Instrumented Posterior Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine: Prospective Study Evaluating Fusion Outcomes in Patients Receiving an Interspinous Fixation Device for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Diseases

References

• Frymoyer JW, Hanley E, Howe J, Kuhlmann D, Matteri R. Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease – a minimum ten-year followup. Spine. 1978;3(1):1–6. doi:10.1097/00007632-197803000-00001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine. 2018;44(5):369–376. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, et al. Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg. 2017;80(5):701–714. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong-Hing K, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The pathophysiology of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 1983;14(3):491–504. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31329-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9(7):545–550. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259–1265. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794–810. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney J, Michalopoulos GD, Alvi MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;14:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith ZA, Vastardis GA, Carandang G, et al. Biomechanical effects of a unilateral approach to minimally invasive lumbar decompression. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie KA, Dickey JP. Biomechanical role of lumbar spine ligaments in flexion and extension: determination using a parallel linkage robot and a porcine model. Spine. 2004;29(11):1208–1216. doi:10.1097/00007632-200406010-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Maingard JT, et al. The use of minimally invasive interspinous process devices for the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a narrative literature review. J Spine Surg. 2021;7(3):394–412. doi:10.21037/jss-21-57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunley PD, Patel VV, Orndorff DG, Lavelle WF, Block JE, Geisler FH. Superion interspinous spacer treatment of moderate spinal stenosis: 4-year results. World Neurosurg. 2017;104:279–283. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine – do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine. 1995;20(12):1410–1418. doi:10.1097/00007632-199506020-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vokshoor A, Khurana S, Wilson D, Filsinger P. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after spinous process fixation and posterior fusion in an elderly cohort. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:271–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postacchini F, Postacchini R, Menchetti PP, Sessa P, Paulino M, Cinotti G. Lumbar interspinous process fixation and fusion with stand-alone interlaminar lumbar instrumented fusion implant in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing decompression for spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(1):27–37. doi:10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE. Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(3):E9. doi:10.3171/2009.7.FOCUS09121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best MJ, Buller LT, Eismont FJ. National trends in ambulatory surgery for intervertebral disc disorders and spinal stenosis: a 12-year analysis of the national surveys of ambulatory surgery. Spine. 2015;40(21):1703–1711. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basil GW, Yang MY. Trends in outpatient minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(Suppl1):S108–S114. doi:10.21037/jss.2019.04.17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim CW. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery - prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine. 2010;35(26S):S281–S286. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022d32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinger N, Yilmaz E, Halalmeh DR, Tubbs RS, Moisi MD. Reattachment of the multifidus tendon in lumbar surgery to decrease postoperative back pain: a technical note. Cureus. 2019;11(12):e6366. doi:10.7759/cureus.6366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merter A, Karaca MO, Yazar T. Biomechanical effects of sequential resection of the posterior ligamentous complex on intradiscal pressure and resistance to compression forces. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019;53(6):502–506. doi:10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedman TP, Ohnmeiss DD, Leasure J, Raji OR, Hochschuler SH. Interspinous-interbody fusion via a strictly lateral surgical approach: a biomechanical stabilization comparison to constructs requiring both lateral and posterior approaches. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41918. doi:10.7759/cureus.41918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formica M, Vallerga D, Zanirato A, et al. Fusion rate and influence of surgery‑related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta‑analysis and systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020;104(1):1–15. doi:10.1007/s12306-019-00634-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He D, Li Z, Zhang T-Y, et al. Prevalence of lumbar spondylolisthesis in middle-aged people in Beijing Community. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(1):202–206. doi:10.1111/os.12871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Tang H, Shan J, et al. A new interspinous process distraction device BacFuse in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with 5 years follow-up study. Medicine. 2020;99:26(e20925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tram J, Srinivas S, Wali AR, Lewis CS, Pham MH. Decompression surgery versus interspinous devices for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the literature. Asian Spine J. 2020;14(4):526–542. doi:10.31616/asj.2019.0105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu R, Gottfried ON, Stevenson JC. Outcomes and complications following spinous process fixation: a single-center analysis of 192 cases. Surg Technol Int. 2013;23:283–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tartara F, Garbossa D, Armocida D, et al. Relationship between lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, PI-LL mismatch and outcome after short fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. Literature review, rational and presentation of public study protocol: rELApSE study (registry for evaluation of lumbar arthrodesis sagittal alignEment). World Neurosurg. 2023;18:100162. doi:10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100162
   Google Scholar