426
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Towards pluriversal views of digital technologies: the experiences of community and indigenous radios in Chiapas, Mexico

Rumo a visões pluriversais das tecnologias digitais: as experiências das rádios indígenas e comunitárias em Chiapas, México

Hacia visiones pluriversales de las tecnologías digitales: las experiencias de las radios indigenas y comunitarias en Chiapas, México

Article: 2254629 | Received 26 Feb 2023, Accepted 28 Aug 2023, Published online: 28 Nov 2023

References

  • Aguilar, Y. 2020. “A Modest Proposal to Save the World.” Rest of World, December. https://restofworld.org/2020/saving-the-world-through-tequiology.
  • Baca-Feldman, C. 2012. “Radio comunitaria en México. Lucha y clasificación en el espacio mediático.” Razón y Palabra 16 (1_80): 280–294.
  • Blaser, M. 2013. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology.” Current Anthropoly 54 (5): 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2022. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Calleja, A., and B. Solis. 2005. Con permiso: La radio comunitaria en México. Fundación Friedrich Ebert M. http://dpya.org/wiki/images/8/8e/Con_permiso-radio-comunitaria-mexico.pdf.
  • Chan, A. S. 2014. Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Couldry, N., and U. A. Mejías. 2021. “The Decolonial Turn in Data and Technology Research: What is at Stake and Where is it Heading?” Information, Communication & Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1986102.
  • de la Cadena, M. 2015. Earth-Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Morgan Lectures Series. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • de la Cadena, M., and M. Blaser, eds. 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Díaz, F. 2007. Comunalidad, energía viva del pensamiento mixe. Mexico City: UNAM.
  • Dourish, P., and G. Bell. 2011. Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Escobar, A. 2012. La invención del desarrollo. Medellín: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
  • Escobar, A. 2014. Sentipensar con la Tierra: Postdesarrollo y Diferencia Radical. Medellín: Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana.
  • Escobar, A. 2016. “Sentipensar con la Tierra: Las Luchas Territoriales y la Dimensión Ontológica de las Epistemologías del Sur.” Revista de antropología iberoamericana 11 (1): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102.
  • Escobar, A. 2020. “Política pluriversal: Lo real y lo posible en el pensamiento crítico y las luchas latinoamericanas contemporáneas.” Tabula Rasa 36:323–354. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n36.13.
  • Eubanks, V. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
  • Fals Borda, O. 1989. El Problema de cómo investigar la realidad para transformarla por la praxis. Séptima ed. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo Editores.
  • Fals Borda, O., and M. A. Rahman. 1991. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action-Research. New York, NY: The Apex Press.
  • Grohmann, R., G. Pereira, A. Guerra, L. C. Abilio, B. Moreschi, and A. Jurno. 2022. “Platform Scams: Brazilian Workers’ Experiences of Dishonest and Uncertain Algorithmic Management.” New Media & Society 24 (7): 1611–1631. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099225.
  • Hui, Yuk. 2020. Fragmentar el futuro. Ensayos sobre tecnodiversidad. Buenos Aires: Caja Negra Editora.
  • INEGI. 2020. CENSO DE POBLACIÓN Y VIVIENDA 2020. https://www.inegi.org.mx/rnm/index.php/catalog/632/datafile/F13/V343.
  • Kwet, M. 2019. “Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South.” Race & Class, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172.
  • Lehuedé, S. 2022. “Territories of Data: Ontological Divergences in the Growth of Data Infrastructure.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 5 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2035936.
  • Magallanes-Blanco, C., C. Rodriguez, O. Rincón, and A. Marroquín. 2020. Mujeres de la comunicación. documento n° °7. FES Comunicación. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/la-comunicacion/17702.pdf.
  • Martínez Luna, J. 2003. Comunalidad y Desarrollo. Mexico City: CONACULTA.
  • Martínez Luna, J. 2015. “Conocimiento y comunalidad.” Bajo el Volcán 15 (2): 99–112.
  • Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Mumford, D. 2022. “Data Colonialism: Compelling and Useful, but Whither Epistemes?” Information, Communication & Society 25: (10): 1511–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1986103.
  • Presidencia de la República. 2000. Iniciativa de Ley de Reforma Sobre los Derechos y Cultura Indígena. December. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/comisiones/asunindi/Iniciativa%20de%20%20Presidente%20VFox.pdf.
  • Ricaurte, P. 2019. “Data Epistemologies, the Coloniality of Power, and Resistance.” Television & New Media 20 (4): 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640.
  • Ricaurte, P. 2022. “Ethics for the Majority World: AI and the Question of Violence at Scale.” Media, Culture & Society 44 (4): 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221099612.
  • Rosa, F. 2023. “From Community Networks to Shared Networks: The Paths of Latin-Centric Indigenous Networks to a Pluriversal Internet.” Information, Communication & Society, 2326–2344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2085614.
  • Solíz, F., and A. Maldonado. 2012. Guía de metodologías comunitarias y participativas. UASB-Digital. https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/3997/1/Soliz,%20F-CON008-Guia5.pdf.
  • Tapia, D., and P. Peña. 2020. Research and Awareness on the Human Rights Implications of the Extraction of Lithium Perpetrated by the Tech Industry in Latin American Ecosystems. GIS Watch. https://giswatch.org/node/6247.
  • Zuboff, S. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5.