Doing it your way: The Variation in, and Importance of, Personal Style in Teaching Quantitative Methods for University Social Science Students

References

• Abraham, J. (2008) Pupils' perceptions of setting and beyond: a response to Hallam and Ireson. British Educational Research Journal 34 (6), 855–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeney, K. and Carey, S. (2009) Contextualising the teaching of statistics in political science. Politics 29 (3), 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advisory Council on Mathematics Education (2011) Mathematical needs: mathematics in the workplace and higher education. London: ACME.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, K. and Harsell, D.M. (2005) Assessing the impact of a quantitative skills course for undergraduates. Journal of Political Science Education 1 (1), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2008) Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievements through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal 34 (2), 167–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blastland, M. and Dilnot, A. (2007) The tiger that isn't: seeing through a world of numbers. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, M.C. (1976) The literary digest poll: making of a statistical myth. American Statistical Association 30 (4), 184–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M. (2011) Students' experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (1) 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, J.M., Hiller, J. and Signoretta, P. (forthcoming) Counting better? An examination of the impact of quantitative method teaching on undergraduate social science students' statistical anxiety and confidence to complete statistical tasks. Active Learning in Higher Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, I.D. (2008) The effects of active learning on students' memories for course content. Active Learning in Higher Education 9, 152–71.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, E. (2012) Integrating quantitative methods into the politics curriculum: a seminar-based approach. Available at http://www.ncl.ac.uk/gps/research/project/4256 (accessed 05 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.L. and Mueck, R. (1990) Student involvement in learning: cooperative learning and college instruction. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching 1, 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.L. and Robinson, P. (2000) The argument for making large classes small. New Directions in Teaching and Learning 81, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. and Nolan, D. (2002) Teaching statistics: a bag of tricks. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D.F. (2014) Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.) NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, J., Hallam, S., Hack, S., Clark, H. and Plewis, I. (2002) Ability grouping in English secondary schools: effects on attainment in English, mathematics and science. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 8 (3), 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, K. (2001) Teaching research methods: the best job in the department. The Political Methodologist 10 (1), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S. and Sammon, S. (2007) Inquiry in higher education: reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education 31, 201–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, (2001) Vark: a guide to learning styles. Available at www.vark-learn.com (accessed 05 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D.A. and Fry, R. (1975) Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In Theories of Group Process ( ed. C. Cooper). London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnes, J. (2009) Proposals to support and improve the teaching of quantitative research methods at undergraduate level in the UK. Swindon: ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Machemer, P.L. and Crawford, P. (2007) Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education 8, 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010) Teaching large classes at college and universitylevel: challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2), 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtonen, M., Olkinuora, E., Tynjälä, P. and Lehtinen, E. (2008) “Do I need research skills in working life?”: University students' motivation and difficulties in quantitative methods courses. Higher Education 56 (2), 599–612.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, D.L., Hood, M. and Neumann, M.M. (2009) Statistics? You must be joking: the application and evaluation of humor when teaching statistics. Journal of Statistics Education 17 (2). Available at http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/neumann.pdf (accessed 14 February 2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ofsted (2013) The report of her majesty's chief inspector of education, children's services and skills schools. Ofsted, London.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Quantitative Methods Teachers Project (2012) Available at http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/qmteachers (accessed 20 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., Dobson, A., Scott, S., Wyman, M. and Sjöstedt Landén, A. (2010) International bench-marking review of best practice in the provision of undergraduate teaching in quantitative methods in the social sciences. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences: Keele University.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. and Cook, M.T. (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2014) Subject benchmark statements. Available at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/AssuringStandardsAndQuality/subject-guidance/Pages/Subject-benchmark-statements.aspx (accessed 10 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Reid, M.I., Goacher, B. and Vile, C. (1981) Mixed ability teaching: problems and possibilities. Educational Research 24 (1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., Sheard, M., Hanley, P., Elliott, L, Chambers, B. and Cheung, A. (2013) Effects of co-operative learning and embedded multimedia on mathematics learning in key stage 2: final report. Institute for Effective Education, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. and Sutherland, M.J. (2003) Setting or mixed ability? Teachers’ views of the organisation of pupils for learning. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 3 (3), 141–146.
   Google Scholar
• University of Manchester (2014) Enriching social science teaching with empirical data project. Available at http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/essted/ (accessed 10 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Payne, G.L., Hodgkinson, L. and Poole, D. (2008) Does British sociology count? Sociology students’ attitudes toward quantitative methods Sociology. 42 (5), 1003–1021.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S.D. and Penney, D. (2013) The effects of setting on classroom teaching and student learning in mainstream mathematics, English and science lessons: a critical review of the literature in England. Educational Review.
   Google Scholar