DWI Courts in Michigan: An Examination of the Interlock Effect on Drunk Driving Recidivism

References

• Ahlin, E. M., Zador, P. L., Rauch, W. J., Howard, J. M., & Duncan, G. D. (2011). First-time DWI offenders are at risk of recidivating regardless of sanctions imposed. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 137–142. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akers, R. L. (2017). Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology: The path not taken. In Crime Opportunity Theories (pp. 299–322). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ambroziak, G., Vincent, S. R., Kahn, R. E., Mundt, J. C., & Thornton, D. (2023). Recidivism and violations among sexually violent persons on supervised release. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 29(1), 93–105. doi:10.1037/law0000364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkley, G. M. A. K. G., & Katz, J. (2013). Creative interventions for DWI offenders. In Drunk Driving in America (pp. 81–102). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, K. H., William, J. R., Elizabeth, A. B., & Allan, F. W. (1999). Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. American journal of public health, 89(11), 1696–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K. H., Scherer, M., Romano, E., Taylor, E., & Voas, R. (2020). Driver experiences with the alcohol ignition interlock: Comparing successful and poor performers. Traffic Injury Prevention, 21(7), 413–418. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1791323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirness, D. J., & Marques, P. R. (2004). Alcohol ignition interlock programs. Traffic Injury Prevention, 5(3), 299–308. doi:10.1080/15389580490465418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bishop, C. A., Liu, S., Stephens, A. N., & Fitzharris, M. (2017). Associations between alcohol consumption patterns and attitudes towards alcohol interlocks. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 108, 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blincoe, L. J., Miller, T. R., Zaloshnja, E., & Lawrence, B. A. (2014). The economic and societal impact of motor vehicle crashes, 2010 (Revised). (Report No. DOT HS 812 013). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pubs/812013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Block, A. W. (2016). Survey of DWI Courts (No. DOT HS 812 283). United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Office of Behavioral Safety Research.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, M., & Blokdijk, D. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of the alcohol ignition interlock programme: A retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 151, 105888. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J. A., Niebuhr, N., & Exum, M. L. (2017). Examining specific deterrence effects on DWI among serious offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 63(14), 1923–1945. doi:10.1177/0011128716675359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, P. A., Ma, T., Mann, R. E., & Elzohairy, Y. (2016). Evaluation of the general deterrence capacity of recently implemented (2009–2010) low and zero BAC requirements for drivers in Ontario. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 88, 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabuig, J. M., García-Raffi, L. M., García-Valiente, A., & Sánchez-Pérez, E. A. (2021). Kaplan-Meier type survival curves for Covid-19: A health data based decision-making tool. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 646863. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.646863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, M. T., & Luo, F. (2020). Intended and unintended benefits of specialty courts: Results from a Texas DWI court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(5), 247–266. doi:10.1080/10509674.2020.1745979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control. (2020). Impaired Driving: Get the Facts. https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, E., & Solomon, R. M. (2012). The challenges of implementing interlock best practices in a federal state: The Canadian experience. Injury Prevention: journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 18(5), 347–352. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, E. A., Daoud, S. O., & Masten, S. V. (2015). General Deterrent Evaluation of the Ignition Interlock Pilot Program in California (No. CAL-DMV-RSS-14-247).
   Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D., Heilbrun, K., Thornewill, A., & Arnold, S. (2019). Problem-Solving Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeMichele, M., Lowe, N. C., & Payne, B. K. (2014). A criminological approach to explain chronic drunk driving. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 292–314. doi:10.1007/s12103-013-9216-4
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, A. M., MacDonald, R., & Carpenter, K. H. (2011). Frequency of alcohol-impaired driving in New York State. Traffic Injury Prevention, 12(2), 120–127. doi:10.1080/15389588.2010.540275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, R. W., Voas, R., Beirness, D., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L., & Compton, R, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2011). Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-related crashes: A community guide systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 362–376. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estelle, S. M., & Phillips, D. C. (2018). Smart sentencing guidelines: The effect of marginal policy changes on recidivism. Journal of Public Economics, 164, 270–293. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2019). Crime in the United States. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-29
   Google Scholar
• Fell, J. C. (2019). Approaches for reducing alcohol-impaired driving: Evidence-based legislation, law enforcement strategies, sanctions, and alcohol-control policies. Forensic Science Review, 31(2), 161–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, S. A., & Draisin, N. A. (2021). Strategies for accelerating the implementation of non-intrusive alcohol detection systems in the vehicle fleet. Traffic Injury Prevention, 22(1), 13–19. doi:10.1080/15389588.2020.1836367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Kaye, S. A., Truelove, V., & Davey, J. (2017). Age, gender and deterrability: Are younger male drivers more likely to discount the future? Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 104, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman-Wilson, K., & Huddleston, C. W. (1999). DWI/Drug courts: Defining a national strategy. National Drug Court Institute. https://www.ndci.org/sites/default/files/ndci/Mono1.DWI_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Liossis, P., Schonfeld, C., Sheehan, M., Siskind, V., & Watson, B. (2006). The self-reported impact of legal and non-legal sanctions on a group of recidivist drink drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(1), 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. F., Goldstein, R. B., Saha, T. D., Chou, S. P., Jung, J., Zhang, H., … Hasin, D. S. (2015). Epidemiology of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(8), 757–766. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora, P. F. (2011). Courting new solutions using problem-solving justice: Key components, guiding principles, strategies, responses, models, approaches, blueprints and tool kits. Chapman Journal of Criminal Justice, 2(1), 7–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hubicka, B., Källmén, H., Hiltunen, A., & Bergman, H. (2010). Personality traits and mental health of severe drunk drivers in Sweden. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(7), 723–731. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0111-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett, A., Shults, R. A., Banerjee, T., & Bergen, G. (2015). Alcohol-impaired driving among adults – Unit States, 2012. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(30), 814–817. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6430a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. A., & Rhodes, K. (2019). A drug court by any other name? An analysis of problem-solving court programs. Law and Human Behavior, 43(3), 278–289. doi:10.1037/lhb0000325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, L. M., Nelson, S. E., Wiley, R. C., & Shaffer, H. J. (2019). Psychiatric comorbidity among first-time and repeat DUI offenders. Addictive Behaviors, 96, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kierkus, C. A., & Johnson, B. R. (2016). Michigan DWI/Sobriety Court Ignition Interlock Evaluation. https://courts.michigan.gov/Administration/admin/op/problem-solving-courts/Drug/Documents/2016%20Ignition%20Interlock%20Final%20Report%20(2).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kierkus, C. A., & Johnson, B. R. (2015). Michigan DWI/Sobriety Court Ignition Interlock Evaluation. https://courts.michigan.gov/Administration/admin/op/problem-solving-courts/Drug/Documents/Ignition%20Interlock%20Device%20Report%20
   Google Scholar
• Kierkus, C. A., & Johnson, B. R. (2014). Michigan DWI/Sobriety Court Ignition Interlock Evaluation. https://www.responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/Michigan%20DWI%20Court-Interlock%20Evaluation%20(2014).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lapham, S. C., Skipper, B. J., Hunt, W. C., & Chang, I. (2000). Do risk factors for re‐arrest differ for female and male drunk‐driving offenders? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(11), 1647–1655. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb01966.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham, S. C., Kapitula, L. R., C'de Baca, J., & McMillan, G. P. (2006). Impaired-driving recidivism among repeat offenders following an intensive court-based intervention. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 38(1), 162–169. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham, S., & England-Kennedy, E. (2012). Convicted driving-while-impaired offenders’ views on effectiveness of sanctions and treatment. Qualitative Health Research, 22(1), 17–30. doi:10.1177/1049732311406450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, M., Chen, M., Singh, S., & Singh, S. (2022). Prognostic nomogram for overall survival in small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: A SEER-based retrospective cohort study. Advances in Therapy, 39(1), 346–359. doi:10.1007/s12325-021-01974-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B. (2012). The facts on dwi courts. Washington State Sentencing Guidelines Commission. In C. Willis, S. Lybrand, & N. Bellamy, editors. Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P. R. (2011). Technologies to monitor the behavior of alcohol-involved drivers. Countermeasures to Address Impaired Driving Offenders, 54–60. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.673.135&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=60
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P., & Voas, R. (2013). Are we near a limit of can we get more safety from vehicle alcohol interlocks? Addiction (Abingdon, England), 108(4), 657–658. doi:10.1111/add.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartt, A. T., Leaf, W. A., & Farmer, C. M. (2018). Effects of Washington State’s alcohol ignition interlock laws on DUI recidivism: An update. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(7), 665–674. doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1496426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. J., Burns, N., Glozier, N., & Nielssen, O. (2023). Homelessness and predictors of criminal reoffending: A retrospective cohort study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 33(4), 261–275. doi:10.1002/cbm.2298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myer, A. J., & Makarios, M. D. (2017). Understanding the impact of a DUI court through treatment integrity: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(4), 252–276. doi:10.1080/10509674.2017.1306007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP). (2021). https://www.nadcp.org/standards/adult-drug-court-best-practice-standards/.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for DWI Courts. (2021a). The ten guiding principles of DWI courts. https://www.dwicourts.org/wp-content/uploads/Guiding_Principles_of_DWI_Court_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for DWI Courts. (2021b). https://www.dwicourts.org/about-ncdc/
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2018). Alcohol-impaired driving: 2017 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 630). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2011). An Evaluation of Intensive Supervision Programs for Serious DWI Offenders (DOT HS 811 446). https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/811446.pd.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2015). NHTSA Releases Two New Studies in Impaired Driving on U.S. Roads. https://one.nhtsa.gov/About-NHTSA/Press-Releases/nhtsa_releases_2_impaired_driving_studies_02_2015.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2019). 2018 Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812826
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 765–824. 0091-4169/10/10003-076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Turanovic, J. J. (2018). Celerity and Deterrence (Vol. 23, pp. 187–210).New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Jing PY - 2017/06/16 SP - 477 EP - 518 N2 - Survival analyses have been developed extensively over the past 50 years. The fundamental challenge lies in the incomplete observation of failure times due to censoring. Another layer of complication which arises frequently in epidemiological studies or econometric researches is the selection bias reduced by left truncation in additional to right censoring. SN - 978-981-10-4854-8 T1 - A Review of Survival Analysis. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4856-2_24ER
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. P., & Quinn, E. L. (2015). The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on driving while intoxicated recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 45(4), 431–446. doi:10.1177/0022042615603390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, W. J., Ahlin, E. M., Zador, P. L., Howard, J. M., & Duncan, G. D. (2011). Effects of administrative ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(2), 127–148. doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9118-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. D., Ward, G. M., & Hing, M. M. (2018). Annual Ignition Interlock Survey, 2016 & 2017: United States. https://tirf.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2016-2017-AIIPA-TIRF-USA-Annual-Interlock-SurveyReport-24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R., Voas, R., & Marques, P. (2007). Interlocks for first offenders: Effective? Traffic Injury Prevention, 8(4), 346–352. doi:10.1080/15389580701598559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer, H. J., & Albanese, M. J. (2004). Addiction’s defining characteristics. In Addiction Counseling review (pp. 27–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, T. L., Chan, K. S., & Morral, A. R. (2006). Predicting DUI recidivism: Personality, attitudinal, and behavioral risk factors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 82(1), 33–40. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, M., Beck, K., Taylor, E. P., Romosz, A., Voas, R., & Romano, E. (2021). A latent class analysis of DUI offender motivation and awareness as predictors of performance while on Alcohol Ignition Interlocks. Journal of Substance Use, 26(3), 250–255. doi:10.1080/14659891.2020.1808725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. S., Emerson, N. J., Antonacci, L. B., & Plant, J. B. (2006). Drunk Driving. US Department Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/e12051224.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, F. A., Gifford, E. J., Eldred, L. M., & McCutchan, S. A. (2016). Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs? Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 97, 197–205. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, R. J. (2019). Policing the drunk driving problem: A longitudinal examination of DUI enforcement and alcohol related crashes in the US (1985–2015). American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(3), 474–498. doi:10.1007/s12103-018-9464-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyar, B., Kanago, B., & Mazuk, S. (2019). The probability of arrest for drunk driving: An empirical investigation of a predator-prey model. Journal of Economic Insight, 45(2), 37–68.
   Google Scholar
• Vanlaar, W. G., Hing, M. M., & Robertson, R. D. (2017). An evaluation of Nova Scotia’s alcohol ignition interlock program. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 100, 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaucher, P., Michiels, W., Lambert, S. J., Favre, N., Perez, B., Baertschi, A., … Gache, P. (2016). Benefits of short educational programmes in preventing drink-driving recidivism: A ten-year follow-up randomised controlled trial. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 32, 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas, R. B., Blackman, K. O., Tippetts, A. S., & Marques, P. R. (2002). Evaluation of a program to motivate impaired driving offenders to install ignition interlocks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(4), 449–455. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00042-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas, R. B. (2014). Enhancing the use of vehicle alcohol interlocks with emerging technology. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 36(1), 81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas, R., Tippetts, A. S., Bergen, G., Grosz, M., & Marques, P. (2016). Mandating treatment based on interlock performance: Evidence for effectiveness. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(9), 1953–1960. doi:10.1111/acer.13149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas, R. B. (2020). 16 vehicle safety features aimed at preventing alcohol-related crashes. In A.W. Jones, J.G. Morland & R.H. Liu (Eds.), Alcohol, Drugs, and Impaired Driving: Forensic Science and Law Enforcement Issues. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., Romano, E., Nochajski, T. H., Manning, A. R., Taylor, E., & Scherer, M. (2021). Changes in alcohol use and drinking and driving outcomes from before arrest for driving under the influence to after interlock removal. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 45(4), 743–751. doi:10.1111/acer.14558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren-Kigenyi, N., & Coleman, H. (2014). DWI recidivism in the United States: An examination of state-level driver data and the effect of look-back periods on recidivism prevalence. Washington, DC: National Highway Transportation Administration. https://trid.trb.org/view/1306862
   Google Scholar
• Washington Traffic Safety Commission. (2019). Post-DUI Crash Risk. http://wtsc.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2019/08/Post-DUI-Driver-Crash-Risk_Aug2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wiliszowski, C. H., Murphy, P., Jones, R., & Lacey, J. (1996). Evaluation of Alternative Programs for Repeat DWI Offenders. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (DOT HS 808 493).
   Google Scholar
• Wiliszowski, C., McKnight, S., Tippetts, S., & Fell, J. (2011). An Evaluation of Intensive Supervision Programs for Serious DWI Offenders (No. DOT HS 811 446). United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, C., Lybrand, S., & Bellamy, N. (2004). Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004(4), CD004168. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004168.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar