Comparison of Edge of Lamina Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Retrolaminar Block for Analgesic Efficacy in Adult Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study

References

• El Mourad MB, Amer AF. Effects of adding dexamethasone or ketamine to bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(4):285–291. PMID: 29720754; PMCID: PMC5907434. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_791_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding W, Chen Y, Li D, et al. Investigation of single-dose thoracic paravertebral analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracoscopic lobectomy - a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2018;57:8–14. PMID: 30056127. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace MM, Sharma B, Anderson-Dam J, Fleischmann K, Warren L, Stefanovich P. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a retrospective study of the incidence of complications. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(4):1186–1191. PMID: 26756911. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murouchi T, Yamakage M. Retrolaminar block: analgesic efficacy and safety evaluation. J Anesth. 2016;30(6):1003–1007. PMID: 27518726. doi:10.1007/s00540-016-2230-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:621–627. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018;50:65–68. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Li H, He Q, Chen T, Wang Y, Zheng X. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45:5–9. doi:10.1136/rapm-2019-100983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu Z, Zhang J, Cao J. A novel approach of ultrasound-guided laminar block for rib fracture surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2021;70:110191. PMID: 33561706. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotome S, Sawada A, Wada A, Shima H, Kutomi G, Yamakage M. Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2021;35(1):27–34. doi:10.1007/s00540-020-02855-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao T, Zhou Q. 竖脊肌平面阻滞与后路椎板阻滞对后路腰椎手术术后镇痛效果的比较 [Efficacy of erector spinae block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia following posterior lumbar surgery]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019;39(6):736–739. Chinese. doi:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.06.17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taketa Y, Fujitani T. A novel paralaminar in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block using microconvex array transducer. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(4):390. PMID: 26079356. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(6):842–852. Erratum in: Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(3):522. PMID: 20947592. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari P, Kumar A, Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumari A. Continuous retrolaminar block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023;17(1):132–133. doi:10.4103/sja.sja_486_22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüttner T, Werdehausen R, Hermanns H, et al. The paravertebral lamina technique: a new regional anesthesia approach for breast surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:443–450. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voscopoulos C, Palaniappan D, Zeballos J, Ko H, Janfaza D, Vlassakov K. The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block. Can J Anesth. 2013;60:888–895. doi:10.1007/s12630-013-9983-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabouri AS, Crawford L, Bick SK, Nozari A, Anderson TA. Is a retrolaminar approach to the thoracic paravertebral space possible?: A human cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(8):864–868. PMID: 29923954. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taketa Y, Irisawa Y, Fujitani T. Comparison of analgesic efficacy between two approaches of paravertebral block for thoracotomy: a randomised trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(9):1274–1279. PMID: 30047132. doi:10.1111/aas.13216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobukuni K, Hatta M, Nakagaki T, Yoshino J, Obuchi T, Fujimura N. Retrolaminar versus epidural block for postoperative analgesia after minor video-assisted thoracic surgery: a retrospective, matched, non-inferiority study. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(5):2758–2767. PMID: 34164168; PMCID: PMC8182553. doi:10.21037/jtd-21-238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Wei S, Li S, et al. Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1229. PMID: 34784889; PMCID: PMC8594110. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08938-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandeep B, Huang X, Li Y, Xiong D, Zhu B, Xiao Z. A comparison of regional anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: a network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106840. PMID: 36030040. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damjanovska M, Stopar Pintaric T, Cvetko E, Vlassakov K. The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block: volume-dependent injectate distribution. J Pain Res. 2018;11:293–299. PMID: 29445296; PMCID: PMC5808708. doi:10.2147/JPR.S153660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar