Digital twins in the minerals industry – a comprehensive review

References

• Agostinelli S, Cumo F, Guidi G, Tomazzoli C. 2021. Cyber-physical systems improving building energy management: digital twin and artificial intelligence. Energies. 14(8):2338. doi:10.3390/en14082338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agouzoul A, Tabaa M, Chegari B, Simeu E, Dandache A, Alami K. 2021. Towards a digital twin model for building energy management: case of Morocco. Procedia Comput Sci. 184:404–410. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.051.
   Google Scholar
• Ali SH, Giurco D, Arndt N, Nickless E, Brown G, Demetriades A, Durrheim R, Enriquez MA, Kinnaird J, Littleboy A, et al. 2017. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature. 543(7645):367–372. doi:10.1038/nature21359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshammari K, Beach T, Rezgui Y. 2021. Cybersecurity for digital twins in the built environment: current research and future directions. J, Inform Techn Construct. 26:159–173. doi:10.36680/j.itcon.2021.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoni A, Machchhar RJ, Larsson T, Frank B. 2022. Digital twins of operational scenarios in mining for design of customized product-service systems solutions. Proceedings of the 32nd CIRP design conference - design in a changing world; Elsevier. 532–537. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.290.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner B, Hummel V. 2017. Digital twin as enabler for an innovative digital shopfloor management system in the ESB Logistics Learning Factory at Reutlingen - University. Proced Manufact. 9:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.039.
   Google Scholar
• Brosinsky C, Song X, Westermann D. 2019. Digital twin - concept of a continuously adaptive power system mirror. Esslingen, Germany: International ETG-Congress 2019; ETG Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Brune J. 2010. Training for tomorrow - application of virtual reality training for the mining industry. In: Extracting the science - a century of mining research. Sydney: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME); p. 517–519.
   Google Scholar
• Calka M, Perrier P, Ohayon J, Grivot BC, Rochette M, Payan Y. 2020. Real-time simulations of human tongue movements with a reduced order model of a non-linear dynamic biomechanical model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 23(1):55–57. doi:10.1080/10255842.2020.1812158.
   Google Scholar
• Cerrone A, Hochhalter J, Heber G, Ingraffea A. 2014. On the effects of modeling as-manufactured geometry: toward digital twin. Int J Aerospace Eng. 2014:1–10. doi:10.1155/2014/439278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimino C, Negri E, Fumagalli L. 2019. Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing. Comput Ind. 113:103–130. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee BJ, Sonnendecker PW. 2022. Fully automated coal quality control using digital twin material tracking and statistical model predictive control for yield optimization during production of semi soft coking- and power station coal. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 122(8):1–7. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/2002/2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DebRoy T, Zhang W, Turner J, Babu SS. 2017. Building digital twins of 3D printing machines. Scr Mater. 135:119–124. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deryabin SA, Temkin IO, Zykov SV. 2020. About some issues of developing digital twins for the intelligent process control in quarries. Procedia Comput Sci. 176:3210–3216. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.128.
   Google Scholar
• Dieck MCT, Correia Loureiro SM, Jung T. 2023. Extended reality and metaverse: immersive technology in times of crisis. 1st edition. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/book/10.1007978-3-031-25390-4.
   Google Scholar
• El Bazi N, Mabrouki M, Chebak A, Hammouch F. 2022. Digital twin architecture for mining industry: case study of a stacker machine in an experimental open-pit mine. Proceedings of the 4th global power, energy and communication conference (GPECOM); Cappadocia, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• El Bazi N, Mabrouki M, Laayati O, Ouhabi N, El Hadraoui H, Hammouch F, Chebak A. 2023. Generic multi-layered digital-twin-framework-enabled asset lifecycle management for the sustainable mining industry. Sustainability. 15(4):3470. doi:10.3390/su15043470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly CT, Davies J. 2021. Interoperability, integration, and digital twins for mining—part 1: pathways to the network-centric mine. IEEE Ind Electron Mag. 15(3):13–21. doi:10.1109/MIE.2020.3029391.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly CT, Davies J. 2021. Interoperability, integration, and digital twins for mining—part 2: pathways to the network-centric mine. IEEE Ind Electron Mag. 15(3):22–31. doi:10.1109/MIE.2020.3029388.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson S, Bennett E, Ivashchenko A. 2017. Digital twin tackles design challenges. World Pumps. 2017(4):26–28. doi:10.1016/S0262-1762(17)30139-6.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Duff E. 2012. Towards the intelligent future mine: the case for the common mine model. Proceedings of the 34th international geological congress; Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Frazzon EM, Albrecht A, Hurtado PA. 2016. Simulation-based optimization for the integrated scheduling of production and logistic systems. Proceedings of the 8th IFAC conference on manufacturing modelling, management and control MIM; Jun 28-30; Troyes, France: Elsevier Ltd. p. 1050-1055.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich C, Lechler A, Verl A. 2014. Autonomous systems for maintenance tasks – requirements and design of a control architecture. Proced Techn. 15:595–604. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.020.
   Google Scholar
• Fu T, Zhang T, Lv Y, Song X, Li G, Yue H. 2023. Digital twin-based excavation trajectory generation of uncrewed excavators for autonomous mining. Autom Constr. 151:104855. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller A, Fan Z, Day C, Barlow C. 2020. Digital twin: enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access. 8:108952–108971. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieves M. 2005. Product lifecycle management: driving the next generation of lean thinking. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Grieves M. 2011. Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management. Boston (USA): Space Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazrathosseini A, Moradi AA. 2023. The advent of digital twins in surface mining: its time has finally arrived. Res Policy. 80:103155. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103155.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch PB. 2022. Adventures in the metaverse. J Bus Strategy. 43(5):332–336. doi:10.1108/JBS-06-2022-0101.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson JH, Elmouttie M. 2020. Cousins, siblings and twins: a review of the geological model's place in the digital mine. Resources. 9(3):24. doi:10.3390/resources9030024.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Nguyen N, Tao W. 2018. Modeling of cloud-based digital twins for smart manufacturing with MT connect. Proced Manufact. 26:1193–1203. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.155.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Yuan B, Xu S, Han T. 2022. Fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motor of coal mine belt conveyor based on digital twin and ISSA-RF. Processes. 10(9):1679. doi:10.3390/pr10091679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S, Fong CN, Maung Aye K, Luo M. 2001. Virtual factory: an integrated approach to manufacturing systems modeling. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 21(5/6):594–608. doi:10.1108/01443570110390354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerridge A, Kizil MS, Howarth D. 2003. Use of virtual reality in mining education. Proceedins of the AusIMM Young Leaders Conference, Brisbane. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid = 2-s2.0-0038498584&partnerID = MN8TOARS.
   Google Scholar
• Kizil MS, Hancock MG, Edmunds OT. 2001. Virtual reality as a training tool Proceedings AusIMM Youth Congress, Brisbane. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid = 2-s2.0-0035784950&partnerID = MN8TOARS.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J, Sihn W. 2018. Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 51(11):1016–1022. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474.
   Google Scholar
• Kukushkin K, Ryabov Y, Borovkov A. 2022. Digital twins: a systematic literature review based on data analysis and topic modeling. MDPI Data. 7(12):173. doi:10.3390/data7120173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok PK, Yan M, Qu T, Lau HYK. 2020. User acceptance of virtual reality technology for practicing digital twin-based crisis management . International journal of computer integrated manufacturing. 34(7-8):874–887. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2020.1803502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc Smith G, Caris C, Soole P. 1998. Interactive evaluation of mine plans with integrated geological exploration data. The Australian Coal Industry’s Research Program. https://www.acarp.com.au/abstracts.aspx?repId=C5026.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Lapira E, Yang S, Kao A. 2013. Predictive manufacturing system - trends of next-generation production systems. Proceed 11th IFAC Workshop on Intellig Manufact Sys, Elsevier. 46(7):150–156.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Mahadevan S. 2017. A dynamic Bayesian network approach for Digital Twin 19th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Aslam S, Wileman A, Perinpanayagam S. 2022. Digital Twin in Aerospace Industry: A Gentle Introduction. IEEE Access. 10:9543–9562. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3136458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang R, Huang C, Zhang C, Li B, Saydam S, Canbulat I. 2023. Exploring the fusion potentials of data visualization and data analytics in the process of mining digitalization. IEEE Access. 11:40608–40628. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvinova Y, Rehm S, Goel LC, Junglas I. 2018 Jan. Collaborating in virtual reality by using digital twins. Ispim conference proceedings. Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Liu K, Chen L, Li L, Ren H, Wang F. 2023. Metamining: mining in the Metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Systems, man, and Cybernetics. Systems. 53(6):3858–3867. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2022.3233588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Liu B, Wang G, Zhang C. 2019. A comparative study on digital twin models. AIP conference proceedings 2073; Jan 19-20; Wuhan, People’s Republic of China: AIP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Parlikad AK, Woodall P, Don Ranasinghe G, Xie X, Liang Z, Konstantinou E, Heaton J, Schooling J. 2020. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: case study of west Cambridge campus. J Manag Eng. 36(3). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Liu C, Wang KI, Huang H, Xu X. 2020. Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 61:101837. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837. (OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo W, Hu T, Zhang C, Wei Y. 2019. Digital twin for CNC machine tool: modelling and using strategy. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 10(3):1129–1140. doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0946-5. (Berlin: Springer).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutters E, Damgrave R. 2019. The development of pilot production environments based on digital twins and virtual dashboards. Procedia CIRP. 84:94–99. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.228.
   Google Scholar
• Nagovitsyn OV, Stepacheva AV. 2021. Digital twin of solid mineral deposit. J Min Sci. 57(6):1033–1040. doi:10.1134/S1062739121060168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan SS. 1987. Modelling the performance of industrial ball mills using single particle breakage data. Int J Miner Process. 20(3):211–228. doi:10.1016/0301-7516(87)90067-6.
   Google Scholar
• Okol’nishnikov VV, Ordin AA, Rudometov SV. 2021. Development of a digital model of mining face of coal mine. Optoelectron Instrum Data Process. 57:659–667. doi:10.3103/S8756699021060108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouahabi N, Chebak A, Zegrari M, Kamach O, Berquedich M. 2021. A distributed digital twin architecture for shop floor monitoring based on edge-cloud collaboration. Third international conference on transportation and smart technologies (TST); Tangier, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya HB, Champaneria TA. 2017. Enhancement of security in IoTSyS framework. In: Modi N, Verma P, Trivedi B, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on communication and networks, advances on intelligent systems and computing. Singapore: Springer; p. 31–43. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2750-5_4.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez L, Rodriguez-Jimenez S, Rodriguez N, Usamentiaga R, Garcia DF. 2020. Digital twin and virtual reality based methodology for multi-robot manufacturing cell commissioning. Appl Sci. 10(10):3633. doi:10.3390/app10103633. (Basel: MDPI).
   Google Scholar
• Polyakov R, Paholkin E, Kudryavcev I, Krupenin N. 2020. Improving the safety of power plants by developing a digital twin and an expert system for adaptive-predictive analysis of the operability of gas turbine units. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo; Sep 21-25; Virtual, Online: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Qi Q, Tao F, Hu T, Anwer N, Liu A, Wei Y, Wang L, Nee AYC. 2021. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J Manuf Syst. 58:3–21. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelinghuys AJH, Basson AH, Kruger K. 2020. A six-layer architecture for the digital twin: a manufacturing case study implementation. J Intell Manuf. 31(6):1383–1402. doi:10.1007/s10845-019-01516-6. (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen R, von Wichert G, Lo G, Bettenhausen KD. 2015. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. Proceedings of the 15th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing; Elsevier. 567–572.
   Google Scholar
• Saad A, Faddel S, Mohammed O. 2020. IoT-Based digital twin for energy cyber-physical systems: design and implementation. Energies. 13(18). doi:10.3390/en13184762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen J, Urbani M. 2021. Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation example from the mining industry. J Intell Manuf. 32(7):1953–1973. doi:10.1007/s10845-021-01740-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleich B, Anwer N, Mathieu L, Wartzack S. 2017. Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann. 66(1):141–144. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040. (AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Ltd).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluse M, Rossmann J. 2016. From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE); Oct 3–5. p.1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder GN, Steinmetz C, Pereira CE, Espindola DB. 2016. Digital twin data modeling with AutomationML and a communication methodology for data exchange. Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on telematics applications; Nov 6-9; Porto Alwegre, Brasil: IFAC-PapersOnLine. p. 12-17. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.115.
   Google Scholar
• SEDRIS. 2004. SEDRIS: What it is and is not; [accessed 2023 Jul 16]. https://sedris.org/ab_1trpl.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Servin M, Vesterlund F, Wallin E. 2021. Digital twins with distributed particle simulation for mine-to-mill material tracking. Minerals. 11(5):524. doi:10.3390/min11050524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshadri BR. 2017. Structural health management of damaged aircraft structures using the digital twin concept. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.25146.2017-1675.
   Google Scholar
• Shibanov DA, Ivanov SL, Shishkin PV. 2021. Digital technologies in modeling and design of mining excavators. J Phys Conf Ser. 1753(1):12052. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1753/1/012052.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg R, Wärmefjord K, Carlson JS, Lindkvist L. 2017. Toward a digital twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Ann. 66(1):137–140. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone R. 2012. Human factors guidance for designers of interactive 3D and games-based training systems (2 ed.). University of Birmingham (UK). https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-eps/eece/research/bob-stone/human-factors-guidance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stothard P. 2023. Mining Metaverse – a future collaborative tool for best practice mining. Mining Technology. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):1–14. doi:10.1080/25726668.2023.2235155.
   Google Scholar
• Stothard P, Squelch A, Stone R, Van Wyk E. 2019. Towards sustainable mixed reality simulation for the mining industry. Min Technol. 128(4):246–254. doi:10.1080/25726668.2019.1645519. (Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Stothard P, Squelch A, Stone R, van Wyk E, Kizil MS, Schofield D, Fowle K. 2008. Taxonomy of interactive computer-based visualisation systems and content for the mining industry - part 1 Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Stothard P, Squelch A, Stone R, van Wyk E, Kizil MS, Schofield D, Fowle K. 2015. Taxonomy of interactive computer-based visualisation systems and content for the mining industry - part 2. Transact Inst Min Metall. Sect A, Min Techn. 124(2):83–96. doi:10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000006. Taylor & Francis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao F, Zhang M. 2017. Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access. 5:20418–20427. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin I, Myaskov A, Deryabin S, Konov I, Ivannikov A. 2021. Design of a digital 3D model of transport–technological environment of open-pit mines based on the common use of telemetric and geospatial information. Sensors. 21(18):6277. doi:10.3390/s21186277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG, Spottswood SM. 2011. Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int J Aerospace Eng. 2011:1–14. doi:10.1155/2011/154798.
   Google Scholar
• Turner RM, MacLaughlin MM, Iverson SR. 2020. Identifying and mapping potentially adverse discontinuities in underground excavations using thermal and multispectral UAV imagery. Eng Geol. 266:105470. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Um J, Weyer S, Quint F. 2017. Plug-and-simulate within modular assembly line enabled by digital twins and the use of AutomationML. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 50(1):15904–15909. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2360.
   Google Scholar
• Unity Real-Time Development Platform | 3D, 2D, VR & AR Engine. 2023. Online: Unity Technologies; [accessed 2023 Jun 22]. https://unity.com
   Google Scholar
• Volodin VS, Tolokonskii AO. 2019. Concept of instrumentation of digital twins of nuclear power plants units as observers for digital NPP I&C system. J Phys. Conf Ser. 1391(1):12083. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1391/1/012083.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace C, Rosenberg L, Pearlman K, Choudhary B. 2023. Metaverse standards whitepaper. Online: Standards Australia. Document Number: H2-3061. p.2-42. https://www.standards.org.au/documents/h2-3061-metaverse-report.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gao RX, Wu D. 2018. Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J Manuf Syst. 48:144–156. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Web3D Consortium. 2023. What is X3D: open standards for real-time 3D communication; [accessed 2023 Jul 16]. https://www.web3d.org/x3d/what-x3d.
   Google Scholar
• Xie J, Wang X, Yang Z; Hao S. 2019. Virtual monitoring method for hydraulic supports based on digital twin theory. Min Technol, 128(2): 77-87. doi:10.1080/25726668.2019.1569367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrajsek AJ. 2017. The development and use of a digital twin model for tire touchdown health monitoring. Proceedings of the 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; Jan 9–13; Grapevine, Texas: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0863.
   Google Scholar
• Zhironkina O, Zhironkin S. 2023. Technological and Intellectual Transition to Mining 4.0: A Review. Energies. 16(3):1427. doi:10.3390/en16031427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar