Review of recent developments in short-term mine planning and IPCC with a research agenda

References

• 2018 Global Fuel Prices Chart. Pp. IEA, Global fuel price changes, 2005-2018, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-fuel-price-changes-2005-2018.
   Google Scholar
• 2022a Petroleum and Other Liquids. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMD_EPD2D_PTE_NUS_DPG&f=M.
   Google Scholar
• 2022b US Average Retail Price of Electricity (I:USARPE). USA: YCHARTS. https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_average_retail_price_of_electricity_total.
   Google Scholar
• 2023a Average Fuel Prices in the USA. USA: U.S. Department of Energy. https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10326.
   Google Scholar
• 2023b Putting Price on Carbon Pollution. Canada: Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it-will-work/putting-price-on-carbon-pollution.html.
   Google Scholar
• Abbaspour H, Drebenstedt C. 2020. Determination of transition time from truck-shovel to an IPCC system considering economic viewpoint by system dynamics modelling. 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, MPES 2019, Perth, WA, Australia, December 2–4, 2019. Springer. p. 289–295.
   Google Scholar
• Abbaspour H, Drebenstedt C, Dindarloo SR. 2018. Evaluation of safety and social indexes in the selection of transportation system alternatives (truck-shovel and IPCCs) in open pit mines. Saf Sci. 108:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awuah-Offei K, Askari-Nasab H. 2009. Valuation of belt conveyor and truck haulage systems in an open pit mine using life cycle assessment. The Canadian Institute of Mining. Metall Pet Bull. 102:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bektaş T, Laporte G. 2011. The pollution-routing problem. Transp Res B Methodol. 45(8):1232–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Awuah E, Pourrahimian Y, Askari-Nasab H. 2010. Hierarchical mine production scheduling using discrete-event simulation. Int J Min Miner Eng. 2:137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi L, Kumral M, Renaud M. 2020. Comparison of fixed and mobile in-pit crushing and conveying and truck-shovel systems used in mineral industries through discrete-event simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory. 103:102100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom M, Pearce AR, Stuckey PJ. 2016. Short-term scheduling of an open-pit mine with multiple objectives. Eng Optim. 49:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom M, Pearce AR, Stuckey PJ. 2017. Short-term scheduling of an open-pit mine with multiple objectives. Eng Optim. 49(5):777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom M, Pearce AR, Stuckey PJ. 2018. Short-term planning for open pit mines: a review. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 33(5): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom ML, Burt CN, Stuckey PJ. 2014. A decomposition-based heuristic for collaborative scheduling in a network of open-pit mines. Informs J Comput. 26(4):658–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodon P, Sandeman T, Stanford C. 2011. Modeling the mining supply chain from mine to port: a combined optimization and simulation approach. J Min Sci. 47:202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Both C, Dimitrakopoulos R. 2020. Joint stochastic short-term production scheduling and fleet management optimization for mining complexes. Optim Eng. 21(4):1717–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozorgebrahimi E, Hall RA, Blackwell GH. 2003. Sizing equipment for open pit mining - a review of critical parameters. Inst Min Metall Trans Sect A Min Technol. 112(3):A171–A179.
   Google Scholar
• Can L, Grossmann IE. 2021. A review of stochastic programming methods for optimization of process systems under uncertainty. Front Chem Eng. 2(1). doi:10.3389/fceng.2020.622241.
   Google Scholar
• Chilès JP, Delfiner P. 2012. Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. 2 vols. Volume 2. Paris, France, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781118136188
   Google Scholar
• Curran M,A. 2014. Strengths and limitations of life cycle assessment. In: W. Klöpffer, editor. Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Dean M, Knights P, Nehring M. 2015. Selection and planning of fully mobile IPCC systems for deep open-pit metalliferous applications. AusIMM 2015 3rd International Future Mining Conference; Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dellino G, Meloni C, Pierreval H. 2014. Simulation-optimization of complex systems: methods and applications. Simul Model Pract Theory. 46:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Werk M, Ozdemir B, Kumral M. 2017. Cost analysis of material handling systems in open pit mining: case study on an iron ore prefeasibility study. Eng Econ. 62(4):369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos R, Jewbali A. 2013. Joint stochastic optimisation of short and long term mine production planning: method and application in a large operating gold mine. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect A Min Technol. 122(2):110–123.
   Google Scholar
• Dzakpata I, Knights P, Nehring M. 2016. Truck and shovel versus In-Pit conveyor systems: a comparison Of The valuable operating time. Proceedings of the 16th Coal Operators’ Conference, Univeristy of Wolongong. p. 463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Eivazy H, Askari-Nasab H. 2012. A mixed integer linear programming model for short-term open pit mine production scheduling. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect A Min Technol. 121(2):97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Elkan C, Noto K. 2008. Learning classifiers from only positive and unlabeled data. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. p. 213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Erkayaoğlu M, Demirel N. 2016. A comparative life cycle assessment of material handling systems for sustainable mining. J Env Manag. 174:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errico F, Desaulniers G, Rousseau LM. 2016. A priori optimization with recourse for the vehicle routing problem with hard time windows and stochastic service times. Eur J Oper Res. 249(1):55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld S, Roch C, Gabor T. 2019. A hybrid solution method for the capacitated vehicle routing problem using a quantum annealer. Frontiers in ICT. 6(13):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Zhang RQ, Jia G. 2017. Vehicle routing problems with fuel consumption and stochastic travel speeds. Math Probl Eng. 2017:6329203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figliozzi M. 2010. Emissions minimization vehicle routing problem. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2197:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioroni MM, Franzese LAG, Bianchi TJ. 2008. Concurrent simulation and optimization models for mining planning. Proceedings of 40th Conference on Winter Simulation. p. 759–767.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschetti A, Honhon D, Bektaş T. 2013. The time-dependent pollution-routing problem. Transp Res B, Methodol. 56:265–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu MC. 2015. Handbook of simulation optimization, Vol. 216. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1384-8S.
   Google Scholar
• Fuming L, Qingxiang C, Shuzhao C. 2015. A comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions for different modes of transportation in open-cut coal mines. Int J Min Sci Technol. 25(2):261–266. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• Gholamnejad J. 2008. A zero-one integer programming model for open pit mining sequences. J South African Inst Min Metall. 108:759–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzevich O, Romanko O. 2006. Normalization and other topics in multi­objective optimization. Proceedings of the First. Fields-MITACS. Industrial Problems Workshop. p. 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hay E, Nehring M, Knights P. 2020. Ultimate pit limit determination for semi mobile in-pit crushing and conveying system: a case study. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 34(7):498–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabali O, Van Woensel T, De Kok T. 2012. Analysis of travel times and CO2 emissions in time-dependent vehicle routing. Prod Oper Manage. 21(6):1060–1074. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewbali A, Dimitrakopoulos R. 2018. Stochastic mine planning-example and value from integrating long-and short-term mine planning through simulated grade control, Sunrise Dam, Western Australia. Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning. p. 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Klanfar M, Vrkljan D. 2012. Benefits of using mobile crushing and screening plants in quarrying crushed stone. AGH J Min Geoeng. 36:167–175.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler F. 2003. In-pit crushing system the future mining option. Proceedings of Mine Planning and Equipment Selection (MPES); Melbourne, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. p. 371–376.
   Google Scholar
• Konak G, Onur AH, Karakus D. 2007. Selection of the optimum in-pit crusher location for an aggregate producer. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 107(3):161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kozan E, Liu S, Wolff R. 2013. A short-term production scheduling methodology for open-pit mines. Proceedings of the 36th Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry (APCOM) Symposium. p. 465–473.
   Google Scholar
• Kozan E, Liu SQ. 2016. A new open-pit multi-stage mine production timetabling model for drilling, blasting and excavating operations. Min Technol. 125(1):47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L'Heureux G, Gamache M, Soumis F. 2013. Mixed integer programming model for short term planning in open-pit mines. Trans Inst Min Metall, Sect A: Min Technol. 122(2):101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Liu D, Pourrahimian Y. 2021. A framework for open-pit mine production scheduling under semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying systems with the high-angle conveyor. Mining. 1(1):59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SQ, Kozan E. 2017. Integration of mathematical models for ore mining industry. Int J Syst Sci Oper Logist. 6:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londoño JG, Knights PF, Kizil MS. 2013. Modelling of in-pit crusher conveyor alternatives. Min Technol. 122(4):193–199.
   Google Scholar
• Manriquez F, González H, Nelson MV. 2019. Short-term open-pit mine production scheduling with hierarchical objectives. 39th International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry.Wroclaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Manríquez F, Pérez J, Morales N. 2020. A simulation–optimization framework for short-term underground mine production scheduling. Optim Eng. 21(3):939–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinaki M, Marinakis Y. 2016. A glowworm swarm optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Expert Syst Appl. 46:145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matamoros MEV, Dimitrakopoulos R. 2016. Stochastic short-term mine production schedule accounting for fleet allocation, operational considerations and blending restrictions. Eur J Oper Res. 255(3):911–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy RJ. 2011. In-pit crushing and conveying: fitting a square peg in a round open pit: Canadian Institute of Mining. Metallurgy and Petroleum.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi Afrapoli A, Askari-Nasab H. 2017. Mining fleet management systems: a review of models and algorithms. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 33(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/17480930.2017.1336607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris P. 2008. Key production drivers in in pit crushing and conveying (IPCC) studies. South Afr Inst Min Metall:12.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi A, Kozan E, Liu SQ. 2016a. Comparative analysis of three metaheuristics for short-term open pit block sequencing. J Heuristics. 22(3):301–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi A, Kozan E, Liu SQ. 2016b. Open-pit block sequencing optimization: a mathematical model and solution technique. Eng Optim. 48:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehring M, Knights PF, Kizil MS. 2018. A comparison of strategic mine planning approaches for in-pit crushing and conveying, and truck/shovel systems. Int J Min Sci Technol. 28(2):205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelis G, Morales N. 2022. A mathematical model for the scheduling and definition of mining cuts in short-term mine planning. Optim Eng. 23(1):233–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgate T, Haque N. 2013. The greenhouse gas impact of IPCC and ore-sorting technologies. Miner Eng. 42:13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes R, Junior H, Tomi G. 2019. A decision-making method to assess the benefits of a semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying alternative during the early stages of a mining project. REM Int Eng J. 72:285–291.
   Google Scholar
• Osanloo M, Paricheh M. 2020. In-pit crushing and conveying technology in open-pit mining operations: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 34(6):430–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paduraru C, Dimitrakopoulos R. 2018. Adaptive policies for short-term material flow optimization in a mining complex. Min Technol Trans Inst Min Metall. 127(1):56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paricheh M, Osanloo M. 2016. Determination of the optimum in-pit crusher location in open-pit mining under production and operating cost uncertainties. 6th International Conference on Computer Applications in the Minerals Industries; Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Paricheh M, Osanloo M. 2019a. Concurrent open-pit mine production and in-pit crushing–conveying system planning. Eng Optim. 52(3):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Paricheh M, Osanloo M. 2019b. A new search algorithm for finding candidate crusher locations inside open pit mines. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection.
   Google Scholar
• Paricheh M, Osanloo M. 2020. A new search algorithm for finding candidate crusher locations inside open pit mines. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES, Cham, Springer International Publishing. p. 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Paricheh M, Osanloo M, Rahmanpour M. 2016. A heuristic approach for in-pit crusher and conveyor system’s time and location problem in large open-pit mining. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 32(1):35–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paricheh M, Osanloo M, Rahmanpour M. 2017. In-pit crusher location as a dynamic location problem. The South Afr Inst Min Metall. 117(6):599–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley M, Dimitrakopoulos R. 2019. Incorporating geological and equipment performance uncertainty while optimising short-term mine production schedules. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 34(5):362–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmanpour M, Osanloo M, Adibi N. 2013. An approach to determine the location of an in pit crusher in open pit mines. 23rd International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey, IMCET, Vol. 1. p. 141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter R. 2016. Contribution to the capacity determination of semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying systems. Faculty of Geosciences, Geoengineering and Mining Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter R, Drebenstedt C. 2019. Output prediction of semi mobile in pit crushing and conveying systems (SMIPPC). In: Litvinenko Vladimir, editor. Scientific and practical studies of raw material issues, Vol. 1. London: Taylor & Francis Group; p. 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rodovalho EdC, Lima HM, De Tomi G. 2016. New approach for reduction of diesel consumption by comparing different mining haulage configurations. J Environ Manag. 172:177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumpos C, Partsinevelos P, Vlachou A. 2014. The optimal location of the distribution point of the belt conveyor system in continuous surface mining operations. Simul Model Pract Theory. 47:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samavati M, Essam D, Nehring M. 2020. Production planning and scheduling in mining scenarios under IPCC mining systems. Comput Oper Res. 115:104714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samavati M, Essam DL, Nehring M. 2018. Open-Pit mine production planning and scheduling: a research agenda. data and decision sciences in action. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Sandeman T, Fricke C, Bodon P. 2011. Integrating optimization and simulation - a comparison of two case studies in mine planning. Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference. p. 1898–1910.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasola B, Doerner KF, Schmid V. 2016. Variable neighborhood search for the stochastic and dynamic vehicle routing problem. Ann Oper Res. 236(2):425–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder DL. 2003. The use of in-pit crushing and conveying methods to significantly reduce transportation costs by truck. Coaltrans Asia Conference; Bali.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsi M, Nehring M. 2021. Determination of the optimal transition point between a truck and shovel system and a semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying system. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 121:497–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsi M, Pourrahimian Y, Rahmanpour M. 2022. Optimisation of open-pit mine production scheduling considering optimum transportation system between truck haulage and semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 36(2):142–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shishvan MS, Benndorf J. 2014. Performance optimization of complex continuous mining system using stochastic simulation. Engineering Optimization IV - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering Optimization; Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Shishvan MS, Benndorf J. 2016. The effect of geological uncertainty on achieving short-term targets: A quantitative approach using stochastic process simulation. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 116:259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shishvan MS, Benndorf J. 2017. Operational decision support for material management in continuous mining systems: from simulation concept to practical full-scale implementations. Minerals. 7:116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ML. 1998. Optimizing short-term production schedules in surface mining: integrating mine modeling software with AMPL/CPLEX. Int J Surf Min, Reclam Environ. 12(4):149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Taheri M, Irannajad M, Ataee P. 2009. An approach to determine the locations of in-pit crushers in deep open-pit mines. 9th International Multidicsciplinary Scientific Geoconference and EXPO, SGEM 2009, Albena, Bulgaria, Vol. 1. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, June 14–19, 2009. p. 341–347.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Singh G, Krishnamoorthy M. 2013. Distributed optimisation method for multi-resource constrained scheduling in coal supply chains. Int J Prod Res. 51(9):2740–2759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Venkateswaran J, Krishnamoorthy M. 2014. A resource constrained scheduling problem with multiple independent producers and a single linking constraint: a coal supply chain example. Eur J Oper Res. 236(3):946–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topf A. 2017. In-pit crushing and conveying systems changing the way ore is moved: mining.com. https://www.mining.com/in-pit-crushing-systems-changing-the-way-ore-is-moved/.
   Google Scholar
• Torkamani E, Askari-Nasab H. 2015. A linkage of truck-and-shovel operations to short-term mine plans using discrete-event simulation. Int J Min Miner Eng. 6(2):97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SP, Askari-Nasab H. 2016. Truck-shovel allocation optimisation: a goal programming approach. Trans Inst Min Metall, Sect A: Min Technol. 125(2):82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SP, Askari-Nasab H. 2017. Dynamic shovel allocation approach to short-term production planning in open-pit mines. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 33(1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SP, Doucette J, Askari-Nasab H. 2021. Short-term production scheduling in open pit mines with shovel allocations over continuous time frames. Int J Min Miner Eng. 12(4):292–308.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanucci L. 2018. Limits and potentials of mixed integer linear programming methods for optimization of polygeneration energy systems. Energy Procedia. 148:1199–1205.
   Google Scholar
• Utley RW. 2011. In-pit crsuhing. Volume 2: sme mining engineering handbook, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, ISBN: 978-0-87335-264-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wachira D, Githiria J, Onifade M. 2021. Determination of semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying (SMIPCC) system performance. Arab J Geosci. 14:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Zhao Q, Kaku I. 2012. Development of a fuel consumption optimization model for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Comput Oper Res. 39(7):1419–1431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar