20–25.
  • Sampson, R. (2010). Gold standard myths: Observations on the experimental turn in qualitative criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 489–500. doi:10.1007/s10940-010-9117-3
  • Sloan, F., Eldred, L., McCutchan, S., & Platt, A. (2016). Deterring rearrests for drinking and driving. Southern Economic Journal, 83(2), 416–436. doi:10.1002/soej.12159
  • Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (2001). Reconciling conflicting evidence on the performance of propensity-score matching methods. American Economic Review, 91(2), 112–118. doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.112
  • Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, 42A.408.
  • Tippetts, A. S., & Voas, R. B. (1998). The effectiveness of the West Virginia interlock program. Journal of Traffic Medicine, 26(1–2), 19–24.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2009). Mediation and mechanism. European Journal of Epidemiology, 24(5), 217–224. doi:10.1007/s10654-009-9331-1
  • Voas, R. B., Blackman, K. O., Tippetts, A. S., & Marques, P. R. (2002). Evaluation of a program to motivate impaired driving offenders to install ignition interlocks. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 34(4), 449–455.
  • Voas, R. B., & DeYoung, D. J. (2002). Vehicle action: Effective policy for controlling drunk and other high-risk drivers? Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 34(3), 263–270. doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00025-2
  • Voas, R. B., Marques, P. R., Tippetts, A. S., & Beirness, D. J. (1999). The Alberta Interlock Program: The evaluation of a province‐wide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 94(12), 1849–1859.
  • Willis, C., Lybrand, S., & Bellamy, N. (2004). Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. Cochran Database Systematic Reviews, 18(4), 1–26.
  • Weinrath, M. (1997). The ignition interlock program for drunk drivers: A multivariate test. Crime & Delinquency, 43(1), 42–59. doi:10.1177/0011128797043001003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.