Work Interventions Within Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs (IPRP) – Frequency, Patient Characteristics, and Association with Self-Rated Work Ability

References

• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker J, Reid KJ, Bekkering GE, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark and Sweden. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:371248. doi:10.1155/2012/371248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):e273–e83. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragoso ZL, McGonagle AK. Chronic pain in the workplace: a diary study of pain interference at work and worker strain. Stress Health. 2018;34(3):416–424. doi:10.1002/smi.2801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindegard A, Larsman P, Hadzibajramovic E, Ahlborg G Jr. The influence of perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain on work performance and work ability in Swedish health care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(4):373–379. doi:10.1007/s00420-013-0875-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, et al. What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):31–42. doi:10.1007/s10926-010-9251-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Försäkringskassan. Statistik. Pågående sjukfall efter diagnos. Secondary Statistik. Pågående sjukfall efter diagnos. [Ongoing illness after diagnosis. Secondary Statistics. Ongoing illness after diagnosis]. 2020. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Ropponen A, Gémes K, Frumento P, et al. Predicting the duration of sickness absence spells due to back pain: a population-based study from Sweden. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(2):115–121. doi:10.1136/oemed-2019-106129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):100–110. doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9436-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg T, Melander S. Key push and pull factors affecting return to work identified by patients with long-term pain and general practitioners in Sweden. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(11):1581–1594. doi:10.1177/1049732319837227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsi P, Turkistani W, Sykes C, Lucas A, Zarnegar R. “Work is a beautiful thing.” Exploring attitudes towards employment in chronic pain (CP) patients attending a pain management programme (PMP). J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;44:97–107. doi:10.3233/JVR-150783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdle BRFM, Ringqvist Å. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs - evidence and clinical real-world results. In: Pain Management - from Pain Mechanisms to Patient Care. London: IntechOpen; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444. doi:10.1136/bmj.h444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringqvist Å, Dragioti E, Björk M, Larsson B, Gerdle B. Moderate and stable pain reductions as a result of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation – a cohort study from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):905. doi:10.3390/jcm8060905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltychev M, Laimi K, Pentti J, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J. Short- and long-term changes in perceived work ability after interdisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic musculoskeletal disorders: prospective cohort study among 854 rehabilitants. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(6):592–603. doi:10.1177/0269215513513602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoMartire R, Dahlström Ö, Björk M, et al. predictors of sickness absence in a clinical population with chronic pain. J Pain. 2021;22(10):1180–1194. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivano Fischer M, Persson EB, Stalnacke BM, Schult ML, Lofgren M. Return to work after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: one- and two-year follow-up based on the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(4):281–289. doi:10.2340/16501977-2544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanholm F, Liedberg GM, Löfgren M, Björk M. Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program - a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–9. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1780479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, Froud R, Underwood M, Seers K, Seers K. The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025743. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beemster TT, van Bennekom CAM, van Velzen JM, Frings-Dresen MHW, Reneman MF. Vocational rehabilitation with or without work module for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and sick leave from work: longitudinal impact on work participation. J Occup Rehabil. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10926-020-09893-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streibelt M, Bethge M. Effects of intensified work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation on occupational participation: a randomized-controlled trial in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014;37(1):61–66. doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skamagki G, King A, Duncan M, Wåhlin C. A systematic review on workplace interventions to manage chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Physiother Res Int. 2018;23(4):e1738. doi:10.1002/pri.1738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel C, Guene V, Michon E, Roquelaure Y, Petit A. Return to work after rehabilitation in chronic low back pain workers. Does the interprofessional collaboration work? J Interprof Care. 2018;32(4):521–524. doi:10.1080/13561820.2018.1450231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Öberg B. Evaluation of self-reported work ability and usefulness of interventions among sick-listed patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):32–43. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9376-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergstrom G, Busch H. Returning to work – a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.923531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedberg GM, Björk M, Dragioti E, Turesson C. Qualitative evidence from studies of interventions aimed at return to work and staying at work for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Clin Med. 2021;10(6):1247. doi:10.3390/jcm10061247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E, et al. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):369–381. doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braathen TN, Veiersted KB, Heggenes J. Improved work ability and return to work following vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subjects on long-term sick leave. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(6):493–499. doi:10.2340/16501977-0081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid M, Heiden M, Nilsson A, Kristofferzon ML. Do work ability and life satisfaction matter for return to work? Predictive ability of the work ability index and life satisfaction questionnaire among women with long-term musculoskeletal pain. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):584. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10510-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialdepartementet. Socialförsäkringsbalken (2010:110) [Social Insurance Code (2010:110)]; 2010. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113(1–2):9–19. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisspers J, Nygren A, Söderman E. Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997;96(4):281–286. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10164.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):350–357. doi:10.3109/07853890109002089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health--a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36(5):404–412. doi:10.5271/sjweh.2917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuoppala J, Lamminpää A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804. doi:10.2340/16501977-0270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenberg G, Pietilä Holmner E, Stålnacke BM, Enthoven P. Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care - a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(21):2085–2094. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1114156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Franche RL, Boot CR, Anema JR. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:Cd006955. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub3
   Google Scholar
• Seing I, Stahl C, Nordenfelt L, Bulow P, Ekberg K. Policy and practice of work ability: a negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):553–564. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9371-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedenfeldt M, Kvarstein G, Nilsen TIL, Schjødt B, Borchgrevink PC, Halsteinli V. Pre-consultation biopsychosocial data from patients admitted for management at pain centers in Norway. Scand J Pain. 2020;20(2):363–373. doi:10.1515/sjpain-2019-0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glavare M, Löfgren M, Schult ML. Between unemployment and employment: experience of unemployed long-term pain sufferers. Work. 2012;43(4):475–485. doi:10.3233/wor-2012-1394
   Google Scholar
• Saunders S, Nedelec B, MacEachen E. Work remains meaningful despite time out of the workplace and chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(18):2144–2151. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1327986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Greasley K, Watson PJ. Barriers to rehabilitation and return to work for unemployed chronic pain patients: a qualitative study. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(8):831–840. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdle B, Boersma K, Åsenlöf P, Stålnacke BM, Larsson B, Ringqvist Å. Influences of sex, education, and country of birth on clinical presentations and overall outcomes of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation in chronic pain patients: a cohort study from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP). J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2374. doi:10.3390/jcm9082374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinord L, Kassberg AC, Stålnacke BM, Stenberg G. Multivariate correlations between pain, life interference, health-related quality of life and full-time sick leave 1 year after multimodal rehabilitation, focus on gender and age. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;1–15. doi:10.1080/11038128.2021.1903990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regioner RoSko. En kvalitetssäker och effektiv sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocess. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (SKR); 2020 [A quality-assured and efficient sick leave and rehabilitation process - Agreement between the state and SKR 2020. Stockholm: Swedish Municipalities and Regions (SKR); 2020]; 2020. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Hutting N, Bartys S, Johnston V. Interventions to promote work-focused care by healthcare providers for individuals with musculoskeletal conditions a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(4):840–865. doi:10.1007/s10926-021-09971-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, Bernfort L, Oberg B. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(4):355–362. doi:10.2340/16501977-0951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Karlsson N, Gerdle B, Sandqvist J. Predictive validity of general work ability assessments in the context of sickness insurance. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(4):jrm00177. doi:10.2340/16501977-2798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar