Evaluation of facade systems in different climate zones regarding energy, comfort, emission, and cost

References

• Aksamija, A. (2016). Design methods for sustainable, high-performance building facades. Advances in Building Energy Research, 10(2), 240–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Badi, A., & AlMubarak, I. (2019). Growing energy demand in the GCC countries. Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 26(1), 488–496. doi:10.1080/25765299.2019.1687396
   Google Scholar
• Aldawoud, A., Salameh, T., & Ki Kim, Y. (2021). Double skin façade: Energy performance in the United Arab Emirates. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 16(5), 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altun, M., Akgul, Ç., & Akcamete, A. (2020). Effect of envelope insulation on building heating energy requirement, cost and carbon footprint from a life-cycle perspective. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 35(1), 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascione, F., Bianco, N., de Rossi, F., Iovane, T., & Mauro, G. M. (2022). Are transparent double-skin facades effective for energy retrofit? Answers for an office building - with and without photovoltaic integration. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44(1), 257–271. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2042430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdrubali, F., Evangelisti, L., Guattari, C., & Grazieschi, G. (2018). Evaluation of the energy and environmental payback time for a NZEB building. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe).
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, d., & Mihlayanlar, e (2017). Yüksek Konut Yapılarında İç Ortam Kalitesinin İncelenmesi. Megaron, 12(2), 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, S., & Ip, K. (2014). Perspectives of double skin façades for naturally ventilated buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 1019–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyazoglu. (2021). Fethi Toker Mimarlık Fakültesi. Retrieved from https://beyazoglumimarlik.com/projeler/fethi-toker-mimarlik-fakultesi.html.
   Google Scholar
• Charvat, P., Jicah, M., & Stetina, J. (2004). Solar chimneys for ventilation and passive cooling. Paper presented at the World Renewable Energy Congress, Denver, USA.
   Google Scholar
• EPDK. (2022). Energy Market Regulatory. Retrieved from https://www.epdk.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliano, A., & Aneli, S. (2020). Analysis of the energy performance of an Opaque Ventilated Façade under winter and summer weather conditions. Solar Energy, 205, 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülaçmaz, Ö., Başdemİr, H., & Gülaçmaz, E. (2022). Mevcut Bir Eğitim Yapısında Enerji Verimliliğini İyileştirmeye Yönelik Bir Analiz. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 10(1), 325–341.
   Google Scholar
• Heravi, G., & Qaemi, M. (2014). Energy performance of buildings: The evaluation of design and construction measures concerning building energy efficiency in Iran. Energy and Buildings, 75, 456–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., He, G., Ge, W., Wu, Q., Lv, D., & Li, Z. (2019). Annual energy performance simulation of solar chimney in a cold winter and hot summer climate. Paper presented at the Building Simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Ibañez-Puy, M., Vidaurre-Arbizu, M., Sacristán-Fernández, J. A., & Martín-Gómez, C. (2017). Opaque Ventilated Façades: Thermal and energy performance review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGDAS. (2022). Natural Gas Distribution Corporation Retrieved from https://www.igdas.istanbul/perakende-satis.
   Google Scholar
• İnan, T., & Başaran, T. (2013). Çift cidarlı cephelerdeki etkin mimari tasarım kararları. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 427–436.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y., Cook, M., Hanby, V. I., Infield, D., Loveday, D., & Mei, L. (2007). CFD modelling of double-skin facades with venetian blinds. Building Simulation, 2007, 1491–1498.
   Google Scholar
• Lapisa, R. (2019). The effect of building geometric shape and orientation on its energy performance in various climate regions. GEOMATE Journal, 16(53), 113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litti, G., Audenaert, A., & Lavagna, M. (2018). Life cycle operating energy saving from windows retrofitting in heritage buildings accounting for technical performance decay. Journal of Building Engineering, 17, 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Cooper, P., Daly, D., & Ledo, L. (2012). Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55, 889–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciel, A. C. F., & Carvalho, M. T. (2019). Operational energy of opaque ventilated façades in Brazil. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, 100775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, A. (2010). Empirical and computational Study of the thermal Performance of a traditional Housing Type in Kosovo. Paper presented at the BauSim 2010-Building Performance Simulation in a Changing Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Mesmoudi, K., Soudani, A., Zitouni, B., Bournet, P. E., & Serir, L. (2010). Experimental study of the energy balance of unheated greenhouse under hot and arid climates: Study for the night period of winter season. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(1), 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.jaubas.2010.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Nadoushani, Z. S. M., Akbarnezhad, A., Jornet, J. F., & Xiao, J. (2017). Multi-criteria selection of façade systems based on sustainability criteria. Building and Environment, 121, 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Y., Nguyen, S., Pham, T., Manh, A., & Huynh, T. (2021). Performance of a Solar Chimney for Cooling Building Façades under Different Heat Source Distributions in the Air Channel. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(1), 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Oberfrancová, L., Legény, J., & Špaček, R. (2019). Critical thinking in teaching sustainable architecture. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ, 17(2), 127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen, E., & Beşiroğlu, Ş. (2020). Aynı İklim Sınıfında Farklı İki Ülkenin Enerji Etkin Bina Kavramı Bağlamında Ele Alınması: İspanya ve Türkiye: MSTAS.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, R., Ordóñez, J., & Martínez, G. (2012). Energy efficient design of building: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 3559–3573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulselli, R. M., Simoncini, E., & Marchettini, N. (2009). Energy and emergy based cost–benefit evaluation of building envelopes relative to geographical location and climate. Building and Environment, 44(5), 920–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada, G., Rousse, D., Dutil, Y., Badache, M., & Hallé, S. (2012). A comprehensive review of solar facades. Opaque solar facades. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2820–2832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qurraie, B. S. (2022). Smart Window Design Tool: Daylight Transmission by Using Transparent Color Filters. Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering, 08(01).
   Google Scholar
• Qurraie, B. S., & Kıraç, B. (2022). Evaluation of energy efficiencies of double skin façade systems and double skin green façade systems in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 79, 1–15. doi:10.1080/00207233.2022.2115202.
   Google Scholar
• Radhi, H., Sharples, S., & Fikiry, F. (2013). Will multi-facade systems reduce cooling energy in fully glazed buildings? A scoping study of UAE buildings. Energy and Buildings, 56, 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani, B., Kandar, M. Z., & Rahmani, P. (2012). How double skin façade’s air-gap sizes effect on lowering solar heat gain in tropical climate. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(6), 774–778.
   Google Scholar
• Revit, A. (2003). Autodesk Revit online document.
   Google Scholar
• Saafi, K., & Daouas, N. (2019). Energy and cost efficiency of phase change materials integrated in building envelopes under Tunisia Mediterranean climate. Energy, 187, 115987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, C. D., Arsan, Z. D., Tuncoku, S. S., Broström, T., & Akkurt, G. G. (2015). A transdisciplinary approach on the energy efficient retrofitting of a historic building in the Aegean Region of Turkey. Energy and Buildings, 96, 128–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensoy, S., Demircan, M., Ulupinar, Y., & Balta, I. (2008). Climate of turkey. Turkish State Meteorological Service, 401, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shahda, M. (2018). Vision and methodology to support sustainable architecture through building technology in the digital era. International Journal of Environmental Science & Sustainable Development, Forthcoming, 2, 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L., Zhang, G., Yang, W., Huang, D., Cheng, X., & Setunge, S. (2018). Determining the influencing factors on the performance of solar chimney in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 88, 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solmaz, Z. (2021). Yüksek Yapılarda Çift Cidarlı Cephe Sistemlerinin İç Ortam Konforuna Etkisi. International Journal of Mardin Studies, 2(2), 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Tavşan, F., Tavşan, C., & Karahaliloğlu, A. (2021). Tasarımda Aktif Ve Pasif Sürdürülebilir Isıtma Sistemleri. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 7(51), 2680–2697.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, A. (2005). Designbuilder software. Stroud, Gloucestershire, Design-Builder Software Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• WeatherandClimate (2022). Turkey climate. Retrieved from https://tcktcktck.org/turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Chen, Y. (2010). A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(4), 1321–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar