Bibliometric Analysis of Research Studies on Postoperative Pain Management of Cesarean Section

References

• Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granot M, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, et al. Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1422–1426. doi:10.1097/00000542-200306000-00018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu R, Ando K, Flood PD. Factors associated with persistent pain after childbirth: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(3):e117–e130. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton CD, Carvalho B. Optimal pain management after cesarean delivery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017;35:107–124. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen D, Hasegawa-Moriyama M, Ishida K, et al. Acute postoperative pain is correlated with the early onset of postpartum depression after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2020;34:607–612. doi:10.1007/s00540-020-02789-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos AC. Post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(5S):S62–S69. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000177100.08599.C8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baeriswyl M, Kirkham KR, Kern C, et al. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in adult patients. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(6):1640–1654. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000967
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(11):812–818. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimpel SA, Torloni MR, Porfirio GJ, et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9:CD011216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer C, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, et al. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(2):437–444. doi:10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrision DM, Sinatra R, Morgese L, et al. Epidural narcotic and patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean section pain relief. Anesthesiology. 1988;68(3):454–457. doi:10.1097/00000542-198803000-00025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:310–317. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31825735c6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl JB, Rosenberg J, Hansen BL, et al. Differential analgesic effects of low-dose epidural morphine and morphine-bupivacaine at rest and during mobilization after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 1992;74(3):362–365. doi:10.1213/00000539-199203000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass PS, Estok P, Ginsberg B, et al. Use of patient-controlled analgesia to compare the efficacy of epidural to intravenous fentanyl administration. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:345–351. doi:10.1213/00000539-199203000-00005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paech MJ, Godkin R, Webster S. Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10 995 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:5–11. doi:10.1016/S0959-289X(98)80021-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filos KS, Goudas LC, Patroni O, Polyzou V. Hemodynamic and analgesic profile after intrathecal clonidine in humans - a dose-response study. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:591–601. doi:10.1097/00000542-199409000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moiniche S, Mikkelsen S, Wetterslev J, et al. A qualitative systematic review of incisional local anaesthesia for postoperative pain relief after abdominal operations. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81(3):377–383. doi:10.1093/bja/81.3.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:186–191. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(5):726–730. doi:10.1093/bja/aep235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, et al. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(6):757–762. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niraj G, Kelkar A, Jeyapalan I, et al. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:465–471. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06700.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, et al. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(5):721–735. doi:10.1093/bja/aet214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(6):1919–1927. doi:10.1097/00000542-199912000-00045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, et al. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008;140(1):87–94. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y, et al. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33(11):853–865. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolajsen L, Sorensen HC, Jensen TS, et al. Chronic pain following Caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(1):111–116. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00271.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richebe P, Capdevila X, Rivat C. Persistent postsurgical pain: pathophysiology and preventative pharmacologic considerations. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(3):590–607. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000002238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges NC, de Deus JM, Guimaraes RA, et al. The incidence of chronic pain following Cesarean section and associated risk factors: a cohort of women followed up for three months. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367(9522):1618–1625. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainu JP, Halmesmaki E, Korttila KT, et al. Persistent pain after cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(6):1535–1545. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim G, Levine MD, Mascha EJ, et al. Labor pain, analgesia, and postpartum depression: are we asking the right questions? Anesth Analg. 2020;130(3):610–614. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000004581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Cao C, Nelson G, et al. A review of enhanced recovery after surgery principles used for scheduled caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(12):1775–1788. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):247.e1–247.e9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar