Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Using a Rechargeable 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Device

References

• Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(36):1001–1006. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain--United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1624–1645. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Abd-Elsayed A, Knezevic NN. Improving care of chronic pain patients with spinal cord stimulator therapy amidst the opioid epidemic. Neurol Sci. 2020;41(10):2703–2710. doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04435-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylands-White N, Duarte RV, Raphael JH. An overview of treatment approaches for chronic pain management. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(1):29–42. doi:10.1007/s00296-016-3481-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter T. Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2014;7:651–663. doi:10.2147/JPR.S37589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carolis G, Paroli M, Tollapi L, et al. Paresthesia-independence: an assessment of technical factors related to 10 kHz paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation. Pain Physician. 2017;20(4):331–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, et al. Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):851–860. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Scientific. Revolutionary technology offers new hope for treating chronic pain [press release], March 29, 2005. Available from: https://news.bostonscientific.com/news-releases?item=58694. Accessed January 04, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Abejon D, Vancamp T, Monzon EM, Cost-Consequence Analysis A. Examining the differences between non-rechargeable and rechargeable systems. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(1):e100308. doi:10.5812/aapm.100308
   Google Scholar
• Annemans L, Van Buyten JP, Smith T, Al-Kaisy A. Cost effectiveness of a novel 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation system in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2014;24(2–3):173–183. doi:10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2014011685
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger J, Kumar K, Verhulst E, Clark MA, Hernandez J. Rechargeable spinal cord stimulation versus non-rechargeable system for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a cost-consequences analysis. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(3):244–252. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e318160216a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson SJ, Kruglov D, Duarte RV. A spinal cord stimulation service review from a single centre using a single manufacturer over a 7.5 year follow-up period. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(6):589–599. doi:10.1111/ner.12587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Rizvi S. Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation therapy in management of chronic pain. Pain Med. 2013;14(11):1631–1649. doi:10.1111/pme.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costandi S, Mekhail N, Azer G, et al. Longevity and utilization cost of rechargeable and non-rechargeable spinal cord stimulation implants: a comparative study. Pain Pract. 2020;20(8):937–945. doi:10.1111/papr.12926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follett KA, Boortz-Marx RL, Drake JM, et al. Prevention and management of intrathecal drug delivery and spinal cord stimulation system infections. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(6):1582–1594. doi:10.1097/00000542-200406000-00034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luecke T, Kuhlmann H, May M, Petermann M, Libutzki B, Jaehnichen G. Spinal cord stimulation: a real-world data analysis on outcomes and differences between rechargeable and non-rechargeable implantable pulse generators. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(8):3000605211038457. doi:10.1177/03000605211038457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley J, Farah N, Van groningen R, Green C. A questionnaire-based study on patients’ experiences with rechargeable implanted programmable generators for spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic lumbar spondylosis pain. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(2):142–146. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00456.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CK, Rosenow JM. Patient perspectives on the efficacy and ergonomics of rechargeable spinal cord stimulators. Neuromodulation. 2010;13(3):218–223. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00269.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Scowcroft J, Kloster D, et al. 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic postsurgical pain: results from a 12-month prospective, multicenter study. Pain Pract. 2020;20(8):908–918. doi:10.1111/papr.12929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Kapural L, et al. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non-surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(6):775–784. doi:10.1111/anae.15036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, et al. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective, open label and proof-of-concept study. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):63–70. doi:10.1111/ner.12563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galan V, Scowcroft J, Chang P, et al. 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy: results from post-hoc analysis of the SENZA-PPN study. Pain Manag. 2020;10(5):291–300. doi:10.2217/pmt-2020-0033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapural L, Gupta M, Paicius R, et al. Treatment of chronic abdominal pain with 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation: safety and efficacy results from a 12-month prospective, multicenter, feasibility study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020;11(2):e00133. doi:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buyten JP, Al-Kaisy A, Smet I, Palmisani S, Smith T. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(1):59–65; discussion 65–56. doi:10.1111/ner.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buyten JP, Fowo S, Spincemaille GH, et al. The restore rechargeable, implantable neurostimulator: handling and clinical results of a multicenter study. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(4):325–334. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816216a9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med. 2014;15(3):347–354. doi:10.1111/pme.12294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(5):667–677. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, et al. Long-term improvements in chronic axial low back pain patients without previous spinal surgery: a cohort analysis of 10-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation over 36 months. Pain Med. 2018;19(6):1219–1226. doi:10.1093/pm/pnx237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz DM, Webster L, Kosek P, Dar U, Tan Y, Sun M. Sensor-driven position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2012;15(1):1–12. doi:10.36076/ppj.2012/15/1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provenzano D, Tate K, Gupta M, et al. Pulse dosing of 10-kHz paresthesia-independent spinal cord stimulation provides the same efficacy with substantial reduction of device recharge time. Pain Med. 2021;22(1):1–12. doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa413
   Google Scholar