Nuclear Weapons Production Complexes in a Disarmed World

References

• Ackland, L. 2002. Making a Real Killing: Rocky Flats and the Nuclear West. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, D., and P. Brannan. 2007. Disabling DPRK Nuclear Facilities. United States Institute of Peace Working Papers series. United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/publications/2007/10/disabling-dprk-nuclear-facilities/.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, D., and M. Hibbs. 1991. “Iraq’s Nuclear Hide-And-Seek.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 47 (7): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1991.11460006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. D., S. S. Hecker, and D. R. Harbur. 1983. “Plutonium - A Wartime Nightmare but a Metallurgist’s Dream.” Los Alamos Science, Winter/spring 1983:142–151. https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/doe/lanl/lib-www/pubs/00285891.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, J. 2008. “The 1958 Anglo-American Mutual Defence Agreement: The Search for Nuclear Interdependence.” Journal of Strategic Studies 31 (3): 425–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390802024726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischak, G. 1988. “Facing the Second Generation of the Nuclear Weapons Complex: Renewal of the Nuclear Production Base or Economic Conversion?” Bulletin of Peace Proposals 19 (1): 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/096701068801900106.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. 2007. Getting to the Core of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: From the Mining of Uranium to the Disposal of Nuclear Waste. International Atomic Energy Agency. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/18/10/nuclearfuelcycle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buffett, S. J. 2013. Tacit Knowledge Involvement in the Production of Nuclear Weapons: A Critical Component of a Credible US Nuclear Deterrent in the 21st Century. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1018881.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. 1997. The Nuclear Weapons Complexes: Meeting the Conversion Challenge: A Proposal for Expanded Action. Russian-American Nuclear Security Advisory Council. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27413768/Bunn_The_Nuclear_Weapons_Complexes_1997.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, T. S., K. Redus, and R. Dryden. 2021. “Estimating Nuclear Proliferation and Security Risks in Emerging Markets Using Bayesian Belief Networks.” Energy Policy 159:112549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggeshall, K., V. Grant, and W. Spivey. 2021. “Pit production explained.” National Security Science 46–52. https://cdn.lanl.gov/files/nss-winter-2021-online_cacdf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Comptroller and Auditor General. 2018. The Defence Nuclear Enterprise: A Landscape Review. HC 1003. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Defence-Nuclear-Enterprise-a-landscape-review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Budget Office. 2023. Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2023 to 2032. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59365.
   Google Scholar
• Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Matters. 2020. ‘Chapter 4: Nuclear Weapons’ in Nuclear Matters Handbook 2020 [ Revised]. https://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/NMHB2020rev/chapters/chapter4.html.
   Google Scholar
• Elbahtimy, H. 2023. “Approaching Irreversibility in Global Nuclear Politics.” Journal of Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.
   Google Scholar
• Feiveson, H. A., A. Glaser, Z. Mian, and F. N. Von Hippel. 2014. Unmaking the Bomb: A Fissile Material Approach to Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. 2020. ‘Iran’s Nuclear Latency Needs to Be Guarded, Not Goaded’. The Survival Editor’s Blog, 6 March. https://www.iiss.org/blogs/survival-blog/2020/03/iran-low-enriched-uranium-stockpile-iaea-report.
   Google Scholar
• Forge, J. 2010. “A Note on the Definition of “Dual use”.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9159-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, M. 2009. “Spreading Temptation: Proliferation and Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreements.” International Security 34 (1): 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.34.1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinnessy, P. 2001. “Pakistan Reshuffles Weapons Program.” Physics Today 54 (5): 28. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1381095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, S. 2008. Report of Visit to the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea (DPRK) Pyongyang and the Nuclear Center at Yongbyon, Feb. 12-16, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hecker, S. 2023. Hinge Points – an Inside Look at North Korea’s Nuclear Program. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, N. E. 1981. The Uranium Half-Lives: A Critical Review. Brookhaven National Laboratory. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/13/691/13691196.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2010. “Technical Features to Enhance Proliferation Resistance of Nuclear Energy Systems Vol. NF-T-4.5.” In IAEA Nuclear Energy Series (pp. 1). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2020. “Design Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories.” In IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.27 (pp. 3-11). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency
   Google Scholar
• Joyner, D. H. 2011. Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. E. 2020. A Technical Retrospective of the Former South African Nuclear Weapon Programme. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/sa_nuclear_technical_retrospective_kelley_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., M. Korda, and E. Johns. 2023. “French Nuclear Weapons, 2023.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 79 (4): 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2223088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, J. C., M. Blau, K. P. Staudhammer, and R. A. Pereyra. 1999. “In situ Purification, Alloying and Casting Methodology for Metallic Plutonium.” Journal of Nuclear Materials 274 (3): 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3115(99)00074-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauf, D., and B. Buchheister. 2023. Cleaning Up America’s Nuclear Weapons Complex: 2023 Update for Governors. National Governors Association. https://www.nga.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2023-Governors-Guide_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., and G. Spinardi. 1995. “Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons.” American Journal of Sociology 101 (1): 44–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/230699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martz, J. C., and A. J. Schwartz. 2003. “Plutonium: Aging Mechanisms and Weapon Pit Lifetime Assessment.” JOM: The Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 55 (9): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-003-0023-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazarr, M. J. 1995. “Virtual nuclear arsenals.” Survival 37 (3): 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339508442800.
   Google Scholar
• Medalia, J. E. 2015. “Nuclear Weapon “Pit” Production: Options to Help Meet a Congressional Requirement.” Congressional Research Service R44033. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44033.
   Google Scholar
• Medalia, J., D. E. Mix, P. Belkin, M. B. Nikitin, S. A. Kan, J. Zanotti, and P. K. Kerr. 2013. Nuclear Weapons R&D Organizations in Nine Nations. CRS Report.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. L. 2017. “Why Nuclear Energy Programs Rarely Lead to Proliferation.” International Security 42 (2): 40–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. 2023a. Nuclear Weapons at a Glance: United Kingdom. House of Commons Research Briefing number 9077. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9077/CBP-9077.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. 2023b. Replacing the Uk’s Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: Progress of the Dreadnought Class. London: House of Commons. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8010/CBP-8010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Monshipouri, M. 2022. In the Shadow of Mistrust: The Geopolitics and Diplomacy of US-Iran Relations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197659632.003.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. L., and K. E. Holbert. 2015. Nuclear Energy – an Introduction to the Concepts, Systems, and Applications of Nuclear Processes. Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Netter, P. 2012. “Reprocessing of Spent Oxide Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors.” In Nuclear Fuel Cycle Science and Engineering, edited by I. Crossland, 485–488. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pelopidas, B. 2011. “The Oracles of Proliferation: How Experts Maintain a Biased Historical Reading That Limits Policy Innovation.” The Nonproliferation Review 18 (1): 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2011.549185.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, A. 1994. “Transparency at the Level of Safeguards Implementation.” JNMM (Journal of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management) 22 (4): 25–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkus, B. 2002. “Atomic Power to Israel’s Rescue: French-Israeli Nuclear Cooperation, 1949-1957.” Israel Studies 7 (1): 104–138. https://doi.org/10.2979/ISR.2002.7.1.104.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, D. W., and W. H. Greenwood. 1998. The History of Nuclear Weapon Safety Devices. Sandia National Laboratory, SAND-98-1184C. https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/nsam-160/671923.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Podvig, P. L., and O. Bukharin. 2004. Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces (1st MIT Press Pbk.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 1995. Dark Sun: The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2023. “Irreversibility and Nuclear Disarmament: Unmaking Nuclear Weapon Complexes.” Journal for Peace & Nuclear Disarmament 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2282737.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwood, L. 2013. Legal Framework for IAEA Safeguards. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/16/12/legalframeworkforsafeguards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schaper, A., and H. Müller. 2009. “Torn Apart: Nuclear Secrecy and Openness in Democratic Nuclear-Weapon States.” In Democracy and Security, edited by M. Evangelista, H. Muller, and N. Schoernig, 159–182, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, J. 2000. The Fate of the Earth and the Abolition. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., and A. Froggatt. 2023. The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2022. 3rd ed. https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/-World-Nuclear-Industry-Status-Report-2022-.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., and M. V. Ramana. 2023. “Nuclear Energy and the Non-Proliferation Treaty: A Retrospective Examination.” Journal for Peace & Nuclear Disarmament 6 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2205572.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. 1998. Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, B., and C. R. Henke. 2012. “Repairing Credibility: Repositioning Nuclear Weapons Knowledge After the Cold War.” Social Studies of Science 42 (3): 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712437778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulberg, A. N. & M. Fuhrmann, Eds. 2013. The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN Security Council. 2015. Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015) [On Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Programme]. https://www.undocs.org/Home/Mobile?FinalSymbol=S%2FRES%2F2231(2015).
   Google Scholar
• US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Dismantling the Bomb and Managing the Nuclear Materials. OTA-O-572. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense. 2022. Nuclear Posture Review. Washington DC: US Department of Defense. https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/2022-Nuclear-Posture-Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Energy Office of History and Heritage Resources. n.d. ‘Electromagnetic Separation’. The Manhattan Project, an Interactive History. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/Processes/UraniumSeparation/electromagnetic.html.
   Google Scholar
• US NRC Office of Public Affairs. 2019. Radioactive Waste. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0501/ML050110277.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. 2015. One in a Million Given the Accident: Assuring Nuclear Weapon Safety. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1426902.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. 2007. “U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation – Better Later Than Sooner.” The Nonproliferation Review 14 (3): 429–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700701611738.
   Google Scholar
• Wellerstein, A. 2021. Restricted Data: The History of Nuclear Secrecy in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westwick, P. J. 2000. “In the Beginning: The Origin of Nuclear Secrecy.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56 (6): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2000.11457012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, J. 2012. ‘Uranium Conversion and Enrichment,’ in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Science and Engineering, edited I. Crossland, 158–165. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, A. F., and J. D. Werner. 2021. The U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex: Overview of Department of Energy Sites. Congressional Research Service R45306. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45306.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2023. ‘US Nuclear Power Policy’. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/usa-nuclear-power-policy.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, P. D. 1993. “Technical Barriers to Nuclear Proliferation.” Security Studies 2 (3–4): 349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419309347530.
   Google Scholar