185
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case reports

The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 513-520 | Received 12 May 2023, Accepted 18 Aug 2023, Published online: 06 Sep 2023

References

  • Lei P-F, Hu R-Y, Hu Y-H. Bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty and management. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(1):15–24. doi:10.1111/os.12425
  • Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Ryan SP, Bolognesi MP. Mid-term results of tibial cones: reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):158–164. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1934.R1
  • Mozella A, Cobra HADAB. Bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Rev Bras Ortop. 2021;56(2):138–146. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1713392
  • Rand JA. Bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. Use of metal wedge augmentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;3(271):63–71.
  • Sculco PK, Abdel MP, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. The management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: rebuild, reinforce, and augment. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1_Supple_A):120–124. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36345
  • Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F. Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(2S):98–111. doi:10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520
  • Sheth NP, Bonadio MB, Demange MK. Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(5):348–357. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00660
  • Panegrossi G, Ceretti M, Papalia M, Casella F, Favetti F, Falez F. Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):419–427. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2262-1
  • Qiu YY, Yan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY. Treatment for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 2012;20(1):78–86. doi:10.1177/230949901202000116
  • Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(2):177–197. doi:10.1080/17453670610045902
  • Chen TH, Arra M, Mbalaviele G, Swarnkar G, Abu-Amer Y. Inflammatory Responses Reprogram TREGS Through Impairment of Neuropilin-1. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10429. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46934-x
  • Huten D. Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(1 Suppl):S22–33. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.009
  • Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2(5):8–43. doi:10.7453/gahmj.2013.008
  • Oh JH, Scuderi GR. Zonal Fixation in Revision TKA: the Key Is Metaphyseal Fixation. J Knee Surg. 2021;34(13):1402–1407. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735281
  • Heidenreich MJ, Lanting BA, McCalden RW, et al. Survivorship of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(6S):S263–S269. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.074
  • De Martino I, Mancino F, Di Matteo V, Singlitico A, Maccauro G, Gasparini G. Tantalum cones for severe bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(5):886–892. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.013
  • Kotrych D, Marcinkowski S, Brodecki A, et al. Does the use of 3D-printed cones give a chance to postpone the use of megaprostheses in patients with large bone defects in the knee joint? Open Med. 2022;17(1):1292–1298. doi:10.1515/med-2022-0494
  • Agarwal S, Kabariti R, Kakar R, Lopez D, Morgan-Jones R. Why are revision knee replacements failing? Knee. 2019;26(3):774–778. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2019.04.012
  • Green CC, Valenzuela MM, Odum SM, et al. Hypoalbuminemia predicts failure of two-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(7):1363–1368. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.012
  • Scully WF, Deren ME, Sultan AA, et al. Removal of well-fixed tibial cone in revision total knee arthroplasty-a uniquely challenging yet necessary scenario. J Knee Surg. 2021;34(7):693–698. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1700572
  • Anderson LA, Christie M, Blackburn BE, et al. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):150–157. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2504.R1
  • Hasandoost L, Rodriguez O, Alhalawani A, et al. The Role of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) in Management of Bone Loss and Infection in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Review. J Funct Biomater. 2020;11(2):25. doi:10.3390/jfb11020025
  • Rimashevskiy DV, Ahtyamov IF, Kurmangalyev ED, et al. Midterm Results of 2 Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Knee Infection. Comparison of Metal/Polyethylene and Metal/Cement Types of Spacers. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics. 2022;5(9):69–79. doi:10.31080/ASOR.2022.05.0554
  • Siddiqi A, Mahmoud Y, Forte SA, Novack TA, Nace J. One and a Half-Stage Revision With Prosthetic Articulating Spacer for Definitive Management of Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Arthroplast Today. 2022;19:100993. doi:10.1016/j.artd.2022.07.009