Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Compressed Sensing (ACS) and Routine Two-Dimensional Sequences on Lumbar Spine Imaging

References

• Oei EH, Nikken JJ, Verstijnen AC, Ginai AZ, Myriam Hunink MG. MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. Radiology. 2003;226(3):837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitar R, Leung G, Perng R, et al. MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics. 2006;26(2):513–537. doi:10.1148/rg.262055063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et al. ESPIRiT – an Eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magnetic Resonance Med. 2014;71(3):990–1001. doi:10.1002/mrm.24751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob PM, Griswold MA, Edelman RR, Sodickson DK. AUTO-SMASH: a self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging. SiMultaneous Acquisition of Spatial Harmonics. Magma. 1998;7(1):42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magnetic Resonance Med. 2002;47(6):1202–1210. doi:10.1002/mrm.10171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller S, Yacoub E, Olman CA, et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 Tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain FMRI. Magnetic Resonance Med. 2010;63(5):1144–1153. doi:10.1002/mrm.22361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng R, Zheng L, Jin K, et al. Single-breath-hold T2WI liver MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to conventional multi-breath-hold T2WI liver MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;81:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weilan Z, Jingyi Z, Xiaohan X. Synthetic MRI of the lumbar spine at 3.0 T: feasibility and image quality comparison with conventional MRI. Acta Radiol. 2020;61(4):461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seung Hyun L, Young Han L. Accelerating knee MR imaging: compressed sensing in isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo sequence. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2018;46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altahawi Faysal F, Blount Kevin J, Morley Nicholas P, Raithel E, Omar Imran M. Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(1):7–15. doi:10.1007/s00256-016-2490-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao T, Lu Z, Wang F, Zhao H, Wang J, Pan S. Using the compressed sensing technique for lumbar vertebrae imaging: comparison with conventional parallel imaging. Current Med Imaging. 2021;17(8):1010–1017. doi:10.2174/1573405617666210126155814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch G, Lauff M-T, Hanke M, Schwenke C, Hamm B, Wagner M. Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography (MRA) of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease at 3 tesla: examination time and diagnostic performance of 2D quiescent-interval single-shot MRA vs. 3D fast spin-Echo MRA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;76:17–25. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2020.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzakour T, Igoumenou V, Mavrogenis Andreas F, et al. Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthopaedics. 2019;43(4):841–851. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-4247-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman DP. Symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(2):359–364. doi:10.2214/ajr.167.2.8686604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MA, Cho SH, Seo AN, et al. Modified 3-point MRI-based tumor regression grade incorporating DWI for locally advanced rectal cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(6):1247–1255. doi:10.2214/AJR.16.17242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jomleh H, Faeghi F, Rasteh M. Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging. Eur J Radiol Open. 2019;6:548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton J, Franson D, Seiberlich N. Recent advances in parallel imaging for MRI. Progress Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 2017;101:71–95. doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA, Ohliger MA, Yeh EN, Price MD. Recent advances in image reconstruction, coil sensitivity calibration, and coil array design for SMASH and generalized parallel MRI. Magnetic Resonance Mater Phys Biol Med. 2002;13(3):158–163. doi:10.1016/S1352-8661(01)00144-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taron J, Weiss J, Notohamiprodjo M, et al. Acceleration of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using compressed sensing at 1.5 and 3 T A clinical feasibility study. Investigative Radiol. 2018;53(11):681–688. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohoefer FK, Kaissis GA, Rasper M, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions. Eur J Radiol. 2019;115:53–58. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwood ER, Recht MP, White LM. Advanced imaging techniques in the knee: benefits and limitations of new rapid acquisition strategies for routine knee MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(3):552–560. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratke G, Rau R, Weiss K, et al. Accelerated MRI of the lumbar spine using compressed sensing: quality and efficiency. J Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;49(7):E164–E175. doi:10.1002/jmri.26526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar