Validity of Routine Health Data To Identify Safety Outcomes of Interest For Covid-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics in the Context of the Emerging Pandemic: A Comprehensive Literature Review

References

• Choudhary OP, Singh I. Making sound public health policy decisions for COVID-19 vaccination: vaccine effectiveness, safety, affordability, programmatic logistics and roll-out globally. J Travel Med. 2021. doi:10.1093/jtm/taab031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cadarette SM, Wong L. An introduction to health care administrative data. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68(3):232–237. doi:10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1457
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauer CM, Chen L-C, Hyland SL, Girbes A, Elbers P, Celi LA. Leveraging electronic health records for data science: common pitfalls and how to avoid them. Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4(12):e893–e898. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00154-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willame C, Dodd C, Duran CE, et al. Background rates of 41 adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines in 10 European healthcare databases - an ACCESS cohort study. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. Vaccine. 2023;41(1):251–262. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law B, Sturkenboom M. Priority list of adverse events of special interest: COVID-19. Available from: https://brightoncollaboration.org/priority-list-of-adverse-events-of-special-interest-covid-19/. Accessed 14 December 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juurlink D, Preyra C, Croxford R, et al. Canadian Institute for Health InformationDischarge Abstract Database: a Validation Study; 2006. Available from: https://www.ices.on.ca/publications/research-reports/canadian-institute-for-health-information-discharge-abstract-database-a-validation-study/. Accessed 14 December 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Sundbøll J, Adelborg K, Munch T, et al. Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012832. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammann EM, Schweizer ML, Robinson JG, et al. Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the Sentinel Distributed Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(4):398–404. doi:10.1002/pds.4398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arana A, Margulis AV, Varas-Lorenzo C, et al. Validation of cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the United Kingdom. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;30(2):237–247. doi:10.1002/pds.5150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard E-M, Witte DR, Charles M, Jørgensen ME, Lauritzen T, Sandbæk A. Validity of Danish register diagnoses of myocardial infarction and stroke against experts in people with screen-detected diabetes. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):228. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6549-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psaty BM, Delaney JA, Arnold AM, et al. Study of Cardiovascular Health Outcomes in the Era of Claims Data. Circulation. 2016;133(2):156–164. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.018610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerchberger VE, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, et al. Chest radiograph interpretation is critical for identifying acute respiratory distress syndrome patients from electronic health record data. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. American Thoracic Society International Conference, ATS 2020. United States; 2020;201(1).
   Google Scholar
• Ashburner JM, Singer DE, Lubitz SA, Borowsky LH, Atlas SJ. Changes in use of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a primary care network associated with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(5):786–791. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer ES, Napravnik S, Eron JJ, et al. Validation of medicaid claims-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction using an HIV clinical cohort. Med Care. 2015;53(6):e41–8. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318287d6fd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush M, Sturmer T, Stearns SC, et al. Position matters: validation of medicare hospital claims for myocardial infarction against medical record review in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(10):1085–1091. doi:10.1002/pds.4396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio LD, Levitan EB, Yun H, et al. Use of medicare claims data for the identification of myocardial infarction: the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study. Med Care. 2018;56(12):1051–1059. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino F, Montedori A, Abraha I, et al. A diagnostic accuracy study validating cardiovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0218919. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Chiara A, Clagnan E, Valent F. Epidemiology and mortality in an Italian region after the adoption of the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Comparative study validation study. J Cardiovasc Med. 2020;21(1):34–39. doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000000893
   Google Scholar
• Ding EY, Albuquerque D, Winter M, et al. Novel method of atrial fibrillation case identification and burden estimation using the MIMIC-III electronic health data set. J Intensive Care Med. 2019;34(10):851–857. doi:10.1177/0885066619866172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd JS, Blondon M, Moore KP, Boyko EJ, Smith NL. Validation of methods for assessing cardiovascular disease using electronic health data in a cohort of Veterans with diabetes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(4):467–471. doi:10.1002/pds.3921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govatsmark RE, Janszky I, Slordahl SA, et al. Completeness and correctness of myocardial infarction diagnoses in a medical quality register and an administrative health register. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(Supplement 1):1026. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx502.P4894
   Google Scholar
• Tu K, Nieuwlaat R, Cheng SY, et al. Identifying Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Administrative Data. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(12):1561–1565. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W-Q, Teixeira PL, Mo H, Cronin RM, Warner JL, Denny JC. Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(e1):e20–e27. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngson E, Welsh RC, Kaul P, McAlister F, Quan H, Bakal J. Defining and validating comorbidities and procedures in ICD-10 health data in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Medicine. 2016;95(32):e4554. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000004554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerchberger VE, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, et al. Chest radiograph interpretation is critical for identifying acute respiratory distress syndrome patients from electronic health record data. Conference Abstract. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Conference: American Thoracic Society International Conference, ATS; 2020;201(1).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ani F, Shariff S, Siqueira L, Seyam A, Lazo-Langner A. Identifying venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in emergency room discharges using administrative data. Thromb Res. 2015;136(6):1195–1198. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2015.10.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alotaibi GS, Wu C, Senthilselvan A, McMurtry MS. The validity of ICD codes coupled with imaging procedure codes for identifying acute venous thromboembolism using administrative data. Vasc Med. 2015;20(4):364–368. doi:10.1177/1358863X15573839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammann EM, Cuker A, Carnahan RM, et al. Chart validation of inpatient International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) administrative diagnosis codes for venous thromboembolism (VTE) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the Sentinel Distributed Database. Medicine. 2018;97(8):e9960. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000009960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang MC, Fan D, Sung SH, et al. Validity of using inpatient and outpatient administrative codes to identify acute venous thromboembolism: the CVRN VTE study. Med Care. 2017;55(12):e137–e143. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall R, Mondor L, Porter J, Fang J, Kapral MK. Accuracy of administrative data for the coding of acute stroke and TIAs. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(6):765–773. doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaki M, Batty GD, Singh-Manoux A, Britton A, Brunner EJ, Shipley MJ. Validity of cardiovascular disease event ascertainment using linkage to UK hospital records. Epidemiology. 2017;28(5):735–739. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klil-Drori AJ, Prajapati D, Liang Z, et al. External validation of ASPECT (Algorithm for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Confirmation and Treatment). Med Care. 2019;57(8):e47–e52. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koola JD, Davis SE, Al-Nimri O, et al. Development of an automated phenotyping algorithm for hepatorenal syndrome. J Biomed Inform. 2018;80:87–95. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan R, Davey P, De Souza N, Baird D, Guthrie B, Bell S. Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study. Clin Kidney J. 2020;13(6):1083–1090. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfz117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstern A, Lippmann SJ, Brennan JM, et al. Use of medicare claims to identify adverse clinical outcomes after mitral valve repair. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(5):e007451. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhdorf P, Overvad K, Schmidt EB, Johnsen SP, Bach FW. Predictive value of stroke discharge diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45(6):630–636. doi:10.1177/1403494817716582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohman L, Johansson M, Jansson JH, Lind M, Johansson L. Positive predictive value and misclassification of diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in Swedish patient registries. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1215–1221. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S177058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat M, Derumeaux H, Sailler L, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Moulis G. Positive predictive values of peripheral arterial and venous thrombosis codes in French hospital database. Fundament Clinic Pharmacol. 2018;32(1):108–113. doi:10.1111/fcp.12326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebholz CM, Coresh J, Ballew SH, et al. Kidney Failure and ESRD in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: comparing ascertainment of treated and untreated kidney failure in a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(2):231–239. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruigómez A, Brobert G, Vora P, García Rodríguez LA. Validation of venous thromboembolism diagnoses in patients receiving rivaroxaban or warfarin in the health improvement network. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020. doi:10.1002/pds.5146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfilippo KM, Wang T-F, Gage BF, Liu W, Carson KR. Improving accuracy of international classification of diseases codes for venous thromboembolism in administrative data. Thromb Res. 2015;135(4):616–620. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2015.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom JB, Zhao Y, Faridi KF, et al. Comparison of clinical trials and administrative claims to identify stroke among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(11):e008231. doi:10.1161/circinterventions.119.008231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Walraven C Improved correction of misclassification bias with bootstrap imputation. Med Care. 2018;56(7):e39–e45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varmdal T, Bakken IJ, Janszky I, et al. Comparison of the validity of stroke diagnoses in a medical quality register and an administrative health register. Scand J Public Health. 2016;44(2):143–149. doi:10.1177/1403494815621641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie F, Colantonio LD, Curtis JR, et al. Development of algorithms for identifying fatal cardiovascular disease in Medicare claims. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(7):740–750. doi:10.1002/pds.4421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedeborg R, Holm L, Feltelius N, et al. Validation of myocarditis diagnoses in the Swedish patient register for analyses of potential adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Ups J Med Sci. 2023;128. doi:10.48101/ujms.v128.9290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heit JA. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(8):464–474. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA (Federal Drugs Agency). Real-World Data: assessing electronic health records and medical claims data to support regulatory decision-making for drug and biological products; 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/real-world-data-assessing-electronic-health-records-and-medical-claims-data-support-regulatory. Accessed 14 December 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Newhouser K. How to choose the right code for a non-traumatic myocardial injury. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) CDI & Coding Considerations for Myocardial Injury. Available from: https://www.medpartners.com/cdi-coding-considerations-for-myocardial-injury/. Accessed December 04, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley RJ, Sawka KJ, Yergens DW, Quan H, Jetté N, Doig CJ. Validity of administrative data in recording sepsis: a systematic review. Critical Care. 2015;19(1):139. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0847-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, et al. Data resource profile: clinical practice research datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(3):827–836. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S91125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notarte KI, Guerrero-Arguero I, Velasco JV, et al. Characterization of the significant decline in humoral immune response six months post-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination: a systematic review. J Med Virol. 2022;94(7):2939–2961. doi:10.1002/jmv.27688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notarte KI, Ver AT, Velasco JV, et al. Effects of age, sex, serostatus, and underlying comorbidities on humoral response post-SARS-CoV-2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination: a systematic review. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2022;59(6):373–390. doi:10.1080/10408363.2022.2038539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyanka COP, Choudhary OP. Vaccine efficacy against COVID-19: a foresight on the host-associated factors. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120(6):1405–1407. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2020.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar