An Examination of Prison-Based Programming and Recommitment to Prison

References

• Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2002). Simple and bias corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometerica, 74(1), 235–267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.) Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. (2017). Limits of prison education. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 563–570. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C., Thomas, N., & Rubin, D. B. (2020). Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propesnity-score method samples: Imputed potential time-to-event outcomes. Statistical methods in medical research, 29(3), 728–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280218817926.
   Google Scholar
• Bauldry, S., & McClanahan, W. (2008). Ready4Work. Final research report, pp 1–46. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., & Caliendo, M. (2007). mhbounds-sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. IZA Paper No. 2542.
   Google Scholar
• Bozick, R., Steele, J., Davis, L., & Turner, S. (2018). Does providing inmattes with education improve post release outcomes? A meta-analysis of correctional education programs in the US. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(3), 389–428. doi:10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucklen, K. B., Sheets, M., Bohm, C., Bell, N., Campbell, J., Flaherty, R., & Wiede, K. V. (2022). Recidivism 2022 Report. Technical, Mechanicsburg, PA: The Bureau of Planning, Research, and Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2005). Residential Susbstance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners (RSAT). Online, Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. M. (2020). The effectiveness of prison programming: A review of the research literature examing the impact of federal, state, and local inmate programming on post-release recidivism. Federal Probation, 84(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2010). Behind Bars II: Substance Abuse and America’s prison population. Online, New York, NY: Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, N., DeWolf, A., & Serin, R. (2015). Effectively training community supervision officers: A meta-analytic review of the impact on offender outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(10), 977–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, R. M., & Tyler, H. J. (2010). Does prison-based adult basic education improve postrelease outcomes for male prisoners in Florida? Crime and Delinquency, 50(7), 975–1005. doi:10.1177/0011128710389588
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. (2010). Preventing future crime with cognitive behavioral therapy. NIJ Journal (NIJ Journal), 265, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Crime Solutions. (2016). Crime solutions. National Institute of Justice. 2 9. Retrieved from https://crimesolutions.ojp.gov/ratedpractices/57#pd.
   Google Scholar
• Crime Solutions. (2017). Crime solutions. National Institute of Justice. 9 5. Retrieved from https://crimesolutions.ojp.gov/ratedprograms/558.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amico, R., Geckeler, C., & Kim, H. (2016). An evaluation of seven second chance act adult demonstration programs: Impact findings at 18 months. Online, Oakland, CA: SPR: Social Policy Research Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. M., Steele, J. L., Bozick, R., Williams, M. V., Turner, S., Miles, J. N., … Steinberg, P. S. (2014). How effective is correctional education, and where do we go from here? The results of a comprehensive evaluation. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Doleac, J. L. (2018). Strategies to productively reincorporate the formerly-incarcerated into communities: A review of literature. IZA Institute of Labor Economics: Discussion Paper Series, June: IZA DP No. 11646.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, E. K., & Fumia, D. (2017). Evolution of correctional education evaluations and directions for future research. Criminology and Public Policy, 16(2), 549–562. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, R. M., & Antenangeli, L. (2021). Recidivism of prisoners released in 34 states in 2012: A 5-year follow-up period (2012–2017). Technical, Washington, DC: Beauru of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G. (2017). The use and impact of correctional programming for inmates on pre- and post-release outcomes. Technical, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A. A., & Buchanan, M. (2016). What works in crime prevention? Criminology and Public Policy, 15(3), 617–649. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groger, A., Harding, D. J., & Henderson, H. (2021). Prisoner reentry. Technical, Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• James, N. (2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community and recidivism. Online, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• James, N. (2018). Risk and needs assessment in federal prison system. Technical, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K., Keena, L., Piquero, A., & Howley, C. (2021). Barriers to inmate program participation in a private southern prison. Journal of Crime and Justice, 44(2), 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karberg, J. C., & James, D. J. (2005). Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates. U.S. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, R. H., & Clark, D. (2013). The effect of prison-based college education programs on recidivism: Propensity score matching approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 196–204. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Vigne, N., & Willison, J. B. (2020). Integerating lived experience into reentry evaluation design. In B. Orrell (Ed.), Rethinking reentry (pp. 72–87).Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. (2020). Triaging of services for individuals returning from prison. In B. Orrell (Ed.), Rethinking reentry (pp. 39–72).Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lattimore, P. K. (2020). Considering reentry program evaluation: Thouts from SVORI. In B. Orrell (Ed.), Rethinking reentry (pp. 7–380).Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lattimore, P. K., & Visher, C. A. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Summary and synthesis. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lattimore, P. K., Steffey, D. M., & Visher, C. A. (2010). Prisoner reentry in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Victims and Offenders, 5(3), 253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Leverentz, A. (2020). Interviewing the "rabble class": Recruitment and retention in studies of prisoner reentry. In A. Leverentz, E. Y. Chen, & Johnna Christian (Eds.), Beyond recidivism: New approaches to research on prisoner reentry and reintegration (pp. 100–135).New York, NY: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, C., Lattimore, P., Willison, J. B., Steffey, D., Loveman, W., & Eisenstat, J. (2018). Cross-site evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance FY 2011 Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects. Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, C., McKay, T., Bir, A., & Steffey, D. (2015). The experiences of families during a father’s incarceration: Descriptive findings from the baseline data collection for the multi-site study on incarceration, parenting and partnering. Research. Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutze, F. E., Rosky, J. W., & Hamilton, Z. K. (2014). Homelessness and reentry: A multisite outcome evaluation of Washington State’s reentry housing program for high risk offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(4), 471–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milkman, H. B., & Wanberg, K. W. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral treatment: A review and discussion for corrections professionals. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. V. (2021). Female reentry and gender-responsive programming: Recommendations for policy and practice. Technical, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(4), 353–375.
   Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J. D., & Harding, D. J. (2014). Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 411–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, J., Wooldedge, J., & Pompoco, A. (2019). Timing of prison programs and the odds of returning to prison. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 6(2), 124–149.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2005). Hard time: Ex-offenders returning home after prison. Corrections Today, 67(2), 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D.J., Hochstetler, A., DeLisi, M. et al. (2015). Parolee Recidivism and Successful Treatment Completion: Comparing Hazard Models Across Propensity Methods. J Quant Criminol, 31, 149–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9229-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompoco, A., Wooldredge, J., Lugo, M., Sullivan, C., & Latessa, E. J. (2017). Reducing inmate misconduct and prison returens with facility education programs. Criminology and Public Policy, 16(2), 515–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylski, R. (2008). What works: Effective recidivism reduction and risk-focused prevention programs. Lakewood, CO: RKC Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rampey, B. D., & Keiper, S. (2014). Highlights from the U.S. PIAAC Survey of Incarcerated Adults: Their skills, work, experience, education, and training. Technical, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, S. (2011). Incarceration and prisoner reentry in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 635(1), 192–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, W., Gaes, G., Luallen, J., Kling, R., Rich, T., & Shively, M. (2016). Following incarceration, most released offenders never return to prison. Crime & Delinquency, 62(8), 1003–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38. doi:10.2307/2683903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, I. A., Cochran, J. C., Motz, R. T., & Nedelec, J. L. (2020). Academic achievement and the implications for prison program effectiveness and reentry. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(7), 848–866. doi:10.1177/0093854820919790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloman, A. L., & Scherer, J. (2021). Desistance from crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, A. L., Osborne, J. W., Winterfield, L., Elderbroom, B., Burke, P., Stroker, R. P., & Burrell, W. D. (2008). Putting public safety first: 13 parole supervision strategies to enhance reentry outcomes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2020). Implementation and intervention sciences: New frontiers to improve research on reentry. In B. Orrell (Ed.), Rethinking reentry (pp. 88–118).Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, F. S. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., Lattimore, P. K., Barrick, K., & Tueller, S. (2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: What types of services matter? Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 136–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C., & Farrell, J. (2005). Chicago communities and prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C., Debus, S., & Yahner, J. (2008). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of releasees in three states. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C., Yahner, J., & La Vigne, N. (2010). Life after prison: Tracking the experiences of male prisoners returning to Chicago. Washington, DC: Urban Insitute.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P., & Walsh, A. (2016). States of incarceration: The global context. Northampton, MA: Prison Policy Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., Dodd, H., & Neusteter, S. R. (2012). Case management strategies for successful jail reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Farrington, D. P., & Gill, C. (2017). What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation. Criminology and Public Policy, 16(2), 415–449. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. Manhattan, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Western, B. (2019). Race, poverty, and justice reform. Du Bois Review, 16(1), 177–180. doi:10.1017/S1742058X19000225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western, B., & Sirois, C. (2019). Racialized re-entry: Labor market inequality after incarceration. Social Forces, 97(4), 1517–1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar