292
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Heterogeneity of provider preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2300923 | Published online: 22 Jan 2024

References

  • Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, et al. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA – J Am Med Assoc. 2019;321(9):844–845.
  • HIV/AIDS Surveillance and Epidemiology Reports. [cited 5 Mar 2021]. Available from: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/data/data-sets/hiv-aids-surveillance-and-epidemiology-reports.page.
  • Xia Q, Lazar R, Bernard MA, et al. New York city achieves the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets for HIV-infected whites but not latinos/hispanics and blacks. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(3):e59–e62.
  • Nash D, Robertson MM, Penrose K, et al. Short-term effectiveness of HIV care coordination among persons with recent HIV diagnosis or history of poor HIV outcomes. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204017.
  • Robertson MM, Penrose K, Irvine MK, et al. Impact of an HIV care coordination program on durable viral suppression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80(1):46–55.
  • Irvine MK, Levin B, Robertson MM, et al. PROMISE (program refinements to optimize model impact and scalability based on evidence): a cluster-randomised, stepped-wedge trial assessing effectiveness of the revised versus original ryan white part a HIV care coordination programme for patients with barriers to treatment in the USA. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e034624.
  • Compendium. 2021 Jun 28. [cited 2021 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/research/interventionresearch/compendium/index.html.
  • Eshun-Wilson I, Kim H-Y, Schwartz S, et al. Exploring relative preferences for HIV service features using discrete choice experiments: a synthetic review. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(5):467–477.
  • Youssef E, Cooper V, Miners A, et al. Understanding HIV-positive patients’ preferences for healthcare services: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e008549.
  • Zanolini A, Sikombe K, Sikazwe I, et al. Understanding preferences for HIV care and treatment in Zambia: evidence from a discrete choice experiment among patients who have been lost to follow-up. 2018.[30102693]
  • Imbert E, Hickey MD, Del Rosario JB, et al. Understanding preferences for HIV care among patients experiencing homelessness or unstable-housing: a discrete choice experiment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;90(2):140–145.
  • Hauber AB, González JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–315.
  • Dubov A, Ogunbajo A, Altice FL, et al. Optimizing access to PrEP based on MSM preferences: results of a discrete choice experiment. AIDS Care. 2019;31(5):545–553.
  • Zimba R, Fong C, Conte M, et al. Provider preferences for delivery of HIV care coordination services: results from a discrete choice experiment. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(3):e25887.
  • Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–413.
  • Johnson FR, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.
  • Mangham LJ, Hanson K, McPake B. How to do (or not to do) … designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(2):151–158.
  • Orme B. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 2010.
  • Orme B. Latent class v4. 5: software for latent class estimation for CBC data. Orem (UT): Sawtooth Software; 2012.
  • Zhou M, Thayer WM, Bridges JFP. Using latent class analysis to model preference heterogeneity in health: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(2):175–187.
  • Huber J, Orme B, Miller R. The value of choice simulators. In: Conjoint measurement. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 347–362.
  • Discover – HELP. [cited 6 Dec 2020]. Available from: https://sawtoothsoftware.com/help/discover/manual/index.html?market-simulation-methods.html.
  • Chen S. Who’s afraid of a transit desert? The New York Times. 11 Oct 2019. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/11/realestate/whos-afraid-of-a-transit-desert.html.
  • Cook PA, Downing J, Wheater CP, et al. Influence of socio-demographic factors on distances travelled to access HIV services: enhanced surveillance of HIV patients in North West England. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):78.
  • Terzian AS, Younes N, Greenberg AE, et al. Identifying spatial variation along the HIV care continuum: the role of distance to care on retention and viral suppression. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(9):3009–3023.
  • Altice FL, Maru DS-R, Bruce RD, et al. Superiority of directly administered antiretroviral therapy over self-administered therapy among HIV-infected drug users: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(6):770–778.
  • Maina G, Mill J, Chaw-Kant J, et al. A systematic review of best practices in HIV care. J HIV AIDS Soc Serv. 2016;15(1):114–126.
  • Kushel MB, Colfax G, Ragland K, et al. Case management is associated with improved antiretroviral adherence and CD4 + cell counts in homeless and marginally housed individuals with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(2):234–242.
  • Aidala AA, Wilson MG, Shubert V, et al. Housing status, medical care, and health outcomes among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(1):e1–e23.
  • Safreed-Harmon K, Anderson J, Azzopardi-Muscat N, et al. Reorienting health systems to care for people with HIV beyond viral suppression. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(12):e869–e877.